The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) may take further action in late 2025, like lowering the reserve requirement ratio (RRR), if needed. This move aims to keep long-term liquidity steady and ensure there’s enough money in the market during mid and late 2025. The goal is to create a supportive monetary environment for economic recovery. Recently, the PBOC injected about RMB1 trillion into the market by cutting the RRR. The RRR is the amount of money that banks must hold in reserve against customer deposits. The PBOC controls this ratio to impact how much banks can lend. Increasing the RRR reduces the money supply because banks must hold more funds in reserve, while lowering it allows banks to lend more, boosting the money supply and encouraging economic activity. By cutting the reserve requirement, the central bank has opened up more lending capacity in the system. This means banks can use the extra capital to lend more money, which helps circulate funds in the Chinese economy. This method doesn’t directly inject cash but makes credit more available without large fiscal measures. This policy often indicates an intention to influence overall market sentiment. Loosening reserve levels typically responds to signs of weaker growth or internal imbalances that need minor adjustments rather than major reforms. The timing suggests a desire to improve liquidity conditions before any potential stress later in the year. The idea is to prevent a tightening of credit markets by giving banks more flexibility now instead of waiting for issues to arise. For those of us following derivatives, these signals are significant. When central banks lower reserve requirements, bond yields may see slight downward pressure. Forward rates, especially in yuan-based interest rate futures, might start to expect lower borrowing costs. Currently, volatility remains relatively stable in short-term contracts, but there’s increasing asymmetry in longer-term contracts. Zhou’s earlier statements about maintaining “reasonably ample” liquidity show a careful approach. There’s no rush to flood the markets; the goal is simply to support the financial system where it’s needed. This strategy encourages us to reconsider short volatility positions, especially in long-term interest rate options. We’ve noticed growing directional bias since the start of the quarter. Looking ahead, those modeling liquidity metrics should also pay attention to potential phantom tightening. This is when liquidity seems stable on the surface, but interbank lending and repo market signals are weakening. We’ve seen this before, especially when mild easing hides deeper structural issues. Over-hedging against immediate rate cuts may be ineffective, but creating layered protection against shifts in the slope appears wiser. Lastly, the significant RMB1 trillion injection has a psychological impact on traders. It signals a readiness to take substantial action again, which helps shape policy expectations and lessens the unpredictability of short-term rates. However, it’s less clear how much this will translate into private credit extensions or affect risk sentiment. We’re already observing the impact in local funding curves. As the gap narrows between state and commercial lenders, correlations of volatility across different assets are decreasing. This is a slightly positive sign for carry strategies, although it’s essential to monitor duration exposure closely.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now