The Philadelphia Fed Business index for June is -4.0, worse than the expected -1.0. The Canadian Producer Price Index for May fell by 0.5%, and April retail sales increased by 0.3%, both below forecasts. WTI crude oil rose by $0.47, closing at $73.97. Meanwhile, US 10-year yields dropped 2 basis points to 4.37%. The S&P 500 fell by 0.2%, and gold decreased by $4 to $3366. The euro improved, while the Australian dollar lagged behind. In foreign exchange, the euro initially performed well but then lost ground as the US dollar strengthened. The dollar also advanced against the yen, approaching weekly highs. Commodity currencies like the Australian dollar (AUD), New Zealand dollar (NZD), and Canadian dollar (CAD) ended lower after an earlier rise. Tensions with Iran continue, alongside discussions about potential rate cuts from Fed members. However, markets largely ignored these dovish comments. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier group is heading to the Middle East, and Israel is facing missile shortages. The upcoming week has little economic data, focusing mainly on trade and tensions with Iran. After the latest economic reports, we see a softening sentiment among data watchers. The Philadelphia Fed’s index at -4.0 suggests factory conditions are declining more sharply than expected, indicating regional manufacturing struggles to gain traction. This decline in sentiment may affect overall pricing behavior, especially with the Canadian figures released the same day. The Canadian numbers are noteworthy: a 0.5% drop in producer prices suggests some easing in manufacturing costs, but weak retail sales growth of only 0.3% shows that demand isn’t picking up either. This combination indicates a lack of economic momentum in North America. So, what does this mean for short-term price movements? In energy, WTI’s increase of $0.47 to just below $74 suggests that even minor supply issues or geopolitical concerns can drive crude prices up. However, with yields declining—2 basis points to 4.37% on US 10-year notes—investors are showing caution. They generally seek higher yields only when confident about returns, and right now, they seem unsure. The S&P 500’s 0.2% drop fits this cautious mood. The market is hesitant to pursue higher valuations without clearer signs of growth or resolution of global tensions. Gold, a common measure of anxiety, fell slightly by $4 to $3366, showing no rush for safety. Given the geopolitical risks and mixed economic data, it’s noteworthy that more funds aren’t flocking to safety yet. Currency movements are revealing. The euro began strong but pulled back as the US dollar strengthened. There’s a rising demand for the dollar, especially against the yen, which faced selling pressure as it approached peak levels. This suggests that despite modest yields, there’s a continuing preference for dollar holdings. Commodity-linked currencies, like the Australian dollar, New Zealand dollar, and Canadian dollar, also fell. This can be explained by the fading optimism in equities, where buyers lacked conviction without supportive data or rising commodity prices. In the geopolitical landscape, tensions in the Middle East continue to pose risks. The presence of the Nimitz aircraft carrier group indicates that tensions remain high. Missile shortages and logistical challenges in Israel highlight vulnerabilities, even if the market reaction is muted. This lack of response may seem odd, but without broader escalation, markets tend to quickly price in headlines. With few economic releases expected soon, focus will shift to policy signals, especially from central bank officials, and any developments in global security issues. Recent dovish tones from officials were largely ignored, likely due to skepticism regarding their credibility—promises of easier policies don’t hold much weight if data doesn’t reflect a need for such changes. That’s the current perspective. From bond market movements to commodity trends, it’s a reluctant picture. Data is mixed, signals about rate paths are uncertain, and geopolitical tensions are simmering. For now, price movements reflect both hesitancy and expectation, creating a need for agility in response.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The economy and policies are currently stable. Concerns about tariffs affecting inflation have eased since their announcement. There are different views on how much tariffs will affect consumer prices. Economic conditions might soon require a cut in interest rates.

Market Expectations

CEOs remain cautiously hopeful about the effects of tariffs. An interest rate cut is more likely in the autumn rather than July, unless there’s a decline in the job market. Currently, the market estimates a 15% chance of an interest rate cut in July. This is different from earlier comments by another Federal Reserve representative but hasn’t surprised market watchers. Recently, the market has calmed from its earlier anxiety over trade tensions and inflation. The worst fears about tariffs haven’t come true, and this is reflected in pricing expectations and general sentiment. Initially, there were worries that tariffs would raise costs significantly, affecting overall consumer inflation. However, the latest data does not support this concern. Pricing models show that while some costs have affected prices, the overall impact on inflation remains limited. In some industries, companies are absorbing these cost increases, reducing the impact on consumers. We are closely monitoring key indicators like wage growth and service-sector costs to ensure no hidden issues are developing.

Economic Outlook

Looking at the big picture, the economy is steady but showing signs of slowing down. Inventories are not clearing quickly, and business investments have dipped in some areas, suggesting caution. These factors are shaping expectations for interest rates. Powell indicated that there’s no immediate need for action, allowing policymakers to assess more data in the coming weeks. If job numbers decline or inflation falls significantly below target, the risks may shift. Currently, the likelihood of a rate change in July is low; markets only see a 15% chance, indicating a consensus against immediate changes. In the next few weeks, the focus will be on job growth and service inflation resilience, rather than reacting to headlines. It’s worth noting that this communication differs from earlier statements by Waller, who linked tariffs directly to monetary policy. For traders focused on interest rate expectations, the advice is to adjust strategies rather than predict immediate changes. Volatility might stay low unless job reports or inflation surprises arise. There’s less eagerness to anticipate early price adjustments. This creates a chance for temporary calm, but it’s essential to watch for any forecast changes from the Fed later this summer. The upcoming focus will be more on job market performance than consumer prices. Derivatives strategies should reflect this shift—monitoring employment trends and policy changes instead of speculating on a July rate cut. Adjusting exposure accordingly can help navigate this period with reduced risk. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The major US stock indices ended the day with mixed results. The Dow 30 had a slight rise, increasing by 35.16 points, or 0.08%, to close at 42,206.82. In contrast, the S&P index fell by 13.033 points, or 0.22%, closing at 5,967.84. The NASDAQ index dropped 98.86 points, or 0.51%, ending at 19,447.41. Throughout the week, the indices showed little change. The Dow industrial average ticked up by just 0.02%. The S&P index slipped slightly by 0.15%, while the NASDAQ gained 0.21%. Even with ongoing uncertainties, the stock market seems to be experiencing less volatility. This week’s performance follows last week’s trend of minimal movement among the major indices. These numbers may seem calm. The Dow edged up a little, but the S&P and NASDAQ experienced declines. On the surface, it looks steady, but a closer look reveals a market preparing for something rather than resolving issues. Weekly performance reinforces this sense of waiting. Small changes in the index levels indicate a market neither speeding up nor slowing down. The Dow’s tiny rise is hardly noticeable when considering inflation or currency shifts. Meanwhile, the S&P’s small drop and the NASDAQ’s slight gain show the market is moving sideways. This reflects a broader trend of reduced daily price swings. Lower volatility makes pricing quieter, but it doesn’t mean investors are gaining confidence. Sometimes, calm simply indicates a lack of direction. What’s notable is the restraint among traders. They aren’t showing optimism or rushing to hedge. It feels as though the market is waiting for a significant event to disrupt this tight range. With fewer fluctuations and cautious positions, implied volatilities are likely falling to the low end of recent ranges. This may make premium strategies less rewarding, but could provide better angles for positioning based on event risks. There’s also a lack of sector rotation, so moves in indices aren’t exaggerated by differences among sectors. This uniformity can help with index-related strategies, especially those that benefit from limited direction. The key takeaway here isn’t what policymakers say, but what big players aren’t doing. This restraint can’t last forever. As clarity around interest rates increases or unexpected macro data emerges, sharper movements may occur. During these calm periods, positioning must be careful—options far out on the curve can quickly lose value unless driven by significant changes. Until there’s more clarity, mean-reversion strategies could offer reliable entry points. Short-term positions need precise timing, especially as expiry schedules shorten premium windows. We typically find better returns when we sell a bit more duration into these quieter conditions, as long as risk is managed. Managing exposure dynamically is increasingly crucial—stay in too long, and theta costs can eat into profits; exit too soon, and you risk missing the inevitable rise in volume and movement when new driving forces take hold. With headline risks fading, the stage is set for building positions rather than reacting. What’s happening isn’t disinterest; it’s quiet positioning, but reactions will come.

Index	Change	Close
Dow 30	+35.16 (0.08%)	42,206.82
S&P 500	-13.033 (-0.22%)	5,967.84
NASDAQ	-98.86 (-0.51%)	19,447.41

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Current market conditions are uncertain due to many unpredictable factors. Decisions concerning a potential war with Iran and the ongoing trade war are still pending and could lead to significant changes. The trade war has not resulted in any deals; Japan has cancelled a planned meeting in July, and progress with the EU is unclear, especially with looming 10% tariffs.

Economic Conditions and Market Hesitance

The economic situation adds to the uncertainty. While Powell remains hopeful, Waller has warned of a possible drop in employment rates, highlighting current vulnerability. The budget is another concern, as ongoing negotiations and rising deficits are impacting the bond market. This environment creates hesitation in the market, preventing new highs and keeping various assets within a range. These uncertainties, intensified by three key themes, suggest potential volatility and risk in market forecasts. The article paints a picture of a market stuck in hesitation, influenced by political and economic factors. The threat of military conflict, complicated tariffs, increasing deficits, and unclear central bank policies all create opposing sentiments. These issues are not just background noise; they directly affect asset pricing, risk tolerance, and the flow of large investments. Currently, predictability is lacking. In this context, hesitation is not weakness but caution. The market recognizes that acting too quickly or strongly could be costly. With directional confidence still under pressure, volatility may increase. In quiet periods like these, there is a temptation to misinterpret faint signals as confirmation. However, the current situation—uncertain supply chains, pending policy decisions, and ongoing labor market issues—argues against making strong directional bets without solid evidence.

Impact of Japan’s Withdrawal and European Strategy

Japan’s withdrawal from July talks has removed a possible breakthrough, increasing pressure on other channels, especially European export assumptions. The 10% tariffs are real and, if sustained, will further strain transatlantic trade strategies. Although it may be tempting to focus on rate decisions, Waller’s cautious tone contrasts with Powell’s reassurance. These perspectives are not opposites; they coexist. Traders need to plan not based on hopes but on existing risks. A fixed rate that once provided clarity is now more of a placeholder than an anchor, discouraging trends. The budget concerns mentioned earlier worsen the situation. Rising deficits do not just hint at future inflation or tax impacts; they also affect bond yields, changing risk-free rates and capital allocation. Positions relying on clear macro signals are less likely to find support in this environment. The current calm should be seen as a warning—it hides underlying pressures. While explosive changes may not be imminent, conditions are right for rapid movement once it begins. Range-bound behavior does not mean no exposure; it means frequently adjusting based on new data, rate changes, and risks from headlines. Concerns about employment and spending are now influencing models designed for more stable conditions. We manage this by paying close attention to implied versus realized volatility and adjusting our thresholds. Given our current situation, maintaining adaptability and quick reaction times has become essential. There is little advantage in establishing directional bias when politics and policy dominate. Instead, the advantage may come from identifying when markets misread delays as disinterest or stability as comfort. These are not typical trading conditions, but they are manageable; they simply require a different kind of focus. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Trump indicated that he found it hard to ask Israel to stop airstrikes and hinted he might support a ceasefire. He talked about discussions with Iran, saying that Israel is doing well while Iran is struggling. Trump noted he couldn’t make decisions about Iran but highlighted that sending ground troops would be undesirable. He mentioned progress in talks between Russia and Ukraine, as well as potential trade agreements with India and Pakistan. However, he pointed out that Iran seems hesitant to engage with Europe. Trump speculated that Iran could be weeks or months away from developing a nuclear weapon. He noted a two-week period for evaluating responses, emphasizing it as a maximum time to check decision-making sensibility. While there were no immediate actions suggested, his comments hint at diplomatic opportunities mixed with uncertainty. There might be room for negotiations, but outcomes remain unclear and could change rapidly. What has been shared so far suggests that diplomacy is being considered but not fully embraced, indicating we might be in a pause before any major actions. Trump’s remarks about the airstrikes and reluctance to send ground troops imply a public preference for restraint, even if there might be different intentions behind the scenes. The mention of talks, whether genuine or just for show, highlights ongoing posturing on multiple fronts. By bringing attention to Iran’s potential nuclear capability, and noting Europe’s lack of dialogue with Iran, it’s clear that state actors are trying to reposition their influence. The short timelines for reassessment are typical in volatile periods, but the two-week timeframe to gauge “sensibility” stands out. It shows a search for early indicators, which is crucial when timing matters. His reference to trade opportunities in South Asia seems like an aside, yet it points to changing trade partners, likely as safeguards against wider regional instability. The main implication isn’t about the strength of these deals but about maintaining open supply channels and flexible pricing structures. The market’s reaction will depend on whether the tone remains steady or falters under pressure from the Middle East or energy markets. From our viewpoint, uncertainty may reduce volumes, but volatility could spike if rhetoric escalates without concrete actions to ground expectations. Defence contracts and energy derivatives might see early directional shifts, so we need to watch for changes in hedging behavior. Notable shifts could be indicated by tightening spreads against index volatility. It’s important to note that no new baselines or formal deals have been introduced—no confirmed de-escalations or renewed alliances. This lack of action, combined with vague signals, implies we’re in a delicate phase where overreacting or underreacting could be risky. Traders should consider these updates as part of a bigger picture; what’s not said carries significant weight. In the intersection of positioning and policy, short-dated contracts are likely to be very responsive. They will probably be used as stances shift quickly, especially concerning future military involvement or energy exposure. Derivatives traders should anticipate secondary effects across sectors—not only regional assets—and look out for sudden liquidity crunches that might arise from unexpected news. We must remember this isn’t solely about hedging for individual events. It’s about connecting how related assets—like currency pairs, Brent options, and sovereign credit risks—react when public sentiment shifts. That’s the vital flow to monitor. While no immediate actions were recommended, pricing models will likely begin incorporating low-volume signals without waiting for official announcements. Pay attention to the speed of statements and how they differ from previous tones. Rapid changes in rhetoric can lead to market movement, not just due to the content but also the delivery and follow-up. We’ve seen this pattern before, and signs are emerging that we might witness something similar again.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The USDJPY recently hit new intraday and multi-week highs, entering a swing zone that previously capped gains in early May (145.92-146.25). The pair is very close to the 61.8% retracement level at 146.148, which is often a key point for market corrections. Recent pullbacks have attracted buyers near the previous day’s high of 145.76. This pattern indicates a bullish market where small dips are seen as buying chances. A drop below this support level and the 50% midpoint of the May range at 145.375 could shift market momentum. However, the current trend hints at a possible rise above 146.24, leading to further increases.

Key Levels For USDJPY

Key levels for USDJPY are vital to watch. Resistance is at 146.148, with the 61.8% retracement and swing-zone top at 146.25. Support levels include the previous highs and short-term floor at 145.76, additional support at 145.375 for the 50% May range, and further support at 145.15, representing the 100-hour moving average. We’ve reached levels not seen since early May. Prices are reacting where past sellers showed interest. The ongoing buying—especially after every dip—suggests that the market remains strong. The fact that buyers keep stepping in above 145.76 daily shows that the market is tilted towards strength. Traders aren’t waiting for significant pullbacks. Instead, smaller pauses are quickly bought up—often before prices test wider support below.

Market Dynamics And Momentum

The 61.8% retracement at 146.148 can act as a barrier. When prices consistently hold above this level, the next movement tends to extend further than expected. However, it might not happen immediately. There may be days when prices hover just below these levels, almost inviting more participants or shaking off hesitant traders before moving on. We have tested close to 146.25 without much selling pressure, lacking the rejection seen previously. This changes the market’s dynamics. These zones become stronger only when the market respects them. If we continue to move through intraday without pullbacks, we are unlikely to stay below for long. However, if we falter and the area near 145.76 doesn’t attract buyers, the next support will fall to 145.375. This isn’t just a number; it’s the midpoint from a broader retracement and represents the balance of the past month. Dropping below this would take us back to price levels that haven’t supported higher bids—an unfavorable situation. Our focus is on the short-term direction from how prices react just under the recent highs. If upside momentum pauses and shows indecisiveness, that may indicate a need to adjust our short-term bias. As long as dips are seen as buying opportunities, the potential for higher prices remains. Trading volume may decrease into the weekend, but thin trading can still break through technical levels easily, especially if we’re just below a key resistance like 146.25. Pay attention to how these levels behave with low liquidity, especially at the start of next week. If defensive trades set up below 145.76 and follow through beyond 145.375, we may start to question the strength of this upward move. If momentum continues, we could see targets move to higher retracement levels not reached since April, with only minor pullbacks meriting attention. Stay light unless the move fails twice; then defensive trades are more likely to hold. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Japan has canceled a trade meeting with the U.S., according to the Financial Times. This decision came after the U.S. asked Japan to raise its defense spending to 3.5% of its GDP. This announcement may have contributed to recent stock market declines. Investors will soon focus back on trade issues, where recent signals have not been encouraging. This situation shows a clear change in diplomatic priorities, impacting both politics and the mood of financial markets. Japan’s choice to step back from talks with the U.S. reflects a larger concern over military spending expectations. The request for 3.5% of GDP is significant by Japan’s postwar standards. It’s not just a budget request; it indicates a shift in strategic responsibilities that Japan may not have expected. Markets have reacted with short-term selling, suggesting that investors are adjusting their strategies anticipating less cooperation on trade as a result of this split. While news often highlights interest rates or inflation, trade diplomacy plays a vital role in market movements, especially when it changes unexpectedly. Nakamura’s withdrawal from the meeting—possibly supported by key policymakers focused on financial stability—suggests that defense policy is now taking precedence over economic negotiations with the U.S. Traders who look for clear trends might see this as a setback, counteracting earlier signs of stability in trade between the world’s largest and third-largest economies. We’re also seeing weak data in areas like export orders and freight readings, which backs the idea that trade dynamics are not improving quickly. If this trend continues in the coming weeks, it wouldn’t be surprising to see lower expectations for regional earnings, especially for producers and container shipping companies on Pacific routes. Bond markets may also respond with expectations of increased government borrowing in Japan if pressure to reach the GDP spending target increases. Tanaka, a notable voice on fiscal matters, has expressed concerns about the inflationary impact of larger defense budgets, especially as Japan continues its monetary stimulus. Traders should monitor Japan’s 10-year bond yields, which often react quickly to changes in budget forecasts. We should note that implied volatility in equity options rose following this report. While this could relate to broader geopolitical tensions, the timing suggests a more direct link. A sudden breakdown in talks between close allies is uncommon and creates uncertainty for sectors sensitive to trade. In the short term, margin desks and volatility traders might raise prices for Japanese and Asia-related contracts. This could make tactical short selling through derivatives less appealing, though hedging strategies might gain popularity among fund managers wanting exposure to the region without taking on full risk. Quantitative analysts examining macro trends may adjust their models since increased defense spending usually ties more closely to government capital spending than consumer growth. Portfolios focusing on government bonds may perform better than those linked to trade metrics. We expect more discussions about this shift in macro briefings from research teams next week. Depending on the upcoming trade data, we might see additional risk premiums in derivatives connected to Pacific-focused companies.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The USDCHF pair showed a steady upward trend during the week, moving between 0.8055 and 0.8213 from Monday to Thursday. Buyers faced resistance just below the 38.2% retracement level of the drop from April to May, causing a slight pullback to around 0.8150 to 0.8160. Currently, there is a key technical level near 0.8170, where the 100-hour and 200-hour moving averages meet. Prices fell briefly below the 100-hour average but quickly bounced back, indicating a short-term bias towards rising prices.

Upcoming Week Expectations

As we enter the next week, the pair is at a crucial point. If it breaks above 0.8213 and the 38.2% retracement level, it may lead to further upward movement. However, if prices drop below the converged moving averages, we could see a decline, with 0.8146 serving as the last support before a more significant drop. Important resistance levels are at 0.8213 to 0.8216 and 0.8249, which are previous highs. Key support levels include 0.8163, 0.8158, and 0.8146. A further decline could challenge levels at 0.8091 and 0.8055. Overall, this week showed a slow and steady rise in USDCHF. The price remained in a narrow range, hitting a ceiling just below 0.8213, close to the retracement level from the overall decline in April and May. Buyers faced a technical barrier, which caused a temporary dip. Right now, the pair is just above a point where two important moving averages meet—the 100-hour and 200-hour averages. This area acts as temporary support. Although prices briefly dipped below, they quickly recovered, suggesting a moderate inclination towards higher prices for now.

Potential Scenarios

From this point, two main scenarios could unfold. If the price decisively breaks above 0.8213 without getting stuck near the next retracement level at 0.8216, there could be stronger buying. The next target above that is 0.8249, where the price previously hesitated. Conversely, if the price falls back below the converging averages, we’ll need to watch for signs of a reversal. If support at 0.8146 fails, tighter conditions or greater volatility could arise, especially if levels near 0.8091 don’t hold. This situation is quite narrow, as the defined range allows for clear entry and exit points. Timing will be crucial. Since movements are small and measured at the moment, we should pay attention to how long the price remains around the lower edge of 0.8150. If higher lows stop happening, a stronger downward move may occur. The price hasn’t touched 0.8055 since the start of the week, so a new dip to that level could indicate weaker buying strength. For now, the 0.8170 area remains critical; it protects the potential for upward movement while also anchoring broader expectations. A break in either direction could lead to significant price action. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

NZD/USD is struggling as risk aversion and different central bank policies push it below the 0.6000 level. The US Dollar gains strength amid tensions in the Middle East and delays in expected interest rate cuts from the US Federal Reserve. The reduced liquidity from New Zealand’s Matariki holiday also affects the NZD. US markets resumed trading after Juneteenth, and full liquidity is expected by Monday.

Market Influences

The movements of NZD/USD depend on New Zealand’s GDP data and the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decisions. Ongoing Middle East conflicts influence market risk, while expectations of delayed rate cuts favor the USD. New Zealand’s GDP grew by 0.8% in Q1, surpassing the 0.7% prediction, but this did not boost the Kiwi because traders are focused on Fed policies. The Fed’s steady interest rates and inflation warnings strengthen the USD. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand hinted at potential rate cuts, which contrasts with the US’s signs of economic strength. This difference in policy favors the USD and affects the NZD. NZD/USD is nearing the lower end of its upward channel, with technical indicators showing various levels of resistance. To stabilize, bulls need to push above 0.6011.

Policy Outlook Tensions

There is a growing tension between the policy outlooks in Wellington and Washington that is putting pressure on the Kiwi Dollar. While New Zealand’s economy grew slightly more than expected in Q1, markets largely ignored this. This reaction is typical—traders often react more to signals from central banks than past data. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s hints at possible future rate cuts undermine any temporary boost from GDP numbers. Meanwhile, US policymakers have taken a firmer stance. Powell and his team have made it clear they are not happy with the current inflation trends. Their reluctance to cut rates while inflation remains high has strengthened the US Dollar, especially as risk-averse sentiment grows. Increased tensions in the Middle East further reinforce this, driving capital towards safer investments like the US Dollar. This week, volatility was seen not just in charts but also on trading desks, as liquidity fluctuated. New Zealand’s Matariki holiday reduced local trading volumes, while US desks were still adjusting after the Juneteenth closure, making price movements unpredictable at times. However, with both sides expected to be fully active by Monday, more orderly trading may return—though this may not be comforting for Kiwi bulls. Technically, NZD/USD is testing the lower limits of its upward channel. While this doesn’t guarantee a breakdown, it increases vulnerability to any negative pressure. So far, attempts to regain levels above 0.6011 have not succeeded, making it a key point for short-term traders. If the price stays below this level, downward momentum could increase. Oscillators confirm this pattern, indicating multiple resistance levels above. For those observing derivatives based on short-term Kiwi movements, it’s crucial to focus on specific events. If inflation trends in the US continue as they are and the Fed maintains its current stance on rates, the upside for the NZD is likely to remain limited. Renewed hawkishness from US officials could further reduce demand for the NZD, especially in light of a potentially softer RBNZ approach. Trading desks should keep a close watch on data releases and central bank meetings. The differing communications from the two countries’ economic authorities create imbalances, which can present opportunities. However, distinguishing between noise and actual policy direction is essential. The fact that the Kiwi could not gain traction even after positive GDP numbers highlights where sentiment currently lies. We should also keep broader trends in mind—risk appetite is not improving. In this environment, currencies linked to growth, like the NZD, often struggle. The overall direction favors the USD, particularly if Treasury yields remain strong and Fed officials don’t rush to change rates. Those looking to trade this pair should proceed carefully. Pay close attention to the timing and framing of rate decisions—not just the numbers but how officials discuss them afterward. Comments from policy board members are more impactful amid a clear divergence in views. If Powell emphasizes a commitment to hold rates longer while Conway’s team hints at easing, pressure on NZD/USD could increasingly build. That’s where we see probabilities starting to gather. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

US stock indices began the day with a 0.5% rise but quickly became volatile. This was the second *Triple Witching Day* of the year, with $6.5 billion in options trades expiring, leading to increased market fluctuations. Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller’s statement hinted at possible interest rate cuts in July. At the time of this report, the Dow was up 0.26%, the NASDAQ had a slight 0.1% loss, and the S&P 500 was unchanged.

Company Performance and Earnings

In company news, Kroger exceeded earnings expectations with a 3.2% year-on-year rise in identical sales (excluding fuel) and a gross margin of 23%. Accenture, however, faced a decline as its bookings fell compared to last year, negatively affecting its stock. Home Depot is exploring a $5 billion acquisition of GMS, boosting its stock price. Meanwhile, CarMax’s stock rose over 5% after it beat Wall Street’s earnings forecasts for its fiscal first quarter, despite a 1.5% drop in average prices. The S&P 500 has remained steady below resistance levels since December, with analysts divided on its future. Some believe new highs are possible, while others are cautious due to ongoing tariff policies. As we move past the second *Triple Witching Day* of the year, the expiration of $6.5 billion worth of options contracts has heightened market volatility. Historical patterns show that such expirations influence market direction, often resulting in sudden changes. The trading day started positively, but major US indices showed varied results by the end: the Dow gained slightly, NASDAQ dipped, and the S&P 500 remained flat. Waller’s comments are significant, as they suggest potential interest rate cuts in July, which could signal a shift in Federal Reserve policy. Markets tend to react quickly to changes in monetary policy expectations. While he did not indicate a strong dovish stance, his comments on slowing economic indicators could allow for near-term actions, impacting interest rate positions. In earnings news, Kroger’s strong performance was largely due to solid sales growth and improved margins. While this may not apply to all sectors, similar retail companies may benefit from stable input costs and efficient operations. Accenture’s decline in bookings, on the other hand, is concerning. Booking slowdowns can signal future challenges, especially for consulting firms like Accenture with significant IT contracts. Home Depot’s potential $5 billion deal for GMS reflects ongoing confidence in the building materials sector, possibly indicating steady construction demand amid economic uncertainty. This could impact related sectors, making it worth exploring spread trades in those areas. CarMax surpassed profit expectations, demonstrating resilience despite soft used vehicle pricing. This type of performance is often welcomed in the consumer discretionary market, but the dip in average selling prices shouldn’t be overlooked. Reduced pricing power and tighter credit could affect consumer credit, particularly for auto loans.

Technical Levels and Market Predictions

Now, looking at technical levels, the S&P 500 remains below resistance levels seen over the winter months. Its failure to push beyond these highs suggests indecision among investors. Analysts are split; some believe new record highs are possible if monetary easing occurs and corporate profits remain strong. Others caution that renewed trade tensions could pose risks and pull prices down further. It’s wise to reassess delta exposures and implied volatility across major indices, especially over weekly and monthly timelines. Current skew patterns may not fully reflect a shift in policy expectations or trade outcomes. Analysis of skew and term structure could help identify opportunities for calendar spreads or butterfly strategies. However, caution is advised. Just as large volumes expired recently, upcoming positioning may reveal new market direction. Opportunities will likely surface once there is clear momentum supported by volume or if macro indicators point in a definite direction. It’s better to react to market movements than to anticipate them prematurely. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now