Central banks’ market pricing stayed mostly constant, except for the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ). The Federal Reserve has a 96% chance of keeping rates the same next meeting, with an uncertainty of 53 basis points. The European Central Bank (ECB) has a 96% likelihood of a rate cut, indicated by 54 basis points. The Bank of England (BoE) shows 39 basis points with a 95% chance of no change.

Central Bank Basis Points

The Bank of Canada (BoC) recorded 37 basis points with a 77% chance of no change. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) reported 72 basis points with a 72% likelihood of a rate cut. RBNZ noted 29 basis points with a 69% chance of no change after their policy decision. The Swiss National Bank (SNB) had 55 basis points with a 57% likelihood of a rate cut, while some expect a cut of 50 basis points instead. Overall, the market remained stable except for the RBNZ. Traders adjusted their predictions for rate cuts after the RBNZ’s policy outcome was less dovish than expected. The content provides a snapshot of how markets are pricing expected monetary policy changes, based on basis points and their probabilities of rate cuts or stability at upcoming central bank meetings. It highlights the contrasts across regions, especially the unexpected stance of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

Market Expectations and Reactions

Most central banks had stable pricing that suggested they would likely continue their current policies. However, the RBNZ diverged from these trends. Following their recent decision, traders rapidly adjusted their outlook since the bank’s language did not match market hopes for softer economic conditions. This shift was significant. For traders analyzing derivatives tied to short-term interest rates, this required immediate recalibration. The previous expectations leaned too far toward aggressive monetary easing, and the subsequent adjustments reflected that misalignment. Instruments sensitive to rate changes, like forward contracts, responded accordingly. Looking ahead, we have a clearer understanding of which central banks are providing solid guidance and which areas remain uncertain. The Federal Reserve and the ECB, based on their probability assessments, appear to have clearer paths forward. The Fed, in particular, seems to be sticking closely to its baseline assumptions. It’s unlikely that markets will change these odds without strong new data, such as upcoming CPI or labor market reports. In Europe, the outlook is mainly clear. With strong expectations for easing from the ECB, positioning options are limited. The narrative from Frankfurt has less ambiguity. It’s not just about the rates anymore; it’s also about when changes will happen and how policy will influence extra liquidity. Timing entries and managing risks on options will be crucial, especially if volatility remains low before summer. For the UK, the situation is more uncertain. Bailey and his team haven’t provided much clarity. Although implied rates indicate no change, there are signs of fragility in the trade-weighted sterling and labor market, which keeps rate-sensitive products under close watch. A pause does not mean stability. In Canada and Australia, market pricing shows a mix of caution with growing signs of economic softness. The rate curve isn’t flat, but it’s cautious. Traders comfortable with shorter maturities might find opportunities here. Although the markets are lukewarm, significant economic changes could lead to rapid reactions from those holding floating exposures. Managing layered delta risk may become essential. The RBNZ’s recent decisions need a different perspective. Their sharper stance has decreased the bearish outlook that had built up. There will likely be attempts to see if this is a one-time adjustment or a sustained approach. The quick retreat from dovish expectations made sense, but how the yield curve develops in the coming sessions will reveal if these changes are durable. As for the SNB, uncertainty continues. Some in the market expect a 50 basis point cut—an assumption not fully backed by recent comments. This disagreement alone creates friction in the rate path, especially for instruments maturing before year-end. Holding positions here without flexibility could be risky, and close monitoring will be needed unless clarity emerges soon. In summary, the immediate focus is less on bold forecasts and more about managing misalignments between market positioning and policy directions. Revising assumptions and capitalizing on small divergences could yield better outcomes than simply following rate decisions. In the current environment, we find that expression through cross-market spreads and shorter strike payers is more practical than making long-term convexity bets. The goal isn’t to predict headlines but to stay ahead of shifts in conditional probabilities. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now