Back

Reuters expects the PBOC to set the USD/CNY reference rate at 7.2057 today.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) sets a daily midpoint for the yuan in relation to a currency basket, mainly focusing on the US dollar. This process takes into account market supply and demand, economic data, and changes in the global currency market. The yuan can vary within a range of +/- 2% from this midpoint each day. This allowance can be altered depending on economic conditions and policy objectives. If the yuan approaches the limits of this trading band or experiences high volatility, the PBOC may intervene by buying or selling yuan to stabilize its value. This helps keep the currency’s value in check. This explanation outlines how the PBOC establishes and manages the yuan’s value. Each trading day begins with the PBOC declaring a central reference point, or “midpoint.” This point considers various factors, like local prices, global market changes, and the behavior of other currencies, especially the US dollar. The yuan can then move freely within a narrow band of plus or minus two percent from this reference. While this band is tight, it allows for some market activity during the day. When the yuan approaches the upper or lower limits of this band—either gaining strength or dropping quickly—the central bank may take action. This involves buying or selling yuan in the market, aiming to prevent erratic fluctuations and stabilize trading behavior. Such interventions help avoid the yuan being pushed too far in one direction, which could unsettle markets or impact the competitiveness of Chinese exports. In the current situation, authorities are closely monitoring yuan movements and reacting in real time to unwanted trends. They focus on reducing volatility rather than imposing strict control, ensuring changes happen gradually and in a managed way. If the midpoint consistently shifts in one direction, like showing continuous appreciation, it may signal policymaker confidence in domestic growth or an intent to boost local consumption. Conversely, consistent depreciation may indicate attempts to support exports or counteract weak international demand. These shifts are not random; they often follow patterns like debt issuance, commodity price changes, or poor trade figures. We believe this context influences short-term decisions in derivatives markets. Near the upper or lower limits of the band, there may be pressure to reassess hedging strategies. For example, if volatility rises near the band’s upper limit and intervention seems likely, traders might prepare for a reversal or limit bets expecting a continued move beyond the band. We’ve also noticed that when there’s increased fixing activity, it often coincides with changes in onshore forward points, especially around mid-month. This suggests that pricing takes into account not just spot movements but also signals from swaps and short-term rates. Watching this relationship can provide early clues about what officials might consider in upcoming midpoint settings. From this perspective, adjusting risk thresholds and being responsive in rolling positions can help minimize exposure to unexpected midpoint changes. Flexibility is key—it’s about interpreting forward guidance related to these centralized fixings, instead of viewing them as fixed reference points. Moreover, we’ve observed leaders like Yi, who influence monetary policy messaging, making signals more deliberately through state-linked bank actions and informal guidance, rather than through formal announcements. The actions of entities trying to “test the band” may reflect unofficial thresholds and should be seen as both a betting strategy and an indicator of market sentiment. In this context, the logical next step is to monitor not only movement toward the limits of the band but also the speed of those moves—speed is crucial. A slow approach to the edge feels different from a quick plunge. Interventions tend to follow rapid shifts. A steady drift often suggests contentment with market direction. By connecting volatility, PBOC midpoint settings, and how often interventions occur, you can better structure pricing models based on stability versus the likelihood of intervention. Structural hedges should be adjusted as these correlations change.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

S&P 500 reacts to Moody’s downgrade news as the closing bell approaches

The S&P 500 started Friday with a cautious approach, influenced by Moody’s downgrade news. This situation raises concerns about the impact on tax cuts and other economic policies amid ongoing Congressional standoffs. Stocks have been volatile lately due to news of tariff relief. The China phase one trade deal has boosted the market, pushing it above the 200-day moving average. However, Moody’s recent downgrade could provide chances for market pullbacks.

Macroeconomic Factors

Recent macroeconomic developments have positively impacted sectors like software and finance. It’s still unclear how gold, silver, and Bitcoin will react to future economic changes. New articles focusing on data highlight how the Producer Price Index, unemployment claims, retail sales, and manufacturing affect stock performance. The dollar continues to be influenced by fiscal news, as seen in its current trading patterns. While analyses reflect the latest data, they are subject to change and may not always be accurate. This content is for educational purposes, and there is a warning about the risks involved with high-risk investments. Readers should make their own decisions and recognize the inherent risks in the financial market. The markets moved cautiously in response to Moody’s ratings action. This reassessment led traders to reevaluate the recent optimism fueled by tax incentives and fiscal easing, as new doubts arise from ongoing legislative disagreements in Washington. Risk assets initially found some support from encouraging trade measures related to tariffs, helping indices break through technical resistance levels just days earlier. However, the downgrade served as a reminder that policy momentum is shaky. The environment remains dynamic. Software and finance sectors have shown some recent strength due to favorable macro conditions. Changes in interest rate expectations and liquidity pricing have worked to their advantage. However, any perceived weakening in fiscal policy could change the assumptions behind these gains. We will monitor whether inflation-related data continues to support current trends or if it begins to soften in light of mixed consumer data.

Inflation Paths and Assets

We are currently in a situation where precious metals and decentralized assets could shift sharply, depending on how inflation trends diverge from expectations. This is especially important as market participants consider gold and silver’s traditional role as hedges against policy uncertainty. Bitcoin, which often moves based on its own dynamics, remains sensitive to wider worries about fiat stability and liquidity changes. Base metals have also seen a gentle increase, hinting at stabilization in important Asian economies. Attention is now focused on upcoming readings from key economic indicators. Recent weekly jobless claims provided some hope, but were not enough to change overall sentiment. Retail sales are still mixed, and the manufacturing sector has not generated much enthusiasm. We are closely watching the Producer Price Index due to its potential impact on future expectations. These factors contribute to how implied volatility is tracked, especially in interest rate and sector-specific derivatives. The dollar is reflecting a market caught between persistent inflation worries and uncertainties about future rate decisions. Treasuries have become more sensitive, affecting cross-asset pricing. We believe any narrowing in the dollar’s range should be monitored closely, particularly regarding policy signals and sovereign credibility. This has subsequent effects on risk appetite for both equities and commodities. For those trading options and futures, changes in implied volatility across different timeframes indicate a transitional period. Short-term contracts have adjusted some of the recent compression, while longer-term ones still reflect a relatively calm outlook. However, shifts in trader positioning suggest they are preparing for sharp, event-driven changes. We advise approaching the upcoming week with carefully planned trades that allow for directional flexibility and adjustments in implied volatility. As always, interpretations should rely on consistent data rather than sentiment alone. Keep a close watch on real yields over the next few sessions. Recent trends indicate a sensitivity to fiscal signals rather than imminent rate cuts. In summary, traders should remain tactical, ready to respond to market noise but not driven by it. Risk is a constant factor, and the path ahead may be challenging. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Bitcoin hits its highest point since January, buoyed by a falling US dollar and increasing gold prices.

Bitcoin’s value is increasing as the US dollar weakens. It has reached its highest price since late January, now exceeding USD 106,400. Other currencies like the Euro, Japanese Yen, Australian Dollar, New Zealand Dollar, Canadian Dollar, and British Pound are also gaining value. Gold prices are rising too.

Moody’s US Credit Rating

Moody’s has lowered the US credit rating, but this change does not raise the cost of issuing US Treasuries. Countries such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE do not seem concerned about this downgrade. The global financial landscape shows different reactions to these changes. Currently, macroeconomic shifts are boosting interest in digital assets like Bitcoin. The rise above USD 106,400 is not random; it is linked to the weakening US dollar. When the dollar declines, many investors seek alternative assets with a limited supply, leading to increased demand. Similarly, gold’s rise indicates that investors are looking for safe places to store their value, which is reflected in price movements. Moody’s cut to the US credit rating does not immediately impact government debt costs. Historically, such changes are more symbolic than immediate in economic terms. However, it can influence how investors around the world feel. Countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia remain calm, showing that confidence is not vanishing quickly everywhere. For those tracking derivatives linked to digital assets, these macro changes matter. The dollar’s direction influences volatility metrics. Currently, implied volatility curves are adjusting. Short-dated BTC options are gaining more premium, with slightly higher out-of-the-money call pricing. This indicates expectation, not fear—as anticipation in trading can be just as valuable.

Global Financial Outlook

As gold gains traction, it indicates that investors are increasing their hedging across assets. This trend often spills over into crypto markets, especially regarding leverage. Funding rates are rising, and open interest is increasing. However, we are closely monitoring the put-call ratio, which is steadily decreasing, typically indicating a bullish sentiment. Volume is also growing near the new high, suggesting traders are positioning themselves for potential resistance levels. With other major currencies like the Euro and Yen also on the rise, there’s a broader cycle at work. Pair performance matters, but in derivatives, it’s the interaction between interest rates, macro news, and risk sensitivity that creates trading opportunities. When the dollar weakens and the US rating is cut, these factors align, allowing positions to profit even when volatility remains stable. Looking ahead, it’s vital to watch weekly expiry flows. Positions can change quickly when momentum builds after macro news. Keep an eye on how implied volatility shifts with CPI releases or comments from credit agencies. Although the rating cut had little immediate effect on bond issuance costs, drifting sentiment in trading rooms worldwide could show up in curve steepness and increased gamma exposure. Also, observe how Asian markets react in the coming days. Initial repositioning often occurs during early-market hours when liquidity is lower, which can amplify price movements. The formation of early candles post-downgrade—and BTC’s correlation to gold—will indicate whether this trend is sustainable or reaching its limits. It’s all about positioning now. Traders are unlikely to sit idly by. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

NVIDIA could reach $163–$174 if it breaks above $135, driven by AI data center demand.

NVIDIA’s stock broke through the demand zone of 131.42–134.48, closing at 135.32 on May 16. This movement suggests the price could potentially rise to the 163–174 range, fueled by demand for AI data centers and institutional interest. Support is strong in the range between 115.43 and 126.48. The volume-weighted average price (VWAP) has stayed positive, indicating ongoing buying over the past months. Technical analysis shows that NVDA is re-entering a medium-term bullish channel, supported by recent highs. Key resistance levels are at 139.42, 142.47, 153.13, and the 163.40–174.45 boundary. Fundamentally, demand for AI and data centers is driving growth. In Q1, data-center revenue surged 427% year-over-year, reaching $22.6 billion. Analysts expect revenue to grow to about $28 billion in Q2, with earnings increasing through FY 2026. The trading plan includes aggressive or conservative entry points based on price trends, with clearly defined stop-losses and profit-taking strategies. Key upcoming events include earnings on May 28, updates on AI spending, and changes in geopolitical regulations affecting trade. On May 16, NVIDIA’s stock ended the trading day at 135.32, slightly above the noted demand area of 131.42 to 134.48. This suggests the price has broken through a short-term barrier, opening opportunities for further gains into the 163 to 174 range. These targets are based on previous trading patterns and rejection levels, forming reliable boundaries during strong trends, especially those driven by artificial intelligence. Below this, there is a solid support range between 115.43 and 126.48. This range held during the last pullback, showing enough buying activity to push the VWAP upwards, indicating ongoing accumulation. When VWAP remains robust and rises, it usually means there’s persistent buying interest, even on slower days. From a structural perspective, the chart indicates that the price is moving sideways before re-entering a medium-term upward channel. The momentum is clear, with higher highs and higher lows now visible. Key resistance levels based on price trends are at 139.42, 142.47, and higher at 153.13, with the breakout channel peaking near 174. These levels aren’t just psychological—they have been tested before, and sellers may appear at these points again. Looking deeper into the numbers, the growth stems from NVIDIA’s expanding role in AI infrastructure. In the first quarter, data-center revenue—critical for AI computing—jumped 427% year-over-year to $22.6 billion. Analysts foresee nearly $28 billion in the upcoming quarter, aligning with a trend of upward revisions. This growth isn’t mere speculation; it’s supported by actual orders and deployment capabilities, which boost earnings projections for the next two financial years. For traders focusing on derivatives, price movements should be closely linked to defined risk limits and strategic entries. The outlined strategy accommodates both aggressive entries during breakouts and cautious setups when pulling back to support, with clear stop-loss limits. Profit targets are established at each resistance point, providing several opportunities to manage partial exits based on trading goals. We should pay close attention to important dates, especially May 28, the day of the earnings release, as it could significantly impact expectations. Additionally, updates on AI spending or changes in trade regulations could increase market volatility. These external factors can influence the trend but will need to be factored into any options strategies or hedging plans.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Goldman Sachs warns that US tariffs could weaken the dollar and lower foreign investment

The US dollar is expected to drop due to trade tensions, uncertain policies, and slowing GDP growth, all of which affect confidence and the demand for US assets. Forecasts suggest that by 2025, the dollar could decline by 10% against the euro and 9% against both the yen and the pound. Tariffs could squeeze profit margins for US companies and lower consumer incomes, putting further pressure on the dollar’s value. Consumer boycotts and reduced tourism also hurt GDP. With strong spending from abroad and weaker performance in the US, investors are moving away from US assets. Foreign central banks are reducing their dollar reserves, which could lead private investors to do the same. If supply chains and consumer behavior remain inflexible due to tariffs, the US could face economic challenges. A potential 10% universal tariff is still uncertain but could arise amidst ongoing trade issues. These factors create new scenarios that differ from those seen during the previous administration. Overall, it’s clear that the dollar is under pressure. This strain can no longer be seen as only temporary. Current policies suggest the dollar is weakening as confidence declines. Global investors are closely watching tariff announcements, macroeconomic shifts, and central bank actions, which are crucial for understanding future currency movements. The anticipated 10% drop against the euro, alongside similar declines against the yen and pound, reflects more than just perception—it indicates a shift in sentiment driven by decreasing growth potential and emerging imbalances. If trade barriers continue to disrupt supply chains and limit disposable incomes, the dollar’s weakness mirrors these economic inefficiencies. It makes sense to expect fluctuations in interest rates and differences in market spreads. Once large-scale capital withdrawal starts, it seldom stops halfway. Wang’s observations about fewer dollar reserves held by foreign central banks suggest that this could be a warning sign rather than a random occurrence. History shows that private investors typically follow these trends, albeit with a slight delay. There’s a strong psychological tendency to hold on until losses become too costly to ignore. Therefore, any temporary strength in the dollar should be viewed as a short-term correction unless there’s a substantial policy change or growth improvement, neither of which is currently expected. From a strategy standpoint, any investments heavily tied to the dollar should now be evaluated based on future predictions rather than past results. While a 10% universal tariff may not be implemented soon, it remains a viable option and could impact pricing strategies. The predictability seen in trade has been replaced by ongoing negotiations, increasing market volatility. Market assumptions have shifted since the previous administration, especially concerning deregulation and the return of capital. This change alters how risks are distributed among currency pairs. With lower real yields and slowing growth, asset flows are moving towards markets considered more stable or offering better returns relative to their volatility. Xu pointed out this trend, and recent portfolio changes support it. In the short term, price movements may appear clearer, but reduced liquidity in certain currency pairs, especially high-risk ones, could lead to unexpected slippage risks not reflected in overall trading volumes. Using tighter stop-loss orders and staggered entries could help manage potential risks. Gujar’s price targets might be adjusted sooner than expected, particularly if trade developments occur without new domestic stimulus. Recently, even major currencies have begun to show stress signals typically seen in emerging markets. This indicates a potential shift in how these currencies correlate. Kelly’s analysis highlights that volatility responds more to policy direction and investor sentiment than to direct economic data, which accounts for the recent disconnect between interest rates and currency movements. So far, narrowing profit margins in industries haven’t fully impacted stock valuations, but the pressure is rising beneath the surface. This signals the need for closer monitoring if you’re holding synthetic positions linked to currency hedges. The longer that sentiment remains aligned with protectionist talk, the greater the momentum against dollar-denominated investments.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Key levels for Nasdaq-100 futures that could impact rally or decline in upcoming trading sessions

The Nasdaq-100 Futures have established a strong weekly base, with a key point of control (POC) at 21,315. This level is crucial for potential market movement. Currently, prices have paused, forming a slight consolidation between 21,434 and 21,947, below the rising regression channel. Key resistance levels are noted, with the first being at 21,434. Other resistances follow at 21,497, 21,575, and 21,631. Immediate support is found at 21,315, with additional supports at 21,169 and 21,077. Below these, the price could slip to the range of 21,331 to 20,502.

Bullish and Bearish Scenarios

In a bullish scenario, holding at the POC could lead to long positions aiming for higher levels, with stops placed just below 21,300. On the other hand, if the price breaks and reclaims at 21,434, aggressive long entries are possible, targeting higher resistances. In a bearish scenario, failing to hold at the 21,434–21,497 zone could encourage short positions aiming for lower levels. Additionally, dropping below the POC/VWAP would confirm a downward shift, indicating lower targets. The plan for Monday involves setting pre-market alerts at these key levels. It’s important to monitor volumes at these pivotal points and apply strict risk management for each setup, adjusting to trends respecting the channel. With the Nasdaq-100 Futures firming up at 21,315, this level acts as a launch point, where recent volume and price action converge, making it significant. The price behavior indicates that market participants currently accept this as fair value. While the market tried to push higher, it hesitated between 21,434 and 21,947, showing a reluctance to commit just beneath the upward slope.

Understanding Key Price Levels

In this context, the 21,434 level should be seen not merely as resistance, but as a decision-making zone. If the price moves decisively through it, volume accumulation becomes vital. A rise without strong volume backing tends to fail. However, if market participants continue to see this area as a buying opportunity, we might see targets at 21,497, 21,575, and possibly 21,631 tested one after another. On the downside, the support at 21,315 is crucial. If it fails, a direct drop to 21,169 could follow. Should that level break quickly, the market might swiftly revisit 21,077 and potentially deepen into a broader zone near 20,502. This would indicate a broader sentiment shift, not just a short-term pullback. As we prepare for upcoming sessions, it’s vital to be reactive rather than merely anticipatory. If the market remains above 21,315 and shows strength—evidenced by repeated defenses near prior resistance—long positions may be wise, assuming stops are set just below 21,300. However, strength without lower timeframe support often results in sharp reversals. If 21,434 breaks and reclaims, quicker decisions may be necessary. However, the path upward is not completely clear. Each subsequent level is more than a target; they reflect areas where volume has built in past transactions. Expect resistance at these points unless strong momentum emerges. Conversely, sharp rejection or lack of follow-through in the 21,434–21,497 range indicates buyer caution. Such rejections could trigger short scalps, with expectations to move through thinner volume areas below the POC. Prices below both the POC and the VWAP, especially with increasing volume, suggest that value is recognized lower, often foreshadowing quick downward expansions. Looking ahead to early-week execution, it’s essential to do more than mark levels—set alerts and triggers in advance during pre-market prep. Pay close attention to how futures behave as they approach or rebound from these levels, and align those behaviors with volume patterns to gain confidence in directional stances. Regardless of strategy, the focus should be on adaptability rather than sticking to a single directional bias. Observing how the regression channel is respected or broken will be significant. Continuously assess move velocities with volume and keep risk settings specific to each position. With a solid foundation, execution and consistency will distinguish performance from mere market noise in the week ahead. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

House prices saw a minimal rise this season, marking the lowest increase in nine years amid decreased demand.

In May 2025, UK house prices rose by 0.6% from the previous month, down from a 1.4% increase. Year-over-year, prices grew by 1.2%, a slight drop from the 1.3% rise seen last year. The average house price hit a new record, but monthly growth for May was the slowest in nine years. The number of homes for sale reached its highest level in a decade.

Demand And Supply

In April, buyer demand fell by 4% compared to April 2024. This decline came after a tax break for buying affordable homes and for first-time buyers ended on April 1. Current data shows that the housing market is slowing down. While prices rose by 0.6% in May, this is much less compared to April’s jump of 1.4%. The annual increase decreased to 1.2%. While this number isn’t alarming, it suggests that the earlier momentum in the market is fading. Although average house prices are at a new high, this May marked the weakest monthly growth in nearly a decade. Buyers appear to be more cautious, while sellers are eager to list their properties. With the highest number of homes for sale in ten years, supply has surged, but demand hasn’t kept pace. The shift in supply and demand was noticeable in April when buyer activity dropped by 4% compared to April 2024. This wasn’t a random fluctuation; it followed the end of government incentives that supported first-time and low-cost home buyers, causing a quick drop in enthusiasm.

Market Stability And Future Expectations

Looking ahead, we expect more stability in the market, but less speculation. Slower price increases and lower demand suggest a solid foundation rather than a dip. High levels of available properties give market participants more options. Savills indicates that the effects of higher borrowing costs are now apparent, with hopes for rate cuts influencing people’s outlook on future transactions. The head of research noted that although the Bank of England hasn’t yet reduced rates, the anticipation has boosted confidence. Halifax’s chief analyst mentioned that rising wages might help households manage current mortgage costs better. However, any significant changes will depend on real improvements in affordability, not just speculation. Additionally, data from the Office for National Statistics earlier this spring indicated price decreases in rental markets, especially in London. This could impact the sales market as landlords adjust their portfolios. Given the current conditions, we expect calm near-term trends. Price spreads aren’t widening dramatically, and activity related to housing price indices seems more influenced by scheduled data than sudden market changes. In practical terms, this provides clear boundaries instead of unpredictable volatility. The path ahead looks stable, but adjustments may arise as new surveys come in. It’s important to keep an eye on affordability metrics, income data, and the direction of rate policies. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Bulls target 6,000 after regaining 5,960, while bears look for a break at 5,904

The S&P 500 Futures have important levels to watch. Major resistance is at 6,000, and there’s secondary support at 5,917. The Volume Profile’s point of control (POC) is around 5,904, which is essential for keeping bullish momentum alive. Even with a recent pullback, the uptrend holds strong because the price stays above the VWAP mid-line. If it falls below 5,969, it may indicate profit-taking, leading to a test of the POC/VWAP on Monday.

Scenarios for Bullish and Bearish Trends

For a bullish scenario, if the price reclaims 5,960, it could target 6,000. A bounce from 5,904 might aim for 5,932. In bearish scenarios, a drop from the 5,969–5,977 zone could take it to 5,904. A break below 5,904 might test lower levels, like 5,870. Risk management recommends keeping trade risks below 1% and using volume as entry confirmation. It’s wise to consider geopolitical influences, as they affect market openings. Remember, prices can change, and trading in foreign exchange carries risks, including those from leverage. Caution is necessary, as total investment loss can happen. Recently, we’ve seen a steady climb, even with short-term corrections. The index is firmly above the VWAP mid-line, supporting a bullish outlook—at least for now. The key takeaway is that, while the price has cooled from recent highs, we haven’t seen a structural shift. Momentum may have flattened, but it hasn’t reversed. Shorter timeframes show some indecisiveness in the 5,960 to 5,977 area, which has become an active battleground. If we drop below 5,969, expect more traders to step back temporarily, leading to a possible move toward the POC around 5,904, where buyers and sellers find balance. Jackson’s advice on risk suggests keeping exposure under 1% per position, especially during times of overlapping data or low liquidity near the end of New York trading hours. Given the increased volatility from last week’s foreign policy news, this advice is not just cautious—it’s a smart strategy.

Approaching Potential Market Moves

Looking ahead to next week, if the price retests 5,904 and sees buying interest—ideally with a volume spike above a 15-minute VWAP—it could push up toward 5,932. If early Monday brings pressure below 5,960, what seemed like bullish consolidation might shift to short trades. This relies not on sentiment but on how the price interacts with volume-weighted levels. Patel’s note about the bounce near 5,917 forming structural support is valid, especially as it aligns with a lower volume node from last Thursday. We favor a watch-and-wait strategy—only taking positions when there’s clear rejection confirmed by order flow. It’s tempting to get ahead of moves, but thin volume can lead to slippage and weak breakouts. This environment requires decision-making based on real-time data, not static assumptions. We’re nearing areas where options positioning, especially around the critical 6,000 mark, might create pinning effects. It’s beneficial to monitor daily changes in open interest for weekly expirations, which can signal short gamma-driven moves, especially on Mondays and Thursdays. Considering how last week’s geopolitical events influenced the market, staying updated on international developments is crucial. Pay attention not only to headline risks but also to early signs from currency markets, which often detect shifts in risk sentiment ahead of index futures. If minor downturns in risk assets occur alongside widening spreads or a stronger yen, reconsider aggressive long positions near resistance. For any momentum-based trading, wait for volume confirmation—volume above the rolling session average is essential. Without this, valid signals can blend into noise. Let participant activity confirm the bias before taking action. All these triggers reflect probabilities rather than certainties. Moves toward 5,870 or beyond 6,000 need more than just direction—they require liquidity convergence and trader commitment. Let’s focus on being observers first, then participants. When liquidity tightens, reacting emotionally should be a last resort. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

New Zealand’s PPI inputs and outputs increased in the first quarter, signaling higher production costs and prices.

In the first quarter, New Zealand’s Producer Price Index (PPI) Inputs rose by 2.9% from the previous quarter, which had seen a decline of 0.9%. Meanwhile, PPI Outputs increased by 2.1% after a small drop of 0.1% before. The biggest increase in outputs came from electricity, gas, water, and waste services, which shot up by 26.2%. Manufacturing outputs went up by 2.3%, and rental, hiring, and real estate services rose by 1.4%. For inputs, there was a significant jump of 49.4% in electricity, gas, water, and waste services. Manufacturing inputs increased by 1.7%, while construction inputs climbed by 0.6%. The PPI measures average prices that producers get for goods and services they sell to businesses or consumers. Rising PPI Outputs may indicate inflation since higher prices might not be passed on to consumers. The PPI Inputs measure what producers pay for raw materials, services, and capital goods. When PPI Inputs increase, it suggests rising production costs, which could lead to higher consumer prices if producers decide to pass those costs on. This data shows a significant shift in producer pricing, with previous declines now replaced by sharp price increases in several areas. The changes in both input and output metrics indicate growing pressures at different production stages, particularly concerning energy costs. The 49.4% jump in utility input costs is unusually high and likely impacts various product chains, not just direct providers. Such rising expenses signal a problem that could affect broader areas of the economy. Manufacturing costs are also rising but at a slower pace of 1.7%. Unlike the more volatile energy costs, manufacturing prices tend to increase steadily. That both input and output prices have risen indicates that producers have less flexibility to absorb these costs. This could mean tighter profit margins if prices don’t stabilize soon. Construction inputs showed only a slight increase of 0.6%. While this is much lower than in other sectors, it still indicates rising costs rather than relief. The gradual increase in framing materials, labor, and raw materials can lead to delayed pressure, especially in housing markets and related finance products. This sector tends to react slowly, so it’s important to monitor it closely. In terms of outputs, beyond the jump in utilities, the 2.3% increase in manufacturing output prices is notable. When output prices rise at the same rate or faster than input prices, it suggests that producers are passing costs further down the supply chain. They may be raising end prices not only due to costs but also in anticipation of further inflation. The supply chain may be adjusting prices for a less favorable cost environment in the future. Hodgson’s earlier remarks about rising output not always leading to higher retail inflation are worth noting. However, the rapid and significant increases this time suggest something more lasting is happening. Price changes are driven by clear input increases rather than vague demand factors, so actions must align with these shifts. We’re not just seeing price adjustments based on future expectations. The current output increases are closely tied to substantial upstream costs, especially from utilities. With this in mind, expect increased short-term price volatility. Instruments sensitive to producer margins may fluctuate more than usual due to uncertain cost pass-through levels. Yield spreads that depend on consistent manufacturing price relationships could also see changes. We should pay close attention to how commodity-linked contracts and energy-intensive derivatives respond in the coming months. From a structural pricing perspective, it’s clear that there’s a significant change. As upstream cost pressures rise, energy input hedging strategies may need to adapt, and break-even levels tied to the manufacturing and utility sectors may be reassessed. While these changes are sharp now, they could still be absorbed, but the focus is more on how quickly and deeply these adjustments occur. Given the current trend, combining shorter-term and longer-term conditional instruments might help balance exposures and avoid over-reliance on any single cost factor. The next few reports will clarify if this is a one-time spike or part of a longer-term trend. Until then, keep your strategy flexible and focus on underlying price mechanics, rather than just surface trends.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

New Zealand’s producer price index for output surpasses projections by 2.1% in the first quarter

Gold Prices and Geopolitical Tensions

The New Zealand Producer Price Index (PPI) for the first quarter rose by 2.1%, which was much higher than the expected 0.1% increase. The EUR/USD fell to around 1.1130, hitting a three-day low, as the US Dollar strengthened, despite weak data from the U-Mich index. Meanwhile, GBP/USD dropped to 1.3250, influenced by a rise in US consumer inflation expectations. Gold prices fell below the $3,200 level, reversing earlier gains and marking the largest weekly loss of the year. This drop was driven by a stronger US Dollar and a decrease in geopolitical tensions. Ethereum is recovering above $2,500, thanks to the positive reception of the Pectra upgrade. This led to more EIP-7702 authorizations, showing strong adoption by wallets and decentralized applications. Former President Trump’s Middle East visit in May 2025 resulted in trade agreements aimed at improving US trade relations. These agreements focused on correcting trade imbalances and enhancing US technology and defense exports. In forex trading, using leverage carries high risks because of the potential for significant losses. Traders should carefully evaluate their experience and risk tolerance before engaging in leveraged trades.

Knock-On Effects of Price Index Rise

The surprising 2.1% rise in New Zealand’s PPI for the first quarter has led to several immediate effects on macro trading strategies. Forecasts had expected no change at 0.1%, making the actual release a shock. Rising costs are pushing interest rate expectations higher, prompting traders to consider increasing local bond yields. This also affects interest rate differentials, which are important to watch when setting medium-term cross-rate exposures. In the currency markets, EUR/USD fell to about 1.1130 this week. This decline occurred even though US consumer sentiment data was weak. The dollar’s strength is driven more by rising inflation expectations in the US than by weak economic data. Euros and Sterling were both affected, with GBP/USD hitting around 1.3250. This decline reflects both repositioning and adjustments in implied rates due to the increased US inflation expectations. Inflation breakevens and short-end swap curves have steepened in the US, giving dollar bulls more room in the short term. Gold’s drop below the $3,200 mark brings attention back to metal investments. The earlier rise was mainly due to hedge demand during geopolitical tensions, which have now eased. The stronger dollar and lower demand for safe-haven assets created opportunities for profit-taking in gold. The potential for its largest weekly drop this year suggests that some trading strategies may be shifting back to net short or flat positions. When volatility and dollar strength occur together, metals become less attractive for both protection and speculative investing. On the other hand, Ethereum’s rise above $2,500 is supported by key network upgrades. The increasing EIP-7702 authorizations after the Pectra upgrade indicate growing adoption and interest from developers. This momentum appears stable, grounded in actual user engagement, as shown by the rise in integrated wallets and decentralized applications. Such developments can strengthen pricing models for smart contract platforms. We will continue to monitor gas fee structures and validator metrics for signs of overextension. Trump’s trade agreements from his May 2025 Middle East visit have prompted optimism about increased US technology exports and better bilateral trade relations. Defense exports were a significant part of these discussions. Geopolitically, these deals may change supply chains for defense-related manufacturers and certain tech companies. While these changes are challenging to price immediately, they may impact sector-specific equity derivatives before influencing broader market valuations. As always, trading foreign exchange with leverage is risky, especially during weeks marked by data surprises and sharp price adjustments. It is crucial to assess risk carefully during periods of dollar strength, especially when this is driven by changing inflation expectations. We recommend reevaluating exposure levels, particularly with currency pairs that may face significant shocks, and adjusting stop-loss positions as needed. Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

here to set up a live account on VT Markets now

Back To Top
server

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

Chat with our team instantly

Live Chat

Start a live conversation through...

  • Telegram
    hold On hold
  • Coming Soon...

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

telegram

Scan the QR code with your smartphone to start a chat with us, or click here.

Don’t have the Telegram App or Desktop installed? Use Web Telegram instead.

QR code