The U.S. will keep its current tariffs on China. An official has stated that new tariffs will remain at 30%. This consists of a 10% baseline tariff and an extra 20% on fentanyl, resulting in a total effective tariff rate of 55%. This 55% figure comes from existing agreements that will not change. It breaks down into 10% for the baseline, 20% for fentanyl, and about 25% from previous tariffs related to section 301, Most Favored Nation (MFN) rates, and others. These rates show that trade measures against China are still in place.

No Planned Reduction for U.S. Tariffs

This means that tariffs on many Chinese imports will stay high, with no plans for reduction or relief in sight. The total tariff—10% base, an extra 20% for fentanyl, and additional older tariffs—means significant costs for importers and foreign manufacturers who depend on the U.S. market. The official’s clarity about the 55% rate eliminates any previous confusion. For anyone involved in global trade policies or import-sensitive industries, this is a clear sign that conditions are not easing. The tariff structure continues to create challenges across various sectors, especially in technology, precision components, and industrial equipment made in China. With these confirmed policies, we should view short-term fluctuations as more than just background noise. Prices for raw materials, intermediate goods, and logistics contracts are likely to change significantly. Gao’s earlier comments on the uneven impact, particularly on lower-margin exports from China’s interior regions, have serious financial implications. These also affect shipping contracts, which means that positions linked to shipping indexes or rates may no longer hold previous expectations.

Lack of Tariff Rollback Support

It’s important to recognize that the idea of reducing tariffs, which was discussed in previous quarters, now seems to be unsupported by credible institutions. While the 10% base tariff is still politically acceptable, the additional fentanyl-related charge indicates that trade tariffs are being used for broader diplomatic aims, beyond just economic measures. As a result, strategies that involved betting on inflation hedges or recovery after tariffs may need to be reconsidered. Negative basis trades in container shipping insurance, which are affected by rerouting and transloading issues, could become less favorable. Lighthizer’s earlier comments about achieving industrial self-reliance are relevant here. He has emphasized that decoupling from China is not merely a theory but an ongoing reality. This attitude influences capital flows, especially towards alternative manufacturing centers in ASEAN countries. Their currencies may strengthen as procurement shifts away from China. The options market indicates an increasing risk towards the downside, especially as we near the end of the quarter and earnings cycles for semiconductors and automotive parts. Recent customs data has shown a month-to-month decline, particularly in electromachinery and telecommunications equipment. This is not just anecdotal; it reinforces our focus against the backdrop of tight tariffs. The implied volatility markers are rising with each passing day that this tariff structure remains firm, without accompanying discussions. This suggests more hedging activity will occur, especially around contract expirations and quarterly updates. These are not mere hypotheticals. They are driven by policy changes, caution, and logistics—all of which are very real. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now