The Trump administration has asked countries to provide their “best offers” for trade talks by Wednesday. However, it seems that the European Union (EU) has not received this request. EU Trade Commissioner Sefcovic will meet with his US counterpart, Greer, later this week. This meeting comes just 36 days before a key deadline. This situation creates a sense of urgency in the push to restart trade discussions that have been stalled for more than a year. The request for “best offers” by Wednesday indicates a limited time for negotiations, showing that Washington wants to move forward before important political events. The fact that Brussels had not received any formal communication suggests a possible breakdown in coordination or a strategic decision to apply pressure on key partners first. Either way, this puts Europe at a disadvantage in terms of timing. Sefcovic’s meeting with Greer will be the first formal discussion between them since March. Scheduling this meeting just days after Washington’s request seems intentional. With only 36 days until the trade authorization deadline, both sides will need to quickly draft documents that satisfy both domestic and international concerns. Since past talks have often failed at the last moment, expectations are being kept low publicly, but it’s known that internal discussions are considering several backup plans. From our viewpoint, it’s less important if the EU meets the deadline and more about how clear and final their submission appears to American officials. If the proposals seem tentative or unclear, they might be dismissed as mere political gestures. Therefore, we should expect the offer to specify tariff adjustments, gradual reductions over certain timeframes, and access thresholds. It appears that the Americans want these details documented clearly. Market participants focused on metals, agricultural exports, and aviation contracts should keep an eye out for any mention of volume limits or adjusted subsidy figures. These could be early indicators of what will gain traction during the meetings. Any changes that affect regional prices could create trading momentum, especially if the joint press release seems overly aggressive or optimistic. It’s important to note that when verbal commitments turn into numbers, volatility often arises, leading to pressure on carry structures and short volatility positions. Additionally, we’ve observed that bilateral tensions usually impact mid-term derivatives more than short-term ones, especially when access rights have review periods extending into 2025. If this pattern continues, risk could manifest at unpredictable intervals. Don’t expect prices to move in a straight line when geopolitical factors are involved — things often shift even when initial announcements appear straightforward. Lastly, historical trends indicate that US trade negotiators tend to soften their tone once deadlines are within a month, especially after meetings with the media. If Thursday’s briefing has a measured tone, it could create an opportunity for a short-term reversal in correlation trades that were previously based on a bearish outlook. If you are monitoring Q3 rate implieds for potential shifts, consider comparing them with any sector-specific exceptions mentioned later this week. It’s clear that we are now in a phase where headlines can significantly influence model-based strategies. Therefore, it’s crucial to assess exposures not only for directional risks but also for gap risks, especially for products linked to regulated goods.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Comments from the Bank of England Governor indicate that recent interest rate decisions were shaped more by domestic conditions than by tariffs. Inflation has remained steady, but the labour market has eased a bit. Wage growth is still higher than what would normally align with a 2% inflation target, although it has slowed more than expected since February. Even with the highest core inflation rate among major economies, predictions for the June rate decision are still uncertain. It’s anticipated that rates will remain stable, in line with market expectations. However, interest rates are generally trending downwards, though the details of this decline are unclear due to international uncertainties.

Global Trade Impact

Disrupted global trade is hurting overall growth and causing UK businesses to hesitate on investments. The effect on prices is mixed, and we are not seeing the same supply chain issues or inflation spikes that we did in 2021. Before the May policy decision, the Governor was cautious, weighing several unstable factors that are affecting the economy. What we have observed so far indicates that the UK’s monetary policy is still firm but starting to lean toward eventual easing—though this process is not straightforward. Bailey emphasized that the Committee didn’t just react to global factors like tariffs but considered the domestic economy’s nuances. Labour availability has tightened, and wages aren’t growing as quickly as earlier in the year, suggesting a softening in household demand. Yet, wage increases are still higher than what would be ideal for stable inflation. Although they have slowed, they remain above the 2% target, indicating that the downward pressure on inflation is not strong enough to cause a quick policy change. It isn’t just about whether the job market is strong or weak; the pace of change hasn’t been enough to justify a significant shift. From our perspective, this does not support an abrupt change in interest rates. There’s an interesting disconnect right now. Core inflation remains high compared to other countries, yet the domestic pay growth keeping those prices high is declining. This inconsistency complicates predictions about future policy easing. In practical terms, calls for a rate cut in June seem premature. Markets are expecting stability, which is unlikely to change unless there are significant developments.

Global Demand Backdrop

Another factor adding to the uncertainty is the global demand environment. The fragmentation in international trade—due to policy differences and geopolitical issues—has removed some advantages for UK exports. This disruption hinders investment planning, especially for businesses that rely on international trade. We’ve noticed that companies are hesitant to invest, which negatively impacts productivity. However, even with slower business investments, we are not experiencing the price spikes that disrupted supply chains a few years ago. This situation helps maintain some stability in input cost forecasts. Currently, major inflation pressures are more related to services and wages than to transportation or commodity shortages. The Governor’s last-minute change on the latest vote underscores the careful nature of their decision-making. This wasn’t just a simple pause; it was a measured response based on evidence that is softening—but not rapidly enough for decisive action. For us, this means that any sudden changes in rate expectations remain unwarranted until data shows more concrete shifts. In the near future, we expect the risk profile to stay stable, unless unexpectedly high wage or inflation data emerges. Global uncertainties still pose challenges, but they are not influencing the system as they once did. This suggests that current strategies should focus on interest rate stability while remaining flexible as the global situation evolves. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Bank of England policymaker confirmed that the disinflation process is still happening. All members of the Monetary Policy Committee agree, except one who sees more risks ahead. Supply chain data shows clearer signs of disinflation than complex wage data. Core inflation, which stalled at 3.2%, has now risen to 3.8%. Current observations suggest that inflation is slowly declining, though this decline isn’t as smooth as expected. The increase in core inflation from 3.2% to 3.8% indicates that domestic price pressures might not be easing consistently. Wage data remains tricky to interpret due to distortions and delays, but supply chain improvements have led to lower goods prices—an early sign of reduced cost pressures in some economic areas. One Committee member is more aware of the possibility that inflation may drop more than expected. This could lead to greater room for easing later this year. This viewpoint contrasts with the broader agreement among Committee members, who all acknowledge that prices are generally heading downward. Given this division in perspectives and the recent rise in core inflation, we can expect future policy decisions to be more staggered. It’s not the right time for large directional positions. Instead, it’s wiser to focus on short-term interest rate volatility rather than making bold bets on rates. This is especially true since upcoming data, particularly on wage growth, will significantly influence how the markets adjust to any future policy changes. Price movements in short sterling futures reveal uncertainty about when the first rate cut might happen. The latest adjustments show the market stepping back from earlier optimism. We also observe an increase in near-term implied volatility, as traders begin to hedge against a slower policy response, which aligns with the inflation data trends. Some risks still depend on global factors, especially energy and trade, but our main focus is on the domestic situation. The main drivers of inflation now come from services, meaning wage data, despite its noise, will remain in the spotlight. Policymakers are cautious and may change their approach depending on how clear the next data reports are. For now, we are actively engaged in the middle of the curve, favoring strategies that benefit from a steeper front end. This reflects our belief that the Bank will hold off on aggressive actions until more solid evidence of disinflation appears. Policy is not predetermined, and the current market environment requires flexibility.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The deputy governor of the Bank of England, Sarah Breeden, recently spoke at a monetary policy hearing for the Treasury Committee. She noted that the UK is making steady progress in reducing inflation, with the economy moving towards having too much supply. Breeden emphasized the need for future policy decisions to keep inflation on track. She expects tariffs to have little impact on the UK economy. Additionally, she mentioned that new surpluses in the labor market would guide policy changes.

Thinking About Rate Cuts

Breeden pointed out that there was already a discussion about lowering the bank rate in May, even before the effects of tariffs were clear. She argued that inflation in the UK is now decreasing steadily, showing that price pressures are easing. At the same time, the balance of supply and demand is changing, with the economy producing beyond its immediate needs. This change may create less pressure on prices, a situation we haven’t seen for years due to high inflation and tight labor markets. For those of us monitoring interest rates, Breeden’s comments clearly indicate that policymakers are ready to act even before all data is available. The early discussions about rate cuts in May, despite possible tariff impacts, reveal their careful risk evaluation. While tariffs typically cause cost-related complications, Breeden suggested that their impact on inflation would be limited. This means we should not assume that import costs will force permanent price increases. It’s important to avoid overreacting to headlines and instead focus on what the Bank identifies as the main influences.

Attention to Wage Developments

She also highlighted that changes in job market slack—the unused labor—are being analyzed more closely. This slack directly affects wage growth, a significant factor for core inflation. If wage growth weakens, this supports the idea of a more relaxed policy. As traders, we may now need to anticipate that rate cuts could happen sooner than expected, possibly under less favorable conditions than previously thought. This could lead to a flatter, lower near-term rate outlook. Any options strategies should reflect this shift in perspective, adjusting forward curves downward. A strong belief in higher rates, especially at the shorter end, may fade quickly if economic indicators weaken. Pricing models that assume ongoing inflation or a tightening stance within six months might need revisiting. Analysts should stress-test scenarios where rate cuts occur more frequently, or sooner than currently anticipated. While forward guidance is still implied rather than stated clearly, Breeden’s comments suggest that the bar for action is lower than some may think. We should also consider gilt volatility, especially for shorter maturities. If the Bank begins to shift rates more quickly, we might see increased risk premiums as confidence in the policy path drops. In summary, when market signals begin to align with central bank messaging, it’s important to adjust strategies. We now have a strong indication of the potential direction of policy, and being inflexible risks mispricing this change. Reevaluating curve exposure, especially in the middle term, should be a priority. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

A Bank of England policymaker prefers a new approach to the bank rate. They worry that strict policies may limit demand and discourage investment. Currently, risks to inflation and economic growth appear to be downward. This approach could impact overall economic stability and future growth. The statement indicates a change in sentiment within the Bank of England’s policy committee. One policymaker is reconsidering the current interest rate path, believing it may be too strict. The concern is that if rates stay high for too long, borrowing will cost more. As a result, consumers may spend less, and businesses could hesitate to invest in new projects or hire more staff. This situation could slow economic growth and lower inflation, but it may also lead to weaker performance in the coming quarters. So, what does this mean for us? We should pay attention to how other committee members respond in their speeches or meeting notes. If more members begin to share this viewpoint, interest rates could change more quickly than expected. Consumer inflation, while still above the target, has been slowing down. At the same time, businesses report reduced demand, especially for goods. Although the labor market is still tight, there are fewer signs of increasing wages. For now, Bailey leans toward patience. However, dissent from others indicates rising concerns within the central bank about excessive tightening. Investors predicting future rates should watch for any changes in guidance or unexpected actions. If this sentiment spreads, adjustments may be needed in the swap markets. Economic data will play a crucial role in setting rate expectations. For example, if retail sales, wage settlements, or services PMI figures come in lower than expected, this would strengthen the case for holding rates or even cutting them. The growing risks in both growth and price stability mean it’s less about inflation hitting the target and more about preventing recession-like numbers. Given this, traders in short-term interest rate products might need to rethink their expectations. Yield curves are already flattening, indicating lower expectations. However, implied volatility suggests that the market hasn’t fully settled on the Bank of England’s direction yet. We could use this uncertainty to explore opportunities in options strategies, especially where volatility is undervalued based on the current macro situation. If rates do drop more quickly than initially predicted, any repricing in short sterling futures and SONIA swaps will reflect that. Still, any changes will likely be gradual unless economic indicators significantly worsen. It’s wise to stay adaptable and reassess using shorter time frames, particularly with more policy communications and GDP updates coming soon. We suggest reducing exposure to directional bets unless backed by upcoming data. Instead, consider relative value trades where the policy differences between the Bank of England and other central banks are more evident. As always, liquidity conditions affect premiums, so adjusting positions before the month ends could provide better entry points. For clients involved in collateral or hedging, adjusting discount curves might have short-term effects, especially if sterling positions need rolling or rebalancing ahead of the next policy meeting. Although waiting for clearer signals may seem appealing, current conditions suggest that implied rates might not stay this low for long.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Eurozone’s preliminary Consumer Price Index (CPI) for May has risen by 1.9% year-on-year, which is slightly lower than the expected 2.0%. This differs from April, where the rate was higher at 2.2%, indicating a slowdown in inflation. Core CPI, which excludes unpredictable food and energy prices, increased by 2.4%, below the expected 2.5% and down from April’s 2.7%. These numbers hint at easing inflation pressures, which may lead the European Central Bank to consider a rate cut in their next meeting.

Cooling Inflation Measures

We are observing a continued cooling in both overall and core inflation in the euro area. The flash estimate for May confirmed a drop from the previous month. Headline CPI fell to 1.9% year-on-year—just a bit shy of predictions, but enough to suggest that pressures on consumer prices might be decreasing more quickly than expected. Core inflation, which policymakers prefer because it excludes more volatile components like food and energy, also eased more than anticipated. The decline from 2.7% in April to 2.4% in May indicates that underlying pricing trends are softening. Traders should pay attention. If we view the gap between expectations and reality as part of a larger trend, we see a gradual shift in monetary policy assumptions. The European Central Bank now has additional evidence to adopt a slightly more accommodating stance. Before this, markets were already pricing in the chance of a rate cut, but this data boosts confidence—especially if wage growth and services inflation remain controlled in upcoming reports. In terms of positioning, shorter-term rates are adjusting to this possibility, with swaps markets starting to show a stronger likelihood of a move at the next meeting. German bunds and short-term sovereign spreads have begun to reflect these changes, with tighter ranges and lower yields observed in the 2Y to 5Y segment.

Future Outlook

Looking ahead, attention may shift to service cost disinflation and monthly wage negotiations in key member states like Germany and France. If unit labor costs stabilize or decrease, this could further push expectations for a rate cut. It wouldn’t make sense to bet against softening policy if this trend continues. However, the ECB remains alert to external shocks and geopolitical issues, so even though inflation seems to be easing, caution is still needed. At this point, there’s no need to significantly change implied volatility, but interest in gamma positioning may rise depending on comments from ECB members leading up to the decision. If Lagarde and her team shift their messaging from a wait-and-see approach to one of action, we could see the curve react. We also note that recent movements in EUR-denominated rates have been more influenced by macro data than central bank comments. This trend may continue in the short term, although liquidity during the summer could impact flow-driven signals. Regarding hedging strategies, there’s an opportunity to move away from higher convexity shorts into spreads that benefit from a flattening euro curve. Those who stick to April’s pricing assumptions might find themselves on the wrong side of the next CPI revision or producer price updates, especially with seasonal effects starting to emerge in the third quarter. In summary, we have data moving gently towards a direction that requires us to stay responsive. If future Eurozone reports confirm this trend (and that’s a significant “if” based on wage data), we can expect further shifts in the front end of the curve that favor carry and roll-down strategies heading into summer. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Governor of the Bank of Japan said there’s no need to change the overall view of Japan’s economy right now. Since the outlook report from May 1, there have been no significant changes in Japan’s economic and pricing trends. Talks with the United States about trade are ongoing, adding uncertainty to the situation. Future decisions on interest rates will rely on how Japan’s economy and prices develop. The Governor did not comment on the ups and downs of bond yields. This reflects how closely the Bank of Japan is watching the trade talks with the U.S. and trends in inflation. In simple terms, the Bank of Japan does not plan to change its main economic outlook soon. According to Ueda, conditions in the Japanese economy have not shifted much since early May. This indicates a steady, careful approach from the policymakers. He noted that discussions with the U.S. are still not resolved, leaving forecasts open to surprises. These talks continue to create uncertainty in the markets, especially concerning monetary policy. Ueda’s cautious tone shows that the Bank is not in a hurry to react to current economic signals. Instead, they prefer to be patient, suggesting that interest rate changes won’t happen quickly. They are watching inflation closely over the coming weeks to see if domestic prices keep rising or start to slow down. These details are more crucial than any big news right now. From our perspective, Ueda’s choice not to discuss bond yields suggests that the Bank wants to avoid causing more volatility in the already sensitive debt markets. Short-term changes are likely viewed as distractions rather than clear trends. Decisions will probably rely more on long-term trends, especially in core inflation and wage growth. For those of us in trading, this approach doesn’t prompt drastic changes, but it does encourage cautious adjustments in near-term strategies. Trading volumes in options and leveraged products might decrease as participants wait for clearer signals, especially from the ongoing negotiations with Washington. Still, even with rates unchanged, some market players might misinterpret caution for inactivity. This misreading could allow those who have planned carefully to make more precise trades. What’s important now is how price stability evolves and whether consumer demand increases enough to prompt new policy discussions. Until that happens, implied volatility may fluctuate, and only temporary corrections will serve as catalysts. From our understanding, the monetary policy board prefers to rely on data for decisions, and the lack of change in perspective today reinforces that stance.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

The Bank of Japan’s governor, Kazuo Ueda, discussed the high uncertainty in both Japan’s and the global economy. He pointed out that the economic and price situation is complicated, partially due to tariffs that started in April. These tariffs, which were implemented during Trump’s presidency, are creating worries about demand because of increased uncertainty. This could hurt the economy. Companies might take on these higher tariff costs, which could reduce their profits and affect wages negatively. Tariffs also threaten Japan’s economy by changing financial conditions and foreign exchange rates. Despite these challenges, prices are likely to rise gradually, while corporate profits remain stable. Underlying inflation is rising at a moderate pace as the economy slows down. Japan may keep a system where wages and prices increase together, with the Bank of Japan aiming for a 2% inflation rate. The Bank is ready to raise rates more if inflation gets closer to that goal. They will evaluate future economic and price forecasts carefully, considering the current uncertainties. Ueda’s comments show a careful approach. He is not announcing a significant policy change, but he does highlight that ongoing tariff-related disruptions are becoming more established across different sectors. Companies are facing rising costs from tariffs, which can squeeze their profit margins and make it harder to increase labor costs. When wages stagnate, consumer spending often follows. A slowdown in consumption can lead to weaker price growth. Ueda acknowledges this trend clearly. The main point here is timing. Ueda sees inflation rising, but not rapidly. He isn’t ignoring price pressures, but he isn’t prepared to raise interest rates sharply just yet. Still, his tone is not passive. He recognizes that inflation and employment are moving together, at least slightly, and the central bank is paying attention. Markets often look for reasons to test policies. When the central bank hints that rates might increase if inflation rises, investors may start acting ahead of time. This can be problematic if the data isn’t clear. It’s good to factor in expectations, but acting too soon can lead to losses. We’ve seen this happen: expectations about rates can change quickly, and sudden reversals can hurt those who are leveraged. For traders working on rate expectations or volatility, this means keeping their positions lighter. This isn’t just because of Ueda’s statements, but also due to where surprises might arise. If stronger wage agreements show up in lower-tier indicators, bets on rates could become chaotic. At that point, pricing shifts in Japanese government bonds (JGBs) could quickly impact the yen, especially if Japanese companies start bringing back funds or changing their hedging strategies. It’s also important to keep an eye on external factors. While the original tariffs started with the Trump administration, broader trade policies and energy costs can also affect Japan’s growth. Therefore, global rate expectations are important too. If other countries start tightening their policies while Japan remains flexible, yen carry trades may widen. These trades can be tricky when market sentiment shifts. Right now, monetary policy is more about preparing than making big moves. Ueda and his team are signaling a path for the future without forcing the markets to follow immediately. There is no urgency from the central bank, but their messages are still significant. If inflation gets closer to 2%, it will become harder to hold onto interest rate risks, especially for those betting against JGB volatility. The signals have been given. It’s not just about quick action, but also about realizing which pricing expectations are starting to break down.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Tesla’s stock dropped by 1.09% yesterday, continuing a downward trend seen over the past few days. From its recent peak, the stock has fallen over 9%, filling the gap created between May 23 and May 27. This shift might suggest that buyers are losing momentum. On May 30, a bear flag pattern appeared, indicating that there could be more drops ahead. A bear flag shows up after a sharp price decline followed by a period of stabilization, leading to another fall. Trading volume was 81.87 million shares, which is lower than the 30-day average of 110 million, but it shows that there is still some interest at current price levels. The put/call ratio of 0.69 indicates that people are hopeful for a price increase. Support for Tesla’s stock is around $319, while resistance sits near $368. If Tesla can’t stay above the $340 range, it might soon test the $319 mark. Recent reports about Elon Musk and allegations regarding his conduct add to market uncertainty. For traders, bear flags usually suggest that prices will keep falling, and filled gaps often mean limited upside. Before entering any trades, it’s crucial to wait for signs of price reversal at support levels. Trading stocks like Tesla carries risks, so it’s wise to use stop-loss orders and do thorough research. The current sharp price pullback, combined with weak recovery attempts, suggests that sellers are still in control. Filling the gap between May 23 and May 27 has eliminated recent short-term gains, dimming the bullish excitement from that time. As the share price continues to drop, many traders are hesitating. The volume on May 30 was below average, indicating that while interest is there, buyers may not be fully committed until the stock shows clearer signals. The chart from May 30 indeed showed a bear flag. This pattern often appears when a steep decline is followed by a small bounce, typically forming a parallelogram shape that leads to further declines. It usually indicates a pause before sellers push the price down again. The current put/call ratio of 0.69 shows that there are more call options than puts, meaning many traders are still leaning toward a bullish outlook, perhaps too much. In the past, when optimism runs ahead of the actual price movement, it often results in disappointment. There is solid technical support around the $319 mark, and any price approaching this level should be approached carefully. The $368 resistance will likely hold in the short term, with the $340 range acting as a pivot point. Until the stock can reclaim and consolidate above $340, it may struggle to rise significantly. The filled gap has drained some short-term momentum, leaving few technical targets for upward movement unless new buying interest or news surfaces. The decline isn’t happening in isolation. Negative reports about Musk have added a layer of uncertainty. Traders often react quickly to negative news involving prominent figures, especially when the company is closely associated with an individual. While some are still betting on a price bounce, recent trading patterns indicate that confidence among buyers is dwindling. Like many stocks with similar chart patterns, it’s essential to confirm demand before making a move. This confirmation comes from solid price stabilization and upward movement with strong volume, not just hope or support levels. Timing is also critical, especially with short-term contracts. Prices can drop suddenly, so anyone trading near support levels needs to manage risk carefully. It’s better not to try to catch a bounce while prices are still falling. Instead, wait for a clearer trend and confirmed momentum in both volume and price action. Currently, the market environment shows strong resistance, vulnerable support, and continued reactions to external headlines that affect short-term price movements. There are still opportunities to trade this stock, but trying to predict the bottom, especially after a bear flag, is a risky strategy. When the market is uncertain and media coverage is intense, preparation outweighs guessing. Knowing your risk before entering is essential. Patience often leads to better outcomes than rushing in.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

European stocks opened slightly higher today, recovering from minor losses yesterday. The Eurostoxx, Germany’s DAX, and France’s CAC 40 each rose by 0.2%, while the UK’s FTSE gained 0.3%. Spain’s IBEX stayed flat, and Italy’s FTSE MIB fell by 0.1%. This uptick in European stocks reflects a late recovery in Wall Street markets. However, optimism is tempered by a 0.35% drop in S&P 500 futures. Trade uncertainties continue, and upcoming discussions between the US and EU could affect European markets later this week. Today’s rise in European stock indices follows a small recovery from the recent sell-off. While the gains are modest, they indicate an effort to stabilise after Tuesday’s subdued performance. Major indices—tracking the Eurozone and key economies like Germany and France—showed little movement, barely shifting more than 0.3%. The UK’s benchmark did slightly better than its continental counterparts. Meanwhile, Spain’s flat performance and Italy’s slight decline suggest a selective approach rather than uniform movements across national markets. Last night’s session in the US helped slow down risk aversion, but just barely. The S&P 500 rebounded from its lows, suggesting that some buyers are cautiously entering the market. Still, futures are showing a lack of confidence, with a 0.35% drop this morning putting pressure on investor appetite, especially without fresh developments. The current market atmosphere is driven more by policy discussions than by economic data. Ongoing talks between the United States and European Union are still unresolved, with lingering tension around trade issues, tariffs, and subsidies affecting European equity valuations. While nothing has significantly changed, market chatter indicates a reluctance to take on more risk in this uncertain environment. For those trading index derivatives, patience is essential. The absence of volatility at the market open—despite recent news—suggests a cautious wait-and-see attitude. We’re seeing more options activity leaning towards the downside for the short term, aligning with this careful sentiment. We will monitor delta shifts around upcoming options maturities, particularly at the week’s end when significant positions begin to roll off. Trading volumes are still below average, which is typical ahead of scheduled policy meetings. A single unexpected comment could prompt market repositioning. In the meantime, focusing on short-term positions is crucial. Trading intraday fluctuations rather than committing to strong directional bets has been more effective. Observing the movement in implied volatility late in yesterday’s New York session revealed a lot; the quick decline after an initial surge indicated that investors are not yet bracing for a major disruption. However, that could change. Be strategic. Tighten your stops. Stay aware of your gamma after noon CET as US trading begins to influence the market. This is when spreads may widen, and erratic price movements have been more common recently. Prices might appear stable, but underlying activity can be volatile under pressure.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now