Nicola Willis supports more annual RBNZ meetings to align with other central banks and improve responsiveness.

    by VT Markets
    /
    Jun 10, 2025
    New Zealand’s Finance Minister Nicola Willis has suggested that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) should hold rate decisions eight times a year. This plan is meant to bring the RBNZ in line with other major central banks and shorten its long summer break of 12 weeks. The New Zealand Treasury supports this idea, noting that the current meeting schedule is less common among central banks. More frequent meetings could help the RBNZ respond better to economic changes. Although the RBNZ hasn’t formally replied to the idea, it has stated that it can hold unscheduled meetings if needed.

    Aligning with international norms

    Willis’s suggestion aims to adjust New Zealand’s central banking practices to follow global standards. Right now, the Reserve Bank meets for monetary policy decisions just seven times a year, creating a long gap from its November decision until the next one in February. Treasury officials point out that this is infrequent compared to other banks like the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve, which meet approximately every six weeks. This longer waiting period can slow down responses. Economic conditions and global markets don’t pause during the RBNZ’s summer break. The Treasury suggests that central banks in other countries are able to react more quickly to changes in inflation, unemployment, or currency values because they meet more often. While the Reserve Bank has historically claimed it can call unscheduled meetings, doing so requires meeting high standards. Rarely used tools often lead to bigger disruptions when they are eventually used. Relying on special meetings makes it harder to maintain clear communication and credibility.

    Implications for market strategy

    For us, this change would limit planning windows. When policy responses happen at long intervals, market players must guess not only about economic forecasts but also about the timing of any unplanned responses. Forecasting rate changes then adds another layer of uncertainty: guessing whether policymakers see a situation as “urgent” enough for an unscheduled meeting. By increasing the number of meetings to eight, the policy cycle would become less uncertain. This doesn’t promise quicker responses, but it would make them easier to manage. Traders could adjust their expectations based on more recent data, leading to smoother pricing in short-term interest rate derivatives. Interest rate swaps and futures would likely show smaller changes, reducing surprises and lowering risk in overnight instruments transitioning to longer terms. This change could also help reduce market volatility. With a more regular meeting schedule, forward guidance would become clearer. Any hints shared during meetings or conferences would be analyzed more closely, eliminating the long wait to see if a shift in policy leads to real action. This would make it easier to understand signals and adjust strategies accordingly. Furthermore, more regular updates from the central bank could make it easier to measure policy differences. Quick reactions to changes from foreign central banks—especially during volatile times in the US or Asia—could help the RBNZ adjust domestic policies more quickly, shortening the delay before global conditions impact local financing costs. In the short term, we may need to update our models and strategies to reflect this increased meeting frequency. If this proposal moves forward, we can expect tighter expectations around meeting schedules and option expirations. Our approach to liquidity planning, particularly during the summer, may require adjustments. Those used to smooth conditions in December may find the situation now less predictable. Until we have confirmation, we should keep probability in mind. We need to view the discussion of increased meeting frequency not as a sudden change but as one factor among others that could affect our term structure assumptions. Pricing in increased responsiveness, without assuming increased frequency of actions, will likely lead to stronger positioning. Practically, this means testing trades that benefit from curve steepening under tighter decision-making intervals and observing whether rate paths show less inertia in forecast periods. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

    here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

    see more

    Back To Top
    Chatbots