Atsushi Mimura serves as Japan’s vice finance minister for international affairs, recognised as the ‘top currency diplomat’. The finance ministry oversees interventions in the Japanese yen (JPY) and Mimura would lead actions from the Bank of Japan if necessary.

He noted an uptick in protectionism, including tariffs, and stressed the importance of finding a balanced approach to tackle the downsides of globalisation without resorting to protectionist measures.

Growing Market Frictions

Mimura’s remarks underline a growing friction between global markets and national policies. Trade barriers, such as tariffs, create ripple effects that push investors to rethink their positions. The tension between economic integration and domestic priorities has nudged authorities into a more active stance, particularly concerning exchange rates.

Japan’s Ministry of Finance holds direct authority over FX interventions, meaning any major decision on the yen’s valuation would pass through Mimura’s hands. Currency traders have already been on high alert, monitoring any unusual movements that might hint at an official response. These interventions, if triggered, tend to result in sharp movements due to the size and speed of government actions. Such conditions present both risks and opportunities, especially for those paying attention to early signals.

Tariffs and other restrictions can indirectly influence foreign exchange markets by altering trade flows and supply chains. This can lead to shifts in capital allocation, creating changes in demand across asset classes. If businesses face higher costs due to new import taxes, inflation expectations may shift accordingly. Traders watching inflation differentials and interest rate projections would do well to factor these developments into their assessments.

Mimura’s emphasis on balance suggests a measured approach rather than an abrupt policy shift. Authorities have shown a preference for verbal warnings as an initial strategy, with direct intervention reserved for moments when market movements become disorderly. Past instances of yen-buying suggest that action generally follows prolonged, one-directional trends rather than short-term volatility.

Global Policy Implications

For those tracking these developments, attention should not be limited to Japan alone. Broader shifts in trade policy, especially in economies with deep links to Asian markets, could add further weight to future currency movements. Markets have already been whipsawed by abrupt changes in policy direction from major economies, making it increasingly necessary to stay ahead of official communications.

Each statement from policymakers carries meaning, especially when it comes from those with direct oversight of national currency stability. Reading between the lines of Mimura’s comments, it becomes apparent that patience is being exercised—for now. If shifts in trade and capital flows accelerate, responses may become more forceful. In the meantime, expectations will continue adjusting, influencing how capital moves in both the FX and broader financial markets.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Donald Trump announced via his social media platform that he is collaborating with House of Representatives Republicans on a continuing resolution to maintain government funding until September. He mentioned that the proposal aims to facilitate tax cuts and spending reductions in the Reconciliation process while purportedly freezing spending for the current year.

Despite this assertion, there is skepticism regarding the likelihood of actual spending levels being frozen.

### Political Challenges Ahead

The assertion from Trump suggests a commitment to keeping government spending unchanged for now, but doubts remain over whether this will hold in practice. Historically, similar promises have faced hurdles, particularly when competing political priorities enter the discussion.

McCarthy’s faction in the House may back the resolution on the premise that it lays the groundwork for tax reductions and scaled-back expenditures, but there is no certainty that these goals will be achieved in their intended form. Political realities have often led to adjustments, especially when negotiations with the Senate and the executive branch unfold. If historical patterns persist, revisions and compromises might render initial proposals unrecognisable by the time they reach implementation.

Market participants should remain aware that spending expectations influence a range of financial instruments. Fixed-income markets, in particular, tend to react as fiscal policy discussions develop. Any deviation from the presumed spending freeze could lead to revaluations across debt markets, affecting yields and broader borrowing costs. Price movements in related areas may not be immediate but could gather pace as confidence in the resolution’s durability shifts.

Additionally, if the proposal moves forward with an emphasis on tax cuts, there will likely be growing assessments of how such measures align with broader revenue streams. Balancing lower tax receipts with reduced expenditure has historically proved difficult. Even if the resolution passes in its current form, subsequent debates may introduce new uncertainties about funding allocations. These uncertainties frequently lead to market volatility, especially as different factions push for adjustments.

### Impact Of Upcoming Elections

With the presidential election approaching, any fiscal commitments made now must also be viewed through the lens of political strategy. The willingness of various groups to compromise might shift depending on polling trends and broader campaign dynamics. Investors should closely track legislative progress and watch for any early indications that promised spending constraints may fade as negotiations progress.

The coming weeks will likely bring further developments as the finer details of funding plans are discussed. Sharp reversals in rhetoric are common when political realities set in. Participants should position accordingly, keeping in mind that expectations today may bear little resemblance to final outcomes.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume ”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact [email protected].

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) sets the daily midpoint for the yuan (renminbi) against a basket of currencies, primarily the US dollar. This process occurs each morning and considers market supply, demand, economic indicators, and international fluctuations.

The yuan is allowed to trade within a band of +/- 2% around this midpoint, which can be adjusted by the PBOC. Should the yuan approach the band limits or show excessive volatility, the PBOC may intervene by buying or selling yuan to stabilise its value.

Market Reactions To Midpoint Adjustments

Beijing’s monetary officials attempt to maintain an equilibrium between stability and market-driven pricing. When external pressures increase, adjustments to the daily reference rate can send a distinct message regarding intent. Market participants track this closely, as even subtle shifts hint at future policy direction. If the midpoint deviates from expectations, it frequently leads to recalibrations in positioning.

Recent shifts in the yuan suggest policymakers are keen on preventing unchecked depreciation. A weaker currency can bolster exports by making goods more competitive overseas, yet excessive weakness risks capital outflows and erodes confidence. Authorities remain particularly watchful when external influences, such as interest rate differentials with the Federal Reserve, amplify strains. Should heightened volatility persist, direct intervention becomes more likely.

Beyond immediate rate-setting, liquidity measures further reveal Beijing’s posture. Open market operations and reserve requirements influence funding conditions, affecting broader sentiment. Traders who account for these signals tend to avoid being caught on the wrong side of abrupt moves. When central bank policy leans towards loosening, short-term borrowing becomes cheaper, often influencing carry trades. On the other hand, restrictive measures can tighten leverage and dampen speculative activity.

Global Factors Influencing The Yuan

Shifts in the yuan’s pricing do not occur in isolation. The dollar, shaped by Federal Reserve policy and macroeconomic conditions, plays an undeniable role. If US yields climb, capital tends to flow towards dollar-denominated assets, applying depreciation pressure on the yuan. Conversely, signs of dovishness in Washington can temper dollar strength, reducing strain on Beijing’s currency management. Traders who align their expectations with broader monetary trends stand a better chance of navigating upcoming adjustments.

All of this underscores the need to track multiple factors simultaneously. The currency band, intervention patterns, liquidity shifts, and global macroeconomics all weave into daily price action. Sudden moves often reflect a reaction to shifting fundamentals rather than isolated randomness. Being tethered to a singular data point or short-term fluctuation often leads to misreading the broader trajectory.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Japanese yen has weakened as the 10-year Japanese Government Bond (JGB) yield has risen to 1.5%, marking its highest point since 2009. This trend in bond yields indicates a shift in Japan’s financial landscape.

The implications of these rising yields on the yen could affect its strength against other currencies. Ongoing market reactions to these developments are expected, prompting close observation of currency fluctuations and changes in market sentiment.

Impact Of Rising Yields

A 1.5% yield on the 10-year JGB signals that borrowing costs in Japan have increased. This suggests that investors are demanding greater returns to hold longer-term debt, potentially reflecting expectations of monetary policy adjustments or concerns over inflation. Since this yield has not been observed in fifteen years, it raises questions about how the market will adjust to higher funding costs and whether the trajectory of Japan’s monetary policies might shift accordingly.

A weaker yen often follows a rise in domestic bond yields when global factors drive capital outflows. However, the current trend is influenced by wider expectations of monetary divergence. While Japan’s bond yields are climbing, rates elsewhere—particularly in the United States—continue to shape capital movement. If US policymakers signal prolonged high interest rates, the yen might remain under pressure.

With the yen already depreciating, traders will be monitoring the Bank of Japan’s stance closely. Central bank actions influence market expectations, and any modification in rhetoric from policymakers like Ueda could affect short-term price swings. If authorities intervene verbally or directly in currency markets, volatility is likely to increase.

Market Reactions And Positioning

Meanwhile, broader sentiment will be shaped by external developments. If inflation data from major economies surprises markets, global yields may react, altering capital flows into and out of Japan. Should the Federal Reserve or European Central Bank shift tone, the yen’s path may be affected not only by domestic dynamics but also by external monetary conditions.

Market positioning will also be key. If large speculative bets against the yen continue to grow, sudden corrections could occur with any unexpected policy action. Factors such as government statements, economic data releases, and investor sentiment will be closely watched in the days ahead. Decisions made by policymakers and investors will determine how this trend unfolds.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Roberto Perli, managing the Fed’s System Open Market Account, stated that the balance sheet drawdown has proceeded smoothly. While addressing the Money Marketeers of New York University, he noted that pausing quantitative tightening would not change the balance sheet’s continued reduction.

Perli mentioned that he does not expect a pause in the short term, even amid current uncertainties related to policy fluctuations. The ongoing debt-ceiling impasse in the US government remains a key challenge influencing these discussions.

Policymaker Perspectives On Quantitative Tightening

Perli’s comments suggest that policymakers see no immediate need to adjust the approach to quantitative tightening, even with lingering fiscal uncertainties. The balance sheet is expected to continue shrinking at the current pace, reinforcing the Federal Reserve’s broader strategy to manage liquidity. As the debt-ceiling standoff persists, market participants must remain mindful of potential shifts that could alter short-term funding conditions.

Beyond liquidity management, attention will likely turn to interest rate expectations. Adjustments in monetary policy continue to unfold, and any developments here could carry implications for rate-sensitive assets. Given that policymakers still favour ongoing balance sheet reduction, short-term assumptions regarding liquidity availability should be made with caution.

Perli’s remarks also suggest that he sees stability in current processes, meaning abrupt changes remain unlikely. That said, investors should not discount the possibility of volatility should unexpected dislocations arise in money markets. Past disruptions illustrate how quickly short-term borrowing conditions can change when external pressures mount.

Debt Ceiling Considerations And Market Impacts

The debt-ceiling debates introduce another variable that requires constant monitoring. As lawmakers remain in negotiations, markets could see heightened sensitivity to political discussions. A prolonged impasse has historically led to liquidity shifts, forcing adjustments in positioning. Given this, those with exposure to short-term funding vehicles must consider possible strain if resolution appears uncertain.

Policy signals indicate that no immediate pause is expected, yet external influences could test this stance. In the past, periods of increased Treasury issuance following debt-limit resolutions have impacted reserves in the banking system. This presents a potential consideration for those engaged in rate-based instruments. Being prepared for sudden liquidity shifts remains a necessity.

The pace of balance sheet reduction may remain unchanged for now, but external shocks have the potential to add pressure. Monitoring official statements—both from policymakers and fiscal authorities—will be essential for assessing the probability of unexpected liquidity adjustments.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Germany is considering relaxing its fiscal rules to access funds for military spending and establish a 500 billion euro off-budget infrastructure fund.

However, MUFG has expressed caution regarding future tariff actions from the US, specifically mentioning that Trump’s stance could impact the euro’s strength.

Euro And Fiscal Policy

This raises the question of whether the current shifts in fundamentals are sufficient for EUR/USD to surpass its current range trading patterns.

If fiscal constraints are loosened, Germany will have more flexibility to allocate capital without breaching debt limits. This would not only provide additional resources for defence but also open doors for extensive infrastructure improvements. A fund of this scale could stimulate various sectors and influence long-term growth trends, particularly if investments are directed towards transport, energy systems, and digital development.

At the same time, concerns over future trade policies in the United States introduce an external factor traders must assess carefully. MUFG has pointed to the possibility of renewed tariff measures, specifically highlighting how a shift in leadership could bring a fresh round of protectionist policies. Such decisions have historically influenced currency valuations, and any return to aggressive trade barriers may weaken confidence in global trade stability. For the euro, this introduces potential downside risks, particularly if European exports are targeted.

With these factors in play, market participants will need to reassess whether broader economic conditions justify a break beyond the current EUR/USD range. Structural shifts in German fiscal policy may provide long-term economic benefits, but the pace at which these adjustments impact the real economy will take time to materialise. Meanwhile, trade policy remains an unpredictable element that could fuel sudden moves in currency markets if rhetoric escalates.

Market Considerations

Considering these developments, traders should maintain a close watch on upcoming policy signals from German authorities, as delays or amendments to fiscal plans could influence sentiment. Similarly, clarity on US trade approaches in the coming weeks will play a role in shaping expectations for global flows. These two elements together hold the potential to either reinforce or disrupt the stability observed in recent exchange rate trends.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Roberto Perli manages the Federal Reserve’s System Open Market Account (SOMA), which includes a portfolio valued at $6.8 trillion. His role involves implementing monetary policy, while overseeing the Fed’s bond and asset management.

The reduction of the Fed’s balance sheet has proceeded smoothly, despite challenges posed by the ongoing debt ceiling discussions. Financial system reserves remain plentiful, and the Fed’s reverse repos may see further reduction, with the potential reinstatement of early morning SRF operations at quarter-end.

Fed’s Balance Sheet Strategy

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed more than doubled its asset holdings but has since allowed over $2 trillion in Treasury and mortgage bonds to expire without replacement. The central bank aims to cautiously decrease market liquidity to facilitate normal volatility and maintain control over the federal funds rate.

Perli plays a key role in executing policy objectives, with SOMA holdings still substantially larger than they were before 2020. Liquidity withdrawal continues in a steady manner, though with recent shifts in market conditions, it remains necessary to monitor how banks and money market funds adjust to these changes. Excess reserves across the financial system have helped prevent any disorderly market reactions, but funding dynamics could become more sensitive as balance sheet contraction progresses.

The possibility of reinstating early morning Standing Repo Facility operations at quarter-end suggests an effort to preempt liquidity dislocations. When temporary funding needs increase, short-term repo facilities help stabilise overnight rates. Given past quarter-end adjustments, it is reasonable to expect heightened attention to reserve levels in the coming weeks. A slowdown in Fed reverse repos has further indicated that cash parked at the central bank is gradually being absorbed by the system.

Allowing Treasury and mortgage-backed securities to roll off rather than selling them outright has helped maintain stability across funding markets. By doing so, policymakers have avoided unnecessary volatility while guiding overnight rates within an intended range. The approach taken thus far signals a preference for gradual adjustments over abrupt shifts.

Liquidity And Market Stability

Still, the delicate balance between reducing excess liquidity and ensuring smooth market functioning remains at the core of decision-making. With more than $2 trillion in assets already removed from the Fed’s holdings, the question is not whether balance sheet tightening will continue, but rather how financial institutions adapt to these conditions. Reserves remain ample, yet shifts in funding markets warrant ongoing assessment.

While this phase of policy normalisation has avoided major disruptions, market participants should remain attentive to changes in short-term interest rate behaviour. We recognise that reserve availability influences rate dynamics, which means fluctuations in repo activity, Fed holdings, and Treasury issuance levels are all elements to track. The adjustments taking place shape expectations for forward funding costs, reinforcing the need for close observation of liquidity demand and supply mechanics.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trump’s Tariff Policy Shift

Such unpredictability in policy direction introduces challenges for those assessing market stability. If tariffs can be reversed or softened based on short-term pressures, assumptions about long-term trade commitments become unreliable. Market participants relying on consistent frameworks to model risk must now reassess core expectations.

Impact On Market Stability

Tariff uncertainty affects commodity prices, supply chain planning, and broader investment decisions. Adjustments in exemptions will likely alter cost structures for producers, especially those reliant on cross-border trade. If agricultural products receive leniency, other industries may demand similar concessions, making future shifts harder to forecast. Market reactions will hinge on whether these exemptions signal a broader retreat or remain confined to agriculture.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The CBA predicts three interest rate reductions by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) in 2025, specifically in May, August, and November.

TD analysts expect a rate cut in May due to signs of reduced rental inflation, which may help alleviate overall inflation and allow the RBA to lower rates.

Expected Rate Cut In August

Following the anticipated May cut, another decrease is predicted for August to support economic growth and maintain inflation within target levels.

TD also notes that global trade dynamics and tariff issues are influencing market conditions, increasing the demand for safe-haven assets and lowering bond yields, thereby supporting expectations for further monetary easing.

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) forecasts three reductions in the cash rate by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) in 2025, scheduled for May, August, and November. Expectations for these adjustments stem from economic indicators suggesting a slowdown in inflationary pressures, particularly in rental costs.

Strategists at TD Securities anticipate that the first reduction in May will be prompted by easing rental price growth, which could contribute to a broader moderation in inflation. A decline in price pressures would provide the RBA with room to bring rates down, aligning policy with shifting economic conditions.

Beyond the first adjustment, another reduction is projected for August. This move would aim to bolster economic activity while ensuring inflation remains within official targets. A measured approach to policy changes allows for consistency in supporting economic stability.

Global Trade And Market Influence

In addition to domestic conditions, external factors are shaping market expectations. TD analysts highlight that global trade policies and changes in tariffs are exerting influence on financial markets. Investors seeking stability have increased demand for lower-risk assets, leading to a decline in bond yields. This reinforces the argument that further monetary easing could be appropriate.

Given these developments, the direction of monetary policy in the coming months is becoming clearer. Expectations around inflation, external trade considerations, and financial market movements will continue to guide decisions. Actions taken by policymakers will likely reflect the shifting balance between inflation control and economic growth.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.