Semiconductors are the fourth most traded goods in the world and are essential for many consumer products. The U.S. is investigating semiconductor supply chains and considering a 25% tariff. This has raised concerns among industry representatives in the U.S., who prefer supporting domestic production instead. These tariffs could affect various electronics and industries since semiconductors make up over 4% of global exports in 2024. The U.S. controls about half of the semiconductor supply chain, but it’s complex and also involves countries like China, Taiwan, and Korea.

Potential Impact of Tariffs

These countries are heavily integrated into the semiconductor network, making them vulnerable to higher tariffs. Studies show that a 25% tariff could reduce U.S. GDP growth by 0.2 percentage points in the first year. The uncertainties in the semiconductor market highlight the possible economic effects of these tariffs. Since semiconductors are crucial across many industries, any changes could lead to widespread consequences. This article discusses a potential change in trade policy focusing on semiconductors, the vital components in nearly every digital device. It highlights the proposed 25% tariff and its effects on both domestic and international production. The key issue is that semiconductors might be designed in one country, made in another, and assembled elsewhere. If one part of this process is disrupted, it affects the entire value chain. While the U.S. influences nearly half of global semiconductor production, it relies on essential suppliers like China, Taiwan, and Korea for various chip production stages. These sources are not easily replaceable, especially without incurring significant time and cost. Any disruption, like tariffs, can create noticeable friction in the market.

Economic Sentiment and Market Reactions

Goldman Sachs estimates that U.S. GDP growth could drop by 0.2 percentage points in the first year of the tariffs. This isn’t just theoretical—it’s about lost money, innovation, and production. Though this drop might seem small, its impact could be significant in sectors like consumer electronics, automotive, and industrial technologies. We are currently weighing risks associated with volatility. A decision like this, especially in a multi-billion dollar sector, affects not just economic data but also market sentiment. This can lead to pricing changes in technology stocks, regional ETFs, and currencies sensitive to trade issues. Whether through Taiwanese chip manufacturers or major U.S. tech firms that rely on chips, unexpected market shifts can catch traders off guard. Thus, we recommend a careful approach to short-term positioning. Rather than withdrawing entirely, hedging against potential volatility might be wiser than trying to predict market directions. Trade policy is difficult to time precisely, and any news from the U.S. Trade Representative or China’s Ministry of Commerce can trigger rapid market responses. Traders must stay alert, as sentiment shifts can quickly influence pricing. There appears to be a difference in how tariff measures impact the earlier stages of production compared to the later ones. This difference could present opportunities if approached carefully. For instance, long gamma positions on stock indices heavy in semiconductors might help manage sudden price swings. Additionally, examining the performance spread between domestic chip designers and foreign fabricators is worthwhile, as trade tensions may cause uneven effects. In the coming two to four weeks, implied volatilities in tech-related indices are on the rise. While not extremely high, the market is adjusting to the possibility of policy changes. This may offer opportunities for tactical portfolio adjustments, including buying volatility or engaging in relative-value trades. Taking a short position on Asian indices vulnerable to tariffs while supporting U.S. chip suppliers can be structured with controlled risk. The overall message is clear: any change in semiconductor trade, even with good intentions, has far-reaching consequences. Supply chains built over decades cannot be adjusted quickly. Investors who connect price movements with policy risks swiftly are better prepared for what comes next. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The US stock market is feeling optimistic after Trump suspended tariffs on Liberation Day. This positivity is shown in the AAII survey, where bullish sentiment has jumped to 45% from 35.1%. This rise indicates growing confidence as the market hits new highs almost every day. However, we’re still below the notable mark of 50%. Last July, bullish sentiment peaked at 52.7% before the S&P 500 saw a 9% drop due to economic worries. After that drop, the Federal Reserve stepped in, helping stock prices recover. If bullish sentiment goes beyond 52%, we should be cautious. There is still a chance that the S&P 500 could reach 6500 or even 7000. The recent boost in investor confidence, according to the AAII retail sentiment survey, serves as an early sign, not a guarantee. When optimism among individual investors rises sharply, history shows that the market often faces downturns, especially if economic fundamentals don’t back that optimism. Last year’s decline after sentiment crossed 50% is a key example. With the index nearing significant thresholds again, it’s essential to be mindful of positioning. The rise from 35.1% to 45% suggests we are entering a risky area where expectations might not align with economic realities or company earnings growth. Being close to the 50% mark raises concerns for those using leverage or holding closely correlated contracts. This kind of optimism can result in inflated valuations, increasing vulnerability to market corrections if any negative news arises. The tariff news was a clear driver this time. Trump’s decision to suspend the tariffs led to a positive market response, pushing stocks to new highs. However, we know that the narrative can shift quickly. Just a few weeks of weak labor reports or disappointing corporate results could start to reverse this newfound confidence. If the momentum continues and the S&P 500 approaches 6500 or even 7000, we may see more price swings in derivatives. Upside demand could raise premiums for both calls and downside protections. Traders are already seeing spreads widen at the longer end of the curve, indicating that sentiment isn’t the only factor heating up. When sentiment readings near 52%, we don’t wait for clear confirmation; we prepare. Risk premiums often take time to adjust, so when volatility hits, prices might already have changed. We need to keep an eye on implied volatility, especially for short-term options, to spot potential mispricings. Selling into inflated premiums can be profitable, but only if backed by hedges. It’s not the right time to be exposed without proper protection against market surprises. Some traders are focusing on buying upside exposure, especially in individual stocks with strong earnings prospects. We’re steering clear of crowded trades that seem overly optimistic. Put-call ratios in leading tech names show a one-sided trade. When these ratios dip below a specific level—like 0.6—it becomes clear where the crowd is heading. Instead, we’ve discovered better opportunities in skewed structures, where upside potential is balanced by cautious views on the downside, or through calendar spreads in rate-sensitive sectors. With the central bank considering its next moves post-recovery, even a mildly dovish signal could trigger strong reactions in fixed income futures. Keep an eye on STIRs for early signals. Changes in overnight expectations can quickly affect equity and FX-linked trades. Holding a bullish position isn’t wrong, but chasing a rally that has already stretched too far without recognizing when the crowd mentality hits late-phase levels is often unwise. It’s easy to ride the wave when the market is rising. However, it’s at moments like this—right before hitting speculative peak levels—that careful attention pays off the most. This isn’t about predicting a market top; it’s about managing risk wisely. When low summer trading volumes meet overly optimistic sentiment, liquidity can disappear quickly. That’s when option sellers or amplified long positions experience the toughest declines. Keep your charts and quantitative models handy. Most importantly, remember what happened the last time sentiment crossed the 52% threshold. We’re not there yet, but the patterns are predictable enough that waiting for full confirmation can often lead to late reactions.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Swiss Franc (CHF) is gaining slowly against the US Dollar (USD) as new concerns about US fiscal policies and trade arise, increasing interest in safe-haven currencies. The USD/CHF pair is under pressure as traders consider the effects of the recent bill and the tariff deadline on July 9, which may lead to more market fluctuations. A ceremony at the White House will celebrate the bill that raises the US debt ceiling by $5 trillion. This bill helps avoid a short-term funding crisis but also raises federal borrowing. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that this bill will increase the US budget deficit by $3.3 trillion over the next ten years, exceeding past estimates by over $1 trillion. These fiscal issues are affecting confidence in the US Dollar.

Increasing Government Debt

Rising government debt raises worries about long-term financial stability and inflation risks, which can weaken confidence in the Dollar. Along with concerns over possible tariffs, this may boost the Swiss Franc. Currently, USD/CHF trades below 0.8000 due to uncertainty and lower trading volumes from the US Independence Day holiday. Potential tariff notices from the Trump administration add to market tensions as the deadline nears. Looking at the USD/CHF 4-hour chart, prices are stabilizing above 0.7940, with resistance at 0.7950 and support at 0.7927. If the US Dollar remains weak, a drop below 0.7900 may lead USD/CHF to test lower levels around 0.7872. Conversely, if it rises above 0.8000, it could increase towards 0.8015. This situation highlights mounting pressure on the US Dollar due to two main factors: rising federal borrowing and the increasing likelihood of further trade restrictions. The new legislation adds trillions to the existing US debt, avoiding immediate funding issues but failing to reassure long-term market players about financial stability. As debt and deficits can influence inflation expectations, the Dollar may struggle to find its footing in the short run. Now that the US budget deficit is expected to be larger than previously thought, this new debt issuance might impact yields and investor trust. When combined with tariff risks, this often leads to a move towards safer investments, explaining the ongoing interest in defensive currencies.

Franc Benefits From Broader Tension

In this context, the Franc is quietly gaining from the overall tension in the market. Currently, the focus is on short-term trading, especially amidst reduced liquidity during the recent US holiday. This thin market environment does not benefit the Dollar, especially with institutional players lacking strong confidence due to uncertainty surrounding future policies. On the charts, prices are moving sideways, hovering just above 0.7940, indicating uncertainty rather than strong direction. Resistance at 0.7950 remains intact, while the key psychological level is around 0.8000, which could serve as a short-term pivot point. If this level breaks upward, the next key price to watch is 0.8015. On the other hand, if the price drops below 0.7900, it may trigger stops that could pull the pair down toward the 0.7872 area. As tariff announcements are expected soon, each headline carries significant importance, leading to increased short-term volatility. It’s crucial to pay attention to upcoming speeches from policymakers, as their tones could quickly shift market dynamics. Traders who keep their positions flexible and small will be in a better position than those who make large commitments too soon, allowing for a more resilient approach in such uncertain times. It is important to adjust position sizes according to the level of uncertainty—entering positions near key levels and adding only when there is confirmation can help manage exposure. With liquidity varying and political risks rising, exercising patience can be a strategic advantage rather than a missed chance. In these situations, being reactive may outpace trying to predict outcomes, so staying adaptable is crucial. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

A long weekend gives us a chance to relax before potential changes in the markets next week. Key events may lead to market shifts, especially Trump’s letters about new tariff rates and the US Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Consumer Price Index Impact

The CPI could be more influential since the tariff deadline is on August 1st, similar to past tariff announcements. However, we might still see volatility, which raises the risk from news headlines in the coming week. Enjoy your Fourth of July celebrations. As we approach a busy week, taking a break during the long weekend may be brief. Those focused on short-term market changes will find it tough to ignore the important data and events ahead. These could compel quick adjustments in pricing.

Foreign Policy and Market Reactions

The CPI release is likely to be the main driver of price changes, not just because of the data, but because it relates directly to discussions about interest rates. In recent months, inflation data has surprised policymakers or confirmed their predictions. If the CPI is higher than expected, we may see immediate increases in short-term interest rates. These reactions can create gaps in futures and options pricing. Conversely, a lower CPI could support the trend towards rate cuts or fewer hikes, softening expectations for short-term rates. Either way, we shouldn’t expect a muted response. Foreign policy also affects markets, with upcoming trade announcements. Although the proposed tariffs are not yet in effect, they create a pricing threat weeks before any actual policy change, particularly in currency and equity derivatives. Historically, hedging happens not during the announcement, but as concerns build up. Written letters or statements don’t move markets by themselves; instead, markets react when investors interpret the tone as a signal to reevaluate risk. Volatility metrics remain above average, reflecting ongoing unease about market-sensitive moves, which don’t always follow clear technical breakdowns or calendar signals. When uncertainty rises, implied volatility tends to increase, especially for options nearing weekly or monthly expirations. More market makers will adjust volatility smiles, particularly when headline risk is challenging to predict. As we move forward, the best strategy isn’t just to predict direction but to keep flexible positions for hedging. We’ve seen that clinging too much to one view, even if well-reasoned, can leave trades vulnerable when the market reacts to news rather than solid economic data. In sensitive times like this, implied volatility can be a trade itself, especially short-term straddles or calendars that bet on a price move without choosing a direction. Market liquidity often decreases around holidays, so even small trades can significantly impact prices. What seems like minor news during busy trading hours can affect a lightly traded market much more profoundly. This means we should adjust our position sizes accordingly—not pull back entirely, but be aware that order tolerance is lower for now. For those trading derivatives, this week is crucial for closely monitoring open interest, especially in index and FX products. Let’s use this time to breathe but remember that quiet doesn’t equal stability. When the CPI is released midweek, timing will be key. Don’t delay your adjustments. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Euro rose against the British Pound on Friday, mainly because the Pound was weak. Concerns about the UK’s financial situation grew after a welfare reform bill passed but included fewer savings than expected, leading to doubts about the UK’s fiscal health. During American trading hours, the EUR/GBP exchange rate climbed to nearly 0.8630. This increase comes as the Pound struggles, allowing the Euro to recover from losses earlier in the week and potentially end the week on a positive note.

Commitment to Inflation Target

European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde highlighted the bank’s goal to maintain a 2% inflation rate. She mentioned that the ECB’s plans are well-aligned but pointed out that global uncertainty could impact inflation. While the Euro remained steady, the Pound faced pressure due to ongoing worries about the UK’s financial outlook. Reports indicated that welfare savings were lower than expected, raising fears of possible tax increases or cuts in spending. In May, the Eurozone’s Producer Price Index dropped by 0.6%, indicating a decrease in price pressures. The annual inflation rate from industrial producer prices also slowed to 0.3% in May, which matched forecasts. All eyes are on Alan Taylor from the Bank of England, who will speak today. Taylor has expressed worries about the UK’s economic future and has suggested that more rate cuts might be needed due to weakening demand and trade challenges.

Policy and Fiscal Projections

The Euro gained strength largely due to the Pound’s recent decline. However, market trends are driven more by policy and fiscal outlooks than just headline numbers. After the passage of the welfare reform bill, which lacked expected savings, investors started to doubt the stability of the UK’s fiscal policy. This caused the Pound to drop in late-week trading, pushing the EUR/GBP close to 0.8630 during New York hours. This movement reflects short-term trading rather than a major structural change. Lagarde’s earlier comments provided support for the Euro. By affirming the commitment to the 2% inflation target, she didn’t surprise anyone, but her statements were enough to keep confidence in the Euro. Her warning about potential external influences on inflation was significant, highlighting the ongoing supply vulnerabilities caused by global disruptions, particularly in energy and shipping. The Eurozone’s Producer Price Index falling 0.6% in May supports the trend of cooling inflation. With producer inflation at 0.3% annually, it aligns with manageable expectations, indicating that aggressive rate cuts from the ECB are unlikely in the near future. Any cuts will probably be cautious and spaced out until there’s solid evidence that inflation is contained across all areas, not just in energy and industrial sectors. In the UK, worries about funding new spending commitments are becoming more pressing. The details of the welfare bill show fewer cuts than expected, leading to speculation about further borrowing or tax increases. As the budget outlook tightens, the Pound quickly lost momentum. Taylor’s remarks may attract more attention today, especially since he has been leaning towards easing policy. He has warned about weakening demand in export-heavy and service sectors and has called for interest rate cuts sooner than others on the committee. If he reinforces this stance today, markets may see it as increasing disagreement within the Bank of England, even without immediate policy changes. This adds uncertainty around the yield curve, particularly for mid-term rates. In the upcoming sessions, traders will likely focus more on policymakers’ language than on incoming data. Markets may start anticipating a greater policy divide between the Bank of England and the ECB. Data such as May’s inflation figures might not suffice without central banks’ guidance. The forward curve shows this shift, with shorter-dated Sterling swaps indicating lower expectations compared to Euros. What matters now is not just what officials say, but how strongly they express it. If discussions about rate cuts increase without solid inflationary support, the risk premium on Sterling assets could rise quickly. This situation places pressure on both fiscal and monetary authorities to regain credibility, particularly in light of declining public trust in official guidance. Traders in rates or FX markets should closely monitor speeches and meeting minutes, watching for signs of internal disagreements. Often, the tone can shift momentum more significantly than the actual content. This subtle distinction could lead to short-term volatility before the next major data release. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In June, Canada’s service economy shrank, mainly because of uncertainty surrounding US trade policies. This uncertainty led to a drop in international demand and made it hard to predict business trends. Despite these challenges, many companies hired more staff, focusing on part-time workers to keep labor costs manageable. At the same time, operating costs rose significantly, the largest increase since October 2022. This, in turn, pushed selling prices higher, even in a tough market. The report begins by noting a decline in Canada’s service sector in June, largely due to external trade pressures. Unclear US trade policies discouraged international clients, slowing overall growth. This drop in demand made it harder for businesses to plan for the future, causing caution throughout supply chains and among consumers. Interestingly, instead of cutting jobs, many firms chose to hire more staff, mostly in part-time roles. This can be seen as a careful strategy—growing their workforce while avoiding long-term payroll commitments. This approach offers flexibility in an environment where demand signals are uncertain. Meanwhile, rising input costs reached levels not seen since late 2022. Businesses could not absorb these cost increases for long and began raising their prices more quickly. For traders, this is important as it feeds into inflation expectations and limits the margin of error for central banks. Overall, this situation shows that global policy uncertainty—particularly from major trading partners—affects service activity directly through external demand and costs. A slower pipeline of orders may lead policymakers to rethink when or how much to ease monetary policy. However, rising prices complicate this decision. We believe that producers still have pricing power, but they are being careful with it. Traders should focus on cost indexes in the short term for early signs of margin pressures and potential price increases in the next quarter. It’s also essential to pay attention to labor indicators—not just the total number of hires, but also the types of jobs created. If the trend of temporary jobs continues, it may indicate a temporary fix rather than true strength in the job market. This context can alter how we interpret wage data and expectations for interest rates. Finally, when monitoring market positions, remember that inflation drivers—even those from outside the country—can influence forward-looking indexes. This can lead to unexpected changes in spreads, especially if yield curves don’t align with pricing trends. It’s wise to reassess exposure to short-term factors, particularly if pricing signals shift faster than employment adjustments.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

GBP/USD found support after a sharp drop, closing a bit higher on Thursday but struggling to gain momentum on Friday, trading around 1.3650. Easing geopolitical worries in the UK helped the pound after Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ position. The GBP/USD pair fell to 1.3377, the lowest level since June 23, influenced by a strong US employment report that increased demand for the dollar. Support for the pound earlier came from Starmer’s reassurances about Reeves’ role, easing fears of sudden policy changes.

Global Market Themes

Global market themes are significant, with US tariffs and geopolitical concerns influencing trading. Other markets, like gold and EUR/USD, reflect broader financial trends and economic worries. Traders should remember the risks of foreign exchange trading, including the chance of large losses. Seeking expert advice and doing thorough research is wise before trading, as leverage can be risky. The pound saw some relief during Thursday’s session after its earlier decline, slightly gaining against the dollar. However, it couldn’t maintain those gains the next day. Trading remained around the 1.3650 mark, but the pound is still vulnerable. A wave of reassurance from Downing Street helped, with Starmer’s clarification about Reeves’ position giving investors less reason to fear sudden fiscal changes. This stabilized nerves, even if temporarily. Despite this stabilization, the earlier drop to around 1.3377 highlighted the impact of unexpectedly strong US jobs data giving the dollar an advantage. When US employment numbers exceed expectations, markets usually raise USD asset prices, pushing GBP/USD lower. This pairing showed weakness compared to earlier June levels, with the pound losing ground after a significant intraday shift, which often draws technical interest.

International Movements

We must view these developments against a backdrop of wider international movements. Tariff discussions from Washington affect all major currency pairs, not just the pound. Growing unease over certain geopolitical events continues to impact risk sentiment. In such times, gold prices often reflect uncertainty or hedging behavior in equity and bond markets. We cannot overlook the situation in Europe. The euro has also weakened, indicating that this issue isn’t unique to the pound. Concerns about fragmentation and disappointing industrial numbers from Germany are prompting investors to seek clarity while reducing their exposure. Risk sentiment across currency pairs is increasingly responsive to isolated data points and public messages, complicating short-term predictions. In this environment, making directional trades based solely on intuition may not work, unless real-time data analysis is incorporated. Stops placed too closely are likely to be triggered prematurely by market noise. Therefore, careful position sizing and a preference for wider ranges, even if managed with hedging techniques or options, could be more effective. Correlation patterns suggest liquidity is moving differently than earlier in the year. Ultra-short-term trades are at risk unless they can handle slippage and brief reversals without unnecessary losses. For longer strategies, watching for sustained movements above 1.3700 or pullbacks toward 1.3320 will help shape directional confidence. This reactive environment calls for greater discipline. Using tools to protect against gamma exposure or market gaps during low liquidity hours is advised. We’ve observed heightened overnight volatility, particularly from unexpected political news—a key factor when holding positions past the European close. For the upcoming weeks, range traders may find conditions easier to manage than those chasing momentum. However, upcoming economic reports from the US, especially CPI and PCE figures, will heavily influence market direction. Until then, patience may prove more valuable than speed. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Inflation expectations are stable, according to an ECB policymaker. The ECB recognizes that it must be flexible in its guidance. The recent strategy focuses on presenting possible scenarios instead of clear predictions because of uncertainties. The market is currently expecting a final rate cut of 25 basis points, likely in December, unless changes in the euro or weaker inflation data prompt an earlier cut in September.

Shift In Strategy

This information is straightforward: policymakers are choosing to avoid firm commitments. Instead, they are offering a variety of potential outcomes. This shift has become clearer in recent months, and there’s good reasoning behind it. Fluctuations in pricing data and currency movements make it harder to predict rates. Although inflation isn’t changing drastically, forecasts have become more cautious. Lane has emphasized that inflation expectations remain stable, which simplifies one concern. However, this stability doesn’t dictate their timing. The goal appears to be creating space for both positive and negative developments. That’s why, rather than committing to a specific action, central bankers are allowing us to prepare for likely scenarios. Markets are leaning strongly towards one last rate cut, with December as the front-runner. This makes sense. Forward pricing tends to balance out risk, but there’s a vulnerability—if the euro remains strong or if consumer price index figures soften again, the case for acting sooner becomes more compelling. This isn’t speculation; swaps and short-end curves are already moving closer to September as a possible pivot. From our perspective, this strategy shift should not be seen as just talk. For short-term rate exposure, we’re focusing on volatility during decision months. The move away from strict guidance leads to greater uncertainty in pricing, especially in gamma positioning. Timing and structuring are crucial. It’s not only about being right directionally; it’s also about adjusting for pace and hesitation.

Markets And Strategy Adjustment

Lane’s comments indicate that flexibility remains a priority. This signals that strict binary choices for policy responses won’t work. Relying on just one possible path without considering opposing swings is risky. We’re adjusting our hedges to account for these complexities, especially for shorter terms, where reactions to statements and data surprises are significant. The current preference seems to lean towards reacting rather than prescribing. This isn’t indecision; it’s a new way for central banks to manage expectations when data is inconsistent. Our trades, especially in conditional curves and slope steepeners, are now structured with this approach. Additionally, the flattening bias in euro swap rates, along with minor upward shifts in implied volatility, tells a story. We’re not seeing aggression; we’re adopting a protective stance. Even small positive inflation surprises can trigger repositioning. For now, we are preparing for asymmetric repricing. Any slight deviation from current beliefs can influence rates more than usual, mainly because the market is tightly clustered around one main expectation. When the entire curve centers on a dominant viewpoint, there’s little room for nuance—until it shifts. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

India is thinking about imposing retaliatory duties on US auto parts at the WTO. This follows the US decision to apply 25% tariffs on imports of vehicles and certain auto parts. India argues that these tariffs from the US work like protective measures for their industries. In response, India plans to suspend trade concessions that are equal to the harm caused by the US tariffs. Additionally, India plans to increase tariffs on selected US products 30 days after July 4th. Trade talks between the Trump administration and other nations, including Japan and India, have not progressed well. Initially, Japan was expected to negotiate easily, and India was thought to be the first to finalize a trade deal. Unfortunately, these expectations have not been met. Despite the ongoing negotiations and a new deadline of August 1st set by Trump, it seems that the situation may just be typical tariff disputes. This indicates that the situation may not be as serious as it appears. The article outlines a clear cycle of retaliation following the US’s decision to impose high import duties on vehicles and auto parts. The US calls these tariffs safeguard measures, used when a country believes its local industries are under threat from rising imports. However, to India, these actions seem punitive, especially when they affect important sectors. In response, India intends to suspend trade benefits that were granted under WTO rules. This means preferential treatment previously given may be changed or removed. India’s goal is to create balance by applying trade pressure equal to the harm caused by the US tariffs. This response is allowed under WTO rules and is typically used when talks are stalled, and one side imposes restrictions. There is now a clear timeline: if no agreement is reached, tariffs on a selected list of US goods will increase after a 30-day notice starting July 4th. This means mid-August becomes a critical time for progress, despite political announcements suggesting earlier dates. Trade talks have hit a snag. The US administration aimed to quickly finalize agreements with Japan and India, viewing them as easier targets than negotiations with Europe or China. However, this has not occurred. Misjudgments about other countries’ willingness to compromise or underestimating domestic pressures in those nations have caused delays. Early miscalculations can lead to more difficult negotiations later, especially if tempers rise and deadlines are missed. For those in the market, this situation is not just about vehicle tariffs or reciprocal duties on items like almonds and motorcycles. It’s part of a trend that can unsettle trade-dependent businesses and impact industries that rely on stable exports and reliable supply chains. This turbulence can affect pricing, hedging strategies, and inventory planning. While the public narrative frames these as typical disagreements, there is a noticeable trend toward increased trade tension. Delays in finalizing agreements signal uncertainty to global markets, which often leads to volatility. As we keep an eye on these developments, the timeline regarding deadlines is crucial. Any tariffs coming into effect in August won’t exist in isolation—they’ll interact with any new policies or responses that arise in the coming weeks. For traders involved in areas affected by consumer goods, automotive exports, or sensitive imports, it is essential to adjust models based on these changes. We may need to re-evaluate implied volatilities, check how tariff changes could affect earnings forecasts, and plan our contracts accordingly. Timing will be critical. The announced tariff increases are not yet in effect—they depend on the ongoing friction. However, waiting is not an option either. There’s no assurance that negotiations will resolve the deadlock, and bets placed too close to a deadline often result in lost flexibility. This phase feels like a pause before action. It’s not a peaceful pause; it’s filled with legal preparations and negotiations under public scrutiny, while time is running out. This situation often raises short-term uncertainty premiums, especially in markets related to cross-border activity or consumer attitudes. We should focus our calendars on trade announcements rather than broader economic indicators, as the latter may take longer to respond.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Today, the Canadian Services PMI takes center stage amid limited news and stable market conditions. Recent fluctuations from the Non-Farm Payroll (NFP) report have settled, leading to calmer movements in foreign exchange and US equity markets. The White House is set to inform trade partners about new US tariffs. Approximately “10 or 12” letters will be sent today, with more anticipated before a July 9th deadline.

Tariff Expectations

Tariffs are expected to be between 60% or 70% and 10% to 20%. Trump has indicated that these tariffs will be implemented by August 1st. Businesses have been preparing for tariffs of 10-20%. Rates higher than this could hinder growth, and the potential impact may become more significant as the August deadline approaches. In simple terms, there are three main updates affecting the markets right now. First, traders are focused on the Canadian Services Purchasing Managers’ Index, a survey that indicates the health of the service sector, including retail and banking. New data from this index can influence the Canadian dollar, especially based on whether the results meet or miss expectations. Since there aren’t many other economic reports out, this Canadian figure is more important than usual. Second, the market had been shaky after the US jobs report, but that instability has calmed down. We now see stable movements in major currencies and US stock markets. Traders seem to be waiting for clearer signals, showing a slight decrease in risk appetite but not a complete withdrawal.

Announcements and Market Reactions

Third, the US is preparing to send formal notices to trading partners about upcoming tariffs. The administration plans to send about ten or twelve letters today, with the possibility of more before the self-imposed deadline early next month. The key issue is the levels of duties being introduced. Business leaders were ready for lower rate increases of up to 20%, as they had adjusted their operations for this. However, the mention of rates as high as 60% or 70% changes the situation. It raises concerns not only about increased trade risks but also about a possible slowdown in business activity starting as early as August when these changes will take effect. Going forward, market reactions will vary based on positioning. For now, markets are not anticipating further shocks, but this calm could change with the upcoming deadlines. It’s crucial not just to focus on final tariff levels, but also on how companies respond—whether they cut imports sharply, reduce investments, or absorb the costs. Recently, Lighthizer emphasized that the letters sent are just the start, suggesting that the amount of affected trade may grow. This indicates a broader scope than previously expected. For derivative traders, this could mean increased volatility as more countries respond or retaliate. Before the August 1st implementation, the markets are likely to adjust, especially if higher tariffs become more certain. This adjustment will be uneven—certain sectors and indices will feel more impact than others. Companies with long supply chains linked to Asia should be watched closely. We’re observing implied volatility moves to gauge early positioning shifts. Future option flows, particularly in sectors related to consumer durables and industrials, will provide insight into where hedges are forming. Currently, we’re experiencing a brief decline in realized volatility, but the potential for pricing shocks remains if announcements become more aggressive. In summary, we are closely watching for early adjustments by businesses and investors, as they will indicate whether the effects will happen quickly or gradually. Market reactions are coming, just not all at once. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now