Physically backed gold ETFs gained $38 billion in the first half of 2025, according to the World Gold Council. This marks the largest semi-annual increase since 2020. The surge is due to a growing demand for safe assets amid geopolitical and economic fears, particularly from a trade war driven by tariffs. ETF holdings rose by 397.1 metric tons, totaling 3,615.9 tons by the end of June. However, this amount is still below the October 2020 high of 3,915 tons. US-listed ETFs contributed 206.8 tons, while Asian-listed funds made up 28% of total global inflows, even though they account for only 9% of global assets under management (AUM). This growth is in stark contrast to the modest inflows of 2024 and years of outflows due to rising interest rates. Spot gold prices jumped 26% this year, reaching a record $3,500 per ounce in April. The World Gold Council, based in London and supported by major gold mining companies, seeks to boost gold demand and accessibility. It helps shape global views on gold by providing data on trends, investment flows, and central bank purchases. While it appears neutral, its primary goal is to promote gold, especially during economic or geopolitical challenges. In simpler terms, the rise in gold ETF inflows shows a clear shift among asset managers who are responding to a renewed desire for safety. These impressive numbers indicate a significant movement of capital into gold, an asset that many trust during uncertain times. When we look at the nearly 400 metric tons added to holdings in six months, it’s a clear reaction to changing economic fears. While total holdings haven’t returned to their peak from late 2020, the momentum this year is unmistakable compared to the more subdued activity in recent years. Geographically, Asian-listed funds stand out. They captured over a quarter of the inflows, despite holding less than 10% of global assets under management. This suggests a rapidly building institutional interest in that region, with purposeful capital movement. On the other hand, US-listed products are bringing in the most tonnage, emphasizing their role as the primary choice for larger transactions. The connection between US inflows and gold price movement isn’t merely coincidence; the 26% increase in spot gold signals that investors expect further short-term volatility. This shift is not only a return to gold but also a broader recalibration of risk appetite. As central banks show patience on interest rates and trade tensions continue, many institutions are rethinking their reliance on traditionally safe assets like government bonds. For teams managing short-dated exposure, staying in tune with ETF subscription data and forward price action will be crucial. Ongoing inflows into gold funds, even as yields remain flat, create short-term discrepancies in futures premiums. This situation makes tactical positioning more valuable than passive holding. It’s important to recognize that the data on these flows comes from a group with a clear agenda. Thus, while trends are evident, it’s essential to keep in mind that support for gold is both analytical and structural. In our analysis, we’ve started adjusting our positions, particularly where ETF holdings impact options skew or lead spot prices in the Comex futures curve. We don’t foresee sudden shifts, but strong demand from funds can distort short-term volatility expectations. All these movements stem from a simple fact: investors are reluctant to hold cash that yields less than inflation, and there’s uncertainty about the stability of other typical safe havens. Whether driven by policy or news, this reaction leads to one outcome: an increased demand for gold. Positioning in derivatives has shifted from conviction-based strategies to anticipating others’ late hedging. Timing of entry now holds more weight than macro alignment, at least in the next month or two. Live gamma exposure, especially during gold ETF rebalancing periods, can create both opportunities and risks. These periods have already seen increased order book activity as funds adjust their hedging strategies, and we’re closely monitoring these trends for potential opportunities. Recently, signals have emerged from higher options volumes linked to rollover hedges. This suggests that nimble investors see price support levels as stable, even without significant price rallies. However, tail risk is still a possibility. Traders need to adapt to changing conditions instead of assuming stability. Let’s continue to stay alert.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Gold prices have fallen over 1% during the North American session due to a drop in demand for safe-haven assets. This decline comes as the US Dollar strengthens and US Treasury yields rise. Currently, gold is priced at $3,297, down from a peak of $3,345. Recent trends show improvement in major US stock indices. While the US has imposed tariffs of 25% to 40% on 14 countries, the deadline for these tariffs has been extended to August 1.

Impact of US Treasury Yields on Gold

Rising US Treasury yields are impacting gold prices, as expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts decrease. According to data from the Chicago Board of Trade, there is an expectation of 48 basis points of easing in 2025. Market participants are eagerly awaiting the Federal Reserve meeting minutes and the upcoming Initial Jobless Claims report. US real yields and the 10-year Treasury note yield both rose by four basis points. The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index dipped slightly to 98.6 in June. Gold ETFs saw their largest inflow in five years, increasing by 397.1 metric tons. Gold is under pressure, with the Relative Strength Index indicating more sellers than buyers. The important level to watch is the June 30 low of $3,246. If this level is broken, it could signal further declines. Gold’s decline of more than 1% during North American hours was largely due to a reduced appetite for safe-haven assets, which usually see higher demand in uncertain times. However, confidence in equities has improved, especially in US indices, leading to higher Treasury yields. As bond yields increase—particularly the 10-year note, which gained four basis points—the cost of holding gold, which generates no interest, becomes less appealing.

Strength of the US Dollar and Its Effects on Gold

The US dollar’s strength is also putting pressure on gold prices. Since gold is priced in US dollars, a stronger dollar makes gold more expensive for foreign buyers. This is not ideal, especially as traders reduce long positions. Gold is currently trading around $3,297, down from a recent high of $3,345. For traders focusing on interest rates, this shift in expectations is crucial. With rate cuts from the Federal Reserve no longer anticipated this year and pushed further into 2025, US yields remain strong. Recent data from Chicago suggests that only 48 basis points of easing might occur next year, which is much lower than earlier predictions. This environment supports dollar strength and weighs on gold. On Wednesday, new insights are expected with the Federal Reserve meeting minutes, followed by Thursday’s jobless claims. While neither report may be significant on its own, together they provide a clearer picture of the Fed’s direction. If jobless claims hold steady and the labor market remains strong, expectations for policy easing may fade further. Technically, the RSI indicates a bearish bias. Market momentum favors sellers, and the June 30 low of $3,246 is a critical level to watch. A close below this could boost confidence among those betting against gold’s recent rally. However, with ETFs seeing their largest inflow in five years—adding 397.1 metric tons—there is a notable counterbalance. Some traders may view this as a long-term strategy or a hedge against unseen risks. Additionally, the slight drop in the NFIB Small Business Optimism Index to 98.6 fits the broader trend. Small businesses often reflect the real economic mood. Even a small dip in optimism contributes to overall caution. Going forward, we should monitor whether buying interest emerges around $3,250 or if yields and dollar strength continue to push prices down. Risks regarding potential policy changes remain, and the tone of the Fed meeting minutes may quickly alter market expectations. We are compiling data, reassessing levels, and observing trading volume to confirm any significant movements. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Goldman Sachs has raised its target for the S&P 500 to 6600, an increase from the previous target of 6100. This change follows a similar increase made in May. The bank sees a bright outlook for earnings growth in 2026. They expect the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates again and believe that this will lead to more market gains as the rally broadens.

Federal Reserve Easing Expectations

Goldman predicts that the Federal Reserve will ease its policies earlier and that bond yields will be lower than expected. They expect large-cap stocks to perform well and have adjusted the S&P 500 forward price-to-earnings ratio to 22x, up from 20.4x. Recent data shows that less of the tariff costs are being passed on to consumers than anticipated. Goldman believes that large companies will manage tariff impacts by using inventory buffers as tariff rates rise. Goldman’s new target for the S&P 500 is a significant upward revision—from 6100 to 6600. Their earlier adjustment was in May, and this latest change reinforces the belief that current conditions allow for further growth. Key takeaways include steady earnings growth expectations through 2026 and an assumption that monetary policy will become more favorable sooner. Lower bond yields are viewed as a key factor driving equity valuations.

Valuation Adjustments and Market Positioning

Solomon’s team is now using a forward P/E multiple of 22x instead of 20.4x. This suggests that stock valuations are expected to rise, supported by healthier profits and lower discount rates. A broader rally is crucial; it’s not just a few companies pushing the index up, but more stocks could contribute if these predictions hold true. Interestingly, the recent tariff-related challenges appear less severe than feared. New trade restrictions might have threatened profit margins and supply chains, but evidence shows that their effects on prices have been minimal. Large firms, with their global reach and flexibility, are absorbing these challenges well by leveraging inventory and cost strategies. When a major bank like Goldman highlights strong corporate discipline, lower inflation pass-through, and an earlier shift in interest rates, it suggests that market volatility could be more directional. This means any dips in the market might not last long, especially when linked to policy changes or earnings reports. It’s also important to note that market participants are generally neutral in their positions. This sentiment creates opportunities for new investments without forcing widespread selling. It also suggests that investment flows can continue into risk assets, particularly among larger companies that attract both passive and defensive investments. Derivative pricing already reflects some of these trends, but quick changes in projections can cause short-term disruptions. We need to be mindful that certain strike ranges, especially those that were previously out of reach, may now be closer than they seem. As volatility remains low but trending upward, time decay during the summer could impact options differently. Careful adjustments to hedge ratios are crucial, especially if implied volatility undervalues directional movements as we approach earnings season. If interest rate expectations change or yields become uncertain, delta sensitivity might not align with actual market moves as predicted by models. Thoughtful calendar structures and tactical rolling strategies could provide value now, especially while central bank signals remain unclear and interest rate spreads are narrowing quicker than expected. Less commonly used ratio spreads might offer significant opportunities before the next policy meeting cycle. Remember, implied correlations typically decrease when the overall index rally broadens, impacting multi-leg positions. Rather than trying to catch every market fluctuation, it’s more about managing exposure during price adjustments. This is particularly important as the actions of the Federal Reserve and inflation reports will continue to influence market dynamics. For now, strong profits and inventory flexibility in leading companies could keep returns positive, even amid challenging economic headlines. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

President Donald Trump has announced a new 10% tariff on BRICS countries, describing it as low and fair. The European Union is in touch with the U.S. and is treating it positively. A letter to the EU is expected in two days. Trump mentioned that recent talks with China have been encouraging, especially about trade agreements.

Upcoming Tariff Changes

New tariffs on pharmaceuticals will soon be announced, along with those on semiconductors. A significant 50% tariff on copper is also expected. Be aware that forward-looking statements come with risks and may contain errors. Any investment choices should be based on careful personal research, as there are inherent risks. This information does not serve as a recommendation to trade. The author has no positions in any mentioned stocks and has not received any compensation beyond what is disclosed. This content should not be seen as personalized investment advice, and neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any potential losses or errors.

Market Impact and Trade Effects

Trump’s announcement about the 10% tariff on BRICS nations should be considered alongside his description of it as “low and fair.” This framing may seem moderate at first, but it signals a shift in trade incentives rather than simply punishing imports. Often, such language hints at broader changes in international pricing strategies, especially concerning products impacted by these economies. It’s also important to note that tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors are coming soon. This adds pressure to high-tech and healthcare manufacturing sectors, which often face tight supply constraints and slim profit margins in international trade. This suggests a focus on using critical components, not just raw materials, in future trade negotiations. It’s wise to plan for potential market volatility, possibly using calendar spreads or synthetic hedging until more details are available. Meanwhile, the EU is being cautious, maintaining diplomatic communication and preparing to send a response within 48 hours. This timing aligns with earnings reports from major European industries, which could cause fluctuations in the market. When the U.S. emphasizes friendly deals, it often leads to side agreements with partners looking for alternatives to BRICS supply chains. Now is not a good time to take big risks in futures trading, given the mixed signals. Regarding copper, a 50% tariff is substantial and will impact commodity markets. Expect global prices to rise, especially as inventories are still adjusting after COVID. One overlooked risk is the potential disruption in electric vehicle and grid development cycles. This tariff exposure is not just about raw materials; it also influences producer behavior and margin expectations. Therefore, it’s crucial to quickly re-evaluate any open short positions for potential mismatches. China is mentioned again, with Trump speaking positively about trade discussions. While these comments do not yet translate into concrete agreements, they signal a possible softening in trade tensions, at least in some sectors. However, any signs of warming relations should be approached with caution. Pairing new tariffs on essential goods with these comments suggests that negotiations are complex and not straightforward. Any optimism should be tempered until formal agreements are established. Lastly, while disclaimers about forward-looking statements often seem standard, their prominence here suggests uncertainty about the follow-through on these policies. When such warnings are highlighted, it can indicate a lack of confidence in the stability of the announced measures. Both investors and traders should stay flexible, remain cautious about correlation models for now, and wait for clear signals before making larger investments. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

J.P. Morgan believes that emerging market currencies look overbought and expects a short-term decline. As a result, the bank is changing its strategy and becoming less optimistic about emerging market foreign exchange (EMFX). J.P. Morgan is reducing its recommendation for the Mexican peso, which has recently performed well. While there is still long-term support for EMFX, the bank warns that recent gains may have gone beyond what the short-term fundamentals can justify, so a more cautious approach is needed. The bank’s comments indicate a reassessment of current prices in the emerging market currency exchange. Positions have stretched too far compared to short-term fundamentals, leading to the belief that some mean reversion is likely soon. This means we might see the market returning to more balanced levels as excitement fades. By reducing the position on the Mexican peso, the bank is signaling that strategies based on momentum could risk reversing. This isn’t because of worsening economic conditions in Mexico, but rather due to the rapid recent gains that may not be fully supported by immediate economic or policy changes. Investors might find that carry trades—still attractive for their yields—are now more vulnerable to sudden changes in market sentiment or shifts in overall global risk appetite. For us, this is straightforward. When major institutions adjust their positions after strong gains, it creates a vulnerable period for assets that have thrived on positive momentum. This is especially important for options traders and those with leveraged positions, since sudden changes in spot rates can cause significant increases in delta and vega exposures. Furthermore, implied volatility in emerging market currency pairs may no longer remain low. If technical factors lead to a correction, we might see realized volatility rise, affecting options premiums. It’s less about directional bets now and more about managing re-entry points or adjusting option skews that depend heavily on steady trends. We also need to consider that this price adjustment could affect relative value trades among emerging market currencies. If one currency starts to unwind while another remains overextended, that difference can be profitable—but timing becomes more critical. In practice, we are now looking to roll hedges sooner than we originally planned. When spot movements have outstripped the carry collected, we will rebalance with tighter stops and adjust the delta on structured products that may have strayed too far out of the money (OTM). Lopez, who heads the FX strategy team, suggested that global liquidity conditions might be changing. If dollar funding conditions vary in the weeks ahead—due to central bank actions or geopolitical events—this could lead to increased movement in and out of EM positions. These flows might dampen some recent trends and introduce more volatility, impacting gamma profiles on short-term contracts. As traders, we should monitor how other institutions respond to this thinking. If real-money accounts and CTA models start to deleverage, it could result in daily moves that break recent volatility patterns. This might widen bid-ask spreads or increase slippage during local market openings. In such environments, being slow to react could be costly. We’re shifting our focus to protecting volatility structures on specific currency pairs, especially those that have diverged from their interest rate differentials. This means relying less on static models and more on real-time flow data and changing rate probabilities. Short-term pullbacks often come without warning, so our goal is to be quick to reprice risk—rather than slow to adjust.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The yield on the United States 3-year note auction has dropped to 3.891%, down from 3.972%. This change indicates a recent shift in financial rates. Trading for AUD/USD is active, staying above 0.6500 due to different factors, including inflation data from China. The rise of the U.S. Dollar is making it harder for the pair to maintain strength, especially given recent announcements from the Federal Reserve.

U.S. Dollar and Trade Influences

USD/JPY has risen above 147.00, boosted by the strength of the U.S. Dollar and trade tensions between the U.S. and Japan. President Trump’s tariffs have shaped market attitudes, increasing demand for the Dollar. Gold is facing pressure around $3,300 as traders look forward to updates on tariffs and minutes from the Federal Reserve’s meetings. This uncertainty is affecting trading decisions, as people await new economic signals. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple are holding steady, with expected growth for ETH and XRP. Bitcoin has found support at a specific level, suggesting it may trend upwards. President Trump’s new tariffs significantly impact Asian economies, although some nations, like Singapore and the Philippines, could benefit if negotiations improve. These tariffs are particularly tough on transshipments in the region.

Changing Yield Dynamics

The decline in the 3-year U.S. note auction yield to 3.891% from 3.972% suggests a change in how fixed-income investors perceive risk. Lower yields like this often indicate a stronger demand for shorter-term risks, influenced by slight changes in inflation expectations or bets on future rate cuts. For macro hedgers, this offers valuable insights into the front end of the yield curve. There’s a hint of easing rate expectations here, which may influence futures positioning in the upcoming sessions. Breakevens and real yields will support directional decisions. In currency markets, AUD/USD shows some volatility. The spot rate remains just above 0.6500, demonstrating resilience, but influences, such as China’s disinflationary pressures, challenge short-term bullish views. With a stronger U.S. Dollar, spurred by the Fed’s statements, AUD bullishness may only grow with sustained risk-positive sentiment or softer U.S. macro data. Conversely, USD/JPY’s rise above 147.00 clearly reflects dollar strength but also indicates broader geopolitical tensions. Trade friction and renewed tariff discussions—which echo Trump’s previous policies—are swaying market positioning toward safe havens, yet the yen remains sidelined due to U.S. rate differences. Gold’s struggle to rise past $3,300 reveals trader caution. Investors are hesitant to invest in gold while the Federal Reserve’s decisions and tariff matters remain uncertain. The reduced volatility in gold suggests potential, yet history shows this kind of stagnation often leads to significant price movements. The sentiment toward inflation-linked assets will largely depend on policymakers’ approaches, whether they lean hawkish or dovish. Monitoring flows into longer durations and their impact on real rates will be crucial when adjusting commodity investments. In contrast, the crypto market appears stable. Bitcoin maintains solid support, and forecasts for Ethereum and Ripple remain positive, indicating that speculative interest is still strong despite broader economic concerns. Bitcoin’s support level can help determine ongoing investor interest or signal potential market pullback. ETH and XRP are at a crossroads, balancing growth forecast and technical stability, standing apart from the hesitance seen in traditional markets. Current trading data supports this steady outlook. Considering recent tariff policies, reactions in Asia have been mixed. While countries like Singapore and the Philippines may experience some relief if talks progress, others face increased scrutiny, especially concerning transshipment operations attracting U.S. attention. These actions require recalibrations across trading sectors—such as equities and synthetic FX instruments. Portfolio managers focusing on Asia-ex Japan strategies might need to adjust their sector allocations based on trade exposure. Overall, recent price movements and yield curve trends provide valuable signals. Structured products desks can refine their strategies. Clients sensitive to interest rate volatility or Fed-related shifts are already factoring in significant pressures. It’s essential to quickly determine whether these phases are consolidatory or the onset of wider trends. Keep a close eye on rate differentials, inflation data, and geopolitical factors. Their impacts will clarify current price boundaries or lead to breaks. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

A recent private survey by the American Petroleum Institute (API) has shown a significant increase in crude oil stock levels, which is unexpected. Analysts had predicted a decrease of 2.1 million barrels for crude oil, a drop of 0.3 million barrels for distillates, and a decline of 1.5 million barrels for gasoline. This survey gathers information from oil storage facilities and companies. The official government report, expected Wednesday morning, will come from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Unlike the API report, the EIA provides detailed statistics on refinery inputs and outputs as well as storage levels for various crude oil grades.

EIA Report vs. API Survey

The EIA report uses data from the Department of Energy and other government organizations. It is typically seen as more reliable and thorough than the API survey. While the API gives a quick look at total crude storage and changes from the previous week, the EIA offers a broader view of the oil market’s condition. For derivative traders, the difference between the API data and the upcoming EIA report creates a notable source of volatility. The API reported an increase of 3.03 million barrels last week, defying common market expectations, which anticipated a decrease. Such a large difference, especially concerning crude oil balances, can lead to short-term price changes, affecting futures spreads and calendar structures. Wall Street had factored in tighter supply assumptions. Normally, smaller inventories lead to higher prices, suggesting strong demand or limited supply. However, when there is a build-up instead, this logic reverses. Prices usually drop, as larger stockpiles indicate lower consumption or higher production, both of which weaken the bullish stance.

Impact on Derivative Traders and Market Dynamics

Large inventory builds are especially important during contract rollover periods. A wider contango—which means a bigger difference between short-term and long-term futures—can put pressure on those holding long positions. This is especially true if they based their entries on backwardation expectations. Depending on what the EIA confirms or disputes tomorrow, we anticipate a significant shift in open interest across expiry curves. For traders dealing in product-related derivatives, the figures for gasoline and distillate movement also have important implications. Inventories for these components exceeded expectations, with gasoline showing an unexpected increase instead of the predicted drop of 1.5 million barrels. This is crucial because it often represents seasonal demand—like summer driving or winter heating. Higher stocks at the start of peak consumption months increase downside risks for crack spreads. Positions linked to refinery margins may need adjustment if the EIA data aligns with early indications. The API report process, while helpful, doesn’t have the detail found in the EIA’s data. This difference often causes spot and futures prices to react more strongly once the EIA numbers are released, particularly if there’s another discrepancy. The difference in methodology is significant—the API collects voluntary data from private firms, while the EIA uses systematic collection methods. We will be watching for changes in refinery utilization rates, export flows, and shifts in regional stocks. These areas provide more insights into supply conditions that directly affect derivatives pricing. As a result, we are adjusting our expectations for implied volatility, especially in the 48 hours before the EIA’s release. Traders sitting on short-dated options and straddles may want to add hedges or adjust their positions, as the market often recalibrates sharply once more accurate data is available. We’re also observing whether any Gulf Coast or Cushing-specific metrics indicate logistical changes, as either outcome could affect basis trade decisions. If the EIA report contradicts the API report again, whether in magnitude or direction, it could lead to rapid countertrend movements. The focus is not on whether the market was correct earlier, but on how quickly it adjusts when the facts change. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The British Pound is losing value against the US Dollar due to worries about the UK’s fiscal policies. This drop is linked to the Labour government’s introduction of a larger welfare spending bill in the House of Commons. At the same time, the GBP/USD pair rose slightly, reaching about 1.3630 during Asian trading hours. This increase came after two days of losses and was driven by a weaker US Dollar, following President Trump’s announcement of new tariffs on 14 countries that don’t have trade deals with the US.

Other Market Updates

In other updates, the Australian Dollar gained strength after the Reserve Bank of Australia’s firm outlook helped AUD/USD rise past the 0.6550 mark. The EUR/USD pair found initial support at 1.1680, bouncing back from earlier lows as demand for the US Dollar decreased. Gold prices recovered, trading around $3,300 per troy ounce, while Ripple (XRP) showed signs of improvement. New US tariffs affected Asia, but countries like Singapore, India, and the Philippines could benefit if trade negotiations get better. The earlier rise in the GBP/USD pair, where the pound gained slightly against a weaker dollar, was only temporary. While it briefly reached 1.3630 during Asian hours, this was mainly due to the dollar losing strength after Trump’s tariff announcement, not a surge in demand for the pound. The bigger issue is that the UK’s fiscal outlook looks increasingly uncertain. The Labour government’s bigger-than-expected welfare bill may lead to shifts in public spending that directly affect investor confidence. When we see the pound softening amid such fiscal changes, it usually doesn’t happen alone. The uncertainty of how new social spending will be financed raises concerns about debt and borrowing. Traders should focus on UK gilt yields, as rising yields could indicate higher risk, rather than better returns. Markets often dislike fiscal looseness without a clear revenue plan. It’s not just about one budget item; it’s about the overall direction of economic management. In the meantime, currencies have shown modest rebound attempts. The Australian Dollar gained ground thanks to the Reserve Bank of Australia’s unexpected firm stance, helping AUD/USD climb above 0.6550. This shows how monetary policy can influence markets more than external factors. It will be interesting to see if buying continues if inflation reports match expectations next week. Regarding the euro-dollar movement, this is also part of the same trend—less about trust in the euro and more about the US Dollar losing strength temporarily amid changes in trade policies. We saw the pair dip to 1.1680 before bouncing back, highlighting that risk sentiment is being affected by geopolitical issues, while currencies respond with a slight delay. This timing insight is valuable, even if it doesn’t provide direction.

Market Signals and Trends

Gold’s rise to around $3,300 per troy ounce reflects this anxiety. Investors are seeking protection as trade policies raise concerns about global demand. Commodity traders see gold as a hedge, but this suggests more about protective strength than expectations for future inflation. Remember, this signals a desire for protection, not growth. Ripple’s upward movement shows that some digital assets are starting to break free from immediate macroeconomic ties. We’ll be watching closely to see if this trend continues as US regulatory discussions resume. If digital investments keep rising while riskier assets falter, it indicates that investors are seeking isolated gains. As for the new US trade measures, they are more than just a headline. Targeting fourteen countries without trade agreements aims to exert pressure through tariffs. However, the impact will not be the same across Asia. Countries like Singapore, India, and the Philippines could gain if supply chains are effectively rebalanced. These aren’t just hopes; they’re scenarios worth tracking with real import-export data over the next two quarters. Looking ahead, derivatives pricing is likely to reflect these complexities with less certainty and more strategic fluctuations. Implied volatility measures will play a bigger role, especially for currency pair expirations linked to upcoming political events. Pay close attention to options markets this week—not for surprises, but to gauge how much emphasis is being placed on uncertainty. This insight can help navigate both direction and size. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Recent tariff threats from Trump could raise the average U.S. tariff rate to about 18.7%. This is an increase from around 17% seen last week. The new rate includes a 10% baseline tariff, with extra duties on items like cars, steel, and aluminum. Even with this rise, it is still lower than the potential rates from April’s “Liberation Day” plan, which could have exceeded 22%. The increase in proposed tariffs, moving the average up to 18.7%, is part of tighter trade proposals. Although it’s still below earlier plans, it clearly raises costs for imported industrial goods and consumer products. This means more expensive raw materials, higher costs for components, and increased prices for finished goods. It also sets limits on price fluctuations in linked sectors and raises the chance of retaliatory actions from affected trade partners. This adds new challenges to pricing strategies and risk assessments. What stood out last week wasn’t just the rise in the average tariff rate but what it targeted. The focus on vehicles, along with metals like steel and aluminum, gives these changes significant meaning and direct effects in industry. While some sectors were already taking precautions against tougher measures, emphasizing these targets pushes us to reassess long-term options and contracts across materials, energy, and logistics. Economic players involved with these commodities should stay aware of changing freight costs and warehouse inventories, especially in coastal areas where imports are first recorded. So far, forward premiums on key materials like aluminum and iron-based alloys have reacted mildly. However, this calm shouldn’t be misinterpreted. There can be delays between tariff threats and changes in derivatives markets, especially in areas where liquidity is low and trading volumes drop quickly during busy news periods. In response to changes like these, we focus on volatility rather than the specifics of the announcement. The stronger reactions may occur as contracts near expiry or when customs data updates provide confirmation. This is where derivatives traders can set their short-term views—by basing volatility expectations on market responses, not just the announcements. It’s rarely just the headlines that change market dynamics; it’s how they translate into real demand and speculative challenges. With any rise in import costs, the impact on consumer goods will take time to show. This delay can create a temporary gap between current prices and forecast models, potentially leading to wider spreads in cross-border goods futures. One area feeling the impact now is automotive components, where import prices from key Asian hubs could rise by mid-single digits unless currency changes offset this. As traders, we shouldn’t confuse the limits of this rise with a stopping point. Tariff ceilings can change rapidly, but positioning will be uneven due to margin capital needs and delays in clearing. Hedge strategies should remain adaptable during this time, especially where commodity baskets may overlap in exposure to policy risks and consumer spending weaknesses. Watch the yield curves and bond volatility as indirect indicators. While they don’t price metals or cars directly, they often react first to tighter capital costs from strict trade policies. Pricing stability and any late-week volume shifts may provide the earliest hints.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

GBP/JPY has hit a new high for the year at 199.48 due to threats of US tariffs against Japan, which have weakened the Japanese Yen. Currently, GBP/JPY is trading above 199.00, showing a strong upward trend with support at important levels. On Monday, the US informed Japan about a planned 25% tariff on Japanese imports starting August 1. Japan hopes to negotiate to prevent further complications, emphasizing the need for a deal on automobile tariffs.

Impact on the Yen

The recent news has made the Yen less appealing, allowing GBP/JPY to rise. Even though there is a three-week extension for trade talks, existing tariffs are already affecting the Yen’s value. GBP/JPY is supported above 199.00, with the RSI indicator close to overbought levels, suggesting the pair may consolidate in the short term. Immediate support is at 198.81. If it falls below this level, we could see it retrace to 195.03. Resistance is marked at the day’s high of 199.48, with further resistance at 199.81 and the significant level of 200.00. The Yen is influenced by the Bank of Japan’s policies, bond yield differences, and overall market sentiment, all of which affect its value. With GBP/JPY reaching fresh highs for 2024, particularly at 199.48, this movement is driven by geopolitical and trade policy factors. The planned 25% tariff on Japanese imports by Washington has shaken investor confidence in the Yen. This has resulted in a sharp decline in the Yen, boosting GBP/JPY’s upward momentum. Right now, the pair is holding strong above 199.00.

Tokyo’s Diplomatic Response

Tokyo’s response focuses on diplomacy, as officials seek a bilateral agreement to avoid further economic strain. They are focusing on reaching an understanding about automotive tariffs, a historically sensitive issue between the two countries. As long as negotiations remain uncertain, the market will likely continue to disregard Japanese assets. Despite a recent short extension for trade discussions, traders have already factored in higher tariff risks, leading to ongoing selling of the Yen against other currencies, not just Sterling. The Yen’s weakness is driven more by the search for stability amid uncertainty than immediate economic fundamentals. From a technical perspective, the RSI nearing overbought levels suggests there might be temporary hesitation or short covering. However, this does not indicate an overall reversal. Unless we see a decisive close below 198.81—our nearest significant support—the broader uptrend should remain intact. Breaking above 199.81 again would increase the chances of testing the psychological level of 200.00, which might attract option-related hedging or tactical profit-taking. The Bank of Japan’s continued dovish stance compared to other countries is also keeping the JPY under pressure. With Gilt yields relatively stronger and bond yield differences favoring Sterling, there’s additional support for GBP/JPY. Market sentiment is changing slowly, especially since growth and inflation data in the UK appear steady compared to Japan. For now, any retracements should be monitored closely. A drop towards 195.03 would likely require falling below 198.81, which may only happen if trade tensions significantly ease or if there’s an unexpected shift in Tokyo’s policy tone. Until then, momentum strategies may work better than range-bound tactics, with dips viewed as buying opportunities. We will be watching upcoming economic data, especially on wage growth and inflation expectations, to see if monetary policy needs adjustment. However, in the short term, price movements seem more responsive to trade dynamics than broader economic indicators. In this environment, technical levels are offering useful guidance while policy changes continue to influence short-term flows. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now