The USD/JPY pair is trading above 144.00, boosted by rising tensions in the Middle East and differences in central bank policies. The US Dollar is gaining strength as a safe-haven currency, while the Japanese Yen is weakening partly because analysts expect the Bank of Japan to keep interest rates unchanged.
Recent Israeli military actions in Iran have raised geopolitical risks, increasing the demand for USD. Although BoJ Governor Ueda has suggested a possible rate hike, recent economic indicators show Japan’s recovery is still weak. The U.S. Federal Reserve might cut rates in September, based on new inflation data and consumer sentiment.
Technical Analysis
Currently, USD/JPY is at 144.14, near the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement level. Traders are watching the convergence of the 20-day and 50-day Simple Moving Averages, indicating uncertainty and the potential for significant market movement. If USD/JPY breaks above 144.37, it could lead to higher Fibonacci levels. However, if it drops below 143.00, further declines may follow.
The value of the Yen is affected by Japan’s economic situation, BoJ policies, compared bond yields with the US, and overall market sentiment. The Yen usually performs well during market stress, as it is viewed as a safe-haven currency.
The current USD/JPY level, just above 144, reflects strong reactions to global tensions and diverging monetary policies. Israeli forces’ actions in Iranian territory have contributed to market-wide risk aversion, pushing investors towards the safety of the Dollar. While the Yen has a historical reputation as a safe haven, it isn’t showing its usual strength right now.
Ueda had recently maintained a dovish stance, although there was some openness to rate changes earlier this year. However, domestic data suggests that Japan’s recovery is uneven. Industrial output, wages, and consumption are not robust enough to inspire confidence. Therefore, a rise in short-term rates in Japan seems unlikely for now. This situation could keep downward pressure on the Yen, especially compared to US interest rate expectations, which are only tentatively pricing in a Fed move for later this year.
Market Dynamics
We see how these fundamental factors are affecting prices. At around 144.14, USD/JPY is staying above a key Fibonacci level, providing insights into market positioning. Attention is on the convergence of the 20- and 50-day SMAs—a common setup that often leads to increased volatility. The tight range just below 144.40 indicates traders are cautious before making a move. If this level breaks, it could open the way to 145.00 and beyond, triggering more buying opportunities.
On the downside, if USD/JPY falls below 143.00, it may test previous support levels, and momentum traders could quicken that drop. It’s all about these key levels. For traders, short-term breaks followed by solid confirmations may offer better results than trying to predict direction without clear patterns.
The difference in real yields still favors the Dollar. US Treasury yields, especially short-term ones, haven’t dropped significantly, even with low CPI readings. This uncertainty suggests that traders are on alert regarding the Fed’s next moves. Overall, there’s a sense of waiting—both in price movements and policy decisions. With yields remaining high, it’s tough to foresee a strong Yen comeback.
For now, we have a chart showing underlying tensions. These tensions involve not just interest rates or conflicts, but also market reactions on a daily basis. They are mechanical in some aspects, emotional in others, and always pattern-driven.
Given these conditions, we advise shorter holding periods and more selective trade entries. Use tight stops, particularly in this environment where news can quickly change market trends. Momentum is fragile, likely to remain so as long as central banks send mixed signals without decisive actions.
Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.
New bank loans in China hit 620 billion yuan in May, which was below the expected 850 billion. This follows a nine-month low recorded in April.
Year-on-year loan growth dropped to a record low of 7.1%, down from 7.2% in April. Household loans rose slightly by 54 billion yuan in May, but demand for corporate loans weakened further.
broad M2 money supply
The broad M2 money supply increased by 7.9% year-on-year, falling short of the expected 8.1% and down from 8.0% in April. Total social financing (TSF) growth remained steady at 8.7%, primarily due to more government bond issuances.
Ongoing deflation and high real borrowing costs seem to be dampening private credit demand, despite some easing from the central bank. Analysts at Capital Economics anticipate further rate cuts of up to 40 basis points this year.
The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) plans to add funds via reverse repos for the second time this month.
This article highlights a slowdown in credit growth in China, showing a reduced interest in borrowing despite minor actions from the central bank. The figures indicate a disappointing rise in new loans during May—only reaching 620 billion yuan compared to the forecast of 850 billion. This suggests banks are lending less and that both businesses and households lack eagerness to borrow, even with credit available.
The situation is reflected in the sluggish year-on-year loan growth, which has dipped to 7.1% from the already low 7.2% in April. Household loans saw a tiny increase of 54 billion yuan, while businesses indicate a clear reluctance to borrow.
A major cause of this hesitation is the high cost of borrowing when adjusted for inflation, which is being pushed down by deflation. This means that even if nominal interest rates are low, real rates stay high when prices are stagnant or falling, discouraging debt-driven expansion. Monetarily, the broader M2 money supply grew less than expected, also declining from the previous month. This trend reflects a similar issue—money circulation in the economy is slowing.
While total social financing stayed stable, this was not due to an increase in borrowing demand from businesses or households, but rather due to government bond activities. In summary, the government continues to borrow and spend, while the private sector pulls back. This backdrop sets the stage for potential policy adjustments.
implications of cooling credit
Zichun Huang from Capital Economics expects further easing, predicting up to 40 basis points in rate cuts later this year. In response, the central bank has stepped in again with reverse repos to increase liquidity in the market. This shows their intent to enhance the short-term money supply to stimulate more lending.
We are closely monitoring disinflation risks, changes in the M2 trend, and policy measures like open market operations as they significantly impact rate-sensitive strategies. It becomes challenging to position for growth when loan growth declines alongside private demand. If the central bank goes ahead with rate cuts and liquidity boosts, we might see yield compression.
Funding rates could remain stable or even drop, which might lower implied rates as well. This gives us an opportunity. Higher chances for layered rate adjustments bolster the directional bias in short-term interest rate markets. We expect shifts in the term structure to reflect this cooling credit cycle, suggesting that positioning for curve steepening while keeping a neutral stance further out could be advantageous.
With new lending below expectations, especially after a weak April, current trends are likely part of an overall cooling phase rather than a one-time event. Keeping an eye on reverse repo activity, the pace of government bond issuance, and changes in the PBOC’s MLF activities will help refine our rate expectations. The movement of spreads between instruments linked to government policy and those tied to corporate credit may provide entry points during this quiet issuance period.
Additionally, the market appears less volatile than in the past, making short-term repricing events more reflective of fundamental credit data instead of random spikes in uncertainty. Therefore, it’s wise to compare new loan and M2 figures alongside inflation data and repo rates in the upcoming sessions. Adopting a patient approach based on balance sheet conditions may offer steadier returns during this phase.
Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.
Gold prices have risen for three days in a row due to the conflict between Israel and Iran, leading to a cautious approach in financial markets. XAU/USD is now priced at $3,422, showing an increase of over 1%. Tensions escalated after Israel targeted Iran’s military, creating instability in the region. Gold reached a five-week high of $3,446 but dipped slightly as traders took profits.
In the U.S., inflation continues to decrease, according to the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) figures. A survey from the University of Michigan indicates growing optimism, though there are still concerns about rising prices. The U.S. government has warned Iran about its nuclear activities, linking the conflict to these actions.
Upcoming Federal Reserve Policy Meeting
All eyes are on the Federal Reserve’s upcoming monetary policy meeting, which will provide updated economic forecasts. Key indicators like Retail Sales, Industrial Production, housing, and jobs data could influence the price of Gold.
Analysts forecast that Gold could surpass $3,450, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) suggesting a bullish trend. If the price falls below $3,450, support may be found at $3,400, and then at the 50-day Simple Moving Average (SMA) of $3,281.
Gold serves as a protection during crises and against inflation and currency decline. In 2022, central banks added 1,136 tonnes of Gold to their reserves, valued at about $70 billion—marking their largest annual growth. Typically, Gold rises when the U.S. Dollar and Treasuries go down, especially when interest rates are low. The trends in the U.S. Dollar continue to impact Gold prices.
As Gold prices rise for a third consecutive session amid geopolitical tensions, the metal is reinforcing its role as a secure asset during uncertain times. After Israel attacked Iranian military sites, market sentiment shifted toward safety, significantly increasing demand for non-yielding assets. Consequently, the XAU/USD pair reached levels not seen in over a month, nearing $3,446 before dropping slightly as traders took profits. Such profit-taking is common after consecutive gains and doesn’t indicate a loss of optimism.
Investor Sentiment and Market Dynamics
The recent drop in U.S. inflation measures, especially the CPI and PPI, adds complexity to the situation. While price growth is slowing, inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s comfort zone. The University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey indicates a slight improvement in economic outlook, but worries about buying power continue. Policymakers have a limited timeframe to act without increasing market anxiety.
The Fed’s upcoming meeting, along with new economic forecasts, will provide important insights. We will keep an eye out for any changes in tone or outlook, especially with fresh data on consumer spending, hiring, and industrial activity. These figures will influence expectations on how long current interest rates will remain or if the central bank may delay easing policies. Gold, a non-yielding asset, typically benefits when interest rate expectations decrease.
The outlook suggests that Gold could move higher if buyer momentum continues. RSI indicators show that buyers are in control, and if prices convincingly break above $3,450, we might see even higher levels. On the other hand, any drop may find support at $3,400, with further backing around the 50-day SMA at $3,281. For investors managing exposure, these levels can help in making clear entry and exit decisions.
It’s worth noting that central banks accumulated large quantities of Gold in 2022, reflecting enduring confidence in the asset. With over a thousand tonnes added to their reserves, these institutions appear to be aiming for long-term stability rather than quick gains. Their strategy was influenced not only by inflation but also by evolving attitudes toward the Dollar and sovereign debt.
Gold’s usual inverse relationship with the U.S. Dollar and Treasury yields remains strong. Should interest rate expectations soften further, we anticipate a decline in the Dollar, which may add upward pressure to XAU/USD. Traders looking beyond immediate news should keep this dynamic in mind.
In the coming weeks, staying responsive rather than reactive will be crucial. Although the geopolitical situation may remain tense, the interaction with monetary policy and broader economic indicators will provide clearer trading signals. Sudden market shifts can create opportunities and risks, so careful attention to these trends is important.
Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.
Asking prices for homes in the UK dropped significantly in June, marking the largest decline since 2011. In June 2025, there was a 0.3% fall in prices compared to the previous month, which is unusual since there is usually a 0.4% increase during this time.
The yearly rise in house prices came in at 0.8%, the smallest increase since August 2024. Before this, prices had risen by 1.2% annually.
Currently, there are more homes available for sale than in the past ten years. Recent stamp duty hikes in England might be influencing new sellers’ pricing strategies.
More competitive pricing is helping boost sales. The number of agreed sales has hit its highest level in over three years.
At the start of the new week, the exchange rate for GBP has changed little.
These early figures signal a subtle shift in the property market and its wider effects. The decrease in asking prices during June, typically a strong month for sellers, illustrates growing caution. Families often look to move in June before the new school year begins, so a 0.3% drop against seasonal trends indicates buyer hesitance.
The annual growth of 0.8%, down from 1.2%, reveals a tightening in valuations and how much sellers are willing to negotiate. While sellers were previously aiming high, the surge in available homes—now at a decade-high—has begun to test their confidence. More properties are being listed, but sellers are now pricing them more realistically.
Changes in stamp duty seem to have only slightly influenced new listings, with pricing adjustments being moderate. However, this pressure may impact valuations more directly in the coming months, especially as summer progresses. Sellers easing into tax-related costs could create pricing mismatches that lenders and investors will need to consider.
On a positive note, sales activity is increasing, with more homes actually changing hands. Realistic pricing may be encouraging hesitant buyers to take action. Transaction levels have now risen to their highest since early 2021. The combination of motivated sellers and steady demand, particularly in properties under £500,000, could stabilize areas that seemed fragile before.
From our perspective, this situation affects financial instruments sensitive to local activity. With the housing market adjusting expectations, it becomes important to monitor associated sentiments around monetary policy. This leads us to the current stagnation in sterling. There hasn’t been a strong movement reflecting this housing moderation—at least not yet. GBP remains relatively stable against major currencies, showing little decisive change.
We see this steady trend as a pause before clearer economic signals emerge. Short-term traders might already be anticipating one or two moves from the Bank of England. For any significant shifts to happen now, we’d likely need data from impactful events like core inflation, wage growth, or unemployment changes.
As house prices soften, more homes enter the market, and there isn’t a direct push on sterling, it’s essential to stay flexible. New information isn’t being aggressively factored in, but this could change quickly. Observing how implied volatility behaves—whether it settles or struggles—will provide insights ahead of the English housing market.
Current UK Housing Market Trends
In May 2025, New Zealand’s Services Performance Index (PSI) dropped to 44.0. This is the lowest level since June 2024, down from 48.1, and below the long-term average of 53.0.
This decline follows a significant drop in the Performance of Manufacturing Index (PMI), which fell from 53.3 to 47.5. Both indices indicate that the economy may be heading toward a recession. Despite these concerning numbers, the NZD/USD currency pair remained stable after the data was released.
New Zealand Economy Contraction
The latest figures show a broader slowdown in both manufacturing and services in New Zealand. A PSI of 44.0 indicates that most service sector firms are experiencing contraction rather than growth. While a drop from 48.1 might not seem alarming, the gap from the long-term average of 53.0 shows ongoing weakness rather than just a temporary downturn.
The manufacturing data reinforces this trend. The sharp decline from 53.3 to 47.5 brings the index below the crucial threshold of 50, which separates growth from shrinkage. When combined with service sector data, it points to broader economic challenges rather than temporary industry cycles.
What’s surprising is the market’s response, or rather, the lack of it. Normally, such data would cause currency fluctuations, but the New Zealand dollar remained steady. This could mean traders had expected these results or had already positioned themselves for a downturn. It may also suggest that current market focus is elsewhere, possibly on central bank policies or international events shaping short-term sentiment.
Forecasting Economic Trends
Looking ahead, we observe that both the manufacturing and services sectors have shown consecutive weaknesses. Historically, this kind of dual-sector contraction often precedes a decline in GDP, typically leading to a technical recession if it continues for another quarter.
As a result, we anticipate revisions downwards for domestic growth forecasts in the near future. Market expectations regarding policy rates may also become more responsive to future guidance. Thus, following commentary is crucial—not just decisions on rates but also insights about the future. Yield curves might start to show a higher chance of monetary easing, and this could be reflected in short-term interest rate derivatives.
Given that central banks usually react with a delay to worsening economic data, there’s room for speculation about the timing of their actions. While the services index does not eliminate uncertainty in the short term, it makes earlier expectations for rate hikes harder to defend. If confidence remains low, we could see increased volatility in front-end contracts and a rise in demand for hedging.
Overall, it’s essential to view the latest data as more than just one-month snapshots. Their trends, magnitude, and connection to long-term averages all suggest worsening conditions. We may see more noticeable risk adjustments on the rates side compared to currencies, assuming no unexpected developments arise. If this pattern continues, larger investments in interest rate options, especially those that protect against potential near-term policy changes, might occur.
Our strategy focuses on how these figures influence the forward curve rather than just the current values. Trading strategies may lean towards capturing the changes caused by rising uncertainty, particularly within the 3- to 9-month timeframe. The market may already be considering this approach.
Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.
The yen has weakened after initially rising due to Israeli military actions against Iran. Since then, it has followed a downward path, with the USD/JPY moving past its previous stable range during Friday’s US session.
Japan, a significant energy importer, struggles with rising oil prices, which hurt the yen’s value. Higher US Treasury yields also contribute to this decline. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) is meeting today and tomorrow, and it is expected to keep interest rates unchanged.
The benchmark interest rate is likely to stay at 0.5%, and the BOJ is predicted to maintain rates until year-end. There is also an expected slowdown in bond tapering because of market stress.
Earlier, futures showed some retracement as ES and NQ stabilized, and oil prices fell from their earlier highs.
We see a typical market reaction to geopolitical tensions and economic conditions. The yen initially strengthened due to the military situation in the Middle East; usually, safe-haven currencies gain when uncertainty rises, but this reaction was short-lived. Since then, the yen has returned to its downward trend against the US dollar, breaking out of its earlier stability during the late-session US trading on Friday.
The ongoing weakness in the yen is due to clear reasons. Japan’s dependence on energy imports means that rising oil prices increase domestic costs, which lowers the yen’s value, as more yen is needed to pay for energy in dollars. At the same time, rising US bond yields make dollar-denominated assets more appealing, adding to the yen’s decline.
As the central bank meets for two days, the expectation is to take no action. The base rate is expected to remain at 0.5%, and there is little interest in tightening this year. Market participants appear to be ready for a slower pace of bond purchases due to pressure in the bond market. With global rate adjustments causing instability, policymakers are cautious not to disrupt fragile market conditions.
Futures markets opened cautiously amid military headlines, but initial spikes have receded. Cash indices and their futures, especially in ES and NQ, have stabilized, while energy contracts have softened. After a surge, oil has given back most of its gains. This indicates that markets quickly reassess threats. Fear can spike rapidly, but calm judgment often returns just as quickly when tensions ease.
Recently, we have taken a cautious approach as volatility in fixed income and currency has been a significant factor. With the yen breaking lower after a period of consolidation, there is stronger directional conviction. Pressure is building on the BOJ to act, but markets do not expect changes soon. Current trends are more influenced by events in Washington than in Tokyo.
As the week continues, interest rate differences remain crucial. With no significant changes expected from the BOJ and continued strength from the US economy, the trend still favors a stronger dollar. We are closely monitoring the long end of the US Treasury curve, as any steepening could boost momentum for this currency pair.
Looking further into the curve, recent yield movements suggest that money is positioning for long-term high policy rates. This is not beneficial for asset classes that depend on lower borrowing costs. The carry trade remains strong, especially as institutional flows continue out of yen-based assets.
In equity markets, there is some hesitation but no panic. The risk-off premium has generally faded since the initial military news, suggesting that this risk is now background noise rather than a major factor affecting future estimates.
As market conditions improve and commodity prices realign with calmer FX flows, we are prepared for late-day positioning on Tuesday as BOJ comments come through. The interactions between bond supply and dollar strength indicate a need for careful inventory management—adding at extremes rather than chasing average ranges. Timing and patience are essential practices, not optional tools.
Oil futures rose at the beginning of the week, with Brent crude increasing by about $3, or roughly 4%.
In contrast, U.S. equity index futures fell. E-minis dipped, with the ES down 0.3% and the NQ down 0.4%.
This shows a noticeable difference in market sentiment between energy markets and stock indices. The nearly $3 jump in Brent crude reflects strong buying interest, likely due to supply issues or expectations for higher demand. Such a significant move indicates that traders are making adjustments in response to expected changes, possibly related to geopolitical events or decisions from OPEC, signaling tighter supply.
On the other hand, E-mini futures, which track major market benchmarks like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, are down in early trading. The 0.3% drop in the ES and the 0.4% decline in the NQ suggest some investor unease. While this isn’t a full-on risk-off response, it hints that investors may be pulling back from growth-focused or tech-heavy stocks, likely reacting to macroeconomic data or guidance that’s below expectations.
This disconnect—rising oil prices amid falling equities—often highlights concerns about rising costs affecting corporate profits. If energy prices go up while other assets struggle, it points to a resurgent worry about inflation. This concern can influence the costs of hedges and increase implied volatility in certain sectors.
Traders should watch for how this divergence appears in volatility trends in the next few sessions. Implied volatility can rise even before major price movements. We’ve seen this in short-term oil futures, where call skews have widened, indicating a shift in positioning more for hedging rather than speculation. Longer-dated calls seem to be more appealing than short-term downside protection, at least for now.
The cautious attitude in U.S. equity futures may also prompt a look at correlations. If index deltas decrease while crude prices rise, past relationships may start to weaken. This could lead to dispersion strategies. Currently, the gap between Brent and ES implied volatilities is widening, which indicates we should closely monitor how pricing models adjust over time. Such gaps typically do not last without some form of adjustment, either by compressing or expanding volatility.
Market breadth warrants attention as well. Recent flow data suggests that money isn’t being pulled out of U.S. equities entirely; instead, it’s being shuffled internally, with cyclicals gaining some interest while growth sectors feel mild pressure. This shift mirrors what’s happening in energy, as capital changes respond to expected short-term variations in costs or consumer behavior.
To manage risk effectively in this situation, it’s essential to refine your Greek measures, especially vega and delta across different assets. Asset managers dealing with shifting sectors and commodity prices should reassess their hedging strategies—not just in size but also over different time frames. The last two sessions show a clear change in open interest for weekly versus monthly options.
Looking at liquidity, it’s evident that some of these changes may be influenced by expirations and roll activities. However, we cannot overlook the signals that price movements in commodities and equities are sending in the short term, especially for anyone adjusting risk exposure ahead of the next volatility cycle.
Iran has informed mediators from Qatar and Oman that it will not join negotiations while under attack. This affects ceasefire talks with Israel and possible nuclear discussions with the United States. Iran insists that serious negotiations will only happen after it finishes responding to Israel’s preemptive strikes.
This stance reflects what Iran’s Foreign Minister has said before: they will prepare for talks only after addressing recent conflicts. While the validity of these reports is unclear, there is hope that violence may soon decrease.
In market news, futures trading is set to begin at 6:00 PM Eastern Time (11:00 PM GMT) this week.
The situation shows Iran is now taking a “wait-and-react” approach, directly impacting ongoing diplomatic efforts. Iran has made its position clear: no talks while missiles are being fired. The message relayed through Gulf intermediaries sets a definitive boundary. It raises important questions about timing: how long will Iran take to respond? When might talks resume, if at all?
For those watching the broader scenario, especially in the derivatives market, this signal goes beyond diplomacy. Santos has emphasized a methodical approach: react first, negotiate later. Even without full confirmation of these reports, the diplomatic landscape seems shaky, which could hinder discussions about ceasefires and nuclear limitations.
On the tick charts and options flow, Sunday night’s open at 11:00 PM GMT comes with heightened expectations. Futures traders should brace for quick price adjustments right after the market opens. We can expect increased volatility, particularly in energy-related contracts and safe-haven investments. Price gaps are likely due to the ongoing uncertainty.
We need to closely monitor positions tied to Middle Eastern political risks. Premiums have gradually increased over the past five days and now seem justified rather than speculative. Any hope that a move towards diplomacy could stabilize volatility should be replaced with a more cautious strategy.
It’s wise to adjust positions, tighten stops, and reduce exposure during this risk period. Typically, event-driven swings like this challenge our convictions. The focus should be on adapting quickly, not just holding steady. Timing and preparation for sudden market changes will be more beneficial than rigid directional trading.
As the market opens, it’s best to start with smaller positions and keep an eye on liquidity. If major shifts occur overnight in energy stocks or defense-related assets, fade strategies may not hold up under pressure. Instead, use well-tested strategies and stay flexible. Monitor assets tied closely to oil or foreign policy risks for early signs of trader reactions or methodical risk recalibrations.
We’ve been through similar situations before. It usually begins with postponed diplomacy and gradually leads to pricing instability. Take it one step at a time.
The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) announced a 400 billion yuan cash injection into its banking system using reverse repos on June 16. This money is set to be available for six months.
Last week, the Bank also introduced 1 trillion yuan through three-month reverse repos. These actions are aimed at managing the upcoming 4 trillion yuan in interbank negotiable certificate of deposit maturities due this month.
Liquidity Management Efforts
To meet future liquidity needs, the PBOC might make more cash injections. This is part of the Bank’s strategy to carefully handle liquidity to support the economy.
The recent 400 billion yuan injection adds to the earlier 1 trillion yuan for three months. Together, these steps show the Bank’s commitment to managing the liquidity challenges caused by this month’s maturing deposits. With 4 trillion yuan exiting the system, similar future interventions are likely needed.
Pan has decided to stabilize the situation without making major changes to interest rates. This approach aims to maintain short-term stability through liquidity measures instead of broad easing. Therefore, we expect a careful response to short-term funding stress and possibly more similar-sized actions.
The reverse repos now cover both three and six months, indicating a more refined approach to smooth out market disruptions. The longer-term injection aims to ensure stability for the second half of the year, reducing uncertainty in the medium term as the liquidity cycle resets.
Market Implications
In terms of interest rate volatility, these measures should help reduce fluctuations. With short-term repo rates likely to remain stable, the strain on overnight and seven-day funds should lessen. We anticipate fewer sharp changes during the day, though the funding curve may steepen unless balanced by longer-term operations.
Zou’s team at the central bank is likely managing these cash flows as a safety net, preparing for any potential market disruptions. Based on previous liquidity strategies, it’s a good time for professionals to reassess calendar spreads and differences in terms. These moves tend to lower risk in closely monitored rate ranges.
We would also adjust our strategies. Derivatives linked to short-term funding rates might lose some immediate leverage. We’ll keep an eye on implied volatility in repo-linked futures and proceed cautiously with trades that assume significant tightening. The PBOC’s reintroduction of six-month tenors should be factored into our models for year-end analysis.
It’s essential to watch the rest of the month closely. If liquidity measures fall short of covering maturities, we could see a net withdrawal again, shifting focus to weekly operations. Historically, liquidity tends to normalize in waves rather than on a set schedule, which could create opportunities around expiry periods.
These actions seem to be proactive, aimed at bolstering system confidence rather than reactive measures. This isn’t a surprise cycle; rather, it’s advisable to prepare for potential mean-reversion setups. Spread traders and those involved in the CNH basis should revisit expectations for 3- to 6-month carry trades, refining their entries based on upcoming liquidity updates.
Short-dated interest rate options may show less skew value, mainly due to the more predictable pace of injections, which reduces concerns about extreme events. However, if maturities are greater than new injections, we might see temporary intraday funding stress, presenting chances for short gamma trades.
Longer-dated swaption markets might be overestimating the likelihood of base rate changes, which now seem less likely. Adjusting assumptions about the policy path could better reflect the current use of liquidity tools.
Most importantly, this ongoing rhythm shifts focus from anticipating cuts to a more fluid trading environment. Traders who keep track of daily operations rather than quarterly trends may find better opportunities.
Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.
On Monday, June 16, 2025, the economic calendar in Asia is quiet, with no major events expected to impact the markets. However, surprises can happen.
Attention is on the Bank of Japan, which starts a two-day monetary policy meeting. Officials plan to keep the benchmark interest rate at 0.5%. Surveys suggest this rate will remain unchanged through the end of the year.
The Bank of Japan is also likely to maintain the current rates and slow down its bond tapering due to market pressure. Meanwhile, emerging news, especially from the Middle East, is also capturing attention.
This week begins softly for Asian markets, with no significant economic data to shift market sentiment soon. Analysts are focusing on the Bank of Japan (BoJ), which has just started its two-day meeting. The general expectation from surveys is that the central bank will keep its short-term interest rate steady at 0.5% for the rest of the year. While it’s likely that rates will stay flat, the BoJ may slow its bond purchases due to recent market volatility and pressures, which could come from currency shifts or changes in domestic credit. Market interest is also shifting towards potential geopolitical events in the Middle East, which could change risk sentiment suddenly, even if they aren’t currently factored into the markets.
From a trading point of view, a central bank staying the course typically leads to less confidence in currency and rate movements, unless new guidance is given. Ueda and his colleagues seem to be taking a cautious approach, minimizing the chances of sudden rate changes in Japan. This is important for anyone with long-term investments or interests in expected yield spreads.
Given the lack of surprises in domestic policies, we anticipate less immediate volatility, especially in yen rate markets. However, if bond tapering slows, it could subtly tighten financial conditions through liquidity changes, impacting collateral valuations and near 10-year JGB futures. If the BoJ reduces its buying faster than expected, pricing could become more complicated.
With nothing else on the agenda, focus may turn to implied volatility in overnight transactions involving the yen, which can react strongly to even minor surprises in rate policies. Similarly, futures tied to Nikkei options may adjust based on cross-asset hedging strategies, particularly as liquidity decreases while waiting for the policy statement.
It’s crucial to watch the tone after the BoJ’s decision. If Kuroda’s successor gives hints about possible adjustments this quarter, the market could react quickly—especially in short-term rate swap pricing. This could create opportunities not currently factored into mid-curve volatility.
Don’t overlook external factors either. Increased geopolitical risks might lead to unhedged rate positions being adjusted or reduced, especially for those holding synthetic yen shorts through structured carry trades. In such cases, prioritizing liquidity becomes more important than optimizing yield. We’ve seen this happen before, so keep hedge ratios flexible.
Finally, if rates stay steady but tapering slows down further, we might see a flattening trend in curve spreads, which could warrant changing butterfly structures across JPY IRS tenors. Whether this happens will depend on the future guidance tone—not just actions.
We are closely monitoring OIS forwards.
Insights 
VT 
