The European Union is close to reaching a temporary agreement with the United States. This deal would keep a 10% baseline tariff, similar to what was previously set with the UK. In this possible agreement, the US, under Trump, may try to impose 17% tariffs on EU agricultural and food products. An EU source was taken aback by these terms after long negotiations, pointing out that the agreement with the UK was more favorable.

Progress On EU-US Tariff Negotiations

Negotiations are still happening between the EU and the US, with the temporary agreement expected later this week. Some EU representatives see the 10% tariff as a positive sign, reflecting how the negotiations have changed. In simple terms, it looks like Washington and Brussels might soon agree on a trading plan that avoids major disruptions. This arrangement would keep a steady 10% tariff level on certain items, similar to a previous agreement with London. However, there is more to consider. EU trade officials, after many discussions, were surprised by the proposed increase to 17% on agricultural and food exports. This figure wasn’t mentioned earlier and appeared unexpectedly towards the end of the talks. It feels like something changed in the US negotiation strategy, or they left key issues vague to strengthen their position as deadlines approached. This turn of events is surprising, especially compared to the smoother outcome of the UK agreement.

Implications For Trade And Risk Management

This mixed messaging and sudden changes raise important questions. For those managing pricing risks in the short to medium term, we need to think about what these developments mean for broader trade issues, especially those related to agricultural exports. Once new tariffs are announced, their impact spreads quickly to hedge positions and price volatility. We should pay attention to how sensitive prices are to tariff news. Interestingly, some officials in Brussels, despite the potential for high agrifood tariffs, see the continuation of the 10% base tariff as a positive outcome. This shows a shift in expectations. A few rounds ago, negotiators would have viewed 10% as just a temporary limit. Now, in this tougher landscape, it’s seen more as a victory in itself. This change in perspective is important. We need to adjust our risk hedging strategies, especially for products that rely on transatlantic trade. Near-term expectations for stricter regulations—especially on goods needing sanitary checks—also require close attention. This isn’t just speculation; it’s vital to align margin strategies with new realities, moving beyond outdated headlines. From a trading point of view, it’s important to assume there will be less flexibility and a higher chance of last-minute changes. The political environment has become more complex. Negotiations are no longer just about trade deficits; there’s an emphasis on domestic gains, meaning we need to factor in shifts in public strategy. Whether these tariffs are temporary or not, they introduce new friction into the market. It’s no longer a question of if duties will come into play, but rather how they will be adjusted and which categories they will affect. This situation alters how we should manage cross-border pricing and transport costs. Many may underestimate the increase in carrying costs. It’s wise to leave some room for potential adjustments in EUR hedges. Currency fluctuations are likely to follow the news cycle closely. Remember, trade “arrangements” announced later in the week are often less detailed and more politically charged. The real vulnerabilities will be clearer only after the actual agreement is analyzed and appropriately factored into pricing. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now