Starting 1 August, several countries will face new tariffs, as recently announced. Letters will be sent to 10 to 12 nations beginning Friday. The tariffs will range widely, from 10% to 70%. The specific countries that will be affected have not been revealed. Negotiations are likely to continue, but impacted nations should get ready for higher tariffs soon. The timeline could allow for changes before the 1 August start date. The article serves as a strong warning to targeted countries: if there’s no resolution or compromise, they will face significant new charges on certain exports starting early August. The highest tariff of 70% could have a major impact on trade relationships. Although no specifics about the countries have been shared, the urgency suggests that pressure is mounting. The formal letters sent at the end of the week indicate a serious shift beyond mere discussions. There is still room for negotiations—diplomatic channels remain open—but the current situation should be seen as actionable rather than speculative. For those analyzing and modeling short-term market risks, this development has immediate effects. Volatility often spikes around global trade news. History shows significant price changes in futures, especially in sectors like energy, transportation, and manufacturing, as they react with inventory buildup or order delays. In the coming three weeks, clarity in decision-making is crucial. Pricing models need to factor in a higher likelihood that disruptive news won’t be easily reversed. In past situations, similar in scale, we’ve seen increased options trading in protective hedges, particularly when tariffs exceed 25%. It’s worth noting that this isn’t the first time we’ve faced such issues. In late 2018, conditional event hedging in the S&P 500 revealed delays in market sentiment about auto and tech sectors before tariffs were formally introduced. For those in the right position, the rewards were significantly higher than normal. This time, the window of uncertainty is smaller—letters start Friday, the enforcement date is early August, and once tariffs are part of state budgets, reversing those decisions becomes politically complex. Therefore, we need a more immediate approach to trade setups, carefully reviewing duration and delta sensitivity. If you’re tracking volatility indexes for broad ex-U.S. markets, watch for short-term skew. If the market assigns uneven risk to upside and downside on specific country stocks, it can lead to price memory errors in the following days. Understanding this difference can help you see which instruments others are using to bet on retaliation risks. From our perspective, it’s the frequency of headline changes—rather than just the size of the proposed tariffs—that will likely influence how quickly spreads widen across international exposure themes. Therefore, our alert levels must remain active. Quick reactions are essential, especially when significant portfolios are only partially hedged in anticipation of data that may arrive late. As always, maintaining liquidity before a formal schedule can be tricky. In 2019, Week 3 volatility led traders to close protective positions too early, only for retaliatory taxes to emerge and force them to reposition. We should consider whether similar timing mistakes could happen again, especially since key dates are already set. What happens next will depend more on pacing than resolution. If the messaging becomes firmer in the next two weeks, we should disengage from strategies based on reversals or exemptions. At that point, it won’t be a question of if a reaction will occur, but how quickly the pricing gap shifts from futures to cash.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now