Netanyahu has reportedly indicated that the United States might join the conflict in a matter of days. Sentiments suggest that this involvement is highly likely. This situation raises doubts about Iran’s ability to negotiate with tensions escalating. Trump’s call for unconditional surrender could push Iran toward continued fighting rather than seeking diplomatic solutions.

Foreign Exchange Impact

In the foreign exchange market, the US dollar is gaining value as investors seek safe havens, increasing demand for long-term bonds as well. There are worries about Iran possibly possessing unknown capabilities that could challenge US and Israeli intelligence. Speculations about US involvement range from limited airstrikes to full-scale military action. Historically, the US has not achieved an unconditional surrender since Japan was bombed in World War II. The situation is evolving quickly. Netanyahu’s suggestion that America might enter the conflict soon triggers reactions across political and financial sectors. When there’s a strong belief that the US will engage, asset prices adjust quickly, as fear tends to overrule logic. What does this mean for traders? For those focused on derivatives, it changes how they view volatility. Implied volatility now heavily relies on event-driven assumptions, often resulting in skewed short-dated options, particularly in sectors related to defense, energy, and commodities from the Middle East.

Market Reactions

Trump’s remark that Iran must surrender unconditionally is striking. Such statements eliminate the possibility of compromise and suggest that negotiations may not be worthwhile, prolonging uncertainty. Facing demands reminiscent of the 1940s, Iran feels it has little choice but to brace for a prolonged conflict, as seen in their public stance. The market, especially currency pairs involving the dollar, remains stable. The dollar attracts investments whenever geopolitical risks rise. However, this isn’t driven solely by safe-haven instincts; data show that investors are seeking the safety of long-dated Treasuries. Such actions indicate that significant funds foresee potential instability. Concerns about Iran’s capabilities, particularly those not fully known to intelligence, add an unpredictable element to risk models since unknown factors can’t be hedged. We’re witnessing a complex planning scenario, from limited airstrikes to extensive campaigns. Already, we see the derivatives market reflect this uncertainty, with heightened premiums in defense options, oil futures, and gold ETFs. It’s important to recognize that unconditional surrender is largely absent from modern US military engagements. This historical context influences how traders approach open-ended risks. If the US enters the conflict without a clear exit strategy, demand for convexity hedges is likely to rise, including long-dated volatility instruments and complex spreads. As volatility increases, spreads often widen sharply. This necessitates tighter risk controls, especially in leveraged strategies. Position sizing becomes crucial in this environment. We’ve witnessed several instances this year where high-confidence trades quickly turned as geopolitical events overshadowed traditional economic data. Timing trades based solely on scheduled events is no longer sufficient. Pay close attention to spreads involving Middle Eastern oil benchmarks and Brent. If supply disruptions become probable, reactions in this area could be significant. Those betting on temporary imbalances may find themselves vulnerable if conflict affects tanker routes or port access. All these developments indicate that the modeling inputs we typically use during peacetime are not effective now. A recalibration is essential, affecting both our tools and how we interpret forward guidance from governments and markets. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now