Four forecasts predict that oil prices could rise to US$130 per barrel in a worst-case scenario due to geopolitical tensions. Recent events, including successful US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, have led to a slight decline in US equity index futures at the start of the week. Key developments include US bombings, causing minor changes in foreign exchange prices and potential effects on oil markets. The Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil transit route, remains open despite concerns that its closure could lead to major disruptions. ANZ warns that a disruption might push oil prices to US$95 per barrel. Citi estimates that if Iran’s oil production is disrupted by three million barrels per day, prices could rise to US$90. J.P. Morgan projects prices could hit US$120–130 if Hormuz is shut down. Goldman Sachs notes a US$10 geopolitical risk premium in current prices, while Barclays suggests that cutting Iranian exports by half could push prices to US$85, or even over US$100 in a regional conflict. In terms of market movements, Brent crude is just under closing a market gap and sits at a crucial point on a triple-top breakout pattern. This article highlights serious price expectations for crude oil amid rising tensions in the Middle East, particularly if disruptions affect Iranian production and shipping routes. The recent military strikes by the US on Iranian nuclear sites have created a cautious atmosphere at the start of the trading week, with small price drops in both equity futures and currencies. This shows how sensitive the current markets are to geopolitical risks. Despite concerns, the Strait of Hormuz remains open, which helps keep worst-case oil price estimates in check for now. The volume of oil passing through this strait is massive; a steady flow prevents prices from sharply increasing. According to ANZ, even a partial disruption could raise the barrel price to US$95, quickly affecting pricing models and pushing option markets to adjust for higher risks. Citi’s estimate of US$90 oil resulting from a three million barrels per day disruption shows that markets are closely analyzing supply issues region by region. In this scenario, we might see wider spreads between contracts that are physically delivered and those that are purely speculative. If supply halts exceed storage capacity, the backwardation may deepen. J.P. Morgan’s prediction of up to US$130 per barrel if the Strait closes is based on a severe scenario, but it still influences pricing behaviors as we anticipate physical disruptions. Their assessment indicates that a closure would have widespread impacts beyond just spot prices, resulting in quick changes in calendar spreads and a rise in volatility for call options. Goldman Sachs points out that around US$10 of current oil prices is attributed to geopolitical fears, not confirmed shortages. This context reminds us that risks aren’t evenly spread, and short-term contracts may have inflated premiums. If these premiums fall, traders long on sentiment might face rapid reversals. This situation reduces the incentive for derivatives traders to pursue price movements unless new supply data confirms disruptions. Barclays provides a middle-ground estimate, suggesting that if Iranian exports drop by half due to intensified sanctions or localized conflict, oil could surpass US$100. Their view aligns with historical data on supply shortfalls and futures prices. It’s not just about price levels—volatility could lead to strong intraday movements, especially on low liquidity days. Technically, Brent crude is at a pivotal point. A triple-top resistance pattern is close to breaking. As traders, we’re monitoring this closely—not because it’s solely predictive, but because it indicates where trailing stops may cluster. If the price breaks above, we could see quick buying, particularly from short-term funds employing breakout strategies. In the upcoming sessions, as geopolitical risks increase, we need to carefully adjust calendar spreads and gamma exposure. It’s not the time to rely heavily on static assumptions or cushion margins. The nature of developments—whether shipping interruptions or additional strikes—will affect open interest in options, particularly at key price points like US$110 or US$130. These levels not only become targets but also influence delta hedging that could lead to strong directional moves. For now, it’s important to reassess whether directional bets justify the cost, especially with potential skews caused by event risks rather than actual supply changes. Each additional strike or confirmed disruption alters the probabilities traders calculate. Being adaptable is more important than being early in these scenarios.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Analysts have been analyzing Trump’s recent actions regarding Iran. JP Morgan pointed out that past regime changes in the area often led to oil prices increasing by as much as 76%, with an average rise of 30%. Trump spoke about potential regime change in Iran, although some members of his team claimed that was not the goal. ANZ predicts that Iran might retaliate by disrupting oil shipments from the Middle East, possibly pushing prices up to the $90–95 per barrel range. Many agree that completely closing the Strait of Hormuz is highly unlikely for Iran. However, this doesn’t mean that oil transport won’t face disruptions.

Market Reactions to Possible Regime Change

In simple terms, Trump’s statements about potential regime change in Iran have caused market jitters. While some officials downplayed his remarks, the concerns have spread. Historical data from JP Morgan shows that similar statements in the past have often led to significant hikes in oil prices, sometimes by over two-thirds. On average, prices increase by about a third during times of leadership changes in the region. That’s a considerable shift. ANZ believes that Iran could respond by targeting oil transport routes out of the area. While it’s unlikely they could completely close shipping lanes, even small disruptions—like attacks or delays—could unsettle markets. They speculate that oil prices could rise to the mid-$90s if supply routes face any pressure. This is especially relevant, given the recent volatility in crude futures. While blocking the Strait of Hormuz completely might be unrealistic, history shows that even minor incidents can affect the market. Events like missile tests or meddling with oil tankers can lead traders to anticipate worst-case scenarios. In such situations, perceptions quickly influence demand for hedging, which causes prices to rise almost instinctively.

Strategic Steps in Response to Market Changes

What should we do about it? We’ve noticed that forward contracts for Brent are showing a steeper curve, indicating greater concerns about future oil availability. Implied volatility has increased, and CDS spreads on Middle Eastern sovereigns are also widening, albeit slowly. These aren’t random shifts; they reflect market anticipation of geopolitical risks. Traders looking to position themselves should pay attention to the spread between Brent and WTI, which typically widens during Middle East instability. We’re already observing initial signs of this. Additionally, long-dated options are pricing in increased event risk, echoing previous movements during tensions in Iraq, Syria’s chemical weapons incident, and Libya’s supply issues. Instead of assuming the situation will resolve itself just because the Strait remains open, we should watch freight rates and insurance costs for tankers in the Persian Gulf. These costs are among the first to rise when tensions escalate. If a minor news event leads to rerouting or delays, commodity traders will quickly react, especially those relying on shipping data algorithms. Keep an eye on open interest data. If speculative positions in crude futures increase significantly while commercial hedging lags, we may end up pricing in gains before any solid disruptions are confirmed. This has happened before—markets sometimes preemptively adjust, and full pipeline shutdowns aren’t necessary for this to occur. We should also monitor fuel oil cracks and middle distillates. If refiners indicate tighter margins through adjustments in run rates or crack spreads, that serves as another early warning signal along the supply chain. This reinforces that these events are significant, as traders reassess risk premiums based on potential delivery changes and input costs. It’s during times like this that clear signals can get lost in the excess of news and reactions. But by carefully observing not just prices but also flows and premiums, we can avoid getting caught off guard by rapid market moves. The market has predictable responses to these events, even if the actual events are unpredictable. Risk management models need to be adjusted, especially if delta-hedging strategies haven’t accounted for the recent backwardation increase. Passive exposure to energy-focused indices won’t provide much protection, particularly if those indices rely heavily on spot instruments. Consider where your risk is most concentrated, not just by price but in terms of delivery timelines. There’s a narrow window to act before summer liquidity is thinner. This always makes price swings wider and increases Theta burn. Focus on structure, not sentiment. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Australia’s preliminary June 2025 manufacturing PMI remains steady at 51.0, unchanged from May. This suggests that the manufacturing sector is stable. The flash services PMI has increased to 51.3, up from 50.6 in May. This indicates growth and improvement in the services sector. The composite PMI, which combines manufacturing and services, has also risen from 50.5 in May to 51.2. This shows overall growth in economic activity across sectors. The data indicates that manufacturing activity in Australia is stable, maintaining a PMI of 51.0. A PMI above 50 signals expansion, which means the sector hasn’t shrunk. This can be seen as a time of consolidation after previous changes. More importantly, the flash services PMI’s rise to 51.3 from 50.6 in May indicates greater demand, possibly due to increased consumer or business spending. While this growth is modest, it enhances confidence that the services sector is slowly improving. By combining both sectors, the composite PMI offers a clearer picture. Its increase to 51.2 shows slightly better business conditions than last month. Although this isn’t a significant jump, it indicates gradual growth and suggests that economic activity is strengthening. These figures provide valuable insights. They reveal that output isn’t declining and that the services sector is gaining momentum. For those tracking broader economic risks, it’s essential to watch forward-looking components like new orders and employment to determine if this growth is sustained or just a short-term boost. Earlier in the quarter, concerns arose due to high borrowing costs and margin pressures. Recent figures may help alleviate these worries. As conditions improve, pricing pressures may need to be reassessed. During this adjustment, short-term volatility could rise as expectations shift across asset classes. Historically, when composite indicators hover just above 51 for several months, pricing has shown significant sensitivity. This is crucial because implied volatility often reacts more to future earnings or inflation-related costs. Any significant movement in PMIs in the coming months could lead markets to revise rate expectations. In this context, maintaining a PMI above 50 typically strengthens cyclical investments, often influencing sentiment around policy changes. Short-term activity expectations, especially involving leveraged assets, tend to be more responsive during these phases, with trading activity often accelerating. We’ll keep an eye on how pricing in front-end derivatives responds in the coming sessions. Performance in contracts linked to volatility or growth often sets the early market tone. We’ve also seen that when services improve without a drop in manufacturing, directional bets can grow larger. With positive data trends, it’s reasonable to expect increased interest in trading strategies that benefit from rising activity indicators. Timing is crucial during slow expansions. Traders usually react quickly when both services and composite indices show month-on-month improvements.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Market gaps usually occur on Monday mornings in Asia, which is Sunday evening in the US. This pattern happened again after the US targeted Iranian nuclear sites, leading to a rise in USD and a small drop in US equity index futures on June 16, 2025. Gaps often fill up, unless the news is surprising or significant, which can result in bigger moves. Earlier indicators from President Trump hinted at possible actions, causing equities to dip slightly and oil prices to rise on Friday. After the markets opened, they showed some recovery. ES bounced back from its lows, almost closing its gap, while the EUR/USD currency pair opened lower but covered about 50% of its gap.

Oil Market Movement

Oil’s movements are important because it only partially filled its gap, returning to a “triple top” previously seen last week. This creates a possible opportunity for traders. We’ve noticed a pattern where geopolitical events, such as military actions, lead to initial risk-off feelings. When the US acted against Iran’s nuclear sites, it made sense for equities to drop and the dollar to gain. Traders moved away from equities to safer assets like the US dollar. However, the market’s reaction in the following hours was intriguing. Much of the equity futures gap was recovered, suggesting disbelief in the breaking news or a possible overreaction. The S&P futures (known as ES) nearly retraced fully. This was a significant move, indicating that investors were skeptical about the military action escalating further. Meanwhile, the dollar’s strength persisted. The euro’s slight decline and partial rebound hint at continued support for the greenback. Oil, on the other hand, followed different reasoning. It did not fully recover. We observed a reluctance just below previous resistance—this “triple top.” Large options positions or futures hedging may influence this. The gap not being filled leaves room for a breakout if upcoming data stirs concerns about energy supply or demand.

Market Implications

From our perspective, this mixed reaction opens several tactical options for those focused on derivatives. In equity indices, the gap behavior serves as a reference level—it’s a point to monitor if volatility returns. The speed of the partial fill indicates where buyers are willing to act, creating a soft support area unless headlines worsen significantly. Currency moves in EUR/USD did recover somewhat, but not completely. This situation provides a few insights for traders. While actual volatility remains low, implied skews suggest that traders are purchasing downside protection for the euro. There’s a tendency in that direction, even if it’s not strongly visible in spot trading. The action in oil shows that buying interest hits supply just under multi-week highs. However, the lack of follow-through is significant. Momentum traders seeking a breakout may pause without support, while range traders might maintain their positions until more news appears. There’s no rush to adjust positions until either demand consistently exceeds resistance or prices fall back into previous ranges. During these quiet periods before reactions solidify, monitoring changes in implied volatility across rates and commodities can provide valuable insights. This helps gauge the uncertainty priced into options, particularly focusing on short-term oil contracts sensitive to immediate supply concerns. Our observations indicate that traders are still on alert for major developments. The varying extent of gap filling across different assets shows different levels of confidence. Equities bounced back more than energy, suggesting that traders view this event as contained, though caution remains. These small differences in gap behavior reveal a lot. They indicate which asset classes are attracting speculative money and which are being overlooked. By tracking how quickly and fully these gaps are filled, we can better gauge market sentiment. It’s not about predicting news but understanding how willing the market is to move either against or with it. In the coming days, the levels established by this weekend’s shifts will guide us. They serve as key areas—not just for entry points but also for defining where conviction lies, and conviction often precedes broader trends. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

US equity index futures kicked off the week on Globex with a slight decline. The S&P 500 futures (ES) dropped around 0.5%, while Nasdaq futures (NQ) also showed a smaller decrease. At the same time, 10-year US Treasury futures rose by 3 ticks. In the commodities market, Brent crude increased noticeably, and gold prices also climbed. This segment indicates a cautious start to the week. The lower equity index futures suggest a risk-off attitude among traders. The small pullback in S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures might indicate profit-taking after their recent rises or growing worries about upcoming economic factors, such as inflation data or central bank announcements. The 3-tick rise in 10-year Treasury futures suggests a slight uptick in demand for safe-haven assets, a sign that investors are being more cautious. This often happens when there are worries about global growth, uncertainty in monetary policy, or expectations of weaker economic data. Higher bond demand typically leads to lower yields, which can dampen interest in equities. In commodities, Brent crude’s rise points to supply concerns or geopolitical tensions, both of which tend to push energy prices higher. Meanwhile, gold’s price increase implies a shift toward safer investments during uncertain times, as investors seek to protect their assets. Overall, we see a gentle rebalancing across asset classes. It’s not a drastic shift but rather a careful adjustment of risk and a move towards safer positions. For those focused on derivatives, here are key points to consider: First, keep an eye on implied volatility levels. With the initial downside pressure in indices and a simultaneous move into Treasuries and gold, we may see widening skew. This suggests potential disconnections between realized and implied volatility, which could present trading opportunities. Second, watch relationships between different markets. As equities, bonds, and commodities behave in predictable ways, tighter correlations can create chances not just in index options but also in specific sectors or bond futures. We might see a difference in performance between tech-based instruments and overall benchmarks, especially if the Nasdaq decline is smaller. Third, monitor the options flow during overnight and early US sessions for insights. A rise in volume while markets fall can reveal if positioning is protective or speculative. This could uncover tactical opportunities in strike prices or expiry timelines, potentially affecting gamma positioning and intraday responses. Finally, don’t disregard upcoming economic data if it has begun to impact this week’s opening. Staying flexible is important, especially if Treasury futures keep showing signs of steady accumulation, which could alter interest rate forecasts and impact pricing. In summary, this early movement in futures appears methodical rather than reactive. It’s a prompt to stay alert for changes in positioning bias, as movements across asset classes create clearer opportunities for strategic trades.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Mary Daly, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, recently shared her insights. However, her comments got less attention due to major news like the U.S. military’s successful strike on Iran’s nuclear sites. Daly stated that the Fed’s current monetary policy is “in a good place.” She pointed out that there are equal risks to both U.S. employment and price stability. She also explained that providing guidance on interest rates can come with costs. Officials should focus on known factors, stay humble about uncertainties, and adjust to unexpected global changes. Daly’s comments highlight the importance of balance and humility in decision-making. This approach relates to trading strategies too. In the past, she has been clear about policy directions. She suggested that a rate cut might be more likely in the fall instead of July. Daly leads the San Francisco Federal Reserve branch. While Daly’s comments this week didn’t make major headlines, they resonate with those paying attention to policy signals. She emphasized the need for a balanced view, recognizing that current risks to employment and inflation are equally significant. For us, this indicates there’s no rush. This brings a sense of reassurance, suggesting that even though markets seek clear direction, policymakers won’t be rushed into decisions. Her caution about the costs of verbal guidance is an important point. Communication can shape expectations. If too much clarity is given about future actions, it might lead markets to react to movements that may not actually occur. So, while she supports transparency, it must be limited to the known. This careful and humble tone is essential. Any misunderstandings or assumptions could be costly. From our perspective, this environment rewards patience and care. Overreacting to rate expectations or trying to interpret every economic indicator may lead to frustration. If market-based rate forecasts trend toward summer easing, we need to evaluate whether these moves are based on Daly’s comments or simply misplaced optimism. Her idea that September might be a more realistic timeframe for rate relief makes sense. There’s a gap between market wishes and the actions officials are preparing to take. Powell and others have kept their commitments vague, which is wise given the unclear inflation readings. This means that the upcoming weeks should focus not on sudden changes, but on steady realignment. Looking at the bigger picture, it’s clear that decisions won’t be made in response to a single data point. They will develop over time. Daly isn’t revealing a clear policy pathway now, but she isn’t ruling one out either. Thus, we can’t expect consistent actions, and we should avoid over-leveraging based on short-term shifts in messaging. It’s also important to consider her perspective on humility. This isn’t just a personal trait; it’s a guideline for navigating uncertainties. For us, it serves as a reminder to avoid assumptions. With many global unknowns, it’s crucial to exercise restraint. Whether dealing with geopolitics or inaccurate data, flexibility is more valuable than conviction. Overall, we can interpret this stance as consistent with past messages: the Fed does not feel pressed to cut rates right now, nor do they see hikes as necessary unless inflation surprises again. This balance typically results in stable price reactions and makes volatility more reactive than driven by systemic factors. What this means for us is clear: Keep positions light. Be responsive, not proactive. Let policymakers navigate through uncertainty. Progress will be gradual, and rushing ahead of the data is unlikely to yield favorable results.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Asian economic calendar for June 23, 2025, features several minor data points. These are not expected to significantly impact foreign exchange markets when released. Reports from Singapore and Australia will be included, and it’s easy to mix up their flags. Though these economic events may not cause major changes, they help us keep track of wider economic trends. Even small updates can provide hints about the overall economy, despite their limited effects when viewed alone. It’s important not to ignore these upcoming data releases. While they may not directly affect currency pairs, they add to the broader flow of information that can slowly shape economic expectations. We’re not looking for sudden large moves, but rather confirmations or contradictions of existing market trends. This week, with only minor data scheduled across the Asia-Pacific region, there is less chance of unexpected local surprises. As a result, attention will shift to changes in market sentiment, especially in relation to short-term interest rate expectations. Traders should pay attention to how these smaller events may influence market narratives and implied volatility, rather than just focusing on their headlines. The quiet calendar provides an opportunity to analyze pricing anomalies and reassess risk in near-term interest rate products. This can be especially helpful when dollar liquidity is balanced and risk appetite is stable. The lack of strong data allows for a closer look at short-maturity instruments, where small changes in rates may be notable. Tan highlighted that expectations for Australia’s data do not lead to differing monetary policy views, and that remains the case. What’s more important is how the market reacts to news that doesn’t boost sentiment, especially if the news has already been anticipated. Instances of weak data often reflect market trends rather than fundamentals. Observing gaps between realized and implied volatility could provide more insight than waiting for dramatic events. Lee also commented on Singapore’s data, which suggests a stable outlook. While this may not present immediate trading opportunities, it can influence overall confidence or weaken it without better external insight. This is where relative performance is key. When offshore flows favor consistency over change, minor data points become background noise in a market focused on stronger signals. We will need to be attuned to subtle technical patterns and outcomes in the rates market across Asia. In weeks like this, what is left unsaid or unchanged can be more significant than what does move. That’s why we will closely monitor follow-through behavior in rate futures rather than just the main economic indicators. Quiet calendars can still bring valuable insights, though it may take a bit more patience to uncover them.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The new FX week starts with the USD making a small gain after the US conducted strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Current exchange rates are: – EUR/USD: 1.1473 – USD/JPY: 146.09 – GBP/USD: 1.3408 – USD/CHF: 0.8189 Additional rates include: – USD/CAD: 1.3745 – AUD/USD: 0.6439 – NZD/USD: 0.5955 Recent news focuses on the US strikes in Iran, with prior comments indicating possible action within two weeks. Some traders misread this timeframe, thinking immediate action was likely, which has now occurred. This situation highlights the need for careful interpretation in trading, particularly when considering official statements. The initial rise of the dollar reflects how the market quickly reacts to the uncertainty caused by military actions. The US has acted on previous hints about these strikes, shifting the situation from speculation to reality. The earlier rates, like EUR/USD around 1.1470 and USD/JPY just above 146, show a return of risk-averse sentiment. While energy-related currencies and those linked to commodities seem stable, the impact of geopolitical events on pricing is becoming clear. Powell’s earlier comments suggested measured responses, giving the market some leeway, but that perspective has changed. Clear communication is vital, and misinterpretations can lead to shifts that become hard to manage as time goes on. For those using leverage, it might be wise to rethink current gamma exposure in currencies that could react sharply to further military or diplomatic actions. Traditional safe havens have reacted predictably, but not excessively, indicating that markets may not expect long-term escalation or are awaiting clarity from other indicators like oil futures or credit markets. Traders who expected a delayed market response might now adjust their volatility structures to limit exposure, especially as we approach the later part of the week. Misjudging the speed of events is a serious error that affects options chains and forward rates, which are already showing signs of adjustment. Commodity-linked currencies, such as CAD and AUD, may respond more slowly, presenting chances to rebalance directional risk. Currently, the options skew in these pairs hasn’t widened much, making directional bets risky unless perfectly timed. We’re using insights from bond yield spreads and overnight index swaps. The FED doesn’t react solely to headlines, but shifts in rate sentiment are becoming a secondary indicator that matters. Short-term rate expectations will likely change if the conflict involves more actors or produces a retaliation. For now, keep an eye on correlations. Currencies tied to stock performance are softening slightly, and we see implied volatilities gently rising across G10 currencies, but not uniformly. This inconsistency suggests that some trading desks are quietly building in risk premiums. In summary, misreading the administration’s tone and acting too soon or too late can lead to significant losses. This week, it’s important not to assume typical behavior in USD pairs. Monitor spread positioning near gamma hedging levels closely, especially as any delays in diplomatic responses could make intraday moves more volatile. For now, we’re hovering around key levels, but the pace of responses should be the main focus.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Traders are preparing for the gold futures market opening by concentrating on key technical levels. Recently, gold futures dropped below a bearish channel at 3,368 but quickly bounced back, showing bullish momentum. Observers identified a bull flag pattern that suggests prices may rise if they exceed 3,390, with 3,382-3,390 marked as a crucial area. In a bullish scenario, traders may seek two hourly closes above 3,390 before taking long positions. An optimal entry might involve a retest near 3,382, with a stop-loss set below 3,372. A target of 3,500 provides an attractive reward-to-risk ratio of about 11.5. On the other hand, a bearish scenario would occur if prices fall below the bullish channel, targeting around 3,325.

Technical Analysis Insights

Market analysis incorporates advanced methods like volume profile and VWAP, alongside traditional indicators. Understanding trader positions can provide strategic benefits. Technical analysis identifies high reward opportunities and emphasizes disciplined risk management. Staying flexible prepares traders for various market conditions. This overview emphasizes technical factors impacting short-term decisions within the futures market. The recent dip below the descending channel at 3,368 likely attracted attention as a potential breakdown. However, the swift recovery and formation of a bullish flag changed the perception. This reaction indicates significant buying pressure returned to the market, surprising those who expected further declines. As the price settled back into the 3,382–3,390 zone, it established a battleground between bulls and bears. The requirement for two hourly closes above 3,390 offers a disciplined confirmation for entry, a preferred structure before making directional trades. Watching for breakouts from congested areas allows traders to avoid pitfalls during fluctuating sessions. The ideal strategy of waiting for a small pullback to 3,382 before a continued rise represents a clean entry setup when the broader pattern aligns. Placing stop-loss orders just below 3,372 helps manage risk while allowing the price to move comfortably, which is crucial in a market prone to intraday fluctuations. The target of 3,500 may seem ambitious, but considering the proposed stop and entry points gives a favorable reward-to-risk profile, enhancing its attractiveness even if the full position doesn’t reach the target.

Strategic Planning in Volatile Markets

If the price fails to hold above the channel and drops again—especially below the lows near 3,368—it would significantly weaken the bullish outlook. A sharper decline towards 3,325 would then shift focus to short setups, particularly if volume increases during the downturn. Both scenarios require precision, as setups depend not just on price movements but also on their position relative to critical structures. By integrating volume profile and VWAP, traders gain deeper insights into potential market movements. These tools help locate areas where institutional activity may cluster, offering additional hints about how far prices could move or where reversals may occur. Ultimately, knowing when to act and when to exercise patience is key. Clearly defining what constitutes a valid breakout—such as two closes—allows for better decision-making. Additionally, using historical price ranges to guide possible entries or exits provides clarity amidst uncertainty. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In other markets, the EUR/USD faced challenges around the 1.1500 mark as the US Dollar became stronger. Although Fed Governor Waller hinted at a possible rate cut in July, tensions in the Middle East created a cautious mood among traders.

The Surge In Gold Prices

Gold prices jumped to nearly $3,370 as investors sought safe assets. The ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and rising tensions between Iran and Israel added to this trend. In the cryptocurrency world, tokenized treasuries could impact Ripple’s value. Ondo Finance’s launch on the XRP Ledger aims to attract institutional interest, with the market for tokenized treasuries now at $5.9 billion. Global markets showed a cautious trading attitude because of the Israel-Iran conflict. Equity markets mostly fell, and US treasury yields dropped too. Still, overall, markets did not fully avoid risk. The original passage indicates a slight drop in the British Pound against the US Dollar after UK retail activity sharply declined. In May, consumer spending fell 2.7% month-over-month, a bigger drop than the expected 0.5%. This decline could challenge views on short-term economic strength, especially in the services sector, which is vital for overall demand. However, the steadiness of the pound, even in light of weak consumer data, should not be overlooked. It suggests that market participants may have already anticipated softer economic conditions, or they believe the Bank of England is not ready to cut rates yet. This stability shouldn’t be mistaken for strength. The pricing seems more influenced by relative narratives rather than by domestic data.

Cautious Moves In Currency Markets

In the broader currency market, the euro also faced resistance near 1.1500 against the dollar. Its failure to rise above this level signals a strengthening dollar and a euro weighed down by no significant shifts in monetary policy from Frankfurt. Although Fed Governor Waller’s comments hinted at easing, overall caution prevailed, driven by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Investors seem hesitant to react strongly to individual policy remarks, preferring safety-focused positioning over speculation about interest rates. Gold saw increases as overall unease grew. With trading near $3,370, the rise confirms that investors are hedging their bets. Given the escalating Iran-Israel tensions and no clear resolution in sight, investing in physical assets provides traders a safety net during unpredictable political risks. This behavior is consistent and expected. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now