**China-EU Trade Dynamics** We see that the ongoing back-and-forth between China and the EU is increasing volatility expectations in the medium term. This is particularly true for contracts related to exports, industrial raw materials, and some manufacturing sectors. While short-term movements might be cushioned by existing hedges and calendar effects, current pricing signals indicate that participants are preparing for reduced flexibility in cross-border flows. It’s not just background noise; we’re noticing a pattern in positioning that suggests a reevaluation of risk linked to EU-dependent trade. From our viewpoint, we need to track how European stocks and regional currency futures are changing together. We may soon see shifts in implied volatility for options connected to trade-sensitive indexes. This has happened before: in past trade disputes, we initially saw sharp but brief shifts in market behavior, which later developed into ongoing changes in demand for specific price points. If this pattern repeats, we will first notice it in the more extreme positions before it spreads to the central prices. **Market Sensitivities and Passive Funds** Given this context, it makes sense to adjust entry points to accommodate a wider potential range. History shows that actions from China can create short-term sentiment swings, even though significant policy changes take time to materialize. It’s wise to make adjustments now rather than wait, especially since we don’t anticipate quick shifts in rhetoric from either side. If we strip away the initial sentiment, what remains is a test of how integrated certain supply chains are. Some connections appear stronger than others. We’re also keeping an eye on liquidity trends in these areas. Wider bid-ask spreads on specific sector contracts, while not yet widespread, can signal early repositioning. This shift typically occurs when market players expect new agents to enter the market to hedge policy risks or shift their exposure. We’ve already noted minor disruptions, especially in contracts with longer timeframes. While these aren’t enough to alter the overall direction, they are significant enough to warrant attention. At a fundamental level, the main change is where the pressure is being applied. Restrictions aimed not at finished goods but at state-level procurement heighten the sensitivity of contracts linked to internal policies. This shift impacts not just asset pricing but also benchmark tracking, as it may lead to index reweights later on. Observing how passive funds react can offer early insights, especially where there’s overlap between procurement-heavy sectors and weighted portfolios. There’s no momentum yet for a reversal, so we maintain a balanced approach for carry while staying alert for changes under evolving narratives. Recalibration tends to start in fringe contracts before it spreads to the wider market. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now