Russia’s foreign trade grew from $10.5 billion to $11.756 billion in March. This increase is a positive sign for the country’s trade metrics. The data shows changes in economic activities and transactions, which can reveal shifts in global trade dynamics. These numbers can affect economic forecasts and strategies.

Russia’s Trade Dynamics

The $1.256 billion rise in foreign trade from February to March indicates more than just rising revenue—it suggests Russia is actively adjusting its trade channels to keep progress steady. While the month-to-month increase is impressive, consistency is key—not just a temporary change due to supply chain adjustments or short-term price variations. Such changes often lead to re-evaluations in regional risk models. For us, this means we may need to broaden the scenarios used for advanced derivative pricing, especially for instruments sensitive to interest rates that are connected to macroeconomic changes. We should closely examine future volatility tied to commodities and shipping, as these are directly influenced by trade volumes affected by sanctions or new payment methods. Nabiullina’s policy approach supports this shift. The connection between the Central Bank of Russia’s monetary flexibility and its trade flows seems stronger than before. When trade grows while policy signals are not tightening, it allows for potential currency movement, especially if the rouble seeks stability through non-dollar transactions. Currency-linked swaps are unlikely to stay quiet. We should be more cautious with FX volatility curves.

Governance and Trade Stabilization

Mishustin has implemented stabilization measures quietly. Despite global signs pointing to tightening, fiscal support has not been completely withdrawn. Thus, carry trades that previously depended on lower export margins may need to be reevaluated. Options market underwriters who anticipated less FX earnings might face unexpected risks if their pricing models are based on outdated trade assumptions. A solution could be to stress-test correlations between the rouble and crude oil baskets on a weekly basis to spot any shifts. In simple terms, this new data urges us to reassess skew positions, particularly related to dollar-rouble pairs or shipping routes outside Europe. Abrupt changes aren’t necessary, but we should adjust our exposure duration for short-term derivatives from days to weeks. Given the complexities in clearing routes and ongoing sanctions compliance, the risk premium has changed in ways that we may not fully recognize yet in short-term volatility. When strong figures emerge during limited system access, it usually leads to more aggressive hedging from the state side. We often see this reflected in swap spread movements. If history is a guide, any compression may lag by two or three weeks, especially when benchmark transparency on global indices is challenging. We should prefer forward contracts with known or guaranteed payment terms. It’s also important to verify anything that involves heavy settlements with compliance teams for spillover effects. Traders need to stay vigilant about cross-instrument feedback loops—today’s trade data can influence unrelated positions tomorrow, especially if synthetic exposure conceals real risks. Markets respond to the strength of data rather than waiting for thresholds to be met. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Doximity had a strong fiscal fourth quarter in 2025, reporting adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of 38 cents, which exceeded expectations by 40.7%. This is a significant improvement from the previous year’s earnings of 25 cents per share. For fiscal 2025, adjusted EPS reached $1.42, a 49.5% increase compared to last year. The GAAP net income per share rose to 31 cents, up from 20 cents from the same quarter a year ago.

Strong Revenue Growth In Fiscal 2025

Revenues increased by 17% year-over-year to $138.3 million, mainly driven by subscription revenues that totaled $131.9 million. Overall, Doximity’s annual revenue for fiscal 2025 was $570.4 million, up 20%, with subscription revenues rising 21% to $543.8 million. Despite these positive results, DOCS shares fell by 20.7% after the earnings release and are down 9.5% for the year. The S&P 500 Index only dipped 0.3% in the same timeframe. Adjusted gross profits were $126.5 million, resulting in a high gross margin of 91.4%. However, the company saw a significant rise in research, development, sales, and marketing expenses year-over-year. At the end of the quarter, Doximity’s cash and cash equivalents stood at $915.7 million, with total assets of $1.26 billion. For fiscal 2026, the revenue forecast is between $619 million and $631 million, which is slightly below what analysts had expected.

Future Guidance And Market Reaction

Doximity’s fourth-quarter results for fiscal 2025 were much better than many analysts had predicted, especially regarding earnings. The adjusted EPS of 38 cents was a big jump from last year’s 25 cents and beat estimates by over 40%. Throughout the year, adjusted EPS reached $1.42, up nearly 50% from the previous year. Net income per share on a GAAP basis also increased to 31 cents, signaling strong profitability. Revenue saw solid growth, with the recent quarter achieving $138.3 million, a 17% increase from last year. Most of this came from subscription services, contributing $131.9 million. For the year, total revenue grew 20% to $570.4 million, again primarily due to subscriptions, which saw a 21% rise. The company maintained strong profitability with an adjusted gross profit of $126.5 million, translating to a 91.4% gross margin. This demonstrates Doximity’s efficiency, but there are concerns. Research and development expenses, along with sales and marketing costs, increased significantly compared to the previous year. While this reflects efforts to expand the platform, it could impact net margins if not managed well. Despite these achievements, the stock price took a hit. Since the earnings report, shares dropped over 20%, adding to a 9.5% decline this year. In comparison, the S&P 500 only fell 0.3% during this time, indicating that the market reacted negatively more than it warranted. This reaction may stem from the lower future guidance. Looking ahead, Doximity’s management expects revenue to range between $619 million and $631 million for the next fiscal year. While this shows growth, it falls short of analyst projections. Investors seem to be focusing more on future growth potential rather than past successes. This change in attitude occurs when high-growth companies slow down amid increased competition. Considering all this, the high valuations associated with Doximity’s subscription model may be facing a test. Recent price movements suggest expectations have adjusted downward. We advise positioning for potential shifts in market sentiment based on short-term volatility readings, especially as they settle after the earnings report. Recent spikes provide a chance to refine strike options and expiration times. While we used to focus on long positions during predictable earnings beats, the surprise now is how quickly investor sentiment can change, even with solid performance. Currently, options pricing reflects a reassessment of risk rather than the stability of the business model. This distinction matters, especially since implied volatility might stay high even if actual price movements don’t. In practical terms, we should consider neutral to slightly bearish strategies in the short term, with tight hedging. The long-term outlook is improving, offering chances for calendar or diagonal spreads if new positions are needed. Keeping an eye on further updates, particularly during the next earnings cycle, will be crucial. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The S&P 500 index rose by 0.41% on Thursday, boosted by hopes about trade talks, investment from the Middle East in the U.S., and the possibility of peace in Ukraine. It is now testing the resistance level of 5,900-6,000, getting closer to its record high from February at 6,147.43. Today, the index is expected to open 0.4% higher, indicating that the upward trend may continue. According to Thursday’s AAII Investor Sentiment Survey, 35.9% of respondents feel optimistic, while 44.4% are pessimistic about the market’s future.

Nasdaq and Market Volatility

The Nasdaq came close to 21,500 before pulling back slightly, ending the day with a small gain of 0.08%. It is projected to open 0.5% higher today, despite a 5% drop in Applied Materials during pre-market trading. Market volatility is showing lower fear levels, with the VIX decreasing. A falling VIX usually indicates market calmness but can also lead to sudden downturns. S&P 500 futures are trading higher, suggesting a positive opening, with support around the 5,870 mark. After Thursday’s rally, traders should be on the lookout for potential profit-taking in the short term.

Market Sentiment Analysis

The current data indicates that the market is cautiously optimistic, though there are short-term challenges ahead. The S&P 500 climbed 0.41%, driven by renewed hopes in global diplomacy and increased foreign investment. Now, the index is near the 5,900–6,000 range, which has historically been tough to break through. This level is close to the all-time high from February, making further moves more realistic rather than speculative. The expected small rise of about 0.4% at today’s market open extends the positive trend and might encourage new long positions from investors who have been waiting on the sidelines. However, sentiment indicators like the AAII survey present a more complex picture. With just 35.9% of respondents feeling bullish and 44.4% pessimistic, retail investors seem skeptical about this rally. This gap in sentiment often opens doors for opportunities in derivatives, especially those aimed at mean reversions or opposing trends. Regarding the Nasdaq, Thursday’s slight 0.08% gain reflects some hesitation, even as it approached 21,500—a number it struggled to maintain this week. The expected 0.5% increase today is notable but could be impacted by the 5% drop from Applied Materials in pre-market trading. This type of pressure from individual stocks can affect semiconductor-focused ETFs and related options strategies. When it comes to implied volatility, the lower VIX indicates a calm market environment. However, lower volatility often precedes sudden price swings. As fear metrics decline, intraday price movements can surprise traders, especially those who have reduced their insurance against market shifts. We’re watching for potential spikes in implied volatility, which can significantly affect derivative pricing, particularly for short-term weekly options. S&P 500 futures are showing signs of early positivity, with the next support level around 5,870. This level could play a crucial role in the coming week, especially if the index shows signs of reversing. Following Thursday’s rally, some profit-taking or rotation would not be surprising and could lead to intraday weakness. This setup might be ideal for capitalizing on resistance weakness or using structured spreads that benefit from sideways or corrective action. Current trends suggest a rising willingness to take risks, but this is not limitless. The quick pace of the recent rally and the closeness to previous highs increase the likelihood that traders might start anticipating consolidation. In these situations, short-term contracts with clear risk profiles often provide better value than directional bets, especially when premiums are low and skew is flat. Pay close attention to how the market reacts around 5,900—failure to break and hold above this level could trigger quick repositioning. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Canada’s foreign portfolio investment in Canadian securities dropped by $4.23 billion in March, much lower than the expected $5.2 billion. This unexpected decline indicates a shrinking demand or possible selling off of Canadian securities during this time. The negative figure shows that more money left than came in.

Shift in Investor Sentiment

The shortfall compared to expectations reveals a clear change in how international investors view Canadian assets. With an outflow of $4.23 billion instead of an inflow, it’s likely that foreign investors reduced their holdings or stopped reinvesting altogether in March. This could be due to weak economic indicators, changing interest rates, or a general reassessment of risk tolerance in global investment. This behavior often signals a lack of confidence in Canada’s short-term financial outlook or suggests that more appealing investment opportunities exist elsewhere. The difference of over $9 billion between the expected and actual investment figures is significant and shouldn’t be taken lightly. Such capital exit could pressure Canadian fixed income and equity markets, especially if further outflows occur in the upcoming months. For those following short-term contracts, it’s wise to monitor bond yields and their fluctuations closely. If inflows slow down or turn negative again, government security yields may also shift, affecting other interest-sensitive investments. Expectations around the Bank of Canada’s interest rate decisions could also change, influenced by external factors, even if domestic inflation remains steady. Furthermore, the way this data operates is important. When foreign investors sell off their assets, such as bonds or stocks, it can increase volatility in the domestic currency, especially if the proceeds are exchanged before being sent back home. Although the Canadian Dollar (CAD) has been stable lately, those holding longer-term investments may need to rethink their currency hedging strategies.

International Economic Releases

We can expect gradual updates to forward-looking risk models since diverse international exposure often relies on steady capital flows. While the timing is uncertain, the March data sets a clear benchmark. It’s time to reevaluate investments in Canadian credit or equity assets that closely align with global market changes. As net flow becomes less predictable, implied volatility might increase—not just in response to events but potentially already priced in before new data is released. Smith’s past strategies for reducing risk during low-liquidity periods can provide guidance, but replicating them should wait for further evidence. Acting too soon can be risky. Corporate borrowing may also slow, starting subtly. With reduced foreign interest, the risk premiums on new debt could rise, impacting the timing or structure of planned offerings. Traders should keep an eye on primary market activity for any delays, especially if lending conditions worsen as we head into Q3. Ultimately, focus should shift to upcoming international economic updates and how they interact with Canada’s own indicators—such as inflation, retail sales, and GDP adjustments. Minutes from overseas policy meetings might shed light on how persistent risk-averse spending will be. The March result could be just the start of a trend. Instead of getting too committed in one direction, adjusting investments based on foreign activity might be a smarter approach. It’s wise to avoid being caught off guard when inflows resume or if outflows increase. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Interest rates change based on two main factors: growth and inflation. Knowing what causes interest rates to rise is key for predicting market trends. When rates go up because of growth expectations, the stock market usually thrives. This happens because companies are expected to perform better, and the market is more comfortable with higher rates. A good example of this is from 2016 to 2018, when the market did well despite rising rates, thanks to tax cuts and steady inflation.

Inflation-Driven Rate Increases

On the other hand, when interest rates rise due to inflation concerns, the stock market often struggles. This situation leads to lower expectations for returns and tighter monetary policies. A recent example is 2022, when rapid tightening was needed to control high inflation. Context is crucial for how markets react to rising rates. Rate increases based on growth are generally seen positively, while those driven by inflation cause concern. Understanding the reasons behind rate changes helps predict their impact on the market. The article clearly explains two scenarios that can lead to rising interest rates and how each affects equity markets. Rates can rise when the economy shows strength (called a pick-up in real growth) or when inflation exceeds expectations. In the first case, stocks often continue to rise because companies benefit from improved demand. The article highlights the 2016–2018 period as an example of when higher rates did not hurt market performance. In contrast, the 2022 tightening cycle was damaging because it aimed to curb inflation, not boost growth. For those involved in soft commodities or interest rate products, this information is vital. If key markets like the S&P 500 or credit spreads are caught between strong economic data and persistent inflation, predicting policy changes becomes much more complex. Uncertainty can cloud even the best models. Powell’s messages have been consistent lately—wait for inflation to stabilize well below 3% before making any changes. However, consumers are still spending, and jobs are tight, leaving the Fed with a patience-based strategy. This creates tension: inflation is slowing, but not enough; growth is steady, but uneven. As a result, forward guidance focuses more on shifting probabilities than on certainties.

Market Volatility and Positioning

Currently, implied volatility in rate products is high compared to actual market movements. This suggests uncertainty about central bank actions. Specifically, longer-term rate options show a persistent trend, indicating protection against stubborn inflation—suggesting inflation might not just take time to decrease, but could stop falling altogether. Bond yields for two- to five-year maturities have risen due to stronger-than-expected data, which has been reflected in positioning metrics. CFTC data shows that leveraged accounts have reduced their rate cut bets at the front end. Additionally, options activity has leaned towards caps and payers, indicating a strategy to hedge against the Fed keeping rates high into next year. Meanwhile, equity index volatility is low compared to past levels, but it shouldn’t be mistaken for tranquility. Asset class correlations have increased, and we see a reconnection between rates and risky assets. Stocks are still climbing, but with less confidence beneath the surface. The downside risk in index options has notably increased, meaning traders are preparing rather than showing strong conviction. The current setup suggests that any unexpected strength in the economy will keep implied rate volatility high. Traders may continue to invest in convexity, where holding costs are low. On the inflation side, even a slight increase in core metrics like services CPI or trimmed PCE could rekindle fears that disinflation is stalling, leading to further revaluation across markets. So, attention shifts to anticipating CPI and labor reports, where skew charts and gamma trades indicate a desire to express views with low risk. Monetary policy futures have shown mixed reactions—hawks are less affected by positive surprises than doves are inclined to buy dips in soft data. We see that while the terminal rate remains steady, the path to that rate has changed. The market now questions how persistent inflation must be for current policies to continue, rather than if those policies are restrictive. This gives guidance to derivatives desks: focusing on relative value along the curve is more beneficial than making outright duration bets. Clever structuring is now the focus. There are more opportunities in the differences between realized and implied measures than in chasing large market movements. Particularly during periods sensitive to time decay, like data-event weeks, shallow theta erosion makes buying convexity not just viable, but sometimes appealing. As we progress through the quarter, it’s crucial to monitor whether real rates continue to rise, and if they do, whether this is because of improved growth expectations or ongoing inflation fears. This distinction is significant; it changes how rate sensitivity affects various asset classes. Therefore, it’s important to focus on breakevens, term premium shifts, and equity-sector rotations, not just headline figures. The narrative has changed, and now the question is about persistence. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In March, Canadian investments in foreign securities dropped to $15.63 billion from $27.15 billion in February. Forward-looking statements come with risks and uncertainties. It’s important to do thorough research before making any investment decisions to reduce these risks.

Accuracy Of Information

There are no guarantees about the accuracy or timeliness of this information, and errors or omissions may occur. Investing in open markets can lead to emotional stress and a total loss of your principal amount. All risks, losses, and costs are the responsibility of the investor. This information does not provide personalized investment advice. The author cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the investment amounts or securities. The drop in Canadian investments abroad signals a shift in how capital is allocated. It might point to a reassessment by Canadian investors regarding valuations, global yields, or expectations about currencies. Whether this decline is a one-time event or the beginning of a longer-term trend will depend on various upcoming events, especially data releases from the US and Canada.

Influence On Market Conditions

A decrease in outbound investment can affect short-term flows in foreign exchange (FX) and derivatives markets. Less demand for foreign assets from Canadian investors may impact the Canadian dollar, changing carry trade dynamics. If the loonie gains support, previously assumed volatilities or spreads in popular FX pairs may act differently. Traders relying on past price movements without adjusting for changes in cash flow might be at risk. Existing biases from a period of high outbound investment need reevaluation. Investments in certain foreign sectors, particularly US tech or European energy, may decline if these trends continue. This should be taken into account when planning over several weeks or quarters. Earlier this month, Delisle mentioned how capital movements are becoming more sensitive to interest rate differences. Thus, a pause or slowdown in outward investment could indicate more than just seasonal changes; it may suggest investor positioning before central bank announcements. Monitoring the Bank of Canada’s guidance is becoming increasingly crucial. Taylor pointed out that tightening overseas monetary policies could affect risk appetite, and recent figures support this view. For those concerned with volatility, this shift could provide new opportunities, although the implied volatility surfaces may not yet reflect the hesitancy of Canadian investors. This creates both opportunities and risks. From a systematic viewpoint, those modeling momentum or volatility should adjust their inputs for shorter timeframes. Carry assumptions based on portfolio flows might now have more tracking errors. Additionally, how quickly derivative pricing responds to changes in fixed income sentiment, especially relating to foreign debts, could widen basis risks in previously narrow spreads. Sudden changes in investment preferences may also affect liquidity on major trading desks. If flows remain low, it could reduce the depth of short-duration instruments. This might change hedging strategies, especially for those using swaps or synthetic securities. Relying on a single month’s data release can be risky due to potential data corrections and delays in revisions. Temporarily shifting to lower foreign exposure does not necessarily indicate a trend is solidified. However, risks should be priced as if this shift is real until the data suggests otherwise. We are monitoring how counterparty margining reacts. If brokers adjust their haircut models because of overseas exposure risks, this will quickly influence short-term derivatives pricing. Timing between these indicators and pricing actions will be crucial. If historical trends following declines in outbound flows hold true, we might see a flattening of risk-on sentiment. However, any calm in futures volumes should not be misinterpreted as a significant sentiment collapse. We need to stay responsive and align portfolio updates with daily feedback, particularly regarding index options. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

South Korea has shown interest in a trade deal after the 8 July deadline, as noted by trade chief Ahn Duk-geun. Key topics for discussion with the U.S. focus on the auto and steel industries. Currently, a negotiation framework is in place, with a ministerial-level meeting scheduled for mid-June. However, these trade talks might face delays due to South Korea’s presidential election on 3 June. Major trade discussions are expected to advance after the election period. The fact that South Korea is open to an agreement beyond the 8 July deadline indicates flexibility in timelines if beneficial outcomes are possible. Ahn’s comments reflect a readiness to adjust, especially if important sectors like automobiles and steel receive appropriate attention from their U.S. counterparts. These industries are significant in domestic politics and economics. With discussions formally set and a high-level meeting planned for mid-June, the path for making decisions is clear. However, the upcoming election on 3 June may cause a delay or increased caution. New leadership, or even rumors of it, often leads to changes in policy approaches. This situation will likely cause a temporary adjustment in administrative processes, affecting the timing of negotiations. Trusted analysts believe that momentum will not pick up until the political processes are complete, and we agree. The energy needed for making deals will likely return once the election confusion settles. There’s a reason businesses wait for vote results before moving forward. This situation suggests limited immediate changes. However, low participation can exaggerate market movements. The mid-June meeting and early July deadline could cause stress points due to contract rollovers or position closures. Choi, who has previously managed steel agreements in similar trade talks, may reappear after the election. If he does, the outcomes from last year’s discussions might resurface, not as new issues, but as previously set-aside topics needing urgent attention. Lee, who has been quiet during recent discussions, is another figure to monitor if talks restart post-deadline. He typically values careful framing over speed, so if he engages again, expect detailed procedural requests. His involvement could provide clarity for market participants, especially if existing tensions are to be addressed in future meetings. In the meantime, it might be wise to hedge against inaction instead of volatility. The focus will likely not be on new information, but rather on a gradual return to discussions. Flat volatility curves might briefly invert if political statements are misunderstood after the election. Most activities tend to stay low during this kind of gap. So, the advantage might lie in tracking when liquidity returns, rather than trying to predict outcomes. Pay attention to statements from legislative aides and small shifts in industry language over the next two weeks—they may reveal more than the ministers themselves during this time. Ultimately, we find ourselves in a situation where prices react more to expectations than actual policies. This will continue until official schedules align, allowing officials to communicate without the need for neutrality.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In April, the number of building permits in the United States dropped sharply from a 1.6% increase to a -4.7% decrease. This shows a slowdown in construction activity during this time. The EUR/USD currency pair fell to a three-day low of about 1.1130, driven by the strength of the US Dollar as inflation expectations increased. GBP/USD also fell to 1.3250 for similar reasons, with a stronger US Dollar fueled by rising consumer inflation expectations.

Gold Price Movement

Gold prices fell below $3,200, reversing earlier gains. The US Dollar’s resurgence and easing geopolitical tensions contributed to this drop, making it a challenging week for gold, which faced its largest weekly loss of the year. Ethereum rose above $2,500, nearly doubling since early April. The recent ETH Pectra upgrade led to over 11,000 EIP-7702 authorizations, increasing its use. Meanwhile, President Trump’s trip to the Middle East in May 2025 resulted in significant deals aimed at strengthening US trade and tech exports. These initiatives are viewed as efforts to fix trade imbalances and enhance US leadership. April’s economic indicators were telling, showing a clear shift in sentiment. The sharp decline in building permits indicates a significant pullback in construction activity in the US. This change signals that decision-makers are hesitant to invest in long-term projects, likely due to rising capital costs or worries about future demand. This situation points toward a shift in short-term investment preferences. Given this context, reactions in the foreign exchange market were expected. The decline of EUR/USD to 1.1130 and GBP/USD to 1.3250 reflects a broader move toward the Dollar, driven by heightened consumer inflation expectations. When these expectations rise, traders often adjust their positions, anticipating that the Federal Reserve may maintain higher interest rates for a longer period. This naturally attracts more investments into the Dollar. Moving forward, what the Federal Reserve might do next will be increasingly tied to domestic economic signals. Keeping a close eye on US inflation and employment might provide a strategic advantage. The strength of the Dollar impacts many areas, which will continue to influence asset pricing in the short term.

Commodity Market Dynamics

Commodities also experienced movement. Gold’s sharp decline below $3,200 indicates renewed risk appetite, especially as some geopolitical tensions eased. The strength of the Dollar contributed to the sell-off in gold, making it costlier in other currencies. This weekly loss is the worst of the year. Compared to previous volatility cycles, the current situation suggests that metal markets may react more than follow a specific trend. While traditional assets showed some volatility, the digital market behaved differently. Ethereum’s rise above $2,500, almost doubling since early April, was driven by real market activity rather than mere speculation. The Pectra upgrade resulted in over 11,000 EIP-7702 authorizations, indicating strong user and developer engagement with the new protocol changes. This level of adoption reflects confidence in Ethereum’s usefulness. On the policy front, the May 2025 Middle East visit resulted in significant long-term commercial agreements focused on enhancing trade and technology ties. From our perspective, these initiatives are long-term strategies designed to shift the balance in favor of the US. They aim to stabilize current imbalances and extend economic influence. Although these results may take time to become visible in the markets, the agreements show clear intentions for future growth. What does all this mean for traders? It suggests avoiding a linear narrative. The balance between Dollar strength driven by inflation and the easing of geopolitical tensions could create opportunities for strategic entries or short-covering rallies, depending on how positions are managed. Technology continues to show upward momentum, especially where upgrades enhance functionality. Assets sensitive to interest rates are reacting swiftly to inflation data, requiring quicker adjustments rather than a wait-and-see approach. In summary, monitoring how real economic data aligns with policy discussions is crucial. It’s important to act on discrepancies before a general consensus forms. Things may not remain stable for long. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In March, the Eurozone’s trade balance reached €36.8 billion, up from €24.0 billion in February. Eurostat released this information on 16 May 2025. After adjusting for seasonal changes, the trade balance was €27.9 billion that month. Exports increased by 2.9%, while imports went up by 1.0% compared to the previous month.

External Sector Improvement

These numbers indicate a significant improvement in the external sector during March. A larger trade surplus typically means either greater competitiveness abroad or a decrease in domestic demand. In this case, the bigger rise in exports compared to imports suggests the former is more likely. Compared to February, exports grew nearly three times faster than imports, which is a positive sign for external demand trends. The monthly 2.9% rise in exports clearly outperformed the 1.0% increase in imports. While this gap may not last forever, it often indicates that either a weaker euro is making goods more attractive or better global conditions make European products more desirable. In any case, these figures show that trade-driven sectors are holding strong. The seasonally adjusted trade balance, slightly lower than the unadjusted number, helps eliminate distortions like spikes in investment or unstable commodity-related imports. Therefore, the €27.9 billion figure provides a clearer view of underlying momentum, indicating steady demand from outside the Eurozone, undisturbed by short-term fluctuations. This jump follows a trend of gradual improvement over recent quarters, not just a one-time occurrence. The European Central Bank is closely monitoring these trends for insights on inflation and future guidance, meaning this robust trade data may influence their next moves.

Influence Of External Demand

We are focusing on how external demand from key partners in Asia and North America might change as interest rates vary across regions. Any changes in global manufacturing orders or commodity prices could affect this surplus or alter its drivers, leading to further consequences. We will keep a close eye on incoming PMI data and future shipment trends. Adaptations for shorter-term exposures need to consider this—especially for investments sensitive to net export conditions. Recent data also suggests a growing emphasis on industrial goods and machinery in the export mix, which typically offer higher margins and longer production cycles. We see opportunities where volatility aligns with future expectations. By capitalizing on these strengths while remaining vigilant about transportation bottlenecks or unexpected policy changes elsewhere, one can maximize value from short-term fluctuations or mid-curve adjustments. Traders should interpret these numbers as reflections of risks linked to divergence and potential macroeconomic disparities now impacting European financial instruments more noticeably than before. Be cautious of expanding trade gaps that don’t match currency movements, as this often signals price changes in related asset classes. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

USD/CAD is currently trading at about 1.3960, staying within a narrow range without a clear direction. The Canadian Dollar recently lost strength after hitting a high of 1.3750. The pair remains above the 21-day EMA, but resistance from the 50-day EMA at around 1.4024 is limiting upward movement. In March, Canadian Manufacturing Sales dropped by 1.4% month-over-month, which was slightly better than the expected 1.9% decline. This drop was mainly due to weaker activity in primary metals and petroleum sectors, but it didn’t provide strong support for the Canadian Dollar.

Weakening Market Sentiment

Market sentiment is weakening as the Bank of Canada considers potential interest-rate cuts following disappointing job data for April, which saw unemployment rise to 6.9%. Currently, there’s over a 50% chance of a rate cut in June, putting further pressure on the Loonie. The mid-term direction for CAD is closely tied to trade developments between the US and Canada. The Bank of Canada’s latest report highlighted trade tensions as a major economic threat, warning that increased global protectionism could heighten risks. Despite mixed economic data, the US Dollar Index remains above 100.00. Traders are anticipating key US economic data, including the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment survey, to assess consumer confidence. Next Tuesday, Canada’s GDP report will be closely watched for insights into domestic growth. At present, USD/CAD is hovering around 1.3960, lacking a clear trend and trading in a tight weekly range. After earlier gains, the Canadian Dollar weakened after reaching 1.3750. The price remains above the 21-day EMA, offering some support, but struggling to surpass the resistance at the 50-day EMA near 1.4024, which limits bullish momentum. From an economic standpoint, March’s Canadian Manufacturing Sales saw a 1.4% decline. Although this beat the expected 1.9% drop, it wasn’t enough to change sentiment towards the Loonie significantly. The decline was primarily due to sectors like primary metals and petroleum, which are sensitive to external demand and commodity prices. Since the employment figures in April showed that unemployment rose to 6.9%, sentiment has shifted significantly. This report decreased confidence among consumers and institutions, leading market participants to raise the likelihood of a June rate cut by the Bank of Canada to over 50%. This growing expectation keeps the Canadian Dollar under pressure, especially against a US Dollar that remains strong, holding above the 100.00 mark on the Dollar Index.

Trade Relations and Policy Shifts

From a policy perspective, the latest communications from the central bank included warnings about trade relations. The report highlighted risks associated with widening protectionism that could limit export opportunities and complicate supply chain access. If trade tensions worsen, economic activity in Canada could suffer, which would further weaken the currency. Meanwhile, in the US, the Dollar remains supported by solid domestic indicators and moderating inflation pressures. Attention is now on the upcoming consumer sentiment data from Michigan, which often provides insights into future spending behaviors. Given the American economy’s reliance on consumer spending, sharp movements in this data could influence rate expectations. Next Tuesday, Canada’s GDP report will be crucial for short-term directions. If growth momentum weakens, it will likely reinforce the trend toward policy easing. Conversely, any unexpected strength in output may adjust expectations. For traders using derivative structures tied to USD/CAD, this period of technical uncertainty combined with differing policy directions requires tighter risk management. The current stability around the EMAs creates a compressed setup with potential energy. In the coming days, we will closely monitor how price interacts with these averages and whether economic reports shift positioning decisively. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now