Back

Governor Bowman is open to lowering the policy rate if inflation pressures stay manageable.

FOMC Governor Michelle Bowman recently mentioned that if inflation stays stable, she would support lowering the policy rate at the next meeting. This would help align the rate with its neutral level, ensuring a healthy job market. Bowman is open to possible rate cuts starting at the July meeting. She highlighted the importance of assessing risks to the job market and noted that trade policies have minimal effects on inflation.

Trade Policies And Inflation

Tariffs are expected to have a small impact on inflation, while improvements in trade help reduce uncertainty. The ongoing conflict in the Middle East could drive up commodity prices. Despite a strong job market, there are early signs of weakness. The AUD/USD pair bounced back from its lowest level since May, supported by positive global sentiment after a ceasefire announcement between Israel and Iran. The USD is facing pressure, bolstered by renewed expectations of a Fed rate cut in July, affecting USD/JPY and influencing gold prices. The cryptocurrency market also rose as major assets recovered, driven by the ceasefire. However, concerns about the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route, are resurfacing. Trading foreign exchange comes with high risks and leverage, which can result in significant financial losses. It’s crucial to understand these risks and consult a financial advisor when needed.

Shifts In Monetary Policy Expectations

Bowman’s comments mark a noticeable shift from some previous communications. She suggests that the threshold for easing may be lower than markets previously thought. If inflation remains steady or declines, a July rate cut becomes more likely. It’s important to note that she still views the job market as a strong pillar, although some cracks are starting to appear. This suggests that the economy is resilient enough to implement some monetary easing without immediately threatening employment. She downplayed the inflationary effects of trade policies, reducing the emphasis on tariffs. Even as trade disputes continue, their impact on core inflation seems to be diminishing. This may give the central bank more freedom to focus on domestic factors. However, if conflicts in the Middle East escalate, energy markets may feel the pressure again. For now, the resolution between Israel and Iran prompted a global sigh of relief, positively affecting various asset classes. The bounce in AUD/USD was not driven by domestic data. Instead, easing global tensions restored confidence and increased appetite for carry trades. Markets began to expect a more dovish stance from Washington, leading to a pullback in USD strength and a decrease in defensive positions. This trend was supported by reduced safe-haven investments in the yen and a rise in gold as the dollar weakened. These foreign exchange movements illustrate how sensitive current market sentiment is to international news—value is not solely determined by fundamentals. There were also notable effects in the cryptocurrency market, which appears to be increasingly responding to geopolitical changes. However, these digital assets are still influenced by central bank expectations. Their bounce likely indicates a market anticipating looser financial conditions, especially if risks in the Middle East remain controlled. That said, there are still concerns about the possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This issue extends beyond oil shipping to affect various logistics and pricing chains. From a trading perspective, the possibility of a Fed policy shift brings both opportunities and volatility. Rate-sensitive assets are already adjusting. Some short-term contracts may be anticipating more dovish outcomes faster than the fundamentals may warrant, creating room for abrupt changes if economic data contradicts these expectations. It’s essential to closely monitor job data, wage growth, and fresh inflation figures before July. Any signals inconsistent with rate cuts could trigger a quick sell-off, especially since positioning has become more one-sided. Using leverage in these markets requires careful execution. Volatility from news or policy changes affects not just foreign exchange but can also ripple through commodities, metals, and sectors linked to policy shifts. Given the close relationship between gold and USD/JPY sentiment, traders making directional bets should be cautious of broader correlation changes during sudden geopolitical events. This environment requires thoughtful evaluation of news, timing, and liquidity when placing trades. Relying solely on rate expectations without considering political risks may lead to unexpected setbacks. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Buyers of USDJPY faced challenges at the 38.2% retracement, causing a pullback to support levels.

USDJPY recently went above the 38.2% retracement level from December to April, reaching 147.11, but failed to hold its position. This led sellers to push the price back to the established range between 145.92 and 146.24. If USDJPY drops below this range, it might show a bearish trend. Key levels to watch are 145.47, a minor pivot from May, 144.66, the 200-hour moving average, and 144.42, the 100-hour moving average. On the other hand, if the price holds and rebounds from the swing band, it could indicate a bullish trend. The first challenge would be to reclaim the 38.2% retracement level at 147.11, with a target of 147.49, today’s peak price. The price movement within the range of 145.92 to 146.24 will dictate the next direction. Observing momentum on either side will be crucial to confirm the upcoming trend. This situation reflects a typical response to a failed breakout attempt. After moving slightly above the 38.2% retracement of the recent decline, the pair quickly retreated. Such rejections near retracement levels often shift focus back to short-term balance points, resulting in traders driving the price back into the familiar zone between 145.92 and 146.24. The earlier rise past 147.11 suggested bullish interest, possibly due to hopes for a more assertive policy from decision-makers or better economic conditions. However, the lack of follow-up buying indicates weak conviction or dependency on an absent catalyst. Once the upward movement stalled, sellers re-emerged, particularly those waiting to profit from any strength near technical resistance. Now, it’s crucial to observe the behavior near the lower edge of this range. If the price falls below 145.92 and stays there, it may encourage deeper retracements within the larger range developed over the last few weeks. The initial targets would be 145.47, where there was a brief pause during May, followed by the moving averages at 144.66 and 144.42. Momentum often picks up around these levels, as shorter-term traders view them as key balance points. We focus on price flow and reactions rather than just proximity to specific levels. A breakout from the swing band would be more convincing if it comes with increasing volume or aligns with broader market shifts. For example, if stocks decline or yields remain low, the pair might not stabilize near support levels. Still, a rebound from the current levels would not be unexpected. This wouldn’t be the first time buyers have defended this band. If the price stabilizes here, a move towards retesting 147.11, and ideally up to 147.49, is likely. Breaching that level could support a stronger retracement of the earlier decline this year. In either direction, we are relying on real-time reactions instead of speculation. Observing how the price behaves in and out of this tight range will provide clear positioning insights. The next two sessions could offer more confidence in this analysis. Static levels matter only if behavior confirms them. For tactical positioning, we remain mindful of the defined swing band and momentum indicators. Moving averages, especially the 100-hour and 200-hour lines, are important—they indicate when control is shifting decisively. We look for movements beyond these averages when volatility increases or when major pairs show wider fluctuations. Even if the market remains compressed longer, patience is a better strategy than guessing at turning points. Waiting for movement beyond 147.49 or below 145.92 will clarify direction. Until then, movements within the band are more likely to be noise than signals.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

FactSet Research quarterly earnings fall short of expectations, reporting $4.27 per share instead of $4.31

**FactSet Revenue Trends** Since the beginning of the year, FactSet shares have dropped by 12.1%. In contrast, the S&P 500 has grown by 1.5%. The future stock price will depend mainly on the company’s next earnings calls and commentary. The current consensus for earnings per share (EPS) is $4.13, with anticipated revenues of $591.59 million for the next quarter. For the current fiscal year, earnings are expected to be $17.10, with revenues reaching $2.31 billion. Rollins, a company in the same sector, will soon announce its quarterly results, predicting earnings of $0.29 per share and revenues of $976.52 million. This represents a 9.5% revenue increase from the same period last year. **FactSet’s Performance Outlook** FactSet’s recent earnings of $4.27 per share were slightly below expectations, which were set at $4.31. Although this shortfall might seem small, it’s significant when compared to last year’s earnings of $4.37 for the same quarter. This indicates a slight decrease in efficiency, despite revenue growth. In terms of revenue, FactSet performed well, generating $585.52 million, which was a positive surprise of 0.72% and well above last year’s $552.71 million. This shows that sales are strong, but there may be challenges in managing costs or profit margins, which have dipped slightly below expectations. From a trading standpoint, it’s crucial to understand why revenue continues to rise while earnings are decreasing. This trend isn’t sustainable over the long term in data analytics firms, where profit margins often shrink during periods of investment or restructuring. Although factors like platform expansion or internal cost pressures should not be overlooked, we should be cautious about overly optimistic views until we get clearer insights from company commentary or filings. Watching the upcoming earnings calls will shift focus from just the numbers to the reasoning behind them. Analysts will likely seek explanations regarding operational efficiency, especially since shares have declined over 12% since January. With the broader market rising, like the 1.5% gain of the S&P 500, any underperformance stands out more. Looking forward, analysts have slightly lowered expectations, forecasting EPS of $4.13 for next quarter and projecting revenues to grow to $591.59 million. A gradual drop in earnings, while revenue continues to increase, puts pressure on operating margins. The outlook for the full year suggests an annual EPS of $17.10 and revenues just exceeding $2.31 billion, indicating a cautious revenue forecast. In the same sector, Rollins provides an interesting comparison. It expects earnings of $0.29 per share and a 9.5% revenue increase, totaling $976.52 million. Although the scale differs, the growth trends are similar. The key difference lies in how effectively each company turns that growth into actual earnings. For those monitoring derivative markets linked to these stocks, it’s time to adjust any positions that relied on consistent strong earnings. Previously expected high-probability earnings beats may now lead to increased volatility in EPS outcomes. This situation could create opportunities for strategies that anticipate intermittent weakness, especially where implied volatility is underestimated. It’s more about broadening the hedge than just exiting positions. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

US dollar drops sharply as markets respond positively to oil prices and rising risk appetite

Market conditions are changing. Oil prices are falling, and stock prices are rising, while the US dollar is losing value. This shift came after Iran took a symbolic action against a US base in Qatar, which seemed more like a domestic stage play than a serious escalation. The US dollar has experienced a significant fall, reversing early gains into substantial losses. In contrast, the euro has gained 41 pips overall and has recovered 140 pips from its earlier lows, getting closer to the 1.1600 level.

Market Reaction To Geopolitical Events

So far, it appears that geopolitical events aren’t causing long-term market anxiety. The market seems to view Iran’s response as more for domestic purposes rather than a large-scale conflict. Consequently, the euro, which was previously oversold, found support and has nearly regained all its losses, moving back up and nearing a key psychological level. Simultaneously, the US dollar’s abrupt fall fits a pattern seen when geopolitical tensions ease, allowing macroeconomic trends to take the forefront. After earlier gains were lost, the dollar weakened across the board, despite Treasury yields remaining stable. This indicates that traders are unwinding their positions rather than adjusting rates. We’ve seen such reversals happen before when traders heavily bet in one direction ahead of known risks. For those tracking options and short-term market volatility, there has been a reduction in pricing for near-dated euro-dollar pairs. This suggests that expectations for policy differences are now more measured. The earlier demand for euro downside protection has decreased, and volume in put spreads has lightened, confirming that initial fears were quickly alleviated.

Implications For Traders And Markets

In this context, the focus shifts to adjusting rate expectations—not just for the Federal Reserve, but also for the European Central Bank. Goolsbee’s recent comments haven’t significantly influenced terminal rate forecasts, but they’ve created some uncertainty, pushing sentiment towards more patience instead of aggressive tightening. This sentiment is reflected in swap pricing, which now slightly favors an earlier Fed rate cut than what was anticipated just a week ago. For traders looking to time market moves with derivatives, this shift provides new opportunities. We prefer strategies that benefit from moderate dollar weakening without expecting major shifts. Short-term risk reversals are beginning to reflect this approach, and the euro-dollar movement suggests that betting against the dollar could offer good prospects, especially with upcoming PMI data and consumer inflation expectations. Moreover, rising equities amid a weaker dollar is not a coincidence. There’s renewed interest in reflation trades, with tech and cyclical sectors attracting buyers as the New York market opens. A lower dollar enhances profitability for multinational companies, which is now being factored into option strategies. Open interest in call spreads on large-cap indices has increased, particularly for expirations in late February. Due to this broader shift, volatility selling in US index futures has markedly increased. This makes future shocks likely to cause sharp adjustments in positions. We are closely monitoring volatility surfaces for any steepening that might indicate further market stress. So far, there are no signs of such stress, reinforcing the idea that traders have moved past initial geopolitical responses and are returning to macroeconomic trends instead of seeking safety. Our focus is now on global data surprises. Upcoming economic reports will help determine whether the recent gains in risk assets can hold or fade away. For now, downside protections in euro-dollar seem well secured, and the probability indicators in rate futures suggest that fixed income markets are easing off aggressive tightening expectations. We will continue to look for clearer signals in the next few sessions. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Daniel Ghali notes critically low copper inventories, leading to changes in convenience yields within TDSLME.

LME Copper convenience yields show that inventories are extremely low, with metal leaving the system recently. This is driven by rising demand from China and the US, creating a need for metal to return to avoid running out of stock. In Shanghai, traders have sold a significant amount of Copper positions, totaling 84.5k metric tons this month. Even so, deliveries are still sparse. However, increased buying from Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) may push LME flat prices and the curve upwards. By June, the AUD/USD hit resistance around 0.6550 but recovered to above 0.6400, influenced by a sell-off in the US Dollar. Similarly, EUR/USD approached 1.1630 due to hints of possible interest rate cuts from the Fed. Gold prices are hovering near $3,400 due to geopolitical tensions, particularly after Iran’s missile activities. Former Coral Capital executives are planning a $100 million investment in cryptocurrency, coinciding with a 4% gain in BNB. As geopolitical tensions rise, the threat of closing the Strait of Hormuz resurfaces, especially as tensions between Israel and Iran escalate. Trading foreign exchange carries risks, and using leverage can lead to losses. It’s crucial to understand your investment goals and risks before engaging in trading. The current situation in copper markets reveals a risk framework beyond just supply and demand. The decline in LME convenience yields indicates extremely low warehouse stocks, at a historic low. The recent drawdown signals a severe shortfall likely caused by increased building activity in the US and changes in forward booking from Chinese buyers. As metal continues to be pulled from visible exchange inventories, the tightness in supply remains a significant concern. This scarcity is evident as the curve shows a premium over the spot price, especially in the near months. If short-term stock levels do not improve soon, we expect further steepening in backwardation. This steepening is no coincidence; it reflects genuine concerns over securing physical delivery rather than just paper returns. Additionally, even with the recent unloading of over 84,000 metric tons of copper contracts on the Shanghai exchange, we haven’t seen a corresponding increase in immediate deliveries, highlighting an underlying scarcity of metal. The involvement of CTAs has started to influence flat pricing again. These strategies, driven by price trends and momentum, could amplify market movements. When inventory shortages collide with model-driven orders, both the curve shape and spot prices can react sharply. While timing is challenging, it appears that the risks are skewed, especially for those closing short positions or rolling forward contracts. In the FX markets, the AUD/USD rebound past 0.6400 coincided with a decrease in demand for the dollar. This isn’t just a technical overshoot; it’s a strategic shift based on expectations regarding the US central bank’s direction. The resistance near 0.6550 should not be seen only as structural; it likely indicates a pause as macro players assess future rate expectations. Similarly, movements in EUR/USD towards 1.1630 suggest investors are positioning themselves ahead of potential rate cuts. Data supports an increased commitment to the European currency, likely at the expense of short-term loyalty to the dollar. Gold has once more taken on the role of a geopolitical hedge, with current prices suggesting more than mere sentiment. The rise toward $3,400 follows heightened risks around the Strait of Hormuz, fueled by recent missile launches. These issues are significant for global shipping, as volatility in crude and natural gas prices often starts from concerns in that area. Traders should stay alert for potential cross-sector impacts. Rising tensions between Israel and Iran, specifically regarding potential maritime blockades, add complexity to risk models. These developments should be viewed as primary triggers rather than mere theoretical risks, changing correlations and affecting relative value trades across metals, energy, and increasingly, digital assets. Speaking of digital assets, the planned $100 million crypto fund by former Coral Capital executives comes at a time when BNB has gained 4%, amidst a broader sector rally. Although still a small part of most derivative portfolios, money flowing into token-based assets is becoming harder to overlook, especially as traditional safe-haven assets like gold adjust in price. For those managing derivative strategies, the upcoming weeks will demand close attention to physical indicators, particularly metal stockpile reports and shipping data, along with momentum model signals. Both of these inputs can serve as tipping points that standard macro filters may overlook. We continue to keep a close watch.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Goolsbee states that the effects of tariffs are milder than expected, with uncertainties impacting economic data.

Chicago Fed President Austin Goolsbee noted that the impact of tariffs has been milder than expected. He likened these tariffs to oil shocks, indicating potential stagflation concerns. The limited effect of the tariffs comes from their relatively low levels and specific exemptions. Goolsbee highlighted that uncertainty is present now and emphasized the need to watch soft economic data during this changeable period. He stated that there are no clear signals about interest rate changes at this time. Goolsbee’s comments hint at larger trends beneath the headlines about policy changes and economic data. When he compares import tariffs to past oil shocks, he raises concerns that go beyond inflation and growth; there is a troubling mix of both pressures arising simultaneously. This comparison, drawn from the 1970s, carries historical weight that markets generally dislike—specifically, the worry of slow economic growth alongside rising prices. However, things haven’t unfolded exactly as feared. The tariffs we see remain quite restrained by global standards, with enough exceptions to lessen their impact. It’s one thing to apply tariffs for strategic reasons; it’s another to keep them relatively low from a broader economic viewpoint. So far, the consequences appear manageable. That said, don’t treat this as a reason to relax. The focus on soft data is significant. These indicators—like surveys and sentiment readings—often reflect shifts in mood and expectations before these changes show up in more concrete data like GDP or consumer spending. When these measures start to decline or consistently rise, they often signal the next move in policy or pricing. The lack of a clear message about interest rates shouldn’t be seen as indifference from policymakers. Quite the opposite; it indicates how much they are considering incomplete signals. There’s hesitation—not from uncertainty, but from a careful approach to avoid overreacting to a trend that remains unclear. For those of us analyzing short-term trends and planning for longer-term scenarios, the implications are direct. Patience is necessary. Volatility pricing may not fully capture shocks caused by shifts in sentiment. These changes don’t always follow a trend but can switch rapidly. It may be wise not to assume that the relationship between economic data and market pricing will remain stable. We might begin to adjust our strategies alongside updated expectations, rather than waiting for signals from policy changes themselves. Anticipatory pricing often reacts faster than official statements during transitional times. Right now, there’s a notable gap between tangible data and future expectations. Being slow to adjust could be costly. It may be better to monitor how short-term instruments respond to changes in survey data instead of waiting for slower-to-release top-line figures. While fundamentals seem solid for the moment, upcoming volatility is rarely aligned with risk-focused news—especially when central bank communications lack clarity. Observing how pricing reacts to sentiment will likely provide more insight than waiting for speeches or meeting minutes. There’s no need to hurry, but there’s equally no room for complacency.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Daniel Ghali suggests that prolonged conflict could pose a greater threat to global markets than oil prices amid geopolitical tensions.

Market conditions are changing. Concerns about possible US involvement in long conflicts are affecting defense spending and fiscal situations. Gold, a safe asset during geopolitical turmoil, is nearing its highest price ever due to potential factors like increased demand for safe havens and shifts in interest rates. The risk of more geopolitical tensions and market fluctuations highlights gold’s reliability as a hedge. Global issues, such as trade disputes and uncertainties in central bank policies, pose risks and influence market choices.

Forex and Currency Volatility

Currencies like the AUD/USD and EUR/USD are fluctuating due to geopolitical worries and expectations about interest rates. Forex trading has risks, making careful investment goal and risk tolerance evaluation essential. BNB has gained in value due to major investments, while the oil market remains uncertain. Tensions in the Middle East, especially around the Strait of Hormuz, could disrupt oil transit, affecting energy markets. Investing and trading come with uncertainties and market conditions that require careful analysis. It’s wise to consult financial experts for advice on navigating these complexities and their potential impacts on investments. Even though gold prices are high, the factors driving this surge aren’t just technical. Ongoing geopolitical issues and unresolved trade conflicts are pushing investors toward stable assets during uncertain times. Gold has long been seen as a dependable investment in times of conflict and inflation, especially amid decreasing trust in monetary policies and increasing fiscal stress. We are closely monitoring safe-haven flows, as heavy inflows during market volatility indicate higher risk premiums across various asset classes.

Reassessing Market Strategies

Traders involved in macro-sensitive instruments like interest rate swaps or implied volatility options should rethink their short-term hedging strategies. Although rate policies rely on data, overall sentiment is far from neutral. Unclear inflation data from major economies has contributed to ongoing uncertainty. As yields show short spikes and corrections, basing risk purely on predictions becomes less practical. We will gradually adjust our duration exposure instead of making bold bets on central bank policies. Similarly, movements in commodity-linked currencies like the Australian dollar are becoming more sensitive, quickly changing in response to economic reports. For example, last week’s disappointing trade data caused a swift decline in the AUD, which then rebounded after dovish comments from regional leaders. These events reveal higher short-term gamma risk and lower liquidity, which can challenge trades with tight timeframes. In foreign exchange volatility markets, pricing for tail protection is shifting again, not so much due to realized volatility but rather changes in risk-neutral distributions. Digital assets such as BNB are responding more to capital investment trends than to broader growth narratives. Recent fund flows into some decentralized structures show renewed confidence from certain institutional investors, although this trend hasn’t yet spread to all alt-assets. However, the relationship between crypto and traditional risk indices remains intact. During spikes in VIX or credit spreads, we still observe outflows from speculative tokens into fiat or stablecoins. This divergence may create a bias in long-short strategies that haven’t been adjusted for recent risk factors. The oil market remains highly reactive. The situation surrounding energy futures has fundamentally changed since tensions around the Strait of Hormuz resurfaced. If these tensions escalate to the point of disruption, we would expect response not just in futures but also in equity indices. The effects on energy-related corporate debt are not yet reflected in market pricing, so spread traders should reconsider their downside limits on directional trades, especially where margin requirements depend on stable credit assumptions. No matter the asset type, forward-looking volatility structures are beginning to reflect hidden risks. This shift isn’t about direction but rather timing—expectations for calmer periods are getting shorter, with implied volatility also increasing, even when realized volatility remains low. We aim to maintain flexibility in our hedges, as flat volatility positioning may overlook possible rapid shifts caused by policy missteps or sudden geopolitical escalations. In the coming weeks, we will closely monitor central bank communications for consistency, not just signals. Mixed messages from board members are widening futures spreads, particularly in Eurozone-linked currencies. When economic strength diverges among member states from the bloc consensus, even minor rhetoric shifts can lead to significant impacts on rate differentials. Our pairs trading models are being adjusted accordingly, especially where carry is no longer a reliable hedge. Overall, positioning should be based on clear risk parameters and adjusted to remain resilient against sudden news impacts. Simple directional bets—whether on rates, commodities, or currency pairs—are vulnerable in today’s environment. Portfolio structures that prioritize reactivity over predictions have started to outperform those that rely on misjudged certainty. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In May, existing home sales in the United States exceeded expectations, reaching 4.03 million.

In May, existing home sales in the United States reached 4.03 million, which was higher than the expected 3.96 million. This shows that the housing market is performing better than anticipated. The AUD/USD currency pair bounced back from a drop to around 0.6370, rising again above 0.6400 as the US Dollar weakened and concerns about geopolitical issues in the Middle East continued. Similarly, the EUR/USD pair climbed into the upper 1.1500s as the US Dollar fell, partly due to hints of a possible interest rate cut from M. Bowman.

Gold Prices and Geopolitical Tensions

Gold prices remained near $3,400 per troy ounce as geopolitical tensions increased after Iran attacked a US military base in the UAE. Additionally, BNB saw a 4% increase after it was announced that former Coral Capital Holdings executives plan to invest $100 million in a cryptocurrency treasury company. The Strait of Hormuz is once again a concern amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran. This crucial waterway between key Middle Eastern countries is vital for global trade and has historically affected market stability. The data indicates that existing home sales in the US surpassed expectations in May, coming in at 4.03 million, instead of the forecasted 3.96 million. This suggests more activity in the housing market, serving as an indicator of overall economic health. Housing typically reacts quickly to changes in interest rates and job conditions. For those involved in interest-sensitive investments, this may act as a subtle counterpoint to the recent cautious tones from US monetary officials. Following this, the Australian Dollar rebounded from its recent drop. It had fallen below 0.6400 against the US Dollar, touching the 0.6370 range due to stronger USD flows. However, renewed selling of the USD and overseas headlines helped it back above 0.6400. This change reflects currency dynamics and the shift towards riskier assets we’ve been monitoring. It reminds us how quickly positions can shift during trading sessions when narratives change suddenly.

Euro and Currency Dynamics

At the same time, the Euro remained strong, moving into the upper 1.1500s due to similar weakness in the USD. These shifts are linked to potential changes in US interest rates. When policymakers like Bowman suggest a more flexible approach, markets react quickly—especially before significant inflation or job data. These moments can lead to traders re-evaluating their positions sooner than they might otherwise. Gold prices continued to hover around $3,400 per ounce, driven more by geopolitical tensions than by traditional demand. Recently, an Iranian missile strike on a US military base in the UAE triggered a wave of cautious behavior in the market. The strength of gold in these conditions indicates that safe-haven demand is very responsive. For those monitoring volatility in commodity-linked assets, it’s crucial to note how quickly unexpected risks are being priced in. At the same time, the price movements of some cryptocurrencies reflect patterns of capital allocation rather than larger market concerns. BNB, for instance, rose about 4% after reports of a significant investment from former executives at a major investment firm. This level of investment in digital asset structures shows a focus on utility and value. It signals institutional interest not just in cryptocurrencies but also in the frameworks supporting them. Finally, traders should keep an eye on developments surrounding the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow passage between Iran and its neighbors is key for global oil shipments. Tensions here often lead to immediate price reactions in energy markets. Historical patterns show spikes in volatility in response to even unconfirmed news. If the passage faces more disruptions due to ongoing conflicts, positions in crude benchmarks and even tanker stocks may see significant movements beyond expected levels. In futures and options trading, we are currently focusing on changes in the skew across energy and metals. Shifts from sovereign risk to commodity-focused trades rarely happen in isolation. When uncertainty arises in one area, reallocations can happen rapidly and unevenly, possibly resulting in sudden disruptions. Over the next few trading sessions, it’s essential to stay alert to geopolitical updates, adjusting delta exposure accordingly. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

US 10-year yields decline as safety demand rises due to war concerns and Fed adjustments

US 10-year bond yields have dropped to their lowest levels since early May, falling below the lows seen in June. This decline is driven by safety concerns from war threats and expectations that the Federal Reserve may take a softer stance, following recent comments from officials. The Federal Reserve’s position is affected by news of a weakening job market, which could lead to rate cuts. Analysts see the potential for yields to dip further to 4.15%, especially with important data releases like the PCE report coming up. Today’s S&P Global US PMIs for manufacturing and services met expectations, but there are complex tariff effects that are hard to untangle. In contrast, gold prices have risen by $20, reaching near previous highs. This shows ongoing demand for safe assets, even as typical war-sensitive markets like oil are reversing. We are observing two main trends: increasing worries about geopolitical risks and a Federal Reserve willing to cut rates if economic data supports it. The drop in yields on the US 10-year Treasury note reflects cautious investor sentiment. Yields are falling not just as a habit but due to a reassessment of risk and return. The softening job market is crucial—it directly impacts bond pricing. Lower yields suggest traders believe the Fed may lower rates sooner, which would reduce borrowing costs across the economy. This indicates that the bond market is now considering slowdown risks more seriously, rather than focusing solely on inflation. From our perspective, the path to 4.15% on the 10-year yield appears clear, assuming new information aligns with current expectations. The price movements have followed technical shapes, and momentum suggests further yield compression. On the economic side, today’s PMI figures did not shift sentiment significantly but highlighted a growing complexity—tariffs. While the headline numbers weren’t surprising, the cost pressures from new trade barriers are challenging to analyze. These factors could distort future readings, especially in services where pricing can change quickly. Additionally, the increase in gold prices suggests significant investment in safety. This rise occurs despite oil prices declining, highlighting a shift in how markets respond to international tensions. Typically, both gold and oil move together, but this divergence shows that the move into gold is driven by uncertainty rather than just conflict. Markets may start to distinguish between assets sensitive to inflation and those driven by sentiment. It’s essential to watch how traders navigate this difference. The combination of falling oil prices and rising gold suggests a reassessment of growth prospects. Participants in interest rates and macro-sensitive instruments should closely monitor upcoming economic reports. These updates are not just updates—they will influence risk direction. Surprises can occur, especially if employment or inflation data diverges from the expectations set by Fed members like Waller, who pointed out labor market softness. This creates a period where models need to adapt quickly. The risk of policy errors increases if the market anticipates too much change too swiftly, impacting hedging strategies. Overall, the movement in yields is interconnected. Each asset, including gold, reacts to the same flow of information. The spotlight is now on upcoming data and whether it confirms recent market moves. We should continue to evaluate our positions considering inflation expectations and real rates. These factors will guide us as the market shifts and stabilizes. Our focus should closely follow the yield curve’s movements.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In May, existing home sales in the US surpassed predictions by 0.8%

In May, existing home sales in the United States rose by 0.8%, which was better than the expected decline of -1.3%. This growth may suggest that the market is changing. The Australian dollar faced challenges, reaching a key level around 0.6550, amid ongoing geopolitical worries. At the same time, the EUR/USD pair aimed for 1.1630, following possible hints from the Fed about future interest rate cuts.

Gold And Ripple Market Analysis

Gold traded close to $3,400 due to tensions from Iran’s military actions. Ripple’s (XRP) price remained steady at around $2.00, despite challenges linked to US-Iran unrest. The GBP/USD exchange rate rose to 1.3480 after dropping to around 1.3370. This increase was driven by selling pressure on the US Dollar. Traders are now focusing on upcoming UK Manufacturing and Services PMIs. For trading the EUR/USD, various brokers in 2025 offer different benefits, such as competitive spreads and advanced platforms. This is helpful for both new and experienced Forex traders. May’s economic data shows a shift in a few important areas. For example, the 0.8% rise in existing home sales in the US came as a surprise, especially since a -1.3% decline was expected. This is significant. It coincides with lower borrowing costs in some regions and may indicate improved consumer confidence or resilience amid tightening conditions. The household sector might be more robust than previously thought. For those trading US dollar positions, especially in longer contracts, this suggests that any dovish stance from the Fed will face at least one area of strength. In terms of currency, the Australian dollar struggled to break through the 0.6550 barrier, indicating that it’s facing bearish sentiment unless new stimulus arises or there’s a clear shift in rate expectations. Traders can consider short-dated puts for controlled downside risk when positioning themselves against the AUD. In Europe, the EUR/USD continues gaining momentum towards 1.1630. This is largely due to an emerging belief that the Fed may ease its policies before the ECB takes action. Although Powell’s office has not made a firm commitment, softening US economic data and tepid inflation have pushed markets to anticipate possible cuts later this year. Next, we need to see if eurozone activity data, particularly from German manufacturing and French services, supports the euro’s strength. If it does, we expect upper levels to remain supported—current spreads and swaps favor staged entries rather than heavy upfront positions. In the metals market, gold’s price hovering just under $3,400 highlights where investors are seeking safety. Concerns about Iran’s military stance continue to be a risk factor, but the gold rally shows signs of exhaustion, indicated by more collars in options activity and fewer outright directional calls. Traders focusing on volatility might consider strangles for asymmetric payoffs, especially as prices hold around $3,300. Ripple has remained close to the $2 mark, avoiding deeper losses despite geopolitical tensions. XRP has started to act more neutrally compared to other cryptocurrencies during global risk events. With ongoing legal uncertainties and reduced volatility, traders may favor range-bound strategies unless significant news shifts the market direction.

GBP And Euro Market Sentiments

The GBP/USD pair demonstrated resilience, climbing back to 1.3480 after dipping near 1.3370, as sellers of the US Dollar dominated. However, the focus should be on how the market adjusts to upcoming UK data, particularly Manufacturing and Services PMIs. Weak data in pricing pressures or new orders could reinforce expectations that the Bank of England will maintain its current stance. Those managing forward contracts or weekly FX options might want to keep room for flexibility, aligning tight strikes with lighter leverage to avoid losses during volatile sideways movements. With liquidity for EUR/USD expected to tighten slightly in August, it’s crucial for trading venues to deliver consistent spread pricing and minimal slippage when activity is slower. Brokers that align their pricing with top-tier liquidity providers will be better positioned, especially during macroeconomic announcements or consolidation breaks. Following our methods, we are closely watching developments in macro policy guidance and bond market movements. Understanding duration risk, particularly with US treasuries, will be key. Any lower-than-expected core CPI and labor data may boost risk-asset rotation trades. These elements should be factored into planning, especially for leveraged positions. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Back To Top
server

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

Chat with our team instantly

Live Chat

Start a live conversation through...

  • Telegram
    hold On hold
  • Coming Soon...

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

telegram

Scan the QR code with your smartphone to start a chat with us, or click here.

Don’t have the Telegram App or Desktop installed? Use Web Telegram instead.

QR code