There are two main views on how AI will affect government debt and deficits. One view believes that AI will greatly improve productivity and efficiency, making government debt less of an issue. This optimistic outlook is based on past advancements in technology, which have often led to economic growth. The other perspective is more cautious, asserting that fiscal limits are being ignored. Some even suggest removing the debt ceiling and allowing high deficits related to GDP. This viewpoint raises concerns about how an aging population and increased welfare commitments may challenge fiscal stability. The shift away from gold-backed currencies could also lead to a weakening of fiat currencies. Despite these differing perspectives, both sides agree on one thing: investing in stocks is a smart move. Stocks can provide protection against inflation because well-managed companies can adjust their prices in changing economies. Also, an increase in productivity driven by AI might boost demand for commodities, especially industrial metals. If currency value drops, tangible assets like commodities may hold their worth better. The earlier paragraphs outlined two contrasting views on the fiscal future with AI. The first argues that productivity gains from AI will offset worries about rising public debt. Historically, major technological advancements have improved output while lowering costs. The belief is that greater productivity will lead to increased tax revenues, easing the burden of deficits over time. The second view is more cautious, suggesting that fiscal policy has crossed into uncharted territory. With fewer restrictions on government spending and a relaxed approach to high deficits, there is a risk of worsening financial imbalances. Factors like an aging population and growing welfare costs only add to the worries. Moving away from commodity-backed currencies, particularly gold, removes a natural limit on debt and could eventually erode the value of fiat currencies. Both views point to stocks and commodities as protective investments, albeit for different reasons. On one hand, it’s about growth and profit potential in an AI-boosted economy. On the other, it’s about safeguarding against losing purchasing power. Given this context, investors should consider two main factors in the near term. First, policy discussions are evolving rapidly, even in traditionally conservative economies. This shift could result in either higher deficits or significant budget cuts. Consequently, it’s important to monitor government announcements, especially those related to employment, healthcare spending, and key industries like energy and semiconductors. Traders should pay attention to the financing methods proposed—such as longer-term bonds, inflation-linked securities, or reliance on central banks. Second, there’s a growing link between AI advancements and industrial supplies—not because machines need raw materials, but because the tech infrastructure requires substantial manufacturing outputs. The demand for hardware is closely tied to software needs, affecting commodities like copper, nickel, and aluminum. If technology rollout accelerates, as indicated by recent cloud infrastructure developments, supply chains could face growing pressures. Traders should evaluate current commodity prices against historical inventory levels beyond just inflation metrics. As government bonds become less appealing for long-term investors, alternative assets—such as company shares or certain raw materials—might gain value. This isn’t due to market hype, but rather because these assets are expected to maintain worth when cash and bonds might lose value. The strategy here isn’t speculative but adaptive. We’ve seen this happen before when monetary policies were lax, leading investors to tangible assets that resist price drops. In stocks, focusing on forward margins and consistent pricing is more informative than just looking at revenue growth forecasts. Companies with solid pricing strategies—like subscription models or unique intellectual property—are better equipped to handle rising costs or wage pressures. In times of unpredictable inflation, these businesses can adapt faster than those relying solely on volume production. In derivatives markets, there’s already a shift away from low-volatility conditions. The expectation for stable rates or consistent inflation is dwindling. Volatility for longer-term equity options is increasing, suggesting uncertainty about stock price direction and the reliability of valuation methods. This situation requires more complex hedging strategies, with traders potentially adjusting exposure on both ends, rather than sticking to one position. Finally, the risk associated with bond durations needs reassessment. If policies remain relaxed and AI aids economic growth while disrupting jobs, bond markets may experience fluctuating sentiments. We could observe shifts between worries about deflation due to automation and inflationary shocks resulting from fiscal spending or global commodity issues. This situation calls for closer management of hedging strategies across different bond maturities. Timing is crucial, but it’s not just about making strict choices. It’s important to notice how quickly things are changing—not just in economic indicators, but in the foundational aspects of productivity. The best strategy might not be the one most aligned with AI benefits but rather one that can adapt to the challenges that arise. By looking at correlation trends and volatility, we can create more nuanced strategies. Both optimism and caution are necessary, but they must be used together.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now