Back

President Trump proposes a 50% tariff on EU imports through Truth Social

US President Donald Trump has announced a 50% tariff on imports from the European Union, which will start on June 1, 2025. This action aims to tackle trade issues with the EU, which Trump claims was designed to take advantage of US trade. After this announcement, the US Dollar Index fell by 0.45%. Currently, the index is at 99.45, showing signs of weakness in the dollar.

Understanding Tariffs

Tariffs are fees on imported goods meant to strengthen local businesses. Unlike taxes, which you pay at the time of purchase, tariffs are paid when goods enter the country and are the responsibility of importers. Opinions about tariffs vary. Some believe they protect local industries, while others worry they can lead to trade wars. Trump intends to use tariffs to help domestic producers and may reduce personal income taxes. His focus is mainly on Mexico, China, and Canada, which make up 42% of US imports. Mexico has become the largest exporter to the US, with exports reaching $466.6 billion. The new tariffs aim to leverage this trade relationship as part of Trump’s economic plan. Overall, these changes could lead to a significant shift in international trade and may disrupt the stable pricing that import-heavy sectors have enjoyed. A 50% tariff on EU goods would not only impact US importers’ costs, but it could also force adjustments among those trading currency and assessing interest rates. Trump’s view of the EU as an entity created to harm US trade adds tension to what is shaping up to be another standoff. Whether these tariffs are a long-term strategy or a negotiating tactic, the threat has already pushed the dollar down by nearly half a percent, with the Dollar Index falling to 99.45. While this drop might seem small, it indicates uncertainty about capital flow, inflation, and future monetary policy.

The Impact On Trade Frictions

The key point about tariffs is simple: they make foreign goods more expensive—not just for consumers but also for those absorbing the costs at ports. Importers pay tariffs upfront, adjusting their profit margins or accepting the loss. For traders dealing in derivatives, especially those involved with stocks or credit sensitive to rising costs, this issue is significant. Using trade frictions to boost domestic production is not new, but Washington has shifted its focus back to its biggest sources of imports. Mexico, as the top exporter with annual sales exceeding $466 billion, is likely to be scrutinized more closely. Since China, Canada, and Mexico account for almost half of all US imports, the stakes are high. Tariff expectations, whether confirmed or anticipated, alter the way we view cross-border cost changes. This also increases volatility in trade-related sectors of the economy. Unlike long-term tax policies, which have more evenly spread effects, tariffs directly impact financial statements when goods arrive at ports. This makes their effects evident in quarterly reports, not just in consumer prices later on. Trump has suggested that these tariffs could counterbalance a reduction in personal income tax. Ideally, he hopes that any lost revenue at the ports will be recovered through increased manufacturing and rising wages. For those paying attention, this signals a potential dual economic shift—possible inflation alongside fiscal stimulus—which could complicate interest rates and central bank policy. Some people are concerned this could escalate into retaliation from the EU, which would disrupt trade flows and affect the earnings models of export-heavy US companies. Heightened hedging activities or changes in rate expectations could amplify this trend. For us, these developments are not just about following headline numbers; they involve understanding how they influence pricing dynamics and volatility across different asset classes. Each new tariff announcement, even before it takes effect, necessitates a reevaluation of supply chain strategies and financial reserves on both sides of the Atlantic. Anyone with contracts or positions tied to manufacturing or consumer goods should consider the broader impact of these tariffs. As the rhetoric intensifies and the deadline approaches, capital positioning will become increasingly important, surpassing the influence of public opinion. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Mexico’s trade balance fell from $1.035 billion to $0.083 billion in April.

Mexico’s trade balance for April showed a surplus of $0.083 billion, down from $1.035 billion the previous month. This change indicates a shift in Mexico’s trading environment, which may affect future economic forecasts and evaluations. The EUR/USD pair bounced back from its low, trading around 1.1330, following news of proposed tariffs on European imports. Similarly, GBP/USD remained strong, reaching levels not seen since February 2022, due to an unexpected increase in UK retail sales. Gold prices continued to rise, hovering around $3,350 per ounce, mainly because of a weaker US Dollar amid tariff discussions. On the other hand, Apple’s stock dropped below $200 due to tariff concerns, contributing to a more than 1% decline in US equity futures.

XRP Market Activity

XRP experienced a notable recovery mid-week, driven by whale accumulation that increased demand. This activity indicates a shift in the market, showing higher demand but also more caution due to rising reserves. Several brokers were noted for their services in trading EUR/USD and other financial products. This gives traders options for strategic and economical trading in today’s market environment for 2025. Mexico’s trade surplus fell from over $1 billion to just $83 million, reflecting a smaller gap between exports and imports. This decline may be caused by slowing external demand or increasing import costs. While this isn’t an immediate cause for concern, it highlights the need to monitor macro trade conditions in the region closely, especially regarding commodity prices and ongoing supply chain challenges worldwide.

Impact of Proposed Tariffs

The EUR/USD’s ability to recover near 1.1330 after tariff announcements shows how quickly policy news can impact currency movements. This isn’t just about potential tariff changes; it also affects business costs and investor sentiment. When political discussions lean towards protectionism, we often see swift shifts into safe-haven investments or defensive currency positions. This situation serves as a test for how quickly major currencies can respond to policy risks, suggesting that proactive positioning may provide better opportunities until clearer policies emerge. The strength of the British pound, reaching levels from February 2022, is largely due to a surprising rise in UK retail sales. This sparked hope that domestic demand could help the UK economy even as other major economies slow down. When the pound reacts to internal data like this, it reminds us that G10 variations aren’t solely influenced by the US rate policies. Traders should be cautious not to depend too heavily on US Federal Reserve-linked events across all markets. Gold’s rise toward $3,350 reflects a growing hedge strategy that has developed throughout the year. With the dollar weakening due to tariff discussions, many investors are favoring long positions in metals, often seen as a refuge during inflation. The movements this week weren’t driven by new data but rather a mix of dollar weakness and risk adjustments related to trade tensions. While the price movements may not be straightforward, responsiveness to central bank announcements and real yields remains crucial. Equity futures dipped more than 1% as Apple shares fell below $200, indicating that large-cap tech stocks, often a gauge for investor sentiment, are also affected by trade risks. The anticipated tariffs may pressure tech business models, leading to adjustments in portfolios as earnings forecasts could be revised down. This shows how one headline can shift views within a sector, impacting broader indices and magnifying short-term market movements. XRP’s sharp recovery midweek was noteworthy, not just for how significant the change was, but because of noticeable whale activity and accumulation with rising reserves. In previous cycles, this type of data has aligned with resistance challenges or quick pullbacks, depending on speculation trends. We’re monitoring transaction flow consistency and reserve dynamics as these indicators can precede market volatility in the crypto space. Lastly, more brokers are providing competitive spreads and financing options across EUR/USD and other pairs, opening up chances for tactical trading instead of just long-term positions. With changing currency flows, hesitations in commodities, and tariff negotiations, the upcoming weeks may highlight the benefits of intraday or medium-term strategies that focus on volatility rather than traditional momentum chasing. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In April, Mexico’s trade balance posted a deficit of $0.088 billion, surpassing forecasts.

Mexico’s trade balance for April was better than expected, showing a deficit of $88 million instead of the anticipated $160 million. This suggests that Mexico’s trade performance has improved during the month. This information addresses risks and uncertainties tied to forward-looking statements in markets and financial instruments. Caution is recommended when using any data for financial decisions. Investors should thoroughly research before making any investment decisions, as there are inherent risks, including potential financial losses. The accuracy and timeliness of the information are not guaranteed, and investors bear the risks, including the loss of their principal. The opinions expressed do not represent official views, and there are no guarantees about the accuracy or completeness of the information. Errors in the data may exist, and neither the author nor associated entities take responsibility for such mistakes. It’s important to note that neither the author nor any associated entities are registered investment advisors, and this article is not intended as investment advice. The author does not claim any financial connections with the companies mentioned. Mexico’s April trade deficit was much smaller than expected, at just $88 million compared to a forecast of $160 million. This result presents a more positive picture of Mexico’s external activity than anticipated. The smaller deficit may be due to increased exports or reduced imports, or a combination of both. This stronger figure signals a possible short-term adjustment in related assets. For us, this data leans towards resilience in external demand. Traders dealing with financial derivatives, especially those related to currencies or interest rates, may find this narrower deficit impacts their short-term strategies. It suggests that external accounts are not at immediate risk, countering narratives about domestic weaknesses. Even though the headline figure may seem small, differences from expectations can have significant consequences, especially when the consensus has been strong in one direction. We see this as a catalyst that could prompt adjustments in implied volatilities over the next week or two. Typically, in these situations, expensive out-of-the-money protections may lose value quickly, leading some investors to reduce their exposure. Furthermore, we should consider Mexico’s trade activity when reevaluating strategies in emerging market instruments. Those focusing on relative value strategies might find their macro assumptions altering how spreads behave. The strong trade results do not remove existing structural imbalances, but they offer some time and space for short-duration instruments to adjust. From our perspective, the immediate signal favors lower implied correlations among certain Latin American assets. This reduces the urgency for broader unwinds expected with weaker trade figures. As a result, leveraged participants might hesitate to aggressively reduce risk, especially those with delta-neutral strategies. We believe that positioning for next month’s revised figures should consider that adjustments could go either way—though currently low skew premiums may still allow for some options flexibility. On a risk-adjusted basis, we may see market sensitivity change across curves, particularly if firms reassess their exposure. Curve flatteners in the peso sector, linked to trade-weighted metrics, might find less support after this result. Depending on how exporters respond, short-term rate expectations could shift more than long-term ones, affecting steepening potential. In the end, while the trade data doesn’t set the direction for market views, it does influence perceptions of macro stability. It indicates that significant deterioration is unlikely to occur soon, which could lead to unwinding of hedges set for sudden changes, especially those involving volatility. We’ve updated some of our early-week models based on the implications for month-end positioning. Those with short gamma exposure on trade proxies should keep an eye on upcoming central bank comments to see if they align with the trade numbers. If they diverge significantly, repricing could happen more quickly than usual. Remember, although the headline deficit is small, responses to better-than-expected data in illiquid conditions can lead to exaggerated trading behaviors. So, it’s wise to tread carefully in the near term due to thinner liquidity and execution risks.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

In May, Kazakhstan appeared to overproduce oil, exceeding the agreed production levels again.

Kazakhstan’s oil production in May is likely above its agreed limit, continuing a trend of exceeding OPEC+ restrictions. In the first 19 days of May, the country produced 1.86 million barrels per day, up 2% from April and in line with March figures. OPEC+ had set Kazakhstan’s production cap at 1.49 million barrels per day for May. The Tengiz oil field is the main driver of this increased production, expected to account for about half of Kazakhstan’s output this month. The Ministry of Energy reports that Tengiz has met its production targets, keeping projections stable for the rest of the year. However, OPEC+, especially Saudi Arabia, may be concerned about Kazakhstan’s high output levels.

Potential Boost In Production

Other OPEC+ countries may follow Kazakhstan’s example and increase production, especially in the summer months. This could lead to higher outputs in July, similar to those of May and June. These developments highlight ongoing dynamics within the OPEC+ group regarding production targets. Kazakhstan’s production above the agreed limit indicates a potential shift in OPEC+ norms, suggesting that other members may also ignore quotas. The consistent output from Tengiz allows Kazakhstan to produce confidently without immediate technical issues. This stability lets them balance their internal goals while stretching the limits of compliance with OPEC+. In the short term, the extra supply might hinder price recovery, especially since global inventories have not decreased as swiftly as expected in early Q2. For market players relying on OPEC+ adherence to supply discipline, the case is growing that this discipline may weaken if more countries begin to disregard quotas. With rising summer demand, several member states might shift strategies from compliance to protecting their finances, especially if Brent prices remain near profitable levels. Saudi Arabia, often viewed as the stabilizing force, may react with frustration and a reevaluation of strategy. If Riyadh adjusts its exports or targets specific markets, it could introduce volatility and catch traders off guard. It’s important to monitor their shipping activities and pricing trends in the coming weeks, rather than just their official statements.

Impact On The Futures Curve

In the futures market, backwardation could show less steepness if traders believe that supply increases will continue. If more OPEC+ members decide to produce freely, longer-dated contracts might adjust downward. We should approach calendar spreads with caution, particularly over the next three to six months, to avoid overexposure to tight supply assumptions. For options trading, implied volatility remains sensitive to producer decisions and current inventory levels. Adjusting positions dynamically is crucial, especially during days with shipping reports or unexpected production updates. Kazakhstan has indicated it will maintain production close to current levels, so unless compliance enforcement tightens or other countries change their approach, we should expect ongoing pressure on collective compliance. Tracking refinery margins, especially in Asia where much of this excess crude may flow, could provide additional insights. If margins fall despite seasonal demand, it confirms oversupply. Countries with larger refining capacities might start to benefit, affecting pricing and arbitrage considerations from Europe and the US Gulf. We should also keep an eye on the behavior of producers outside OPEC+. If compliance falters within the group, it might encourage countries like Brazil or Norway to increase production unrestrained, worsening the oversupply situation and undermining efforts to stabilize market benchmarks. Shipping logistics should be monitored closely. If long-term charters begin to fill at higher rates, it signals that excess output is being shipped, increasing pressure on floating storage and impacting front-end contract premiums. Any changes in this area could create short-term trading opportunities for those tracking TIC data and port movements. With individual states taking targeted actions instead of a unified OPEC+ approach, we need to consider more scenarios. A flexible strategy for delta and gamma exposure is advisable, especially since instability now seems more likely to arise from within the group. Stay focused on data and adjust positioning when volume flows indicate changes in the market narrative—assumptions of unity among OPEC+ members are looking less certain than before. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Shaun Osborne notes that the Euro gains strength during dips, supported by adjustments in German GDP.

The Euro shows strong support, trading just above yesterday’s low. Germany’s final GDP for Q1 was revised to a 0.4% increase, which is higher than both the initial estimates and market expectations. This positive news has helped the Euro climb out from the low 1.13 range. Recent gains indicate a potential bullish breakout from earlier downward trends. The Euro’s momentum suggests it may rise in spot trading, but short-term gains might hit resistance between 1.1380 and 1.1420. We expect a possible retest of the 1.16 area, or even higher towards 1.18 to 1.20. The statements provided involve some risks and uncertainties, intended for informational purposes only. They are not recommendations to trade any assets. Readers should do their own research before making investment decisions. There is no assurance that the information is accurate or timely, and investing carries risks, such as emotional distress and financial loss. The reader assumes all risks related to investing, including the possibility of losing the entire principal amount. The author has no ties to any stocks or companies mentioned and has not received any compensation other than for the article itself. Germany’s GDP revision to a 0.4% growth rate confirmed the strength of the Eurozone’s largest economy. This new data not only provides a fresh perspective but also adjusts expectations on broader European fundamentals. Consequently, the Euro has remained strong on dips, making higher lows even in a volatile trading environment. It’s maintaining firm support just below 1.1340. Ongoing buying interest shows that investor confidence is improving. The previous consolidation limiting upward movement seems to be breaking down. Price action now indicates a possible shift in market structure. The near-term resistance between 1.1380 and 1.1420 could test this shift. A move above this range may encourage broader participation and momentum-based strategies. We are closely monitoring price movements toward the 1.16 mark. If we break through, there is potential to reach the 1.18 to 1.20 range. Traders should remember that such movements rarely occur smoothly. Daily volatility could increase, especially around macroeconomic news or geopolitical events, which may disrupt otherwise clear trends. Some traders have started reducing short positions, and forward volatility structures show slight steepening. For those using derivatives, it’s essential to focus on gamma profiles in the 1W and 2W tenors, especially since implied volatility has decreased. This strategy may allow for cleaner directional moves with more defined risks. Chancellor Scholz’s fiscal policy has not significantly affected near-term growth expectations. German exports and industrial orders are showing signs of stabilization, which strengthens the Euro’s sensitivity to local data improvements. Price reactions may pivot near option barriers just above 1.14—if these levels break with volume, we will need to confirm follow-through towards 1.16 with futures open interest. It’s clear that stop-loss orders are closely clustered around last week’s highs. If these orders get triggered in a low-liquidity window, spot rates could jump rapidly. Therefore, risk-adjusted strategies should consider short-term hedges, and spreads across EUR pairs like EUR/CHF and EUR/GBP may widen if capital flows increase. No model is perfect, but when prices react differently to standard news, we must adapt. Throughout this process, capital preservation remains crucial. Not every market movement is worth pursuing.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Paul Krugman explains America’s net international investment position and highlights potential debt concerns.

US economist Paul Krugman has raised concerns about the growing net international investment position (IIP) of the US. This trend might indicate potential problems. Krugman believes that decades of capital inflows are responsible, while others suggest that the role of asset valuations in IIP changes is more significant now. Foreign investors are eager to buy US assets, which increases their value, but also adds to US debt. If these investors decide to withdraw their funds, it could lead to capital flight. Conversely, if the prices of foreign-held assets drop, it might lead to a market recovery.

Market Effects and Dynamics

In 2022, the US net IIP briefly improved as rising yields reduced the value of fixed-income assets. A stock market crash could have similar effects on those dependent on US investments. This situation could impact individuals who have long positions in USD, which contrasts with Krugman’s predictions. Overall, careful analysis of data is crucial in understanding these dynamics and their potential effects. Krugman’s concern arises from the US’s increasing net international investment position (IIP). Simplified, this means how much the US owes the world compared to how much the world owes the US. Historically, Krugman blamed the IIP decline on long-term capital inflows, where foreigners bought American assets, increasing the US’s external liabilities. However, these liabilities are less about traditional debt and more about claims on US income and capital. Others argue that this explanation is outdated. Increasingly, IIP changes are driven by asset price movements rather than just cash flow. Sticking to old theories while market dynamics have shifted could misrepresent real risks going forward. Importantly, foreign investors continue to buy US assets, which raises their prices. This interest inflates the perceived value of US liabilities. However, relying on this consistent demand makes the system vulnerable. A decline in foreign enthusiasm could lead to capital flight, causing corrections not only in asset prices but also in USD holdings.

Impact on US Currency and Derivatives

In 2022, there was a temporary improvement when rising interest rates decreased the market value of fixed-income US assets, like treasury bonds. Lower bond prices reduce liabilities from an overseas perspective, briefly enhancing the IIP. This suggests that market corrections may not always have negative domestic implications. A selloff in stocks or bonds could decrease foreign-held asset valuations, positively affecting the net position internationally. This situation could also impact exposure to the US dollar, especially for those holding long USD positions in derivatives. If asset prices driven by foreign demand start to fall, it could lead to volatility, threatening the perceived stability of long-dollar trades. Specifically, there is a risk of being caught off-guard by sudden shifts in foreign sentiment. For those involved in derivatives, understanding market reactions to international ownership and expectations is crucial. Tracking metrics like yield curve changes or cross-border asset flow shifts can provide clearer short-term signals than structural indicators like IIP. While Krugman’s historical context is valuable, it’s important to adapt our approach to a model driven by asset valuations. We should stress-test exposure to correlated downturns in equity and rate markets, especially when traditional beliefs no longer align with observed behaviors. This is why prioritizing detailed and timely data analysis is essential. The evolving mechanics of the IIP, paired with fluctuating sentiment in global capital markets, require action based on current market conditions, rather than just established theories. Therefore, analyzing each data release with a focus on asset composition—beyond just cash flow—can offer a competitive advantage as we approach late-quarter trades. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Experts note that declining US natural gas prices are due to unexpectedly high storage levels, raising concerns about oversupply.

US natural gas prices fell sharply, with NYMEX Henry Hub futures down by 3.4%. This drop followed new data from the Energy Information Administration, which showed a storage increase of 120 billion cubic feet over the past week. This increase was higher than what the market expected and surpassed the 5-year average increase of 87 billion cubic feet. Total gas storage now reaches 2.375 trillion cubic feet, which is 3.9% above the 5-year average.

Risks And Uncertainties

The data provided includes risks and uncertainties. It’s for informational purposes and should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell assets. Always do thorough research before making investment decisions. Mistakes may occur in this information, and it might not be timely. The authors hold no positions or relationships with the stocks and companies discussed and receive no compensation beyond what’s mentioned in this article. The recent increase in natural gas storage exceeded both market forecasts and the five-year average. This means there is enough supply to meet demand as we approach the peak cooling season, making the pressure on future prices expected. The EIA’s report of a 120 bcf increase is significantly different from market expectations, which anticipated a lower increase. This indicates strong production and shows no supply-side issues despite ongoing maintenance in some areas. Coupled with weak weather-related demand, the decrease in futures prices seems justified.

Market Implications

For traders involved in Henry Hub-linked derivatives, especially options and calendar spreads, this difference between expected and actual inventory data is significant. Not only is one data point exceeding predictions, but there’s also a trend in rising inventories that could dampen bullish positions. Those with long positions in short-term contracts may need to reconsider their delta and gamma exposure if injections remain above the historical average. Additionally, the flattening backwardation curve in the futures market may not completely reflect these developments. Should injection figures continue to be higher than expected, adjustments in calendar spreads might be necessary. Volatility expectations can shift quickly, affecting longer-dated options if supply data surprises further. Wilkinson and others suggest that the current oversupply might not pose long-term issues, but it does change the risk-reward balance for leveraged strategies in the near term. Some indications show that short-term puts are beginning to accumulate, possibly in anticipation of further downward price pressures. During this time, sharp intraday moves can happen due to inventory surprises. Hedging strategies should be adjusted for higher intraday variability, especially early in the injection period when market convictions can shift rapidly. It’s not about leaving the market but staying responsive. Adapt your exposure to the incoming data. For traders using collars or straddles, remember that high storage levels lower the chances of price spikes under normal weather. However, unusual early-summer heat could change this balance, prompting careful consideration when forming strategies based on stable conditions. Avoid becoming overly committed to a directional view based on seasonality alone. Even though summer often sees weather-related volatility and increased gas demand, this hasn’t yet led to storage issues. If there are no signs of increased demand from the power sector or consistent draws from LNG exports, even slight bearish factors can lead to substantial downward movements. Risk managers and traders should stay alert to liquidity conditions around storage report days. Unexpectedly large surprises can disrupt short-term positions, especially in low-volume contracts. Be prepared to quickly scale positions based on volume changes. Expect trading volumes to respond to weather updates or unforeseen maintenance, but without a significant change in supply-demand dynamics, the overall trend is likely to keep building inventory. Use this as a basis to adjust your margin for error. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

UOB Group analysts predict the Pound Sterling will reach a technical target of 1.3500.

Pound Sterling shows signs of continued strength, with a new target of 1.3500. Recent trends indicate trading may settle between 1.3375 and 1.3450, after closing slightly lower at 1.3418. In the next week or two, the indicators still favor a rise towards 1.3500. If it drops below 1.3340, it would suggest the upward trend is over.

Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. It’s crucial to conduct thorough personal research before investing. The information in this article is not a recommendation for buying or selling assets and cannot guarantee accuracy or timeliness. The views in this article are those of the authors and may not represent other policies. There are no personalized recommendations, and any risks from mistakes or misinterpretations fall on the reader. This article does not provide investment advice. Currently, the British pound is still under upward pressure, closing slightly lower at 1.3418 but remaining within its support and resistance levels. Recent technical signals indicate that while momentum may be cooling, it is not completely spent. A rise to 1.3500 remains realistic if the current trend continues.

Technical Analysis

We are keeping an eye on 1.3340. This key level is vital—if it falls below this point, the recent upward movement will likely fail. If it stays above, previous gains are still in play. A drop below would shift focus to potential downturns. Derivatives traders should pay attention to the tight range between 1.3375 and 1.3450. This area often signals a buildup before bigger price movements. Tighter ranges can store energy, and when volatility starts to increase, we may see directionality shift. If this happens while key levels hold, upside potential becomes more attractive. Mid-term indicators, which filter out short-term noise, still show an upward trend. This strengthens the case that bulls maintain control, although their position feels weaker than before. External data shifts and positioning trends, monitored through futures’ open interest and implied volatility, may contribute to this fragility. Traders should focus on the strength of the current move rather than just the price level. Higher highs do not always indicate strength—they must be viewed in context. Maclean, who has reviewed this price movement closely, points out that sellers enter at expected levels while buyers support dips. This creates tactical opportunities in the short term, though less so strategically. Timing is crucial. Traders looking for intraday setups should favor breakout or reversal points around the key range. Those with longer positions should be aware that reaching 1.3500 may face resistance due to option expiry flows, not necessarily broader market trends. Therefore, it’s important to evaluate each level on its own, not just based on continuation chances. Finally, we also monitor the central banks’ communications and local economic data. These often lag behind price movements but can eventually lead to reevaluating positions. Harris has noted that any shifts in expected inflation paths or rate decisions could undermine technical signals, making it necessary to stay updated with scheduled data releases. In this current market, the potential for opportunity exists, but so do the risks. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Optimism among silver buyers keeps prices above $33.00, with daily highs around $33.25 to $33.30.

Silver has been rising again after bouncing back from a recent drop. It hit a new daily high in the $33.25-$33.30 range during early European trading. Buyers stepping in might push the price above this week’s resistance point, breaking out of a month-long downward trend. Indicators show gaining strength, suggesting silver could rise further soon. If silver breaks past the $33.65-$33.70 resistance, it could reach the $34.00 level, and possibly even the year-to-date high around $34.55-$34.60. On the other hand, if the price dips below $32.00, it could create a buying opportunity, stabilizing around $32.60. If there’s a significant drop, the 100-day Simple Moving Average just over $32.00 may offer support. A continued fall could shift momentum toward sellers, potentially driving prices down to $31.40 within the trend channel. Silver’s price is influenced by its industrial demand, safe-haven status, geopolitical events, and the value of the US Dollar. Silver often follows gold’s movements, and the Gold/Silver ratio helps traders compare their prices. The recent bounce in silver prices, after a slight pullback, sparked more buying interest. It reached an intraday high near $33.30 early in Europe, testing levels that marked the upper limit of a downward trend seen over the last month. What we’re seeing now is more than just a regular rebound; it likely stems from renewed interest at lower prices, hinting at the broader trend re-emerging. Indicators like the Relative Strength Index and moving average convergence show strength, indicating that momentum is still alive. A move above this week’s high near $33.70 would break a resistance level that has held since mid-May. This could lead to buying interest targeting $34.00, and if positive sentiment continues, it may push towards the $34.55-$34.60 range, which capped prices earlier in the year. If the price struggles to break resistance, strong demand may still be waiting. Key levels of interest are between $32.60 and $32.00. Just below these, the 100-day moving average is around $32.00, offering a layer of technical support that has drawn short-term buyers in the past. If sellers gain momentum below this point, further declines toward $31.40 could occur, aligning with the lower limits of the trend channel formed in May. This would not be surprising, especially if overall risk appetite changes or the dollar continues to strengthen. It’s also important to note that market participants respond to global factors like central bank policies, inflation data, geopolitical uncertainty, and the dollar’s strength—all impacting daily valuations. Silver’s dual role as both a commodity and a safe-haven asset means it doesn’t always move in sync with gold, but the Gold/Silver ratio can still provide essential insights. We’ve been using that ratio to assess strength, and currently, it indicates a balance. This neutrality suggests that short-term price movements will hinge more on specific commodity flows and technical signals rather than wider macroeconomic factors. So, it’s crucial to keep an eye on specific price levels—especially how the breakout attempt at $33.70 plays out and if the $32.00 support level gets challenged. Monitoring these aspects will help reveal if the current upward momentum is sustainable.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

US Dollar weakens, leading USD/CHF to drop towards 0.8250 after earlier gains

USD/CHF has fallen to around 0.8260 as the US Dollar weakens. This drop is due to concerns about the U.S. fiscal deficit, which the Congressional Budget Office predicts will increase by $3.8 billion because of Trump’s proposed legislation. In contrast, the Swiss Franc is gaining strength as investors seek safety amid U.S. debt issues and geopolitical tensions. The US Dollar Index has decreased to 99.60, its lowest point in two weeks. The proposed budget narrowly passed the US House and offers tax breaks, which could further increase the deficit. However, stronger PMI data has boosted the USD, lowering expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts.

Fed Governor’s Economic Stability Statement

Fed Governor Christopher Waller believes there could be economic stability if tariffs stay around 10%. He also mentioned possible rate cuts later. The CME FedWatch indicates a 71% chance of interest rates remaining stable. The Swiss Franc is strengthening as a safe-haven currency amid ongoing economic and geopolitical uncertainties. The Swiss National Bank’s decisions could influence the CHF, with market expectations for a rate cut in June. The value of the CHF is closely tied to Swiss economic data and Eurozone policies. Known for its stability, the Swiss Franc often attracts investors during market stress. The USD/CHF trend is downward, near 0.8260, as the Greenback faces pressure from new concerns regarding U.S. fiscal health. The Congressional Budget Office’s projections show a $3.8 billion increase in the federal deficit due to proposed tax breaks, which are linked to fiscal expansion. Although aimed at stimulating growth, these tax breaks raise concerns about long-term sustainability and inflation. At the same time, the Dollar Index has slipped to 99.60, indicating a downturn. Risk appetite has decreased due to domestic fiscal issues and ongoing geopolitical challenges. In such situations, currencies known for stability, like the Swiss Franc, usually see more inflows. The Franc has responded quickly, benefiting from classic risk-averse behavior. It’s important to note that the CHF often mirrors perceived economic weakness in other countries. Traders should consider this consistent behavior since confidence in the Franc grows when broader markets decline. This is bolstered by the reliability of Swiss monetary policy and its focus on inflation. Interestingly, mixed signals from U.S. economic indicators complicate the bearish outlook for the dollar. While budget concerns persist, unexpectedly strong PMI data hints at solid performance in manufacturing and services, reducing the need for immediate Federal Reserve action. This may soften recent declines in the dollar. Waller’s recent comments align with a cautious perspective. He is open to rate cuts but only in controlled scenarios. Specifically mentioning tariff levels indicates a willingness to handle near-term inflation as long as trade relationships remain stable. Here, monetary policy seems more reactive than proactive.

Market Expectations And Economic Print Monitoring

The CME’s FedWatch tool reflects this sentiment, showing that about 70% of market participants expect rates to stay unchanged at the next meeting. Expectations have shifted slightly, providing the dollar with some room to stabilize, though not necessarily recover significantly. Focus now shifts to Switzerland. There’s ongoing speculation about a potential policy change by the Swiss central bank, with a modest rate cut expected in June. If this happens, it might slow the recent rise of the Franc. However, any adjustments are likely to be small, keeping the CHF steady rather than volatile. We continue to monitor economic data from both Switzerland and the Euro Area, as these factors will heavily influence short-term valuations. The Swiss Franc often reacts more to international instability than domestic events, highlighting why geopolitical factors are critical indicators for assessing the cross’s short-term direction. Overall, many are adjusting their positions. While volatility remains high, the focus is leaning towards the downside for USD, where concerns about U.S. spending and debt seem to exceed growth trends. Although positioning against the dollar has increased, it has not yet reached extreme levels, indicating that markets could continue current trends before reversing. Those trading derivatives should adapt their strategies accordingly, favoring tactics that align with sustained CHF strength unless the SNB suggests otherwise—especially in markets rewarding patience and precision. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Back To Top
server

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

Chat with our team instantly

Live Chat

Start a live conversation through...

  • Telegram
    hold On hold
  • Coming Soon...

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

telegram

Scan the QR code with your smartphone to start a chat with us, or click here.

Don’t have the Telegram App or Desktop installed? Use Web Telegram instead.

QR code