The Trump administration has revealed several deals, mainly with the United Arab Emirates (UAE). However, many of these agreements appear to have been established before January, and the details surrounding them are unclear. The deals include an “AI acceleration partnership agreement” with the UAE and a project involving OpenAI and Saudi Arabia for large data centres. President Trump claims he has “secured” almost $200 billion in agreements with the UAE, but specifics are missing.

Agreements and Partnerships

One notable agreement is between Amazon Web Services and the UAE Cybersecurity Council for a “sovereign cloud launchpad.” However, it seems the Trump administration may not be fully aware of its development. Additionally, Raytheon, Emirates Global Aluminium, and Tawazun Industrial Park are together working on a gallium minerals deal for a drone interceptor project. Other agreements include collaborations among Boeing, GE Aerospace, and ExxonMobil with UAE companies. The UAE aims to invest $4 billion in an aluminium project in Oklahoma, linked to earlier US business investments. However, clear timelines or explanations for these large financial commitments are not available. While the administration has made broad claims about the scale and value of these Middle Eastern agreements, a closer look shows that many of these claims are recycled or poorly defined. Agreements, like the one with the UAE on artificial intelligence or the infrastructure projects with Saudi Arabia, do not have detailed frameworks or deadlines. Some partnerships mentioned, such as those involving OpenAI or Amazon, might have started before the current administration’s discussions. They seem more like repackaged efforts than new initiatives. The nearly $200 billion figure highlighted by Trump as a major diplomatic and economic success does not correspond to any verifiable commitments. Announcements often lack supporting details, budgets, or legislative backing. This leaves room for ambiguity, particularly for those depending on stable asset flows or confirmed timelines. One noteworthy example is the partnership between Raytheon, Emirates Global Aluminium, and industrial firms in Abu Dhabi around gallium-based materials for drone defense projects. Gallium isn’t widely traded, but it holds strategic importance due to the rising global demand for advanced technologies. This raises questions about future supply chain effects and potential impacts on industrial metal prices. The military use of these materials for drone interception adds another layer, but without clear sourcing and timing details, market effects remain uncertain.

Potential Market Impact

We see a similar trend with major American aerospace and energy companies like Boeing, GE Aerospace, and ExxonMobil entering agreements with Emirati firms. There is some logic in these cross-border collaborations, given their history of joint investments. However, formal disclosures are limited. For instance, ExxonMobil’s role in any related projects is not clearly outlined, making it tough for traders to make informed decisions based on logistics, costs, or energy supply. The $4 billion plan for aluminium production in Oklahoma seems to be the most concrete mention. This could affect the US light metals market, especially if it aligns with rising electric vehicle production or domestic infrastructure needs. Without timelines or permitting information, predicting demand based on this alone would be premature. Depending on the progress of state or federal approvals, construction inputs could change the valuation of building materials and machinery futures. Timing is crucial, and delays could lead to fluctuations in contracts for raw materials. So far, no agreement has resulted in comprehensive regulatory documentation or Congressional review. This leaves us relying on informal references from press releases and interviews. Consequently, any financial exposure based solely on these announcements carries a significant risk of being driven by perception rather than solid deal flow. There is potential in some areas—especially in advanced technologies and aerospace—but until these are backed by concrete numbers and legal documents, caution is advised when entering trades. In upcoming sessions, it may be more beneficial to pay attention to earnings guidance from listed companies and investor reports. If these ventures are substantial, they will show up in future statements or SEC filings. For now, speculation based on isolated announcements, lacking clear milestones or financial frameworks, could result in short-term mispricing. We recommend keeping a cautious approach and light positions until these stories transform into confirmed investment plans or reliable industry data. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now