US companies are pushing for lower tariffs on Vietnam as a way to diversify from China. A letter from the American Chamber of Commerce in Hanoi highlights how important Vietnam has become for changing supply chains. The letter explains that tariffs shouldn’t interfere with the goal of diversifying supply options in the Indo-Pacific. This call comes as import costs rise from new trade policies. As costs climb, US firms are searching for affordable alternatives, with Vietnam standing out during ongoing US-China trade issues. However, Vietnam’s initial 46% tariffs could complicate efforts for US businesses wanting to avoid high fees. The tariff reduction request shows worries about how effective a potential US-China trade deal could be. The effects of the current 90-day pause in trade talks remain unclear. We’re seeing a change in attitudes towards trade, prompting companies to explore more practical options. Due to import taxes, the focus has shifted to countries that may help lower costs. Vietnam is gaining attention because of its growing manufacturing sector and ability to respond quickly. The chamber’s letter isn’t just a plea—it’s a sign that businesses are changing their strategies for future needs. The main point is clear: high tariffs on Vietnam could create problems. They might hinder the very goals the US wants, like more diverse sourcing. As policymakers adjust their views, it’s evident that short-term tactics may not match the longer-term strategies businesses need. The pause in negotiations is meant to provide breathing room, but it hasn’t led to clear results. Instead of offering relief, the delay keeps markets in limbo. There’s no real progress or rollback, which could keep price volatility high, especially in tariff-sensitive industries. For market watchers, this week and next are crucial. It’s important to pay attention to tactical moves rather than larger trends. Price changes may react more to news or policy changes than to the fundamentals. Traders may see quick shifts based on statements from either Washington or Hanoi, especially for industries linked to the Asia-Pacific. Instead of focusing on long-term trends, it’s better to keep an eye on shorter-term contracts, particularly in areas where costs and profits are closely tied. Sentiment could shift, leading to wider spreads. As seen in previous situations, reactions aren’t always uniform and won’t immediately balance out across industry indices. This makes choosing options and timing very important. Holding onto longer positions might carry more risk than reward without clear information. Even a minor change in tariff wording could lead to significant adjustments in related sectors. We need to monitor trading volumes carefully, especially where opinions can shift quickly. Any remarks about trade could lead to rapid changes, though they may not be large, they could be sharp. Another factor to consider is the 46% tariff threshold. Hedging against USD risk might become pricier as currency movements respond to government policies. This means that premiums could vary more than expected based on last month’s figures. Pullbacks might occur unexpectedly if confidence wanes. It’s wiser to prepare for smaller corrections than to await clear upward or downward trends. We should stay adaptable and not linger on decisions that are still pending. There’s still too much uncertainty in public statements for long-term commitments to feel secure.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now