Oil futures rose at the beginning of the week, with Brent crude increasing by about $3, or roughly 4%. In contrast, U.S. equity index futures fell. E-minis dipped, with the ES down 0.3% and the NQ down 0.4%. This shows a noticeable difference in market sentiment between energy markets and stock indices. The nearly $3 jump in Brent crude reflects strong buying interest, likely due to supply issues or expectations for higher demand. Such a significant move indicates that traders are making adjustments in response to expected changes, possibly related to geopolitical events or decisions from OPEC, signaling tighter supply. On the other hand, E-mini futures, which track major market benchmarks like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, are down in early trading. The 0.3% drop in the ES and the 0.4% decline in the NQ suggest some investor unease. While this isn’t a full-on risk-off response, it hints that investors may be pulling back from growth-focused or tech-heavy stocks, likely reacting to macroeconomic data or guidance that’s below expectations. This disconnect—rising oil prices amid falling equities—often highlights concerns about rising costs affecting corporate profits. If energy prices go up while other assets struggle, it points to a resurgent worry about inflation. This concern can influence the costs of hedges and increase implied volatility in certain sectors. Traders should watch for how this divergence appears in volatility trends in the next few sessions. Implied volatility can rise even before major price movements. We’ve seen this in short-term oil futures, where call skews have widened, indicating a shift in positioning more for hedging rather than speculation. Longer-dated calls seem to be more appealing than short-term downside protection, at least for now. The cautious attitude in U.S. equity futures may also prompt a look at correlations. If index deltas decrease while crude prices rise, past relationships may start to weaken. This could lead to dispersion strategies. Currently, the gap between Brent and ES implied volatilities is widening, which indicates we should closely monitor how pricing models adjust over time. Such gaps typically do not last without some form of adjustment, either by compressing or expanding volatility. Market breadth warrants attention as well. Recent flow data suggests that money isn’t being pulled out of U.S. equities entirely; instead, it’s being shuffled internally, with cyclicals gaining some interest while growth sectors feel mild pressure. This shift mirrors what’s happening in energy, as capital changes respond to expected short-term variations in costs or consumer behavior. To manage risk effectively in this situation, it’s essential to refine your Greek measures, especially vega and delta across different assets. Asset managers dealing with shifting sectors and commodity prices should reassess their hedging strategies—not just in size but also over different time frames. The last two sessions show a clear change in open interest for weekly versus monthly options. Looking at liquidity, it’s evident that some of these changes may be influenced by expirations and roll activities. However, we cannot overlook the signals that price movements in commodities and equities are sending in the short term, especially for anyone adjusting risk exposure ahead of the next volatility cycle.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now