The June FOMC minutes should clarify disagreements about the 2025 rate outlook and offer insight into the Fed’s upcoming review of its monetary policy framework. The June dot plot showed a close 10–9 majority favoring two rate cuts in 2025. The minutes might explain what conditions could lead to rate cuts this year. Goldman expects the minutes to provide details on the Fed’s internal discussions about its framework. The May minutes hinted at a possible return to flexible inflation targeting (FIT), moving away from the flexible average inflation targeting (FAIT) used since 2020. The Fed may keep a strategy for scenarios where rates reach the zero lower bound.

Committee Considerations

The minutes may also reveal how the Committee views inflation, tariffs, and labor market data. This information could help markets assess the chances of a rate cut this year. If there’s clarity on the framework review, it may shape expectations about how the Fed will respond to inflation in the future. In simple terms, the early signals suggest Federal Reserve policymakers are considering returning to their older approach—aiming for 2% inflation without excessively correcting past shortfalls. During the pandemic recovery, FAIT allowed inflation to exceed target for some time. Based on Powell’s comments and insights from the May minutes, there seems to be a stronger preference for responsiveness rather than overcorrection. Reading between the lines, it appears the group is split. The vote indicates a slight lean towards easing in 2025, but this balance could shift with a strong jobs report or a rise in core inflation. If the minutes explain why some participants favored only one cut or no cuts at all, it could refine our year-end policy estimates. Yellen’s recent comments, made outside the central bank, suggest she is closely monitoring inflation persistence, influencing discussions about what might prompt earlier or larger cuts.

Policy Forecast and Implications

Many are paying close attention to the policy-setting group for hints that unexpected rate changes in 2024 could happen if inflation starts to fall below current levels. If the minutes highlight which data points are prioritized—such as PCE inflation, wage growth, or unemployment trends—it would give traders clearer reference points for setting rate expectations and managing risk. Tariffs are another factor to consider. If trade restrictions tighten, they naturally contribute to inflation. If the Fed acknowledges these risks in the minutes instead of avoiding them, it would impact future rate expectations. We’re especially focused on this for sectors sensitive to changes in trade flow. While issues like full employment targets and inflation symmetry are still debated, the key is how these discussions affect timing. For those involved in rate derivatives, small changes in tone can lead to significant moves in short-term yield curves, particularly if there’s clarity on whether policy shifts would be slow or immediate. Finally, if the minutes introduce new language about the review of their framework—especially suggesting increased flexibility—the market will likely see this as a sign of potential policy changes. Not immediately, but over the next six to twelve months, guidance will become more dependent on data. We’ll keep an eye on shifts in language, especially regarding inflation persistence and any preference for real-time adjustment over fixed-term planning. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

EUR/JPY recently hit a high of 172.28 this year but has since pulled back due to trade tensions and being overbought. The pair has struggled to break the resistance level at 173.00, as concerns over US tariffs on Japan weigh on the Yen. After solid gains since March, the EUR/JPY pair has faced resistance. It has fallen below 172.00 as the market focuses on ongoing trade talks between the United States, European Union, and Japan.

Impact of US Tariff Announcements

Recent tariff announcements from the United States have sparked speculation about their economic effects. Concerns are rising, especially regarding potential tariffs on auto parts and metals, affecting both Europe and Japan. With trade tensions ongoing, the Bank of Japan’s steady policy rate outlook reduces the likelihood of immediate rate changes. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) shows that the EUR/JPY pair is overbought, putting pressure on it to correct or consolidate until new trade agreements are reached. Technical analysis suggests potential support levels at 170.93 and 168.89. Without new trade deals, reaching the psychological level of 173.00 may remain challenging for now. After a strong upward trend early in the year, EUR/JPY is now facing a more volatile environment. It recently entered overbought territory—based on RSI metrics—before struggling around the 173.00 mark. The earlier momentum has slowed, and now the price is fluctuating below 172.00, indicating that easy gains could be behind us, at least temporarily.

Response to Washington’s Tariff Position

Washington’s tariff decisions have noticeably affected markets. Now, the focus is on how Brussels and Tokyo respond, especially in the automobile and base metals sectors. The uncertainty surrounding the tariffs, rather than the tariffs themselves, contributes to pressure on the Yen. The Yen typically reacts to perceived shifts in risk more than to policy changes, and the latest announcements haven’t eased investor concerns. Meanwhile, Tokyo policymakers are maintaining their current interest rate policy. This steadiness keeps expectations grounded. As a result, it’s hard to see upward movement for the Yen unless an external factor disrupts this stability. Conversely, the European Central Bank’s (ECB) discussions have kept the Euro strong but not overwhelmingly so. Recent weeks have shown that speculative positioning and sentiment are somewhat overheated. With the RSI in stretched territory and no new policy actions or breakthroughs in trade discussions, a technical pullback seems increasingly likely. Support levels are well-defined at 170.93 and 168.89, and prices often test these levels when momentum fades. It’s less about a loss of confidence and more about a shift away from momentum-driven trades. Traders should monitor whether new headlines alter perceived risks. Continued entrenched positions without diplomatic progress are likely to lead to range-bound movement. In the coming sessions, the pair’s direction may hinge on sentiment, technical levels, and the pace of diplomatic efforts. Current momentum alone won’t drive the price much higher without a new catalyst. Any rise towards 173.00 is likely to be short-lived without solid economic backing. From our perspective, we must consider risk alongside policy stability and external shocks. Charts provide context but don’t contain all the answers. Moving forward, it’s essential to focus on volume and macroeconomic news. The market’s reactions to the news, rather than the news itself, will offer greater insights for positioning. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The US has announced new tariffs starting on August 1, targeting smaller countries, with the Philippines being the most affected, contributing 0.4% to US trade. The detailed letters specify tariff rates for various nations, ranging from 5% to 30%. Key tariffs include 30% for Libya, Iraq, and Algeria, and 5% for Moldova, which has minimal trade with the US. The Philippines will face a 20% tariff, with caution against the transshipment of goods. Overall, these countries make up small portions of US trade, with the Philippines at 0.42% and Moldova at just 0.001%. The potential revenue from the Philippines’ $14.16 billion in imports could reach $2.832 billion. Earlier, 14 countries, including Japan and South Korea, were informed about the 25% tariffs on their imports, while Myanmar and Laos might face 40%. Sector-specific tariffs include a 50% rate on copper, and there are future tariffs planned for semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. For Japan, which imports goods worth $148 billion, potential tariff income could hit $37 billion. The announcement highlights the need for balanced trade agreements, calling trade deficits a “major threat” to US economic and national security. In summary, the United States is toughening its trade policy, applying tariffs to more small economies. Among these, the Philippines now faces a 20% tariff on its exports to the US. The US government has warned against rerouting goods through this country, indicating intense scrutiny. Other countries, many with minimal trade levels, are being subjected to tariffs ranging from 5% to 30%. The precision of these measures is notable. The main reason given for this is to address trade deficits and negotiate better trade terms. This approach isn’t new; it builds on previous targeting of larger East Asian economies, suggesting a strategic and symbolic expansion of these measures. Earlier, major exporting countries faced 25% duties, but this time the focus shifts slightly to smaller nations. Although the expected revenues may be lower—only a few billion—the US is signaling its intention not to limit actions to just the largest economies. Targeting specific sectors like copper and semiconductors suggests an emphasis on supply chains. The 50% tariff on copper indicates a preference for sourcing from domestic or allied suppliers. With technology and healthcare components next on the list, sourcing for high-value inputs may become more complex. What does this mean for those dealing in options and futures? We anticipate increased volatility. Consistent policy actions often boost demand for protective measures, especially in sectors that directly impact production. Historically, trading volumes for certain commodities and industries rise following such announcements. Keep a close eye on base metals, particularly copper. Timing is critical. With tariffs starting in early August, expect forward curves to react well in advance. Experience shows that the best positioning opportunities arise three to six weeks before implementation, influenced by customs enforcement and potential retaliatory actions. Be mindful of secondary effects. Forex correlations usually increase when trade policies change significantly. Emerging markets tied to the nations affected may see small capital outflows, especially where US exposure is tied to exports. This can lead to FX volatility, which has previously matched or exceeded effects from interest rate adjustments. This impacts implied volatility levels. Watch for changes in skew—especially if economic indicators suggest stress in technology imports or refined metals. Any downward adjustments in supply forecasts could widen volatility tails in those areas. In terms of timing, mark the beginning of August, but don’t wait for customs data to confirm the changes. Past instances show that mere expectations can widen spreads ahead of time. The key is to observe when speculative positions unwind and liquidity shrinks before policies are enforced. Historically, this is where prices can create larger gaps. Don’t limit your analysis to ETFs or broad commodity ranges. If previous market behaviors repeat, more detailed insights can be discovered. Distorted risk pricing tends to first impact sector-specific derivatives, especially those contracts linked to intermediate goods that rely heavily on consistent trade flows. When core materials like copper fluctuate, the effects directly impact industrial sectors. In various cases we’ve examined, cross-sector correlation often spikes briefly before reversing sharply, potentially leaving over-hedged positions lagging. Choose wisely, stay agile with expiration rollovers, and favor precision in your trades where liquidity allows. Monitoring daily volatility around August contract milestones could provide additional insights. If institutional players begin to secure protections ahead of changes in rates or commodity flows, it may signal broader implications. Thus, we must not only watch for news or official reactions but also monitor actual price movements in related markets. The true trajectory is often revealed through changes in prices, compression of spreads, and increased trading volumes.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The S&P 500 Index closed down slightly by 0.07%, remaining almost unchanged after yesterday’s decline. Futures contracts suggest a possible rise of 0.2%, keeping the index close to Friday’s high of 6,284.65. Recent findings from the AAII Investor Sentiment Survey show that 45.0% of investors are optimistic, while 33.1% feel pessimistic. The S&P 500 is currently above 6,200, according to daily charts.

Nasdaq 100 Overview

The Nasdaq 100 experienced a small increase of 0.07% on Tuesday, staying within its previous trading range. It reached a peak of 22,896.01 but fell to 22,587.47, indicating only a temporary correction. The Volatility Index (VIX) dropped to its lowest level since February at 16.11 last Thursday, suggesting a calm market. However, it didn’t reach a new low, showing some fluctuations in volatility without clear trends. In early trading, S&P 500 futures are holding below 6,300, facing resistance between 6,300–6,320 and finding support around 6,250. The market’s reaction to global events suggests continued potential for fluctuations. Overall, the S&P 500 seems ready for more gains, although the potential for profit-taking is present. There are no obvious negative patterns threatening the current trend. Currently, the market appears stable, not significantly retreating or advancing. The S&P 500 closed just below recent highs, showing a slight decline. Futures are indicating a modest upward trend, hinting at cautious optimism among traders looking ahead rather than just reacting to news.

Analyzing Market Sentiment

Sentiment data provides useful insights. Bullish responses from retail investors are hovering in the mid-40% range, while about one-third remain bearish. This split matters less for predicting direction and more for understanding whether optimism or caution may be stretched. When too many investors lean toward one side, history shows a tendency for the opposite to occur—though not immediately or with perfect accuracy. In the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, the focus is more on current positioning rather than clear trends. The index briefly rallied but then cooled near recent highs. This doesn’t signal a decline in fundamentals; it reflects a steady pace rather than a rush. Traders seem to be in a measured holding pattern—neither acting defensively nor making bold bets. Volatility, assessed by the VIX, has softened, reaching levels not seen in months. This lower reading may indicate complacency more than confidence. Yet, the inability to reach new lows shows there’s still an awareness of risk lurking beneath the surface. From a technical standpoint, the near-term resistance for S&P futures rests around 6,300–6,320, while support is at 6,250. As long as prices stay above 6,200 on daily charts, momentum should be maintained. Stocks generally fluctuate between these levels—alternating between hesitation and decisive movements. Given the current state, it’s essential to watch how prices behave around these levels. Staying below 6,320 may lead to neutral or slightly bearish short-term scenarios, while a breakout above could signal a new upward trend. Meanwhile, dips towards lower levels don’t necessarily mean a reversal; they could simply indicate a consolidation of previous gains. Strategic decisions should focus on well-defined price levels instead of just sentiment or macroeconomic narratives, no matter how appealing they appear. Sector rotations could happen, and leadership may shift. However, short-term derivatives will respond best to specific triggers, such as recent highs and lows. Thus, near-term strategies should prioritize positioning at clear technical points. Current sharp pullbacks are not supported by broader bearish trends, making it plausible to fade weakness within the established range. Profit-taking may be likely as we approach the upper limits of this current move, especially if resistance levels are briefly exceeded while volumes decrease or momentum slows. In this market environment, maintaining a balanced approach may prove more beneficial than holding strong convictions. Being overly rigid in either direction could be costly as trends narrow during the summer. Having the discipline to navigate through market noise—without jumping to conclusions too soon—often yields better results over shorter timeframes. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Major European markets rose by 1% or more, except for the UK. France’s CAC and Italy’s FTSE MIB led the way, each climbing over 1.4%. Germany’s DAX hit new all-time highs, supported by gains in defense stocks. A new trade deal with the US has lifted investor spirits. The European Commission is working on an agreement to resolve a longstanding trade dispute with the US, aiming to finalize it by the end of the week.

European Market Closing Levels

Closing levels were as follows: – German DAX: +1.30% – France’s CAC: +1.44% – UK’s FTSE 100: +0.14% – Spain’s Ibex: +1.24% – Italy’s FTSE MIB: +1.59% As European trading wrapped up, US stocks made smaller gains. The Dow rose by 0.11%, the S&P increased by 0.28%, the NASDAQ went up by 0.58%, and the Russell 2000 climbed by 0.24%. The changes in European markets reflect reactions to specific events rather than broad risk sentiment or economic shifts. A pattern is emerging around sectors like defense, visible in the DAX’s rise. This growth indicates ongoing institutional interest in German industrials involved in military contracts. Instead of just looking at index performance, focusing on the factors driving prices can reveal clearer trading patterns. The prospect of resolving a long-term trade dispute likely boosted investor confidence across Europe. Finalizing the deal quickly could protect the eurozone from US trade barriers, reducing risk for capital-intensive exporters. It seems that investor anticipation of this deal has already influenced market prices. Now, traders should focus on the actual deal terms and how they will impact specific sectors. The UK’s slight increase deserves attention. While France and Italy experienced strong gains, London lagged behind, indicating different investment flows. The FTSE is heavily weighted toward energy, financials, and other cyclical sectors, which haven’t benefited as much from trade optimism as their European counterparts.

Across The Atlantic

Meanwhile, in US markets, we see slower growth. Although all indices rose, the momentum was not as strong as in Europe. This cautious pace suggests hesitance rather than weakness. The steady rise in the Russell 2000 indicates healthy, albeit cautious, interest in risk. The NASDAQ’s better performance aligns with ongoing investment in tech stocks seen since last year. It’s important not to overanalyze daily price movements. What’s more telling is what stays stable. For instance, the Dow’s modest gain shows that even with rising risk appetite in other markets, traditional weightings aren’t responding. This divergence hints at a changing preference that might persist. Looking ahead, attention should shift to sector rotation. With European benchmarks reacting to defense news and improving trade relations with the US, opportunities arise. Proper timing in sectors related to these developments could lead to strong performance. However, traders should wait for confirmation before acting—looking for actual price movements rather than just headlines. This week is unlikely to follow the trends of last week. Gains in Europe stemmed from optimism about real developments. As these unfold, market volatility may either decrease or reappear in sectors that were overlooked during the recent uptrend. Traders should monitor any sudden changes in price and volume, especially among mid-cap European stocks that have lagged but are linked to export-sensitive industries. Finalizing trade agreements affects not only currencies and bond yields but also alters valuations across sectors. For instance, France and Italy showed gains today, showing that external trade-related events impacted their domestic equities more than in markets focused on internal issues. What’s clear is that not all indices are climbing for the same reasons—that’s where the advantage lies. Focus on charts that respond to real developments and steer clear of those driven only by sentiment. There’s less noise to navigate in these cases. We should emphasize what can be seen and measured. In this instance, Europe’s dynamics aren’t speculative; they’re tied to ongoing trade flows and sector shifts. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Silver is currently priced at about $36.40. This marks its third consecutive day of decline due to a stronger US Dollar and rising US Treasury yields. The metal is still trading within a narrow range, close to its recent 13-year high. Recent threats of tariffs from the US have kept demand for safe-haven assets like silver steady. However, these tensions haven’t caused a clear price breakout. President Trump has announced new tariffs, including a 50% tariff on copper imports and a possible 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. There’s also a planned 10% tariff on all BRICS nations, which are seen as opposing US interests. Even with global uncertainties boosting demand for safe-haven assets, silver has struggled to rise. Strong US labor data from last week makes it less likely for the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates soon. This supports the US Dollar and reduces interest in non-yielding assets like silver. Currently, silver trades between $35.50 and $37.30, following an upward trend since April. It’s near the lower end of this range, above the 21-day EMA at $36.19, which has been supportive. Technical indicators show weak momentum, with an RSI near 56 and an ADX of 12.50, indicating a lack of trend strength. A breakout above $37.30 could lead to price increases, but for now, silver is stuck in a range, focusing on geopolitical events. With silver at $36.40, we see a frustrating third straight daily loss. This decline is linked to a stronger US Dollar and higher US Treasury yields, which generally hurt the appeal of precious metals. While silver is close to a 13-year high, it’s not gaining much and is just consolidating. The White House’s new tariff proposals—like the striking 200% tax on pharmaceuticals and the blanket 10% on BRICS nations—have kept some demand for hard assets. Typically, increased trade tensions lead to stronger movements in metals, but lately, silver prices haven’t responded strongly and are just moving sideways. The strength of the US labor market also plays a role. Better-than-expected data last week likely delayed predictions of any quick changes in monetary policy. This supports the US Dollar and raises yields—conditions not favorable for silver, which doesn’t yield any interest. Traders are caught between the safe-haven demand from political risks and the downward pressure from tighter monetary policy. In terms of charts, silver is within an upward structure since April, constrained between $35.50 at the bottom and $37.30 at the top. The 21-day exponential moving average, roughly at $36.19, acts as a soft floor. As long as silver stays above this, it may discourage selling. However, bulls need more than just stability; they need to show initiative. Technical signals are still weak. The RSI at 56 is neutral, not overbought or oversold. The ADX at 12.50 indicates low energy. Currently, there’s no strong trend. Therefore, it doesn’t make sense to take aggressive positions unless prices convincingly rise above $37.30 with strong volume. Until then, a drop could test existing support zones. When planning trades, consider both macro factors and technical signals. With the US Dollar strong and no monetary easing in sight, the focus should shift towards short-term volatility instead of long-lasting trends. We might see temporary shifts in correlation, especially if geopolitical events heat up or market sentiment changes suddenly. Pay close attention to yield movements in the bond market. If Treasury yields peak or decrease, we might see safe-haven flows return to metals. Conversely, more strong US economic data could keep yields high, making real rates attractive, which could prolong the current range-bound action or even invite declines. For now, it’s best to watch and wait rather than make aggressive trades. Being patient and prepared for either side of the price range is a safer approach. Entry points should be carefully calculated, with stop placements that reflect uncertain but limited movements, supported by either moving averages or the edge of the trading channel, depending on market conditions.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model predicts that the US economy will grow by 2.6% in the second quarter of 2025. This estimate hasn’t changed since July 3. Recent reports show a slight decrease in the forecast for real residential fixed investment growth, adjusting from -6.4% to -6.5%. Additionally, the contribution of inventory investment to annual GDP growth has been slightly reduced from -2.13 to -2.15 percentage points. The next update for the GDPNow model is set for Thursday, July 17. This means that expectations for the US economy are stable, even with some minor downward adjustments in certain areas. The overall growth rate of 2.6% for the quarter has not changed, indicating confidence that the economy will continue to grow steadily for now. This is based on how different GDP components, like housing investment and inventory changes, are currently assessed. For example, residential fixed investment has dropped a bit—from negative territory to a slightly worse negative. While this isn’t a significant decline, it shows a slowing trend in sectors closely related to construction and housing. Higher borrowing costs or lower demand might be making developers more cautious, or projects could be experiencing delays. Even a small change of 0.1% adds to the narrative of weakness in sectors heavily reliant on physical assets. Inventory investment is also slightly lower than previously thought. This isn’t a large change—just a small impact on GDP—but it suggests that businesses might be reducing production without immediate buyers. This often happens when companies anticipate less demand or are being cautious due to rising costs. In the short term, this isn’t a major concern, but it’s something to monitor. For analysts watching trends, these updates are more significant than their minor changes might imply. The details of growth can be just as important as the overall rate, showing that underlying issues may be emerging. As we prepare for the official update on July 17, we should consider not just new numbers but what they might indicate about overall sentiment and sector-specific trends. If the Fed stays focused on data, issues in housing or inventory levels will be important to observe. How we interpret recent data and whether a clear pattern emerges will inform short-term strategies. For instance, keeping an eye on changes in rate expectations or commodity flows related to manufacturing can offer insights before traditional reports are released. It’s important not to expect the same pace week after week—the tempo may be slowing down slightly, and that matters. We should also pay attention to upcoming corporate earnings, particularly from firms involved in residential construction or industrial production. Subtle comments about managing costs or future inventory can provide valuable insights, sometimes even more than hard data. Often, what’s left unsaid can clarify the situation. So, before the next GDPNow release, there’s a useful opportunity to adjust models, update volatility assumptions, and reconsider hedging strategies. The overall macro signal is modest and stable, which might cause some to feel overly confident. However, beneath the surface are slow but important changes that we can leverage.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The USDJPY reached a high earlier today close to the range of 147.01 to 147.338 but has since dropped. This indicates that buyers may be losing strength and highlights the support levels below. The next target area is between 145.92 and 146.26, which includes the 61.8% retracement level at 145.978 from the decline that started in June. We will be monitoring this area for any signs of renewed buying interest.

Shift Back To Sellers

If the support area is broken, sellers may regain control. This could lead to lower target levels at 145.347 and the 100-bar moving average on the 4-hour chart, which is currently at 145.02. The recent price movements give us insights into short-term momentum. Specifically, the rise to the 147.01 to 147.338 range and the subsequent decline indicate hesitation among those who previously pushed the pair higher. The pause just under that resistance level shows where demand has faced obstacles. While the difficulty in surpassing 147.338 has been seen before, today’s reaction makes it clearer. With the pair backing down, our attention turns to the support between 145.92 and 146.26. Within this zone, we are closely watching the 61.8% retracement at 145.978. This level represents a critical battleground in the current trend after the decline since June. As prices approach these Fibonacci levels, traders begin to look for reversal opportunities. This is not just an academic exercise; there is capital waiting for guidance.

Potential Downside Targets

If this support band fails, we could see prices drop further. The next relevant areas are based on previous value zones and moving averages. The level at 145.347 has attracted interest before, while the 100-bar moving average around 145.02 often influences price movements when volatility decreases. These are not arbitrary lines; they are significant levels based on historical patterns, indicating where prices might hesitate again, either for new buy opportunities or short-term relief. We avoid guessing and instead react to the levels in play. If prices start climbing toward 146.26 again, the reaction at that level will be more important than the price movement itself. Additional buying may occur, but it needs to be supported by trading volume. We pay close attention when these levels align with retracement signals. It’s when price, time, and participant activity intersect that we gain clarity. With the failed push above 147.33 earlier showing weakness from bulls, our focus shifts to the pressure points below. Monitor the hourly closes and avoid getting trapped by false breaks. Use the 4-hour moving averages to guide your exposure—not your excitement. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The EIA inventory data is due for release soon. Private reports revealed a surprising increase of 7.1 million barrels in crude oil. In contrast, gasoline stocks dropped by 2.2 million barrels. Estimates for today’s report suggest a decline of 2.071 million barrels in crude oil, a decrease of 1.486 million barrels in gasoline, and a drop of 0.314 million barrels in distillates. Last week, data from Cushing showed a decline of 1.49 million barrels. Right now, crude oil is priced at $67.87, down by $0.46, or 0.67%. The recent private inventory figures showing a rise of 7.1 million barrels in crude surprised many, as expectations were different. Meanwhile, the drop in gasoline stocks of about 2.2 million barrels suggests rising demand. The market seems to be preparing for the official EIA numbers, which are highly anticipated this week. Heading into the official release, forecasts suggest a drawdown of 2.071 million barrels of crude oil, along with moderate decreases in gasoline and distillates. These predictions contrast with the private report, creating potential for market volatility. Last week’s decline at Cushing, which dropped 1.49 million barrels, indicates that stockpiles at the WTI delivery point continue to decrease. Reductions in these inventories can significantly affect prices, especially when combined with wider national inventory drops. Observers are cautiously focusing on the full report’s regional details. With crude oil at $67.87, down 46 cents, the market appears cautious. Even this small dip often indicates traders are reacting to earlier data. The downward pressure suggests that traders might be bracing for mixed or unexpected results. This situation presents various near-term dynamics for strategy in derivatives. It’s crucial to monitor gamma positioning and shorter-term volatility around the EIA release. Current option prices might be underestimating the chances of significant market movement if today’s data confirms an inventory increase. This is particularly relevant if commercial stocks go up while key products tighten. We should closely analyze structural activity in futures and options this week by examining open interest changes around the weekly expirations. Clustering of open interest near the $68 and $70 strikes could serve as short-term indicators. It’s important to watch for potential squeezes if trading volume tests those levels. The gap between the private report and public expectations means that secondary confirmations from refinery utilization and import/export numbers—often buried in the EIA report—could quickly influence the markets if they differ from seasonal trends. Therefore, new positions should focus less on being directionally confident and more on managing exposure to surprises in the data. The increasing uncertainty calls for flexible exposure sizing and readiness to counter exaggerated reactions post-data. Depending on EIA results, implied volatility may drop temporarily, creating entry opportunities. Those monitoring spreads between WTI futures contracts should also pay attention to shifts toward contango or backwardation, as these shifts will affect sentiments about supply tightness beyond the headline numbers. In summary, with the current price movements ahead of the data and subtle shifts in options flow, we need to closely watch both the actual data outcomes and the market’s immediate reactions to perceived discrepancies. The growing difference we see today raises the chances that the market’s reaction could overshoot, at least initially.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Market Developments

The Japanese Yen is steady against the US Dollar as it enters Wednesday’s North American session. Overnight, it showed strength, bouncing back due to changes in the US Treasury market. Yield spreads are shrinking, which supports the Yen. The USD/JPY pair is stable, trading between 142.50 support and 148.00 resistance. Market watchers are looking forward to the Producer Price Index release scheduled for 7:50 pm ET. Additionally, a hint from a Bank of Japan board member suggests a likely upward revision in the bank’s inflation forecast at the next meeting on July 31. Caution is present in the market, as EUR/USD has pulled back and GBP/USD is slightly lower, trading below 1.3600. These movements are caused by ongoing uncertainties in US trade policy. Gold prices have also weakened, dropping below $3,300, due to a strong US Dollar influenced by rising US Treasury yields. Ethereum may improve its security thanks to a new proposal from Vitalik Buterin. This plan aims to limit transaction sizes, enhancing network stability and reducing the risk of Denial of Service attacks.

Tariff Implications

New US tariffs are focused on Asia, with Singapore, India, and the Philippines potentially benefiting if negotiations progress. Currently, technical factors, currency flows, and upcoming data releases are creating a wait-and-see approach in the market. Although the Yen is flat overall, it has shown some upward movement due to narrowing US-Japan yield spreads. The USD/JPY pair is comfortably holding around 142.50 support, indicating that significant selling pressure would require a strong fundamental change to break through. Meanwhile, resistance near 148.00 remains strong. For those watching this pair from a short-gamma perspective, short-term options are pricing in lower volatility until we receive more economic clarity. If the upcoming inflation data changes expectations for Federal Reserve policy, it could quickly impact interest-rate-sensitive pairs. We will monitor the producer price report to see if it indicates renewed cost pressures that might raise rates and shift this currency pair out of its current range. Comments from Nakamura this week did not go unnoticed. The possibility of a change in medium-term inflation estimates from the BoJ at the end-of-month meeting adds weight to discussions about policy bias. While a rate hike is not imminent, there is less certainty that the BoJ will stay on hold indefinitely. We might see an increase in options trading closer to the July 31 meeting, especially if JGB yields begin to rise, making carry trades more appealing. Regarding the wider economic environment, gold has dipped below $3,300 due to a stronger US Dollar. This trend is linked to a slight steepening of the US yield curve, making long-term treasuries more attractive for global fund managers seeking quality. It’s important to understand that precious metals are underperforming not due to lack of demand but because of currency valuation pressures and adjustments to real rates. Traders should consider this nuance when assessing safe-haven interest. In the crypto markets, Buterin’s proposal to cap individual transaction sizes has revived discussions about scalability versus decentralization. The aim is clear: reduce vulnerabilities to high-volume attacks. While this doesn’t immediately impact Ethereum’s spot market, any security enhancement tends to gradually build confidence among institutional holders worried about systemic risks. While this isn’t a direct market signal yet, it may indicate a higher baseline for ETH volatility in the future. Overall, sentiment in FX trading is cautious. Trade flows are particularly choppy due to Washington’s new tariff proposals aimed at resolving supply issues in Southeast Asia. While these developments are not yet actionable, if discussions lead to agreements, cross-border flows could support Asian currencies even without direct links to the US Dollar. Bond spreads in these regional economies have already started tightening slightly. Our view is to prepare for a potential momentum shift in USD/JPY through gamma scalping or adjusting risk as we approach Wednesday evening’s PPI release. We are not trading against current levels without confirmation. While gold is weakening in dollar terms, it would be premature to conclude that this reflects a decrease in demand as an inflation hedge without closely monitoring real yields, particularly over the five-year term. Keep an eye on how option markets adjust implied volatility once US data is released. Often, there is a noticeable effect on the spot market after London’s trading session the following day. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now