China’s export growth is anticipated to have slowed in early 2023 due to disruptions from the Lunar New Year and increasing trade pressures from the U.S. Economists predict exports grew by 5% year-on-year, a decline from December’s 10.7% increase, while imports likely rose by 1%.

The trade surplus for January-February is expected to reach $142.35 billion. Combined trade data for these months is published by China’s General Administration of Customs to account for the impact of the Lunar New Year holidays.

Rising Trade Tensions

Trade tensions with the U.S. have escalated, with tariffs imposed on both sides. China has set a 5% economic growth target for the year amid plans to expand its budget deficit, raising concerns that ongoing tariffs may undermine its export capabilities.

China’s export growth has been losing momentum, and this is not by chance. The early months of 2023 brought multiple hurdles that worked against a stronger trade performance. The disruptions caused by the Lunar New Year slowed down manufacturing and shipments, an annual occurrence that tends to skew data during this period. But the more pressing challenge comes from abroad. Trade relations with the United States have become harder to navigate, with tariffs and restrictions weighing on industries that once thrived on easier access to global markets.

A decline from December’s export growth to an estimated 5% increase year-on-year signals more than just a seasonal dip. It points to a shifting international environment that is becoming more difficult for Chinese exporters. Imports, with a modest projected rise of 1%, suggest that domestic demand has not surged enough to counteract external weakness. A trade surplus of $142.35 billion for the first two months indicates resilience, but the underlying conditions shaping trade flows deserve close attention.

Beijing’s push for 5% economic growth this year comes with a commitment to expand fiscal spending, revealing a willingness to stimulate key areas to meet targets. However, tariffs remain a thorn in the side of exporters, potentially capping how much trade can contribute to overall economic expansion. The risk is that persistent pressure from Washington, coupled with efforts to diversify supply chains elsewhere, could leave Chinese firms facing a less favourable trading climate.

Adapting To Challenges

Maintaining competitiveness will depend not just on policy adjustments but also on how businesses adapt to these external forces. Those focused on international markets should be prepared for shifts in demand and pricing as trade barriers influence costs. Watching how Beijing balances its fiscal strategy with these external constraints will be critical in assessing the direction of trade through the months ahead.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Pound Sterling’s upward movement has paused after three consecutive days of gains, remaining below 1.2900 after reaching a year-to-date peak of 1.2923. The current trading rate for GBP/USD is 1.2885, marking a slight loss of 0.06%.

In North American trading on Thursday, GBP retains its position against the US Dollar as fears surrounding tariffs ease. This shift in sentiment has resulted in reduced risk premium for the US Dollar.

GBP/USD has seen recent fluctuations, trading around 1.2890 during earlier sessions on Thursday. Pressure on the US Dollar has intensified due to disappointing private payroll figures and shifting tariff strategies from the US administration.

Sterling’s Recent Performance

This pause in Sterling’s climb serves as a moment of recalibration, particularly after its stretch of advances against the Dollar. The exchange rate hovering just beneath the 1.2900 mark reflects a delicate balance in market sentiment. Sterling had gained momentum over the past few sessions, but a minor retreat suggests that traders are reassessing recent movements. The slight dip of 0.06% places GBP/USD at 1.2885, signalling that while the market remains optimistic, an immediate push higher is not guaranteed.

Sentiment in North America appears to be steering towards easing anxieties over trade measures. These concerns had elevated the Dollar’s appeal in prior weeks, but a softening in those fears is now stripping away some of its defensive strength. This scenario is reshaping positioning strategies and altering near-term expectations for the pair.

Earlier in Thursday’s session, GBP/USD traded around 1.2890, reflecting the day’s ongoing adjustments. A combination of weaker private payroll data from the United States and indications of shifting trade measures have created additional constraints for the Greenback. Weaker-than-expected labour market figures often lead investors to question the overall resilience of the US economy. If this perspective gains traction, the Federal Reserve could face added pressure to recalibrate its policy approach, which in turn affects the currency’s trajectory.

Market Considerations Ahead

For those navigating derivative positions, the short-term outlook requires close attention to employment data and trade-related updates. A softer labour market could feed into expectations for an eventual policy adjustment in the United States. Meanwhile, trade policy discussions, though less volatile this week, need monitoring in case further shifts materialise unexpectedly.

From our perspective, the market is showing an ongoing tug-of-war between economic indicators and policy developments. While Sterling has maintained its ground after reaching new highs, traders should be mindful of whether this is simply a pause before further movement or a sign of consolidation. If weaker data from across the Atlantic continues into the coming weeks, the argument for further pressure on the Dollar strengthens. On the other hand, a shift in rhetoric from policymakers could quickly recalibrate market expectations once again.

With all these elements at play, anyone with exposure to this pair should be prepared to adapt quickly to new information.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Canada is currently assessing the implications of a recent executive order announced by the US, with uncertainties surrounding its coverage. Confusion exists regarding the extent of US-Canada trade affected, as the White House claims only 36% is included while acknowledging possible adjustments.

Additionally, the White House states that 50% of Mexican goods are covered, though contrasting remarks suggest nearly all goods may be impacted. Canada aims to evaluate the order thoroughly before formulating a response, particularly given its existing $30 billion in tariffs and another $125 billion expected in two-and-a-half weeks.

Market Considerations

This latest development introduces fresh considerations for market participants, particularly those engaged in pricing longer-term positions. Ottawa is seeking clarity on whether the announced measures align with preliminary assessments given by Washington. The disparity in figures—both in terms of Canadian and Mexican trade—suggests that further policy refinements could emerge in the days ahead. That, in turn, has prompted us to monitor policymakers for any shifts that may alter pricing dynamics.

What remains certain is that Canada’s $30 billion in imposed tariffs is set to rise sharply. The anticipated $125 billion increase over the next two-and-a-half weeks introduces a measurable degree of pressure, particularly for sectors already contending with persistent cost fluctuations. If existing projections hold, the total sum could surpass $150 billion within a short window, leaving little room for exporters to adjust.

For those watching price movements, this suggests near-term pricing adjustments should be considered. With Washington’s stance still appearing flexible, sudden shifts cannot be dismissed. That is especially true given that reported figures from the administration itself appear inconsistent. If trade restrictions expand beyond the lower-end estimates, that would further reinforce the likelihood of volatility across affected sectors.

Potential Countermeasures

As Ottawa weighs its response, it remains unclear whether countermeasures will be considered. While no formal reactions have been announced, history suggests that adjustments rarely materialise without reciprocal discussions. That leaves open the possibility of further trade recalibrations at the federal level, with direct implications for those focused on maintaining stable pricing structures.

The disparity in US estimates regarding Mexican goods also adds an additional variable. If the broader interpretation—suggesting nearly full coverage—holds, then secondary effects may be more pronounced. Supply chains that traverse multiple regions could see unintended knock-on effects if adjustments take place at varying speeds. Those engaged in multi-market strategies may find that hedging assumptions require further testing, particularly if changes to order volumes occur with little forewarning.

Given the speed at which these policies have emerged, any updates from officials in Washington or Ottawa will require timely adjustments. That remains true whether the current figures hold or whether new revisions enter the discussion. Either possibility would affect expectations, particularly in determining whether trade restrictions remain within the narrower interpretations or extend to wider portions of cross-border commerce.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) determines the daily midpoint for the yuan (RMB) under a managed floating exchange rate system. This arrangement permits the yuan to vary within a 2% range around the central reference rate.

Today, the PBOC established the USD/CNY reference rate at 7.1692, which is stronger than the estimated rate of 7.2386. The previous close for the rate was 7.2345.

Moreover, the PBOC injected 104.5 billion yuan using 7-Day Reverse Repos at a rate of 1.5%. With 215 billion yuan maturing today, there is a net drain of 110.5 billion yuan.

Pboc Policy Signals

By setting the daily midpoint stronger than anticipated, the PBOC is sending a message about its stance on the yuan. When the central bank fixes the rate at a level firmer than market expectations, it often reflects a deliberate effort to reinforce stability or guide sentiment in a preferred direction. Market participants factor this into trading decisions, adjusting accordingly. A stronger fixing may discourage excessive one-way bets against the currency, signalling that authorities are maintaining a watchful eye on currency movements.

The yuan’s previous close at 7.2345 implies that the current fixing stands well below where the market settled yesterday. This means that if traders were expecting further weakness, today’s reference rate challenges that assumption. A gap between market closing rates and the official fixing can influence trading strategies, particularly for those managing short-term currency risk. If the deviation is large enough, it can even trigger shift in positioning.

Liquidity Impact

Meanwhile, liquidity conditions were also a focal point today. Although the central bank injected 104.5 billion yuan through 7-day reverse repos, the maturing amount outweighed it, leading to a net drain of 110.5 billion yuan. When there is a liquidity withdrawal of this scale, short-term borrowing costs within the financial system can tighten, especially if demand for cash remains elevated. This can have knock-on effects on funding markets and capital allocation strategies.

Rapid shifts in liquidity often require adjustments in leveraged positions. Traders who rely on short-term funding may need to reassess their exposure, particularly if tighter conditions lead to increased funding rates. This type of adjustment can alter pricing dynamics across different markets, especially when combined with broader currency management actions.

This combination of a stronger-than-expected fixing and a liquidity drain suggests the central bank is actively shaping market conditions rather than allowing unchecked volatility. Traders attuned to these signals may find it necessary to recalibrate near-term positioning, particularly in currency derivatives and interest rate-sensitive instruments.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Atsushi Mimura serves as Japan’s vice finance minister for international affairs, recognised as the ‘top currency diplomat’. The finance ministry oversees interventions in the Japanese yen (JPY) and Mimura would lead actions from the Bank of Japan if necessary.

He noted an uptick in protectionism, including tariffs, and stressed the importance of finding a balanced approach to tackle the downsides of globalisation without resorting to protectionist measures.

Growing Market Frictions

Mimura’s remarks underline a growing friction between global markets and national policies. Trade barriers, such as tariffs, create ripple effects that push investors to rethink their positions. The tension between economic integration and domestic priorities has nudged authorities into a more active stance, particularly concerning exchange rates.

Japan’s Ministry of Finance holds direct authority over FX interventions, meaning any major decision on the yen’s valuation would pass through Mimura’s hands. Currency traders have already been on high alert, monitoring any unusual movements that might hint at an official response. These interventions, if triggered, tend to result in sharp movements due to the size and speed of government actions. Such conditions present both risks and opportunities, especially for those paying attention to early signals.

Tariffs and other restrictions can indirectly influence foreign exchange markets by altering trade flows and supply chains. This can lead to shifts in capital allocation, creating changes in demand across asset classes. If businesses face higher costs due to new import taxes, inflation expectations may shift accordingly. Traders watching inflation differentials and interest rate projections would do well to factor these developments into their assessments.

Mimura’s emphasis on balance suggests a measured approach rather than an abrupt policy shift. Authorities have shown a preference for verbal warnings as an initial strategy, with direct intervention reserved for moments when market movements become disorderly. Past instances of yen-buying suggest that action generally follows prolonged, one-directional trends rather than short-term volatility.

Global Policy Implications

For those tracking these developments, attention should not be limited to Japan alone. Broader shifts in trade policy, especially in economies with deep links to Asian markets, could add further weight to future currency movements. Markets have already been whipsawed by abrupt changes in policy direction from major economies, making it increasingly necessary to stay ahead of official communications.

Each statement from policymakers carries meaning, especially when it comes from those with direct oversight of national currency stability. Reading between the lines of Mimura’s comments, it becomes apparent that patience is being exercised—for now. If shifts in trade and capital flows accelerate, responses may become more forceful. In the meantime, expectations will continue adjusting, influencing how capital moves in both the FX and broader financial markets.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Donald Trump announced via his social media platform that he is collaborating with House of Representatives Republicans on a continuing resolution to maintain government funding until September. He mentioned that the proposal aims to facilitate tax cuts and spending reductions in the Reconciliation process while purportedly freezing spending for the current year.

Despite this assertion, there is skepticism regarding the likelihood of actual spending levels being frozen.

### Political Challenges Ahead

The assertion from Trump suggests a commitment to keeping government spending unchanged for now, but doubts remain over whether this will hold in practice. Historically, similar promises have faced hurdles, particularly when competing political priorities enter the discussion.

McCarthy’s faction in the House may back the resolution on the premise that it lays the groundwork for tax reductions and scaled-back expenditures, but there is no certainty that these goals will be achieved in their intended form. Political realities have often led to adjustments, especially when negotiations with the Senate and the executive branch unfold. If historical patterns persist, revisions and compromises might render initial proposals unrecognisable by the time they reach implementation.

Market participants should remain aware that spending expectations influence a range of financial instruments. Fixed-income markets, in particular, tend to react as fiscal policy discussions develop. Any deviation from the presumed spending freeze could lead to revaluations across debt markets, affecting yields and broader borrowing costs. Price movements in related areas may not be immediate but could gather pace as confidence in the resolution’s durability shifts.

Additionally, if the proposal moves forward with an emphasis on tax cuts, there will likely be growing assessments of how such measures align with broader revenue streams. Balancing lower tax receipts with reduced expenditure has historically proved difficult. Even if the resolution passes in its current form, subsequent debates may introduce new uncertainties about funding allocations. These uncertainties frequently lead to market volatility, especially as different factions push for adjustments.

### Impact Of Upcoming Elections

With the presidential election approaching, any fiscal commitments made now must also be viewed through the lens of political strategy. The willingness of various groups to compromise might shift depending on polling trends and broader campaign dynamics. Investors should closely track legislative progress and watch for any early indications that promised spending constraints may fade as negotiations progress.

The coming weeks will likely bring further developments as the finer details of funding plans are discussed. Sharp reversals in rhetoric are common when political realities set in. Participants should position accordingly, keeping in mind that expectations today may bear little resemblance to final outcomes.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume ”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact [email protected].

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) sets the daily midpoint for the yuan (renminbi) against a basket of currencies, primarily the US dollar. This process occurs each morning and considers market supply, demand, economic indicators, and international fluctuations.

The yuan is allowed to trade within a band of +/- 2% around this midpoint, which can be adjusted by the PBOC. Should the yuan approach the band limits or show excessive volatility, the PBOC may intervene by buying or selling yuan to stabilise its value.

Market Reactions To Midpoint Adjustments

Beijing’s monetary officials attempt to maintain an equilibrium between stability and market-driven pricing. When external pressures increase, adjustments to the daily reference rate can send a distinct message regarding intent. Market participants track this closely, as even subtle shifts hint at future policy direction. If the midpoint deviates from expectations, it frequently leads to recalibrations in positioning.

Recent shifts in the yuan suggest policymakers are keen on preventing unchecked depreciation. A weaker currency can bolster exports by making goods more competitive overseas, yet excessive weakness risks capital outflows and erodes confidence. Authorities remain particularly watchful when external influences, such as interest rate differentials with the Federal Reserve, amplify strains. Should heightened volatility persist, direct intervention becomes more likely.

Beyond immediate rate-setting, liquidity measures further reveal Beijing’s posture. Open market operations and reserve requirements influence funding conditions, affecting broader sentiment. Traders who account for these signals tend to avoid being caught on the wrong side of abrupt moves. When central bank policy leans towards loosening, short-term borrowing becomes cheaper, often influencing carry trades. On the other hand, restrictive measures can tighten leverage and dampen speculative activity.

Global Factors Influencing The Yuan

Shifts in the yuan’s pricing do not occur in isolation. The dollar, shaped by Federal Reserve policy and macroeconomic conditions, plays an undeniable role. If US yields climb, capital tends to flow towards dollar-denominated assets, applying depreciation pressure on the yuan. Conversely, signs of dovishness in Washington can temper dollar strength, reducing strain on Beijing’s currency management. Traders who align their expectations with broader monetary trends stand a better chance of navigating upcoming adjustments.

All of this underscores the need to track multiple factors simultaneously. The currency band, intervention patterns, liquidity shifts, and global macroeconomics all weave into daily price action. Sudden moves often reflect a reaction to shifting fundamentals rather than isolated randomness. Being tethered to a singular data point or short-term fluctuation often leads to misreading the broader trajectory.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Japanese yen has weakened as the 10-year Japanese Government Bond (JGB) yield has risen to 1.5%, marking its highest point since 2009. This trend in bond yields indicates a shift in Japan’s financial landscape.

The implications of these rising yields on the yen could affect its strength against other currencies. Ongoing market reactions to these developments are expected, prompting close observation of currency fluctuations and changes in market sentiment.

Impact Of Rising Yields

A 1.5% yield on the 10-year JGB signals that borrowing costs in Japan have increased. This suggests that investors are demanding greater returns to hold longer-term debt, potentially reflecting expectations of monetary policy adjustments or concerns over inflation. Since this yield has not been observed in fifteen years, it raises questions about how the market will adjust to higher funding costs and whether the trajectory of Japan’s monetary policies might shift accordingly.

A weaker yen often follows a rise in domestic bond yields when global factors drive capital outflows. However, the current trend is influenced by wider expectations of monetary divergence. While Japan’s bond yields are climbing, rates elsewhere—particularly in the United States—continue to shape capital movement. If US policymakers signal prolonged high interest rates, the yen might remain under pressure.

With the yen already depreciating, traders will be monitoring the Bank of Japan’s stance closely. Central bank actions influence market expectations, and any modification in rhetoric from policymakers like Ueda could affect short-term price swings. If authorities intervene verbally or directly in currency markets, volatility is likely to increase.

Market Reactions And Positioning

Meanwhile, broader sentiment will be shaped by external developments. If inflation data from major economies surprises markets, global yields may react, altering capital flows into and out of Japan. Should the Federal Reserve or European Central Bank shift tone, the yen’s path may be affected not only by domestic dynamics but also by external monetary conditions.

Market positioning will also be key. If large speculative bets against the yen continue to grow, sudden corrections could occur with any unexpected policy action. Factors such as government statements, economic data releases, and investor sentiment will be closely watched in the days ahead. Decisions made by policymakers and investors will determine how this trend unfolds.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Roberto Perli, managing the Fed’s System Open Market Account, stated that the balance sheet drawdown has proceeded smoothly. While addressing the Money Marketeers of New York University, he noted that pausing quantitative tightening would not change the balance sheet’s continued reduction.

Perli mentioned that he does not expect a pause in the short term, even amid current uncertainties related to policy fluctuations. The ongoing debt-ceiling impasse in the US government remains a key challenge influencing these discussions.

Policymaker Perspectives On Quantitative Tightening

Perli’s comments suggest that policymakers see no immediate need to adjust the approach to quantitative tightening, even with lingering fiscal uncertainties. The balance sheet is expected to continue shrinking at the current pace, reinforcing the Federal Reserve’s broader strategy to manage liquidity. As the debt-ceiling standoff persists, market participants must remain mindful of potential shifts that could alter short-term funding conditions.

Beyond liquidity management, attention will likely turn to interest rate expectations. Adjustments in monetary policy continue to unfold, and any developments here could carry implications for rate-sensitive assets. Given that policymakers still favour ongoing balance sheet reduction, short-term assumptions regarding liquidity availability should be made with caution.

Perli’s remarks also suggest that he sees stability in current processes, meaning abrupt changes remain unlikely. That said, investors should not discount the possibility of volatility should unexpected dislocations arise in money markets. Past disruptions illustrate how quickly short-term borrowing conditions can change when external pressures mount.

Debt Ceiling Considerations And Market Impacts

The debt-ceiling debates introduce another variable that requires constant monitoring. As lawmakers remain in negotiations, markets could see heightened sensitivity to political discussions. A prolonged impasse has historically led to liquidity shifts, forcing adjustments in positioning. Given this, those with exposure to short-term funding vehicles must consider possible strain if resolution appears uncertain.

Policy signals indicate that no immediate pause is expected, yet external influences could test this stance. In the past, periods of increased Treasury issuance following debt-limit resolutions have impacted reserves in the banking system. This presents a potential consideration for those engaged in rate-based instruments. Being prepared for sudden liquidity shifts remains a necessity.

The pace of balance sheet reduction may remain unchanged for now, but external shocks have the potential to add pressure. Monitoring official statements—both from policymakers and fiscal authorities—will be essential for assessing the probability of unexpected liquidity adjustments.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.