Ukraine and the United States plan to create a joint minerals fund by the end of the year, with the first board meeting expected in July. Yulia Svyrydenko, Ukraine’s First Deputy Prime Minister, announced this during her visit to Washington. Svyrydenko met with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the U.S. Development Finance Corporation to discuss the next steps. They talked about seed capital and a long-term investment strategy for the fund. The fund comes from a minerals development agreement signed in April after extensive negotiations. This agreement improved terms for Kyiv and received support from former U.S. President Trump. It was later approved by Ukraine’s parliament to strengthen economic ties. The agreement aims to reduce tensions between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, which emerged from their differing views on resolving Ukraine’s ongoing conflict with Russia. This initiative signals a clear effort to strengthen economic connections through coordinated resource development. The mineral fund is designed to gather financial and strategic resources, marking a significant step toward long-term cooperation in a high-demand sector. Svyrydenko’s statement during this high-level fiscal discussion shows a commitment to maintaining progress. Discussions about seed capital and investment strategies are complex. They involve multiple stages: first, financial commitments; then governance; and finally, funding actual development. With a board meeting already scheduled for July, it indicates that much groundwork has already been laid. The timeline for implementation is becoming clearer. The minerals development agreement that initiated this process took time and negotiation. Kyiv did not simply accept the initial terms; it pushed for improvements. This reflects the high stakes involved in securing favorable conditions. For Ukraine, dealing with conflict and economic recovery, achieving better terms shows a focus on securing investment channels. From a trading standpoint, this suggests enhanced economic stability from at least one party. A minerals sector supported by a structured fund reduces uncertainty. High-level engagement from policymakers like Bessent further underscores this ambition. Where there have been foreign policy tensions, this agreement uses economics as a way to mend relationships. It acknowledges that conflict can strain partnerships, but the fund offers a chance to reset international cooperation. It indicates that all parties are willing to negotiate if there’s structure and potential returns involved. In the coming weeks, we can expect news about the fund’s structure, board appointments, and resource priorities. These developments should not be viewed as isolated diplomatic actions, but rather as indicators of where capital may flow next. Early movement could come from companies that align with the fund’s mission, particularly those involved in extraction or logistics. Monitoring fund composition and early policy decisions after July will be essential. Once momentum builds in these discussions, it often flows faster than anticipated. Consistent, clear signals from a multinational board will create patterns that savvy investors will track closely.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The U.S. auto supplier group warns that tightening Chinese controls on rare earth exports may disrupt the automotive industry. Rare earth elements are crucial for electric motors, batteries, and advanced systems in modern vehicles. China dominates global production and processing of these materials. Limiting exports could impact supply chains, increase costs, and delay deliveries within the automotive sector. The group stresses the need for immediate action to find alternative sources or build domestic capacity to lessen the potential economic fallout on the automotive supply chain.

Impact Of Trade Tension

The article discusses rising trade tensions, as China restricts how many rare earth materials can be exported. These elements are essential, not optional. They are key components in electric motors, energy storage units, and advanced electronics found in nearly every modern car. A shortage in supply can cause costs to soar and delivery schedules to slip, particularly in sectors where precision and volume are critical. The auto supplier group is right to be concerned. They’re not just predicting problems; they point out that many supply chains depend heavily on a single source. Alternative materials are not easy to find, and switching to substitutes can be costly and time-consuming. This situation raises immediate concerns in derivative markets, where price expectations are closely tied to the future availability of these essential materials. If the costs of materials increase due to export restrictions, financial instruments related to commodity prices or manufacturing margins might deviate from earlier predictions.

Concerns In Derivative Markets

Take a close look at contracts that depend on battery metals or high-tech manufacturing components. Rules about collateral based on stable costs may no longer apply. In the coming weeks, pricing models for vehicle manufacturers—especially those expanding electric vehicle production—will need significant revisions. Expect wider bid-ask spreads and increased volatility, especially around quarterly hedge rollovers. We anticipate further adjustments, especially in financial instruments that assumed stable input prices in technology and automotive industries. Long-term positions in derivatives dependent on steady supply could face significant risks. Instead of solely focusing on market breadth, analyses should weigh input exposure more heavily than diversity of end products. Focus on break-even analyses for trades related to electrification. Any derivatives that count on rare earths being inexpensive or readily available will start facing significant pressure. Keep in mind that current actions should not be taken as opportunities for quick profit but rather to avoid risky positions that could quickly deteriorate in unstable markets. We are monitoring for clear policy signals or trade exemptions. Until then, options volatility may remain high. Adjusting delta hedges more frequently can help mitigate losses in directional calls. It’s not just about reacting to news; it’s essential to stay ahead of price changes while material constraints shift faster than expected. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Australian dollar held firm on Thursday, hovering around $0.6491, supported more by weakness in the US dollar than by domestic economic strength. Although recent data from Australia was underwhelming, the Aussie found footing amid a shift in risk sentiment, as concerns over US trade policy weighed on the greenback.

The currency advanced by 0.5% overnight, largely tracking a broader decline in the US dollar. American economic releases showed a contraction in the services sector, the first in nearly a year. At the same time, private payrolls, according to ADP figures, rose by only 152,000, well short of the 173,000 forecast. US Treasury yields dropped in response, dragging the dollar index to six-week lows and reviving talk of a potential Federal Reserve rate cut as early as September.

This environment of softening US data encouraged investors to rotate out of the dollar and into higher-yielding risk assets, helping to buoy the Aussie despite Australia’s own economic headwinds.

Domestic Outlook Remains Fragile

Australia’s local data continues to paint a subdued picture. Wednesday’s GDP figures disappointed, and Thursday’s Household Spending Index showed only modest growth in April. This follows earlier soft readings on retail sales and a narrower trade surplus, largely due to a drop in gold exports, pointing to sluggish momentum heading into the second quarter.

Markets are increasingly anticipating that the Reserve Bank of Australia could begin easing as soon as July, with expectations that the rate cycle will bottom out at 2.85% by early 2026. While exports to China remain stable, they’ve yet to compensate for broader softness in consumer spending.

Technical Analysis

The Aussie has been edging higher from a low of 0.6445, touching a peak of 0.6509 before settling into a narrower range. The strongest momentum occurred around the Asia–London session overlap, underpinned by a bullish MACD crossover and a sequence of higher lows. However, since testing resistance near 0.6510, the price has levelled off just beneath the 30-period moving average, indicating a pause in direction.

MACD momentum has weakened, with the histogram near neutral and signal lines narrowing. Short-term moving averages (5 and 10) are clustering with price, pointing to a possible breakout or a fade, depending on incoming catalysts.

Immediate resistance remains at 0.6509, while support sits at 0.6480. A move above 0.6510 could open the door to 0.6530, whereas a drop below 0.6480 may lead the pair back toward 0.6460.

Traders will now look to Friday’s US nonfarm payrolls for the next major catalyst. Any downside surprise may further depress the dollar and give the Aussie the boost needed to test the upper end of its range near 0.6537. Until then, expect range-bound consolidation with limited upside momentum.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

RBC Global Asset Management points out that the recent drop in the U.S. dollar may show a change in how investors feel about American assets. Since January, the U.S. Dollar Index has fallen by 10%, despite market ups and downs and high levels of anxiety, which typically support the dollar. This decline might signal skepticism about the U.S.’s unique status and its reputation as a safe investment. RBC anticipates the dollar will weaken further. This situation has global implications because the drop has affected the performance of U.S. stocks and bonds this year, especially when compared to international investments adjusted for currency differences. The article highlights a clear 10% drop in the U.S. Dollar Index during a time when market uncertainty usually strengthens the dollar. Typically, investors flock to safe currencies like the dollar in stressful financial periods. However, recent trends suggest that global investors are no longer convinced that the U.S. offers the safest or best-performing investments, especially as its stocks and bonds lag behind foreign options when adjusted for currency differences. This observation carries weight. McKay’s team sees the dollar’s decline as more than just a short-term change; it could create challenges for strategies that depend on a strong dollar. It also puts U.S. assets at a disadvantage when converting to stronger foreign currencies. If this trend continues, we can expect more pressure on dollar-denominated trades. From a strategy standpoint, we should focus less on broad correlations and more on how price movements interact with volatility. With ongoing dollar weakness, traders should consider instruments that can benefit from changes in policy and are linked to non-U.S. assets. Increased premiums on puts in Asian equity markets indicate a shift in sentiment that could be advantageous, but caution is advised. When currency values fluctuate, commodity-linked assets often behave unpredictably. We’ve observed lower implied volatility in Canadian and Australian derivatives, which might present a good entry point. If the dollar continues to slide, we should pay closer attention to options in these markets, especially where there is a gap between realized and implied volatility. The shift we’re witnessing isn’t just about timing; it’s also about mechanics. Capital flows seem to be moving away from traditional safe-haven behaviors, indicating that investors are changing their strategies across interest rates and currency markets. There’s potential for reallocating assets, and a widening pricing gap in global options classes could challenge old assumptions. As changes take effect, monitoring interest rate differences becomes less about central bank announcements and more about the adaptability of carry structures. We’re observing a shift in preferences that might test the positions created during last year’s divergence. Sticking to those positions without adjustments could lead to losses. In the coming weeks, short-term options in some European indices may be becoming more appealing due to volatility issues elsewhere. Some rates markets are showing discrepancies from their predicted yield curves, particularly as central bank expectations are changing. What feels timely now is positioning in areas where underlying structures are quietly building up. It’s more about anticipating movements in currency-volatility pairings rather than broadly hedging equity risks. We’re drawing insights not from previous cycles but from these critical moments when standard tools fail to provide clear signals. When mispricings arise from macro dislocations, there are opportunities—not for big changes, but for careful gains. The ongoing shift in the dollar could be one of those chances.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

TD Securities has updated its forecast for the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). They now expect two interest rate cuts of 25 basis points each in 2025, likely in August and November, lowering the cash rate to 3.35%. This change comes after signs of economic weakness in Australia. In the March 2025 quarter, GDP growth was just 0.2%, and per capita GDP has decreased in nine of the last eleven quarters. Contributing factors include weak consumer spending, bad weather, and uncertainties in the global economy.

Economic Challenges Despite Cautious Approach

Despite these issues, the RBA is cautious and does not expect to cut rates in July. However, they might consider a cut as a precaution against further economic decline. The RBA is ready to make quick cuts if global economic troubles, like US trade policies, threaten stability. Market trends align with TD Securities’ predictions, suggesting several rate reductions before early 2026 to boost growth. However, any changes will depend on new data, balancing the need to control inflation with efforts to maintain growth. The RBA already made a rate cut in May, with a meeting scheduled for July 7 and 8. TD Securities anticipates further adjustments from the RBA in August and November. Following the May decision, the cash rate is 3.85%. Two 25 basis point cuts would lower this to 3.35%. While this outcome is expected, the reasons deserve closer examination. Australian GDP growth has been slow, with a mere 0.2% growth in the March 2025 quarter. This is concerning, especially as per capita GDP has fallen in nine of the past eleven quarters, indicating deeper issues. This slowdown suggests households are struggling financially. Consumer demand is weak, affected by rising living costs and unpredictable weather, which dampens confidence in retail and housing. External risks, like trade tensions, only increase the pressure on the central bank to act. No rate cut is expected in July, showing that the RBA is willing to wait for clearer signals. However, there are subtle hints that policymakers are ready for quicker action. The two projected rate cuts in 2025 are not a certainty but a cautious response to worsening economic conditions, if they occur.

Outlook and Future Stimulus

Many economic analysts believe more stimulus will be needed as we head into 2026, and interest rate futures support this view. Market participants are now predicting several rate cuts before the end of the first quarter, highlighting the growing concern about the economy’s resilience. Price pressures will significantly influence the timing and scale of these adjustments. If inflation continues to fall while growth remains slow, the RBA might move one of the rate cuts forward to early 2025. However, with job numbers staying strong and migration supporting certain sectors, expectations will need to adjust based on new information. Looking ahead, risks may increase market volatility. The RBA’s flexible approach suggests that interest rate derivatives are already anticipating changes. Options pricing indicates rising volatility around November, hinting that some are preparing for unexpected shifts. In our strategy, being adaptable is crucial. We should focus more on data than stories—particularly core CPI, job vacancy rates, and consumer sentiment indices. Awareness of macroeconomic reports will be essential, especially in the weeks following the July meeting. It’s clear the central bank will act if they believe risks to growth are more urgent than cost-of-living concerns. While this is a careful balance, they have made similar decisions before. If policy changes happen sooner than expected, many may not be surprised. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Deutsche Bank believes the European Central Bank (ECB) will settle on a 1.50% terminal rate during its easing cycle, but this may happen sooner than expected. As the year continues, attention is expected to shift from lowering rates to possibly raising them in the future. The bank has raised its prediction for euro area GDP growth in 2025 from 0.5% to 0.8%, highlighting the economy’s strength despite U.S. tariffs. Inflation is projected to fall below the ECB’s 2% target in 2025. This suggests there is still room for more rate cuts, even though the case for a 1.50% terminal rate is getting weaker. Looking ahead to 2026, Deutsche Bank predicts that increased European defense spending might enhance strategic autonomy and create a sense of “EU exceptionalism.” The ECB may start raising rates by late 2026, with a forecasted policy rate of 1.75%. The bank has also raised its terminal rate expectation for 2027 to 2.50%, citing fiscal commitments and a potentially higher neutral rate. Geopolitical events and changes in spending could lead to a more vigorous ECB response than what the market currently expects. This shifting policy landscape may affect future monetary decisions in the euro area. What we see here is a significant adjustment in expectations regarding the ECB’s rate movement. Deutsche Bank is suggesting that there may not be as many rate cuts ahead as previously thought. There’s now an implied limit, indicating that the rate-cutting trend could slow down earlier than the market believed just a few weeks ago. By raising its GDP growth forecast for 2025, the bank recognizes that the euro area’s economy is doing better than anticipated. Despite challenges like U.S. trade actions, demand remains strong enough to promote GDP growth without quickly driving prices above the ECB’s target. Inflation is expected to drop below 2% next year, which would usually encourage the central bank to keep rates low for a longer time. However, this assumption is now being questioned. This isn’t just a minor adjustment in terminal rate predictions; it’s a signal that the sentiment in Frankfurt may be shifting. It’s no longer just about lowering interest rates but also about how long those rates will stay low. The shift toward strengthening fiscal capacity in Europe, especially with increased defense spending, adds another layer to consider. Such spending is large and durable, suggesting stronger internal demand in the long term. This type of expenditure is unlikely to be easily reversed, and it could lead to more inflation down the road. This helps clarify why the bank has increased its 2027 terminal rate expectation to 2.5%. There’s no doubt that monetary policy will have to reflect this increased demand. For those planning strategies in interest rate markets, this has clear implications. The path from now might only drop slightly before leveling off – and from that level, there’s a growing chance rates could rise after 2026. Relying too heavily on positions far down the yield curve without a new assessment can be risky. It’s not just about chasing short-term gains from imminent cuts; it’s also about understanding the ECB’s future intentions beyond mid-decade. The central bank’s future seems to require more flexibility, indicating it won’t just keep lowering rates for the sake of it. Changes in global politics, new spending priorities, and a possible re-assessment of the euro area’s neutral rate are all contributing to this updated perspective. Expectations of higher rates in the medium term should influence how pricing risks are considered, particularly on the longer end. Focus should be on the subtle changes occurring further along the curve. That’s where policy thinking is heading and where current pricing may soon diverge. Market participants can no longer rely on assumptions made during the post-pandemic period. New drivers are at play now – some from outside, others from within – all pointing towards a less supportive trajectory for rates. Keeping investments based on a continuous decline in rates after the next few quarters might misinterpret how the ECB is getting ready to adjust its stance.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Saudi Arabia is pushing OPEC+ to increase oil production at a faster rate over the next few months. The aim is to regain market share by adding at least 411,000 barrels per day in August and possibly September. This change marks a new strategy for Saudi Arabia. Instead of cutting output to support prices, they are focusing on increasing supply, even if it means lower prices. Some other OPEC+ members, like Russia, Algeria, and Oman, are hesitant about this plan.

High Seasonal Demand

Saudi Arabia believes that high seasonal demand supports this strategy. The next OPEC+ meeting on July 6 will decide production policies for August. So far, analysis shows that Saudi Arabia is shifting from a focus on maintaining oil prices to prioritizing market share. Meanwhile, some alliance members are concerned that flooding the market with supply could drive prices down too much. Russia, for instance, might be worried about meeting short-term budget needs while ensuring long-term export reliability. The short-term plan is clear: an increase of 411,000 barrels per day in August and possibly continuing this into September. This marks a significant policy change and signals a new strategy to influence oil markets. We can make three reasonable assumptions. First, Saudi Arabia is banking on high summer demand to help absorb the extra barrels without causing prices to crash. Second, they are willing to sacrifice some revenue per barrel to secure a larger market presence. Third, the July 6 meeting could highlight tensions within the group, especially if anyone tries to hesitate or reverse these plans.

Broader Pricing Environment

It’s also important to consider the overall pricing landscape: Brent crude prices have varied enough to allow some mild downward flexibility without jeopardizing producers’ financial stability. However, if other countries in the coalition resist and limit their participation, Saudi Arabia may end up shouldering an unfair share of the supply increase, diminishing the overall impact. From a trading standpoint, this blend of differing policies and increased supply could change price dynamics. Short-term spreads will likely reflect changes in inventory levels—something to monitor closely from July into mid-August. This indicates a need to focus on short-term volatility rather than relying solely on longer-term trends. Such interventions may temporarily reduce implied volatility but can lead to larger shifts in actual market movements, as seen during past coordination breakdowns. Monitor whether backwardation softens in the upcoming weeks, especially regarding cargo data from Asia and refinery activity in India and China. On a more detailed level, looking at product crack spreads might help confirm if demand aligns with Saudi Arabia’s expectations. If gasoline and jet fuel margins decline despite increased production, it could suggest that consumption isn’t strong enough to support this new strategy. As the meeting date approaches, pricing for out-of-the-money options on oil benchmarks may start to differ. We should assess if the skew starts leaning towards downside protection, which could indicate broader market sentiment leading up to the decision. Currently, options premiums are moderate, but this could change if outlooks become less cohesive. Tracking open interest build-up around the meeting date may help refine our market exposure. If speculative positions begin to unwind before July 6, it might suggest a shift away from bullish bets—valuable information for market positioning. The clarity of this policy shift is uncommon, but its success relies heavily on coordination and timing. Traders should ensure their models remain adaptable and adjust their position sizes according to incoming data. Future forecasts could change expectations rapidly, and we will need to adapt accordingly. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Saudi Arabian Oil Co. (Aramco) has lowered its official selling price for July shipments of Arab Light to Asia. The new price is $1.20 per barrel above the Oman/Dubai average, down from $1.40 in June. This adjustment reflects a predicted drop in demand in Asia, affecting light and medium crude grades, while the price for Arab Heavy remains unchanged. On the other hand, Aramco has raised prices for shipments to Northwest Europe and the Mediterranean by $1.80 per barrel. In the United States, prices for Arab Extra Light and Light increased slightly by $0.10, while Medium and Heavy grades saw no changes.

Opec Production Increase

These price changes come as OPEC+ members plan to boost production for the third straight month in July. This raises worries about a possible surplus in supply amidst uncertain demand. The recent $0.20 drop in the price of Arab Light to Asia is a response to the softening demand observed at several Northeast Asian refineries. Such a decline typically doesn’t happen by chance; it usually stems from early buying signals and contract interests that state firms closely monitor. We’re noticing reduced competition for barrels in that region, especially for lighter grades, which are more affected by crack spreads and transportation costs. In Europe, prices have moved up by $1.80. This rise suggests either that refiners are eager for reliable supply before maintenance or that shipping challenges are driving up delivery costs from other sources. When European price differentials increase sharply, it often indicates tighter medium sour balances in Mediterranean storage and strengthening margins on kerosene-rich blends. In the United States, the small $0.10 increase for lighter oils like Arab Extra Light shows that the producer is managing expectations. Inventory levels are generally stable, with Gulf Coast imports within normal seasonal ranges. However, this increase is likely a way to stay competitive without raising expectations of tighter supply.

Broader Supply Concern

Now, let’s discuss the broader supply concern. With the production quota raised for the third month in a row, it’s a clear signal: producers are confident in their ability to produce but uncertain about short-term demand. If buying doesn’t increase, there could be oversupply in floating storage or widening Brent-Dubai spreads. This means we need to closely track differentials against dated benchmarks, especially in Asia. Declining premiums against Oman/Dubai prompt a reevaluation of time spreads and refiners’ willingness to take on new barrels before the peak summer season. A weak spot structure combined with rising output diminishes the value of prompt cargoes, which could lead to flat or contango conditions in futures markets if market sentiment declines. Now is not the time for broad assumptions. Price increases in Europe and the Mediterranean reflect local demand and logistics rather than a broader recovery. We need to consider these movements as short-term rather than long-term trends. Stability in Arab Heavy shows that complex refiners are still operating at full capacity while margins support it—but demand for lighter fractions is weak. Attention will shift towards refining margins and run rates, especially as we receive updated data from Singapore and Korea. Any sustained decrease in utilization there will affect term contracts and adjustments for September loadings. We must focus on the relative value between grades, not just the outright price differentials. In a market where one set of prices rises while another falls, arbitrage opportunities become clearer. This divergence across regions highlights the necessity to monitor freight spreads, costs for VLCCs, and the re-routing of cargoes between the Atlantic Basin and East Asia. Such a setup often leads to volatility in crude time spreads, particularly in the second and third month contracts. Now is a moment to proceed carefully—run the numbers, explore different scenarios, and keep positions light until spreads confirm the trends. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The US dollar fell after reports showed the ISM services index at 49.9, below the expected 52.0, and ADP employment numbers at +37K, down from +110K previously. The Beige Book also indicated a slight decrease in economic activity, raising worries about the US economy. As a result, USD/JPY dropped by 115 pips, and US 10-year yields decreased by 10 basis points to 4.36%. Gold rose by $21 to $3,372, even though WTI crude oil fell by 59 cents, settling at $62.82.

Bank Of Canada Rate Decision

In Canada, the Bank of Canada kept its interest rate steady at 2.75%. Market expectations showed a 26% chance of a rate cut, which helped push USD/CAD to its lowest level since October. The Canadian loonie faced pressure due to falling oil prices, though it saw a slight rise following the Bank’s decision. GBP/USD peaked at 1.3579 before easing a bit. In contrast, EUR/USD reached 1.1434 and held onto its gains. Attention now turns to the European Central Bank’s upcoming decision, with no major changes expected. Discussions about a potential Canada-US trade agreement continue, confirmed in talks involving Trump and Putin. With recent US economic data falling short of expectations, it seems the earlier optimism about a quick recovery might have been overblown. The drop in the ISM services index to its lowest in years indicates decreased demand, suggesting this is not just a temporary issue. Likewise, the ADP report reflects a significant slowdown in job growth, hinting that the overall employment situation might be weakening faster than anticipated, especially in typically stable sectors. As Treasury yields declined by 10 basis points, this shift shows that fixed-income markets are responding to the Federal Reserve’s neutral stance. The 10-year yield now at 4.36% suggests traders are adjusting their rate expectations. The swift drop in the USD/JPY exchange rate was orderly and not just a reaction; it might signal a longer-term trend of USD weakness in the near future.

Gold And Commodity Markets

Gold’s rise underscores how markets are reassessing risk. The $21 gain isn’t merely a response to geopolitical events or speculation. Instead, it points to hedging against economic softness as markets expect policymakers to pause further tightening. With WTI crude oil declining, inflation pressures related to commodities seem to be easing, strengthening this perspective. Policy differences are emerging in various regions. The Bank of Canada’s decision to hold rates steady eased some speculation, at least temporarily. However, the loonie’s brief strength faded as losses in oil prices took precedence. This reaction was not extreme; the currency’s tight connection to energy markets meant many investors had anticipated this outcome. There was increased hedging activity ahead of the meeting, driven by the 26% chance of a rate cut, which played a significant role. Sterling climbed to 1.3579 before slightly retreating. Its rise was notably efficient compared to previous weeks. Meanwhile, the euro maintained its gains better, suggesting that traders are adjusting their positions ahead of the European Central Bank’s decision. Although little is expected in the short term, market participants are beginning to prepare for potential changes in guidance. The geopolitical landscape, particularly the resumed Canada-US trade talks, remains an important backdrop. Engagements between Trump and Putin add complexity, but so far, they have not significantly impacted volatility pricing. Nevertheless, such headlines often resurface unexpectedly, rarely staying limited to rhetoric. Given these developments, careful rebalancing of risk exposure is essential. We’re paying closer attention to rate-sensitive currency pairs, as upcoming data could amplify existing trends. Timing market entries based on fixed-income volatility and cross-asset flows will be especially effective over the next three to four sessions. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The final China PMI for May is set to be released, including the Caixin Services and Composite PMIs. Recent reports show that China’s May Manufacturing PMI rose slightly to 49.5, while the Non-manufacturing PMI dipped slightly to 50.3. The Caixin Manufacturing PMI decreased to 48.3 from 50.4. Authorities have promised more stimulus, with announcements expected around June 18-19. The PMIs from China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and Caixin/S&P Global differ in focus and methods. The NBS PMI mainly looks at large, state-owned companies across various industries, while the Caixin PMI focuses on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the private sector. The NBS surveys around 3,000 companies, giving a broad view of traditional industries, while Caixin surveys about 500 firms, emphasizing export-driven and tech-oriented companies. NBS PMIs are released monthly on the last day, covering both manufacturing and services. Caixin PMIs are published on the first business day of the month, focusing only on manufacturing and services. The NBS PMIs provide insights into policy-driven economic stability, while Caixin reflects current market conditions. Together, they paint a detailed picture of China’s economic situation from both macro and micro perspectives. Though the overall PMI figures are close to the critical 50 mark between contraction and expansion, the differing numbers reveal unique trends within China’s industrial and service sectors. There’s a minor improvement in manufacturing data from official reports, while the private sector shows a different story—likely reflecting challenges faced by export-focused and tech-driven companies that are more vulnerable to global demand fluctuations. Looking ahead, the upcoming policy support, with potential announcements in mid-June, adds a new factor to consider. Markets often anticipate stimulus, but the timing and scale can vary. The difference between official manufacturing data and private sector figures suggests that larger companies may be coping better with lower orders thanks to government support, while smaller firms struggle without the same backing. When there’s a growing gap between these two readings, it historically precedes shifts in market sentiment, affecting swap rates and implied volatility in regional assets. We should see this gap not as a minor issue, but as an early indicator of changes between policy directions and real business performance. On the policy side, the non-manufacturing number staying slightly above 50 indicates ongoing domestic demand, but the downward trend is concerning. If this becomes a lasting trend, we may need to adjust our expectations, especially regarding consumption-related inputs. When the Caixin data is released this week, we should focus not only on the overall numbers but also on key sub-indices like new orders, input costs, and employment. These sub-indices often provide valuable insights for predicting short-term trends and cross-asset hedging. Additionally, following the previous weak private sector data, market positioning has become more cautious. Short-term volatility markets are factoring in further drag through early July, impacting CNH and A-shares, as well as regional FX pairs. This could change quickly, especially if June announcements align the rhetoric with concrete actions. There’s a limited opportunity. If policy indications align with real-time data, it might be a good time to reduce downside protection and adjust for potential recovery—especially in interest rate curves that closely follow onshore trends. On the flip side, if the upcoming services and composite figures show further weaknesses, this could validate cautious market positions, especially considering the retail and SME responses from last quarter when weak numbers persisted over several months. We must keep an eye on whether the forward-looking components in the PMI data improve or merely stabilize. Shifts in these components often signal broader changes in market expectations and risk appetites. This period—between data releases and policy responses—is where markets can misprice risk. Discrepancies often occur between the data and how quickly authorities implement stimulus, and it’s in these short-term gaps that positioning becomes crucial.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now