The EUR/USD pair remains stable above 1.1550, while the US Dollar Index (DXY) has dipped below 98.00. Wage growth in the Eurozone has slowed, and the Empire State Manufacturing Index fell to -16.0 in June from -9.2 in May, putting additional pressure on the Dollar. As market anxiety eases, EUR/USD has bounced back from a dip tied to geopolitical tensions. The pair has gained about 0.70% daily, trading near 1.1594, just below last week’s high of 1.1631, which was the strongest level since October 2021.

Currency Index Movements

The US Dollar Index, which compares the Dollar to six major currencies, is around 97.75, its lowest in three years. In the Eurozone, wages increased by 3.4% year-on-year, the slowest growth since 2022, giving the European Central Bank (ECB) more flexibility in its policies. Due to ongoing economic uncertainties, the ECB’s Joachim Nagel has taken a cautious approach, hinting at possible rate adjustments due to geopolitical risks. Market attention now shifts to upcoming US retail sales data, the Fed’s policy decisions, Eurozone inflation figures, and comments from ECB officials. The currency heat map shows the Euro has risen 0.46% against the US Dollar today. The EUR/USD pair has firmly held above 1.1550, largely influenced by the US Dollar Index (DXY), now around 97.75, its weakest in nearly three years. This movement is driven by a combination of weak US business indicators and slower wage growth in the Eurozone. The slowdown in wage increases—annual growth of 3.4%—has not been this low since early 2022, impacting expectations about the ECB’s future actions. Recent manufacturing data from the US, especially from New York State, has not helped the Dollar. A significant drop in the Empire State Manufacturing Index to -16.0 from -9.2 shows a decline in production confidence. This situation, along with the weakening DXY, creates a favorable environment for the Euro to gain ground. The EUR/USD’s rise of about 0.70% to 1.1594 reflects solid demand for the Euro, getting closer to the recent high of 1.1631.

Key Data Watch

What’s important now isn’t just the current level but how traders respond to upcoming data. We’re looking ahead to US retail figures and any clear signals from the Federal Reserve. The Fed has kept traders uncertain, and with mixed economic reports, every word from Powell is significant. Increased attention is necessary. On the other side of the Atlantic, traders are analyzing Nagel’s comments, as he remains cautious and warns of external risks. This uncertainty, combined with the decline in wage growth, allows for a gradual approach from the ECB without immediate inflation worries. If Eurozone inflation data reflects this slower trend, the ECB can likely proceed without drastic measures. The heat map shows the Euro’s 0.46% gain against the Dollar aligns with a broader theme of moderate risk recovery. Importantly, this rise results not from a single event but from a combination of factors reducing risks for the Euro, even as upward movement may face resistance near recent highs. From a strategic viewpoint, we should be ready to adjust our sensitivity to data over the next two weeks. While volatility might seem low, it can be misleading during critical moments like the present. Option traders may look to reposition or adjust their strategies, especially in short-term EUR/USD trades. The directional bias leans towards testing 1.1630 again, but only with confirmation from upcoming economic data. Stay open-minded and look for confidence in broader market trends before making trades. The mix of ECB caution and weakening US fundamentals has not fully impacted prices yet, and there’s still potential for that narrative to evolve. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The US Senate Republican tax and budget bill wants to remove the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles (EVs). This change would happen 180 days after the bill becomes law. This proposal mainly affects those trading Tesla and other electric vehicle stocks. Removing the credit may shift the market dynamics in the electric vehicle sector.

Impact on Electric Vehicle Market

The plan to remove the $7,500 tax credit is significant for electric vehicle buyers in the United States. This credit has made EVs more affordable for over a decade. It helped early buyers who were concerned about higher upfront costs. By ending this support six months after the bill is signed, policymakers indicate a shift in priorities. It’s not just a minor change; it sets a clear timeline for adjusting market values and expectations. For traders using options and other financial tools linked to companies like Tesla, this change demands immediate adjustments. Pricing models based on sales forecasts must be updated to reflect a possible decrease in demand. Companies at the high end of the EV market, where customers relied on the credit to lower costs, may see a smaller buyer base as prices become less competitive. Historically, when federal support for an industry is reduced, we usually see an immediate but sometimes exaggerated reaction as models are revised and recalibrated. For instance, Dawson noted that preorders and delivery timelines already factor in subsidies; if these are removed, expected order volumes might not hold up.

Repercussions for Related Sectors

We believe that short- to medium-term financial products linked to delivery numbers, vehicle margins, or revenue per vehicle should be reassessed now, rather than waiting for the legislation to pass. The 180-day timeline may seem distant, but trading strategies can change quickly based on market conditions. Traders should adjust their positions for both near-term and slightly longer expiration dates. Changes to tax support will also affect upstream sectors. Companies that supply battery components or specialized software may face increased friction in their deals, especially those based on dollar value rather than unit scale. Mohan previously mentioned that pressures in lithium and nickel supply chains could be affected. Take away one part of the supply chain, and profit margins might narrow quickly. Also, be aware that options trading will likely increase around earnings reports as investors adjust their risk strategies during the regulatory changes. Typically, such periods can lead to overpricing followed by a decline. For some, rolling options rather than trying to catch volatility might be a better strategy. Investors using longer-term products or linked notes should keep a closer eye on implied volatility as this regulatory issue becomes a factor in market shifts. Overall, policy risk is now as important as production capacity and interest rate sensitivity when trading in this sector. Leveraged exposure could be more vulnerable to price swings unless carefully managed. Timing is crucial; it’s not just theoretical—it matters. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The S&P 500 dropped by 1.13% on Friday due to rising tensions in the Israel-Iran conflict. This decline pushed the index below the 6,000 level. However, today it is expected to recover by about 0.6%, despite recent setbacks. Another important event to watch is the FOMC interest rate decision coming Wednesday. Last week’s AAII Investor Sentiment Survey revealed that 36.7% of individual investors are optimistic, while 33.6% are feeling negative.

Technical Performance of Major Indices

Last week, the S&P 500 fell by 0.39%, despite reaching a high of 6,059.40, the highest since February. It remains technically bullish, trading above May’s gap-up, but faces resistance around 6,100. The Nasdaq 100 declined by 1.29% on Friday, mainly due to weakness in the tech sector, which caused it to fall below the support level of 21,700. Resistance now lies between 22,000 and 22,200. The Volatility Index (VIX) surged to 22.00 on Friday amid geopolitical concerns, suggesting increased market uncertainty. Historically, a rising VIX can lead to market downturns, but it could also spark potential rebounds. Currently, S&P 500 futures indicate a possible recovery, aiming for resistance levels between 6,100 and 6,120, with likely consolidation within an ongoing uptrend. The index remains cautious of geopolitical risks and upcoming economic data releases, including the FOMC announcement. The S&P 500’s drop on Friday, losing over 1%, was driven by increasing uncertainty around developments in the Middle East. With rising tensions between Israel and Iran, markets adopted a more defensive stance, pushing the index below 6,000. Yet, despite this decline, futures show a rebound as the week begins, suggesting a modest recovery of about 0.6%. Now, the focus shifts to monetary policy. The Federal Open Market Committee is set to announce its latest interest rate decision on Wednesday. Recent economic surprises have changed expectations for rate cuts, making them less likely. The AAII survey reflects a split sentiment, with 36.7% of respondents feeling optimistic and 33.6% pessimistic. This divided mood can lead to abrupt changes in market positions, particularly in more leveraged areas.

Market Sentiments and Reactions

Even though the S&P 500 lost a small fraction of a percent last week, it briefly reached a new high not seen since February. That peak of 6,059.40, while not maintained, shows that the index has strong underlying support. It is above its May breakout zone and remains within a broader upward trend. However, it struggles to break through the 6,100 area, where selling pressure has increased. In the Nasdaq 100, the 1.29% drop on Friday was driven by the major tech stocks, highlighting their sensitivity to overall market risk. This decline broke below the support level of 21,700, which had previously supported the index. Now, attention is turning to the resistance zones around 22,000 to 22,200, where it has struggled in the past. For volatility traders, Friday’s spike in the VIX to 22.00 indicates a stronger demand for protection in the short term. Historically, such increases in the VIX have often happened before market corrections, but they may also lead to market rebounds as fear quickly shifts sentiment. When fear peaks, it can catch many off guard and potentially benefit trades tuned to short-term shifts. Currently, S&P 500 futures suggest a desire to rise into the 6,100–6,120 range, but many will be watching to see if this is a temporary bounce. When markets consolidate like this—staying within a tight range during a broader upward trend—it can create opportunities for traders focused on breakouts or mean reversions, especially with significant news on the horizon. Geopolitical events and monetary policy updates continue to bring risks that are hard to predict, even with options. The immediate direction may depend on how traders interpret the FOMC’s messaging and how risk premiums adjust in options markets by midweek. Risk units should stay alert to implied fluctuations, especially if the VIX remains above 20. In these scenarios, asymmetric trades often become more appealing than traditional positions. While larger indices remain within familiar ranges, we observe sharper tactical reactions, particularly in the tech-focused Nasdaq. Traders need to closely watch price responses at key levels and prepare for possible mispriced volatility during earnings or policy announcements this week. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Bank of Japan is expected to keep its interest rates steady on June 17, 2025. They might also share details about a slower tapering plan. While there is no set time for the BoJ’s announcement, it will likely occur between 02:30 and 03:30 GMT. Governor Ueda will hold a press conference at 06:30 GMT, which is 02:30 in US Eastern time. Here’s what we understand: Under Ueda’s leadership, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) is likely to stick with its current policy rate in the upcoming meeting. Many expect this, but markets are also paying close attention to hints about how the central bank may slow down its stimulus measures. Although we expect rates to remain unchanged, the message from this month might change slightly. If the BoJ hints at a slower timeline for tapering asset purchases or adjusting its balance sheet, it could signal that the bank is increasingly concerned about fragile domestic indicators. With inflation and wage growth showing weak progress, the BoJ may not feel the need to act quickly. As we wait for the announcement window between 02:30 and 03:30 GMT and Ueda’s press briefing at 06:30, traders should be cautious about depending too much on past reaction models. The rate decision might not lead to much movement; instead, the choice of words and the focus on domestic or global pressures will likely provide more valuable insights. For those trading volatility or managing rate exposure, the days around this announcement could show stable implied volatilities but low actual movement—at least until the press conference. The risk is in misreading any slight change in communication as solid guidance. Ueda is careful and deliberate; even a small change in tone suggests deep internal discussions rather than a casual signal. Short-term yen options have begun to show a slight increase in premium leading up to Tuesday, indicating caution, especially amid differing global central bank strategies, but not panic. This is a sensible reaction given the uncertainties tied to a few paragraphs and a thirty-minute Q&A session. Traders who are too aggressive with directional yen trades or who expect an immediate response from Japanese equity futures may find limited opportunities in the short term. The decrease in overnight volatility after recent announcements shows that global forex markets are less influenced by Japan for now. Still, ongoing inflation expectations and fiscal stimulus suggest this trend may not last. We will continue to carefully consider yield differences and limit exposure before macro statements with unclear timing. After the initial response, it will matter more how long the BoJ maintains its commitment—and whether the market trusts it. Openness varies among central banks, making it crucial to read the full transcript and analyze words that carry more weight compared to other policy updates. Monitoring repo market conditions and increases in JGB futures volumes will also help us detect early sentiment shifts from domestic institutions. If Japanese demand starts moving towards cash or short-term bonds, it may indicate future rate changes more accurately than the headline rate itself. In the bigger picture, we see that flows into Japanese risk assets have slowed but not reversed. This supports the idea of a gradual, rather than sudden, policy change. Spread holders and correlation traders should prepare for a lower-volatility path unless global inflation data shifts broader expectations.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

ReNew Energy Global PLC reported quarterly earnings of $0.10 per share, beating expectations of $0.07. This is a rise from $0.02 per share last year. The earnings surprise was 42.86%, following a loss of $0.11 in the previous quarter, while an expected loss was only $0.04. The company’s revenue for the quarter reached $340 million, which is 16.52% higher than estimated. This is up from $297 million in the same quarter last year. In the last four quarters, ReNew Energy Global has exceeded revenue estimates two times.

Stock Performance And Earnings Outlook

ReNew Energy Global’s stock has fallen by 0.6% since the start of the year, while the S&P 500 has increased by 1.6%. The outlook for earnings will be important for future stock movements. Current predictions for the next quarter are $0.12 EPS with revenues of $418.26 million, and $0.27 EPS with $1.59 billion for the entire fiscal year. The overall industry outlook can also impact stock performance. The Alternative Energy – Other sector ranks in the bottom 27%. In contrast, Kinder Morgan, part of the Oils-Energy sector, is expected to report EPS of $0.27, a 1.9% increase, along with expected revenues of $3.88 billion. ReNew Energy Global PLC’s results show strong short-term performance in both profit and revenue. The earnings per share (EPS) rose to $0.10, easily surpassing forecasts and last year’s figure. This indicates a quick recovery from the previous quarter’s loss of $0.11 per share. The revenue increase to $340 million—up both month-on-month and exceeding projections by over 16%—supports the positive earnings data. However, the company has only beaten revenue estimates in two of the last four quarters, making this feel more like a cautious recovery rather than a lasting trend. From a derivatives angle, a notable difference between expected and actual earnings can signal market movements. This may lead to greater sensitivity in options pricing, especially after breaking away from prior negative results. The 42.86% earnings surprise may suggest a short-term change in implied volatility before the next earnings cycle. This is a good time to review short-term options, looking for higher premiums, and reconsider current positions for potential delta exposure, especially since the stock has lagged behind broader market growth this year.

Future Expectations And Market Reactions

Expectations for the next quarter of $0.12 EPS and $418.26 million in revenue could keep pushing expectations higher. The overall fiscal year prediction of $0.27 EPS and $1.59 billion in revenue adds to this. Traders will likely factor these predictions into pricing, particularly with longer-dated contracts. Monitoring how premiums change for contracts expiring after the earnings season may provide insights into market confidence in the company’s future. In terms of industry performance, ReNew Energy Global sits in the lower tier among its peers in the alternative energy sector. While it has beaten expectations, the overall weak sector sentiment could affect its stock. A strong performance may struggle to gain full support from institutional investors due to the overall performance of its sector. This could also influence implied pricing in derivatives for bullish strategies. Additionally, the comparison to Kinder Morgan highlights investor preferences shifting toward more traditional energy sources. The solid projections and revenue stream in the Oils-Energy category provide context for this trend. The performance of this sector and its revisions are important for hedging strategies and compare valuation measures. The interactions between clean energy and conventional energy can reveal potential value opportunities. Overall, our approach focuses on probabilities rather than certainties. Significant improvements attract interest, but being cautious with near-term options and using spreads to mitigate volatility may improve positioning. It’s essential to watch implied volatility leading up to the next earnings announcement and monitor industry sentiment, especially if broader economic policies start to shift again. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Dominic LeBlanc, who is in charge of US-Canada trade, is hopeful about reaching a deal with the US. Although there were initial hopes for an agreement before the G7 summit, discussions faced challenges. However, it seems that negotiations are gaining momentum. LeBlanc knows there’s a lot of work ahead to finalize any agreement. The Canadian ambassador to Washington stated that talks are still ongoing and pointed out a recent increase in urgency over the past two weeks. President Trump sees tariffs as a solution, which adds complexity to the discussions.

Diplomatic Efforts Speed Up

LeBlanc’s comments highlight a clear increase in diplomatic activity. Although the goal of aligning talks with the G7 did not happen, the renewed effort indicates that both sides are engaging more actively in technical issues that had previously caused delays. This change in pace is significant. It suggests that negotiators are now concentrating on key topics, including tariff structures, dispute resolution processes, and sector-specific rules, like those concerning agriculture and automotive industries. The mention of “urgency” by the ambassador reveals that real deadlines are starting to emerge in these talks. In this environment, factors like import levels, cross-border pricing, and regional supply chains become even more important. Tariff policy, especially Trump’s view of it as a bargaining tool, adds real pressure to make adjustments quickly. This situation is not just about strategy; it’s about encouraging quick responses from partners who might normally hesitate. For those of us in the derivatives market, this development is important. Faster talks—and the market’s sensitivity to tariff decisions that may arise—can change assumptions about low volatility into potential risks. These risks can appear in various forms: widening spreads in industry indexes, new expectations for basis changes, or shifting implied volatilities triggered by trade-related news. Even minor adjustments in North American trade can disrupt positioning models if underlying correlations must be reset.

Impact on Hedging and Contracts

The pace of these developments also provides insights. When political leaders move from optimistic timelines to discussions of urgency, they signal fewer hypotheticals and more concrete schedules. This shift impacts short-term hedging strategies. When structuring trades in this environment, it’s essential to evaluate both direct exposures to manufacturing or energy and how quickly partners will adjust pricing if cross-border processes tighten or loosen. LeBlanc’s understanding of the workload ahead indicates that while optimism is warranted, the details of any revised agreement are still open for discussion. These specifics will influence cost expectations and settlement terms for longer-term contracts that require a stable foundation. It’s wise to keep an eye on indicators such as customs data, transportation delays, or backlog issues in key routes—each of which can provide insights about future trends. In this context, sudden changes in fixed-income volatility might occur before any headlines emerge. It only takes one official to propose a conditional concession or tariff relief for short-term interest rates to respond, especially if linked to trade-driven inflation forecasts. However, noise without reliable confirmation can lead to volatile positioning. Our goal should be to remain cautious, avoiding excessive optimism, while assessing the nature and speed of incoming structural changes. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

WTI crude oil fell by $1.21, ending the day at $71.77 after a bumpy trading session. Prices initially jumped, only to drop over $3 during early trading in New York before partially recovering. This volatility came amid new Israeli strikes and threats from Iran. Oil prices are highly uncertain, mainly influenced by events in the Middle East, although there have been no supply disruptions yet. This latest drop in WTI crude oil shows a market trying to adjust itself amid serious geopolitical challenges. The initial rise followed by a decline indicates that traders are reacting quickly to news instead of focusing on fundamental factors. This creates both opportunities and risks. Movements like these, driven by tensions in the Middle East, suggest that trading is more about sentiment than significant changes in supply chains—at least for the moment. Israeli military actions and Iranian statements have sparked brief rallies and sharp corrections. While these fluctuations are common, their frequency and intensity are increasing. Futures contracts are becoming more sensitive to sudden events, meaning traders may need to switch positions quickly and hedge more tightly, especially during overlapping trading hours in Europe and North America. Since there are no actual disruptions in oil flow, the market is still dealing with probabilities instead of certainties. It’s important to focus on this. The absence of a supply cut has limited further price increases, but the risk premium being built up and then unwound continues to create significant intraday swings. Keep a close eye on the Brent and WTI spreads, which are showing hesitance—another sign of caution beneath any rising prices. Data on Baker Hughes rig counts or upcoming refinery maintenance could provide some insight, especially if they differ from expected seasonal trends. It’s notable how quickly early momentum faded during New York trading. Such a reversal driven by news rather than inventory data or OPEC comments suggests that speculative positions were too aggressive or that many protective stops were triggered at once. When we see $3 drops vanish in just hours, it usually reflects short-covering along with opportunistic buying, rather than strong market conviction. US yields have also started to shift noticeably, and their impact on the dollar could affect crude prices more quickly than in the past. As the dollar serves as a counterbalance to commodities, traders face increased pressure to consider broader economic factors when adjusting their strategies. We may continue to see sharp price movements in the short term, especially if tensions rise without leading to actual blockades or pipeline issues. For now, the market dynamics remain stable, but traders should review their risk-adjusted positions. Price targets shouldn’t depend on quick reactions or isolated events in conflict areas. When Briese cautioned last week about decreased commercial hedging activity, it was more than just a theory. The options markets are becoming more fragile. We’ve observed wider bid-ask spreads in near-term contracts, indicating that liquidity providers are adjusting to protect themselves. This means a more careful approach is needed when using leverage. Always monitor open interest in contracts with unusually high volume. These can significantly influence short-term narratives but often unwind just as quickly. The goal is to tell the difference between noise and movements based on real changes in market structure. With spot prices hovering below recent averages and approaching high-volume price zones, this creates a battleground—not a definitive trend. Energy traders should stay alert. The frequency of unforeseen events is rising, and while supply hasn’t taken a hit, the market is acting as if it’s pricing in risks that might never materialize. This opens up potential for positioning errors, particularly in the short term. The recent behavior during early New York sessions highlights how quickly sentiment can shift—so it’s wise to avoid overcommitting based on initial moves. Remain agile. Keep capital reserved. Avoid chasing trends that lack clear context.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Russia’s central bank reserves increased to $687.3 billion, up from $678.7 billion. This change shows ongoing shifts in Russia’s economic strategy. The rise in reserves signals a careful approach to financial policy, contributing to the evaluation of Russia’s economic stability by analysts and market participants.

Economic Indicators

This data offers a clear look at the country’s financial health and helps us understand larger economic trends in the region. Reserve figures are among many economic indicators that shape financial markets. They help assess national stability and future fiscal plans. The recent increase in Russia’s central bank reserves—from $678.7 billion to $687.3 billion—is more than just a statistic; it results from the government’s policy adjustments. This increase usually shows consistent capital inflow and more careful spending in government accounts. For those focused on derivatives, especially where geopolitical factors intersect with technical signals, this change carries weight. It may influence investment flows and affect price volatility related to Russian assets. Trading volumes in contracts sensitive to Russia may react, especially if reserve changes lead to new policy decisions.

Market Implications

Stable foreign reserves typically serve as a cushion against economic risks. This stability complicates predictions about market volatility, especially in currency-linked options or credit default swap spreads. Predictable reserve growth can impact pricing, but this relies on real liquidity data and broader economic outlooks. While the recent rise isn’t dramatic, it influences market expectations about pressure on the central bank to adjust rates or intervene in currency markets. This clarity aids in short-term hedging strategies and positioning for long-term investments. Traders looking at macro-driven instruments should determine whether the reserve increase genuinely reflects an improved current account or results mainly from changes in gold or other non-U.S. dollar assets. The mix of assets is crucial, as diversification in foreign holdings can impact correlations between different investment contracts. From a relative value standpoint, this might narrow the gap for those betting against countries with weaker reserve profiles. Further increases in reserves could also influence pricing for synthetic exposures. We should consider these changes as part of a larger fiscal strategy. If future data show continued growth, it may encourage restrictive capital policies or boost confidence against upcoming sanctions or external pressures. As we move forward, trade signals may not appear immediately, but strategies relying on stable regional risk—especially in commodities and energy-related currencies—will need to adapt to the new level of reserve stability. Stay flexible, monitor paired exposures where local asset values are responsive to changes in the sovereign balance sheet, and keep an eye on option skews. Small shifts in perceived economic resilience often reveal themselves first through reserve changes. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The U.S. Treasury recently held an auction for 13 million 20-year bonds, achieving a top yield of 4.942%. This yield matched the when-issued (WI) level at the auction time, which was also 4.942%. The auction had no tail, with a 0.0 basis point difference compared to the six-month average of 0.1 basis points. The bid-to-cover ratio was 2.68, exceeding the six-month average of 2.59.

Demand from Domestic and International Sources

Domestic demand accounted for 19.9% of total bids, which is higher than the six-month average of 18.1%. International demand, represented by indirect bids, was at 66.7%, slightly below the six-month average of 67.2%. Dealers took the remaining 13.4%, which is less than the six-month average of 14.8%. Overall, the auction received a grade of C+, indicating slightly better performance in some areas. This auction of 20-year bonds from the U.S. Treasury was well-received. Demand met expectations, and the pricing matched the expected yield in the WI market. With no tail, buyers were clearly aligned with market estimates, showing strong interest in this yield range. The bid-to-cover ratio of 2.68 indicates a healthy demand compared to supply and is above the six-month average. Additionally, direct bids, which typically come from larger domestic investors, increased slightly, suggesting they see good long-term value.

Market Insights and Future Considerations

Indirect bids, often reflecting international demand or foreign central bank activity, dipped slightly below their usual levels. While this isn’t alarming, it may hint at a small shift in preference for different bond durations. Dealers had a smaller share than usual, indicating stronger primary interest and less excess to absorb. Overall, there’s solid demand for longer-dated bonds even as yields approach 5%. This yield may attract investors looking to secure returns near multi-year highs. For those dealing with derivatives tied to longer maturities, these results have significance. Firm demand appears at these yield levels, creating a potential ceiling unless inflation surprises or policy changes occur. Historically, volatility around auction times has caused temporary market shifts. However, with no tail in this auction and dealers possessing a lighter share, we might not see forced trades into swaps or futures just yet. Measured adjustments are essential now. Don’t overreact to a single auction result, but find points along the curve where options may become more attractive. The data indicates that the market can handle higher yields but may struggle to accept much more without pushback. We’re also seeing an increase in direct bidders, which points to a change in how real money accounts perceive volatility. This could shift where convexity supply moves in future sessions, particularly in longer-dated instruments. Adjusting positions should consider both rate directions and the increased activity from domestic accounts looking to re-engage with a longer-term focus. Understanding the diverse motivations of buyers reshapes our approach to hedging and duration targeting through derivatives. This auction showed less turbulence than recent ones. More clarity has emerged. Watch how swap spreads behave around issuance dates, as we are beginning to see similar compression patterns. With flattening auction tails and decreased dealer participation, expect fewer forced adjustments, giving spreads more room to fluctuate. Stay alert; we’ll proceed with caution. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

On Friday, the EURUSD tested the 1.14944 level from June 5 but couldn’t maintain momentum below this point, closing at 1.15468. During the Asian session today, buyers showed interest, pushing the price higher. Today’s trading saw the EURUSD rise above the April 21 high of 1.15726, reaching a peak of 1.16139. However, the price has pulled back, approaching the April high again at 1.15736. The price dipped to 1.1577, staying above this level, which is crucial for buyers. If this support holds, the next target will be last week’s high of 1.16312 for potential further gains. This situation reflects a test of strength near a previously established support level. When the price dropped toward the June 5 low at 1.14944, buyers pushed back before it could fall further. Closing at 1.15468 shows a solid defense of this area. As we entered Monday’s Asia session, fresh demand pushed the price past the April 21 high at 1.15726. This breakout was brief, followed by a pullback that brought the price back above the previous resistance. Traders are now closely watching the area around 1.1573. It acted as a barrier in April and is now being retested from above as support — a typical technical reaction level. Recently, we have seen multiple failed attempts to close below these levels, indicating that the market isn’t ready to fully unwind the earlier rally. This area will continue to guide short-term flows. With the price hovering just above former resistance, there is an opportunity for directional bets. The weekly high at 1.16312 is within reach, but this won’t happen unless 1.1573 holds strong under pressure. The move may not be smooth and could depend on macro releases or unexpected buying activity. From a tactical perspective, lower timeframes show that positioning has been dynamic. Buyers still have options, but slipping below 1.1570 would undermine confidence and could prompt speculative long positions to adjust or exit. We have not seen strong follow-through in either direction yet, leaving many trading desks cautious but attentive, especially with option expiries and data coming later in the week. If momentum builds above the week’s early high at 1.16139, there may be room to test the upper ranges from February and March, especially if rate expectations stay largely priced-in. However, the distance to last week’s low is notable. If buyers back down now, the pair may face a deeper correction, possibly attracting momentum sellers and revisiting 1.1494. We prefer a measured approach to mapping out support and resistance, allowing price reactions to confirm our bias. There is demand, but it is cautious; commitment is not yet clear. Yesterday’s flows were light, but this could change quickly.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now