Taiwan has stated it has not received any official news from the United States about new tariffs. Earlier, Taiwan faced tariffs of 32% that began in April. It may take several days to implement these new tariffs. Japan and South Korea are currently dealing with 25% tariffs due to the same measures. Malaysia and some countries in South Africa also faced tariffs after receiving trade letters. These actions are part of a larger trade strategy. This summary highlights a strategic trade move that impacts several nations reliant on exports. Taiwan has indicated that they have not officially heard about new tariffs from the US, even though they already faced tariffs of up to 32% starting in April. Japan and South Korea, important players in regional supply chains, are dealing with a 25% increase in tariffs as well. Malaysia and some unspecified countries from South Africa faced similar tariffs, but these were not sudden; they came after official trade correspondence was issued. These actions likely form part of a coordinated trade policy rather than isolated risks. The implementation of these tariffs does not happen all at once or by chance—they follow specific procedures, including warning letters from trade departments. As seen with Malaysia and others, enforcement can take time; there’s often a gap between notification and implementation. For traders looking at price changes, these gaps can provide short windows to adjust holdings or hedge against risks. We should pay attention not only to headlines but also to early documents or policy comments that can hint at future decisions. In past cases, receiving a trade letter rather than an official tariff announcement indicated a delay but not a cancellation of the risks. Therefore, the lack of communication with Taipei shouldn’t be seen as a sign that risks have disappeared. Experience shows there’s often a delay between diplomatic signals and actual policy actions, which can leave positions vulnerable to sudden market changes. With Japan and South Korea already facing 25% tariffs, any contracts linked to industrial or tech exports could be affected. These tariffs might cause valuations to reflect higher costs. Market reactions to sudden price changes usually don’t happen instantly; they unfold over multiple settlement periods, especially for contracts related to cross-border shipping or inventory in US dollars. Pricing in derivative contracts, particularly those connected to export-based indexes, might also shift due to these layered tariffs. From a strategic perspective, derivative traders might think about how even hints of increased tariffs could lead to risk reduction in their portfolios. In recent months, even unclear policy signals have triggered increased volatility in regional indexes. This makes the silence around Taiwan’s situation less reassuring. Lack of communication rarely means that a country is safe from tariffs; it raises questions about how long that might last. This uncertainty often leads to sideways trading or minor price changes before a major recalibrating event. Lee, who has closely monitored the Taiwan situation, noted that the April tariffs were a measured escalation rather than a sweeping policy. Following this line of thought, any extended coverage to other Asia-Pacific regions may happen gradually, applying different pressures on specific industry contracts. Derivative products related to transportation, electronics, or semiconductors may experience adjustments not only from the tariffs themselves but also from anticipated future policies that follow these trends. In the weeks ahead, we expect increased attention on currency-adjusted risk, especially where product flows connect with tariff-affected trade routes. Timing is also crucial. The start date of the April tariffs indicates that they can be implemented during the trading cycle, potentially causing mid-month price adjustments. This affects the sensitivity models traders use to make funding choices. Therefore, it’s essential to understand tariff impacts not just by their start dates, but by the potential responses and footprints in derivative pricing that require careful monitoring.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Asian trading experienced changes due to Trump’s varying approach to tariffs. The August 1 tariff deadline is now uncertain. This uncertainty opens up more chances for negotiations but also prolongs instability. The U.S. dollar weakened broadly, except against the yen, which struggled as Japan faces a 25% U.S. tariff threat that could hurt its export-driven economy. Australian business confidence rose unexpectedly, reaching its highest level since March 2024. This includes increases in sales, profits, and employment. Confidence has grown for three months in a row. Market attention now turns to the upcoming Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) policy meeting, where there is a 90% chance of a 25 basis point rate cut. However, the RBA might take a less dovish approach given strong household spending and positive business trends.

Geopolitical Developments

In geopolitical news, Trump announced plans to boost military aid to Ukraine. This shows ongoing political and economic tensions worldwide as countries manage trade talks and broader shifts. The situation remains dynamic and could have significant effects on global markets and economies. The initial sections highlight the high uncertainty in the markets, mainly driven by inconsistent tariff statements from the U.S. With the prior tariff deadline now uncertain, there’s room for continued negotiations. Unfortunately, this ambiguity creates more indecision rather than soothing the markets, impacting pricing mechanisms. Traders are reducing their dollar holdings, evident in its broad decline against major currencies—except for the yen. Japan, heavily dependent on exports, now faces a 25% tariff threat from the U.S. This poses serious risks to Japanese businesses that rely on favorable trade conditions. The yen’s unexpected weakness seems connected to these changing sentiments, indicating that the market is readjusting its expectations for future growth, which limits typical safe-haven investments in the currency. In Australia, business confidence figures exceeded expectations. For three months now, confidence readings have shown positive growth. This improvement is supported by real increases in essential operational areas: higher sales, greater profits, and job creation. Observers of the Reserve Bank of Australia expect a 25 basis point cut, with futures reflecting more than a 90% chance. However, strong domestic data could challenge the need for further cuts. The central bank’s stance may be less inclined toward additional cuts than before.

Diplomatic Affairs

Regarding diplomatic matters, recent U.S. statements indicate plans to enhance military support for Ukraine. This isn’t only a military issue—it also affects markets as an additional geopolitical factor. The implications impact defense-related stocks, systemic risk assessments, and energy markets. For those monitoring closely, this adds another layer of sensitivity to short-term market movements. In light of this, we’ve adjusted strategies to favor options that could benefit from increased volatility. Directional investments remain risky, while straddle strategies and calendar spreads are looking more promising. Watching short-term implied volatility react sharply to daily news signals that the upcoming period may not be stable. It’s wise to keep duration short and adjust exposure as needed. Bid-ask spreads have narrowed in high-beta foreign exchange while widening in synthetic volatility, indicating that investment positions are changing rapidly. We see rising pressure across various asset classes in different ways. Bonds are sought as safe investments, while equities show selective buying, especially in technology and domestic cyclicals. Such dislocations don’t last and usually lead to convergence; often, this is where opportunities arise. Trade strategically, allocate resources carefully, and allow for flexibility in a market that reacts quickly to even minor signals. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Economists at Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities are worried about new U.S. tariffs on Japanese imports. Starting August 1, a 25% tariff will be implemented, which is higher than the 24% tariff that began in April, unless a new trade deal is made. Extended tariffs could harm Japan’s economy by lowering exports and reducing investment. There’s also a chance of new financial aid, with a support package possibly announced in the autumn after the Upper House election. We see the rise in trade tensions as a serious challenge for Japan’s export-focused industries. Markets didn’t fully take into account the lasting nature of previous tariffs, and there’s now a risk of escalation that could affect broader investor interest. Since semiconductor products and auto parts are on the tariff list, we expect more short-term fluctuations in import-export balances. This impact is not just a theory. Capital flows respond quickly to external events, often causing sudden price changes instead of slow adjustments. If policymakers continue to be cautious, funding spreads may widen. There are no clear signs of easing yet, so short-term hedging will likely stay high. Miyake’s prediction of a fiscal package suggests a move towards stabilizing the domestic economy. This could support the yen in the short term. If the government reveals its spending plans soon after the Upper House vote, markets might react by adjusting their curve, especially for the two-to-five-year area. Foreign exchange traders should watch for unexpected shifts in USD/JPY positions. With Japanese policymakers being more reactive than proactive, if the tariffs go into effect without countermeasures, the yen may attract defensive flows, even if the Bank of Japan’s (BoJ) statements temper this. This situation decreases the appeal of carry trades, affecting volatility pricing. Yamamoto’s belief that exports will decline due to weaker investment adds another factor for us to consider in equity index models. Companies heavily reliant on manufacturing, especially those with significant exposure to North America, could struggle compared to regional competitors. The short interest in Japan-related indices may increase, especially if upcoming earnings show even slight downgrades. In the near term, volatility traders need to closely monitor negotiations. Failures in trade talks usually affect S&P futures faster than Nikkei-linked contracts, creating brief opportunities for arbitrage but also increasing the need for vigilance regarding news about U.S.-Japan discussions. On the fiscal front, while no specific amount was mentioned, past autumn stimulus measures ranged from 2% to 3% of GDP. If a figure in this range is confirmed, it could shift duration risk and adjust derivative trades on Japanese Government Bonds (JGB) swaps, especially in the mid-term. In the meantime, watch for imbalances in forward positions; selling pressure driven by market momentum may amplify initial reactions to any policy hints.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Economic Resilience and Gold’s Technical Outlook

Currently, gold’s price is just above $3,320, aligning with its 50-day moving average. This line often signals stability for prices. If it falls below, we could see increased selling, potentially lowering it to the next support level around $3,300. The Relative Strength Index shows that the market isn’t leaning strongly in either direction. It isn’t overbought or indicating excessive selling. This puts us in a waiting phase, as prices are stuck between different forces.

Strategic Market Positioning in a Volatile Climate

For those trading in futures, options, or structured products, these patterns encourage a reevaluation of short-term strategies. With prices fluctuating around technical levels and macroeconomic stability outweighing geopolitical concerns, any plans to bet on a rebound need to be very careful. Although China and other major holders might continue to buy, this activity acts more like a background influence. The real market movement is happening with shifts in Treasury yields and changing expectations from the Federal Reserve. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

China’s central bank is expanding its capital markets by allowing more onshore investors to buy offshore bonds. The People’s Bank of China is broadening the Bond Connect program to include more local institutions, such as brokers, mutual funds, wealth managers, and insurers. The central bank also plans to increase the quota for the Swap Connect scheme, which will give investors more options for hedging and interest rate swaps. Reports indicate that the authorities may double the Southbound Bond Connect program’s quota to USD 139 billion.

Enhancing Global Role

These actions aim to relax capital controls and encourage two-way access to markets. This aligns with Beijing’s goal to boost the global significance of the yuan and diversify investment opportunities for domestic institutions. The update from the People’s Bank is a clear effort to open more channels for cross-border capital flow, especially in fixed income markets. By expanding Bond Connect to include more onshore participants, such as wealth managers and insurers, the central bank is encouraging domestic capital to invest abroad. This kind of move typically requires strong regulatory backing, highlighting the importance of this decision. At the same time, increasing the quota for the Southbound Bond Connect shows a strong intent to foster outbound portfolio diversification. Previous limits restricted offshore investment activity; raising this cap to approximately $139 billion removes a significant barrier, especially for institutions managing substantial fixed income assets. We can expect a noticeable increase in demand for foreign currency bonds, particularly those with a slight yield premium.

Access to Swap Markets

On the derivatives side, the raised limits under the Swap Connect scheme are significant. This change allows Chinese financial institutions to engage more freely with international interest rate markets. For those tracking yield curve strategies, this access enables better duration management and new opportunities for risk-adjusted returns that weren’t possible before. For traders, this development is very important. We anticipate initial inflows into bond maturities that align with target duration ranges in key developed markets. If the exchange rate remains moderately managed and policy rates vary across regions, there will be further opportunities for convergence trades between currencies and rates. Hedging will also become more dynamic. With domestic funds showing greater interest in foreign exposure, this expansion will lead to more activity in interest rate swaps linked to foreign bonds. This amounts to a feedback loop affecting pricing on both sides. There may be temporary volatility around announcements and macro policy signals, but this reflects deeper market participation, not mispricing. Liu’s comments last week already provided momentum for this trend. Regulatory approvals will likely follow market demand, making it crucial to monitor the uptake of allocated quotas instead of waiting for new announcements from the central bank. Position your strategies accordingly. We also expect tighter Treasury-OIS spreads on days when Connect volumes increase, especially during periods of syndicated issuance. This type of friction can create tradeable opportunities, especially for those agile enough to adjust margin thresholds quickly and access overnight liquidity when possible. In the upcoming sessions, pay more attention to the yuan’s relative value compared to basket-weighted indices. This pricing will be more important than simple pairwise FX rates because hedging costs will depend on how new flows are affecting the market. Not all pairs will respond in the same way, and there will be points of saturation as domestic accounts concentrate on perceived safe jurisdictions. An adjustment is happening, and it’s measurable. Watch turnover figures for longer-term interest rate swaps; they have already started to rise along with these announcements. We should adjust our curve dynamics now that institutional participation is increasing. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The US Dollar starts the week strong, driven by a desire for safe assets as concerns about tariffs grow. The US plans to inform over 100 countries about new tariffs by July 9, with possible enforcement beginning on August 1. The DXY index is rising within a falling wedge pattern, indicating a buildup of positive momentum. The US has indicated 25% tariffs for Japan and South Korea, with the potential for expansion to other nations by August. As the July 9 deadline approaches, market sentiment worsens, and tariffs could escalate to 70%. The DXY index is now above last week’s high, trading around 97.55, amid ongoing global trade tensions and cautious investor sentiment.

Trump Issues Tariff Warnings

President Trump has sent letters to Japan and South Korea warning about tariffs due to unfair trade practices that contribute to the US trade deficit. With the deadline coming, more countries may receive warnings, and the US is not offering any exemptions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expects significant trade announcements before July 9, allowing some room for negotiations alongside the tariff notices. Global currencies are facing pressure from trade uncertainty and lower expectations for immediate Fed rate cuts. The US Dollar is gaining support during these tensions, with EUR/USD at 1.1725, GBP/USD at 1.3595, and AUD/USD at 0.6496. The US Dollar Index shows promise for further gains, bolstered by technical indicators like RSI and MACD, as it trades above key moving averages. With less than two weeks until July 9, the broader impact of the tariff announcements is becoming clearer. The US’s tough trade stance is stressing global currency markets significantly. The chance of high tariffs, some possibly reaching 70%, encourages defensive positioning, especially in FX-linked contracts. In this context, shifts in the US Dollar aren’t just affected by interest rate views; they stem from geopolitical factors and safer investments flowing in. Technically, the DXY is showing strength in a falling wedge pattern, indicating a temporary rise despite a longer-term downtrend. Near-term, the conditions favor strength due to increased demand for cash-based assets. This technical setup is likely to lead to short rallies with high implied volatility, allowing for effective delta-neutral or premium-collection strategies. As we approach the July 9 tariff notifications, implied volatility across major currency pairs should rise, particularly in Euro and Pound.

Opportunities Arise in Market Volatility

Bessent’s comments about potential future trade announcements add more uncertainty. These statements might cause temporary price shifts, but markets are getting better at pricing in headline risk, which can lead to opportunities if we stay nimble and disciplined in short-term gamma plays. We may see wider bid-offer spreads during key announcements, but also notable pricing inefficiencies, particularly in shorter-duration contracts like 1-week and 2-week expiries. The strengthening of the USD, influenced by global trade worries rather than monetary policy, is pushing key FX pairs toward breakout points. GBP/USD at 1.3595 and AUD/USD at 0.6496 show where gamma scalpers could find advantages, especially if support levels begin to break. Eurodollar options are showing increased demand for downside puts, indicating a desire for more protection in leveraged portfolios. When these situations arise, the spot market often takes time to fully understand the impact. Additionally, indicators like RSI and MACD moving up on DXY charts mark potential consolidative breakouts. While we see momentum building, it’s important to note that the dollar’s rise isn’t just about growth differences or central bank policies; it’s also responding to widespread political instability. For those holding assets priced against the dollar, managing risk is crucial. Keep an eye on whether the US Dollar can sustain its rise above weekly highs; a move above 98.00 could lead to significant repricings. As trade deadlines approach and the demand for safe assets continues to influence market direction, caution is advised in directional strategies. We prefer to focus on strategies that take advantage of high implied volatility, especially where skew is extreme. Such noticeable shifts are rare and can lead to pricing anomalies, but these gaps typically don’t last long. That’s where valuable opportunities lie. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact [email protected].

The Japanese yen has weakened because of new US tariffs. The tariffs are set at 25%, and the deadline for their implementation has been extended to August 1. The USD/JPY exchange rate hit its highest point in two weeks, while GBP/JPY climbed to an eight-month peak. Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba has confirmed Japan’s position. He emphasized the need to protect Japan’s vital interests amid the tariff situation. This change in the yen’s value follows the US announcement of a 25% import duty, with the new deadline now on August 1. Traders will likely see some fluctuations in yen pairs as they adjust to possible shifts in trade and capital flows before this date. With USD/JPY reaching a two-week high and the pound gaining strength against the yen, the forex market responded quickly. Traditionally, the yen is seen as a safe-haven currency. When it declines during uncertain times, it often means the market is reacting to external pressures, like geopolitical trade issues, rather than problems within Japan. Ishiba made it clear that Tokyo will defend its economic interests. This suggests that the current government may not rush to change its monetary or fiscal policies in response to foreign actions. Thus, there may be a lower chance of immediate intervention, even if the yen keeps falling. We have already seen GBP/JPY reach its highest level since last year. This pairing, in particular, has indicated yen weakness, especially since the pound has been relatively stable elsewhere. Traders holding unhedged positions in yen pairs might face risks if Japanese yields shift or if funds start flowing back to Japan due to political statements before the tariff deadline. Trading volumes have increased—especially for options with expirations around the tariff deadline—indicating that traders are preparing for volatility. This likely shows expectations of further gains in USD/JPY, as investors consider dimming demand for Japanese goods, worsening trade balance figures, or rising risk aversion. For those tracking short-dated derivatives, particularly calendar spreads and risk reversals, timing is crucial. It’s not just about market direction now, but also about duration and sensitivity to changes. If USD/JPY breaches 160—especially alongside correlated trends, like rising US yields or falling Asian stock markets—it may trigger automated trading, pushing the exchange rate further from its usual average. Comments from government officials can often influence market positioning, but their effects may not be fully realized until official updates are published. Ishiba’s reaffirmation serves as a signal that Japanese policymakers are unlikely to act decisively until absolutely necessary. This perspective keeps implied volatility elevated heading into late July.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Potential Global Trade Disruptions

There are ongoing worries that new tariffs may impact more countries, disrupting global trade. President Trump reached out to the leaders of Japan and South Korea, emphasizing the need to address trade gaps and accusing these nations of unfair practices. He indicated that he might impose more tariffs if they retaliate but assured that products made by US companies in those countries would not be impacted. These actions are intended to protect the US economy and lower the trade deficit. However, they have raised concerns about their effects on global markets, particularly affecting the demand for safe-haven assets. Washington’s approach to trade is now broadening beyond China, with new tariffs on Japan and South Korea causing a stir in market sentiment. The response in EUR/USD shows the pair’s sensitivity to geopolitical changes that affect global trade. A brief dip below 1.1700 is being closely watched, reflecting both short-term market movements and a sentiment shift towards the US Dollar. The tariff announcement is part of a larger shift in US trade policy that seems to prioritize action over negotiation. With a 25% tariff communicated through formal letters, the policy seems more like a final decision than ongoing talks. The immediate market reactions—seen in currency and other asset classes—indicate a reassessment of uncertainty rather than just a reflection of economic conditions. The DXY, around 97.50, shows strong demand for USD assets, especially amidst heightened trade tensions.

Manage Geopolitical Risk

The Euro’s poor performance isn’t just due to weaker economic metrics; it’s also about quick adjustments in capital flows towards currencies seen as more stable. These shifts are hard to reverse without a clear trigger, which isn’t on the horizon. More tariffs applied to additional economies could further this trend. It’s crucial to watch how the US government reacts to any pushback from Tokyo or Seoul. The White House signals that retaliation may lead to stronger US measures, but exemptions for US firms show some flexibility. This inconsistent application could confuse markets about how similar future actions might influence global supply chains. Traders need to be aware that this could lead to sector-specific movements even without major economic headlines. Volatility, often gauged by currency option metrics, has increased. For those involved in derivatives, the focus is shifting from just making bets to managing risks from geopolitical concerns. Current guidance from central banks is overshadowed by reactive policies, making it more practical to follow event-driven strategies than those aligned with existing policies, at least for now. It’s noteworthy how quickly traders’ views of the Dollar changed from being overbought to seen as a “safe” currency, despite fluctuations in yield spreads. Hedging strategies should prepare for unexpected risk-off periods that might not correlate with economic updates, but could emerge during busy US trading days. Structured products or option collars may offer cheaper hedging compared to direct puts, especially since implied volatility has not yet adjusted fully to the new trade risks. Monitoring the differences between Eurozone and US bond yields offers some insight, but current market movements seem more focused on capital preservation than monetary policy. Positioning data suggests an increase in short Euro positions, indicating that this may not be a temporary trend but a developing pattern. In the next few days, it will be important to observe not just how the targeted countries react, but also how the EU engages diplomatically. Any hint that Brussels might reconsider its trade relationship with Washington could put additional pressure on the Euro. Timing option expiration around such potential risks could enhance the ability to capture premiums without overspending for delta. We are closely watching the reactions from other G7 countries; even coordinated comments, without direct action, could briefly reverse recent capital flows. Until then, currencies linked to open economies may remain under pressure, including the Euro. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Former Federal Reserve Governor Warsh spoke about tariffs and inflation during a Fox interview. He showed understanding towards some of Trump’s policies. Warsh indicates that we need to change our economic strategies, arguing that current inflation is due to increased money supply, not high wages. He compared today’s situation to the 2008 crisis when the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates to zero and used quantitative easing. He highlighted that a trillion-dollar increase in the balance sheet back then was thought to be equal to a 50-basis point rate cut.

Reducing the Balance Sheet

Warsh suggested that reducing the balance sheet by a few trillion dollars, working with the Treasury Secretary, could act like a significant rate cut. He believes this could enhance the real economy, despite the strong performance of financial markets, such as a booming IPO market. Warsh pointed out that the large amount of money available now benefits the financial sector more than it supports the real economy. He emphasized that genuine economic stimulation could happen through strategies that lower rates and promote growth. The key point in Warsh’s comments is that the current inflation is not mainly caused by wage increases, which some feared. Instead, he attributes it to a rapid growth in the money supply. This shifts the focus from labor markets to earlier monetary actions, particularly liquidity measures like asset purchases. He sees a direct connection between monetary policies from the post-2008 recovery to today’s inflation issues. He also noted that following the 2008 crash, the Federal Reserve’s bold actions—like cutting interest rates to near-zero and making large asset purchases—provided critical support for liquidity. He considers these asset purchases as equivalent to rate cuts, estimating that a trillion-dollar increase in the Fed’s balance sheet equals about a 50-basis point reduction. This insight lays the groundwork for his current proposals.

Coordinating Fiscal and Monetary Policy

What’s his suggestion? Create a way to mimic the effects of rate cuts without changing the actual policy rates. He supports reducing the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet but insists this must happen in collaboration with the Treasury. This detail is crucial—Warsh isn’t just calling for quicker quantitative tightening. He advocates for a coordinated approach between fiscal and monetary authorities. His aim is to redirect excess liquidity from financial markets to the real economy. He believes this could significantly benefit non-financial sectors, especially since capital markets are already thriving, as seen with a healthy IPO environment. It’s also essential to understand where capital has been accumulating. Much of it isn’t flowing into job creation or real investment; instead, it is going into assets like stocks, private placements, and digital instruments—anything promising returns. Warsh questions whether this capital is fulfilling its macroeconomic purpose. This has implications for those assessing risk, affecting not only anticipated volatility but also liquidity premiums. As central banks may start shrinking their balance sheets more actively—seeing this as a hidden tightening mechanism—the real economy could respond differently compared to standard rate hikes. This necessitates a reevaluation of duration exposure. It also suggests that implied rates across derivatives might not fully account for this tightening, especially if central banks’ communications are understated. We must watch Treasury issuance closely. If real coordination between fiscal and monetary authorities emerges, with the Fed actively guiding issuance through strategic balance sheet reduction, we could see rapid and sharp shifts in the yield curve. While shorter-term rates might stay stable for now, intermediate rates could adjust in ways that diverge from recent trends. It’s crucial not to be misled by apparent stability in credit spreads or stock prices. Warsh argues that the activity in asset markets obscures the inefficiency of transmission into the productive economy. This means we should no longer rely on financial sector indicators as accurate reflections of overall economic health. We may need to revise our hedging strategies and pay closer attention to potential funding pressures as liquidity support may unwind more swiftly than futures markets expect. If policymakers head in this direction, financial instruments sensitive to future guidance—like swaps, options on rates, and term premium proxies—might start to show noticeable gaps between expectations and actual moves. This opens up chances for strategic positioning but also carries risks of sudden shifts if the coordination wavers. For now, we not only price current policy rates but also consider the underlying shifts in the philosophy driving them. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now